Differently Abled – A Dental Public Health Challenge

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Gaurav Gupta ◽  
Manu Narayan ◽  
Navin A Ingle ◽  
Sabyasachi Saha ◽  
Sahana Shivkumar

ABSTRACT Oral health care for children and adults with disabilities is a health care area that has received scant attention. It is seen that most persons with a significant disability cannot find a professional resource to provide appropriate and necessary dental care. Lack of access to dental services for this growing segment of our population is reaching critical levels and is a national dilemma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  

Abstract Oral health is a central element of general health with significant impact in terms of pain, suffering, impairment of function and reduced quality of life. Although most oral disease can be prevented by health promotion strategies and routine access to primary oral health care, the GBD study 2017 estimated that oral diseases affect over 3.5 billion people worldwide (Watt et al, 2019). Given the importance of oral health and its potential contribution to achieving universal health coverage (UHC), it has received increased attention in public health debates in recent years. However, little is known about the large variations across countries in terms of service delivery, coverage and financing of oral health. There is a lack of international comparison and understanding of who delivers oral health services, how much is devoted to oral health care and who funds the costs for which type of treatment (Eaton et al., 2019). Yet, these aspects are central for understanding the scope for improvement regarding financial protection against costs of dental care and equal access to services in each country. This workshop aims to present the comparative research on dental care coverage in Europe, North America and Australia led by the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Three presentations will look at dental care coverage using different methods and approaches. They will compare how well the population is covered for dental care especially within Europe and North America considering the health systems design and expenditure level on dental care, using the WHO coverage cube as analytical framework. The first presentation shows results of a cross-country Health Systems in Transition (HiT) review on dental care. It provides a comparative review and analysis of financing, coverage and access in 31 European countries, describing the main trends also in the provision of dental care. The second presentation compares dental care coverage in eight jurisdictions (Australia (New South Wales), Canada (Alberta), England, France, Germany, Italy, Sweden, and the United States) with a particular focus on older adults. The third presentation uses a vignette approach to map the extent of coverage of dental services offered by statutory systems (social insurance, compulsory insurance, NHS) in selected countries in Europe and North America. This workshop provides the opportunity of a focussed discussion on coverage of dental care, which is often neglected in the discussion on access to health services and universal health coverage. The objectives of the workshop are to discuss the oral health systems in an international comparative setting and to draw lessons on best practices and coverage design. The World Conference on Public Health is hence a good opportunity for this workshop that contributes to frame the discussion on oral health systems in a global perspective. Key messages There is large degree of variation in the extent to which the costs of dental care are covered by the statutory systems worldwide with implications for oral health outcomes and financial protection. There is a need for a more systematic collection of oral health indicators to make analysis of reliable and comparable oral health data possible.


Author(s):  
D.S TISHKOV ◽  

Compulsory health insurance is an integral part of health care. Dental care is provided in two forms: private dental services and public dental services based on budget clinics. The purpose of this study is to study dental health in Russia by comparing the policy of compulsory medical insurance and private services in dental practice. During the study, dental health indicators were studied at three levels: indicators for monitoring the oral health of children and adolescents. In the second part, indicators for monitoring oral health in the General population were studied. In the third part, indicators for monitoring the quality of life of the oral cavity were studied. Statistical data processing included implementation of correlation analysis of the obtained data. The results show that social health insurance provides people with equal opportunities for dental services, and health care reforms have improved oral health. Thus, the data obtained indicate the need to Finance the health care system in view of improving the quality of dental care for children and adults, as well as through the introduction of primary and secondary prevention programs.


Author(s):  
Blánaid Daly ◽  
Paul Batchelor ◽  
Elizabeth Treasure ◽  
Richard Watt

This chapter will briefly describe how oral health care may be managed and organized and how health workers may be remunerated. This will be followed by a short outline of the ways in which oral health care is provided in the UK. A separate overview of dental care professionals (DCPs) is presented in this chapter. The reform of the NHS is ongoing, so this chapter discusses principles rather than detail. Since the devolution of health care to governments in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, variations in provision are occurring across the UK and some of these differences are highlighted. If oral health care is to be provided it has to be funded. The money has to be derived from the public and this can be either from individuals or from taxation. Within the UK there are a variety of ways in which oral health care is funded. Figure 19.1 shows the possible flows of money. The model that exists in the UK is in the main centred on routes 1 and 3, based on taxation, either direct or through national insurance contributions, and its subsequent allocation to various public-funded services, including dentistry. In Germany, the arrangement is slightly different in that third-party insurance groups are involved and a proportion of an individual’s annual salary is allocated to health care. A third model operates in the USA under the guise of managed care. Individuals buy into a care plan that is organized by a health care company, which subsequently contracts with dentists to provide a level of care. In route 2, the public pays the dentist directly for his or her services; this is a private arrangement. A third party may intervene to control pricing. For example, Dutch and Swedish adult dental care is now mostly in the private sector, but each year the profession negotiates the scale of fees with their government. The subsequent distribution process for paying oral care workers is illustrated in Figure 19.2. There are again three mechanisms: . . . 1 A purely private arrangement. . . . . . . 2 The state pays the total cost. . . .


Author(s):  
Blánaid Daly ◽  
Paul Batchelor ◽  
Elizabeth Treasure ◽  
Richard Watt

Public health is now recognized as being a core component of the undergraduate medical and dental curricula in many parts of the world (Association for Dental Education in Europe 2010; General Dental Council 2011; General Medical Council 2009). This recognition acknowledges that public health is an important subject relevant to the practice of medicine and dentistry. This chapter will outline what is meant by public health and, in particular, its relevance to clinical dental practice. The philosophical and historical background of public health will be reviewed and the limitations of the traditional system of health care highlighted. Finally, a dental public health framework will be outlined to highlight the central importance of public health to the future development of dentistry. Dental public health can be defined as the science and practice of preventing oral diseases, promoting oral health, and improving quality of life through the organized efforts of society. The science of dental public health is concerned with making a diagnosis of a population’s oral health problems, establishing the causes and effects of those problems, and planning effective interventions. The practice of dental public health is to create and use opportunities to implement effective solutions to population oral health and health care problems (Chappel et al. 1996). Dental public health is concerned with promoting the health of the population and therefore focuses action at a community level. This is in contrast to clinical practice which operates at an individual level. However, the different stages of clinical and public health practice are broadly similar. Dental public health is a broad subject that seeks to expand the focus and understanding of the dental profession on the range of factors that influence oral health and the most effective means of preventing and treating oral health problems. Dental public health is underpinned by a range of related disciplines and sciences that collectively enrich the value and relevance of the subject (Box 1.1) The practice of dentistry is undergoing a period of rapid change due to a wide range of factors in society ( Box 1.2 ).


Author(s):  
Nicholas Longridge ◽  
Pete Clarke ◽  
Raheel Aftab ◽  
Tariq Ali

The content of this subject is frequently overlooked, as it is often ‘not seen as pertinent’ to practitioners’ day- to- day work. However, the impact of dental public health (DPH) as a discipline can be far reaching. DPH is concerned with improving the oral health of the population, rather than the individual. It has been described as the science and art of preventing oral disease, promoting oral health, and improving quality of life through the organized efforts of society. DPH teams have numerous responsibilities, including oral health sur­veillance, developing and monitoring quality dental services, oral health improvement, policy and strategy development and implementation, and strategic leadership and collaborative working for health. As such, the impact of DPH can frequently been seen at a local level, e.g. through health promotion campaigns or provision of new/ redistribution of ser­vices (in conjunction with commissioners) to meet local needs. DPH is predominantly a postgraduate subject, and although the undergraduate curriculum does not cover the whole topic, some core knowledge is valuable. In particular, understanding research method­ology and basic statistics is a useful skill to help interpret the dental lit­erature appropriately. This is ever more necessary in the modern era of evidence- based dentistry. The questions in this chapter will predominantly cover the fundamen­tals of statistics relevant to medical research, along with the basics of study design. Additional questions will touch on the concepts of health promotion and epidemiology, with further reading suggested to supple­ment the content. Key topics include: ● Study design ● Data analysis ● Critical appraisal ● Epidemiology ● Health promotion ● Strategic working and collaboration ● Assessing evidence on oral health and dental interventions, pro­grammes, and services ● Developing and monitoring quality dental services.


2021 ◽  
pp. 113-128
Author(s):  
Amira S. Mohamed ◽  
Peter G. Robinson

Dental public health is concerned with preventing oral disease, promoting oral health, and improving the quality of life through the organized efforts of society. Oral diseases including dental caries, periodontal disease, oral neoplasms, and dentofacial trauma are common, have a significant impact on individuals and wider society, and are largely preventable. While the prevalence and severity of these most common and costly dental diseases have fallen in most developed countries, oral health inequalities exist in relation to socioeconomic status, ethnicity, or region. The links between oral and general health indicate that strategies to improve both sets of problems and reduce inequalities should be integrated within the framework advocated by the Commission for the Social Determinants of Health. Of particular relevance to oral health are increasing the availability of fluoride and ensuring universal access to quality dental services. Factors influencing oral health in the future include tighter financial pressures, changes in disease prevalence, the deprofessionalization of dentistry, the role of consumerism in oral health, and the need for a better evidence base.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S535-S536
Author(s):  
Christina M Baello ◽  
Divya Ahuja ◽  
Norlica Finkley ◽  
Rajee Rao

Abstract Background An estimated 58- 64 % of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) do not receive regular dental care and this gap may be attributed to barriers related to cost, access to dental care, logistical issues, indifference to or fear of dental care.1,2 The Immunology Center at Prisma- University of South Carolina, School of Medicine is a Ryan White funded Part B Program that provides care to > 2400 PLWHA. Based on the perceived barriers, an enhanced oral health care program was implemented in 2018, wherein patients in need of dental care and meeting inclusion criteria are referred to contracted local general dentistry and specialty practices. Enhancements Dedicated Dental Services Coordinator (DSC) Facilitated transport to and from the dental clinic Annual budget of $2700 per patient Access to dental specialties (oral and maxillofacial surgery) Restorative services (crowns, dentures and root canals) Program Goals The ultimate goal of the oral health care program is to provide biannual dental prophylaxis and expanded restorative services to PLWHA. Inclusion criteria for referrals 1 Virological suppression over 6 months. (HIV Viral Load < 200 c/mL) 2 Adherence with HIV clinic appointments. Midlands Region, South Carolina Methods The DSC completes the following: monitoring of referrals, patient compliance to program inclusion criteria, linkage to dental care, payments for dental services, and coordination with case management. Results Between 2018 and 2019, 535 patients were referred to the oral health care program. Almost 75% 399 completed at least one dental clinic visit. The average number of visits for patients from their enrollment date (2018-2019 to December 2019 was 1.56, with an average of 8.08 services, and 1.13 prophylaxis visits with their oral health care provider. Patients were predominantly African American and male but were spread across a wide age spectrum and 8 counties. Nearly 94% of patients remained virologically suppressed during their oral health care treatment. Table 1: 2018-2019 Program Summary of Oral Health Care Table 2 & Figure 1: Oral Health Care Patients by Age Group, Figure 2: Oral Health Care Patient by Gender Table 3 & Figure 3: Oral Health Care Patients by Race and Ethnicity, Table 4 & Figure 4: Oral Health Care Patient by County Conclusion PLWHA have high rates of unmet oral health care needs and low utilization of oral health services. Adequate resources and coordination of care with local dentists can overcome traditional barriers and improve access to dental care. Abstract References Disclosures: All Authors: No reported disclosures


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Estêvão Azevedo Melo ◽  
Livia Fernandes Probst ◽  
Luciane Miranda Guerra ◽  
Elaine Pereira Silva Tagliaferro ◽  
Alessandro Diogo De-Carli ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Aiming to reverse the current impact of oral diseases, which are among the most prevalent diseases worldwide, it is necessary that public dental services act in an integrated manner within the Health System, particularly with the primary care services. However, even inside availability scenarios in health care, the use of dental services is determined by complex phenomena related to the individual, the environment and practices in which care is offered. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the predictors of the demand for dental care in Primary Health Care Units (PHC) with Oral Health Teams (OHTs). Methods The present is a cross-sectional analytical study that used data from the external assessment of the third cycle of the National Program for Improving Access and Quality in Primary Care (PMAQ-AB, Programa Nacional de Melhoria do Acesso e da Qualidade da Atenção Básica), carried out between 2017 and 2018, in Brazil. The final sample consisted of 85,231 patients and 22,475 Oral Health teams (OHTs). The outcome variable was the fact that the user requested a dental appointment at the Health Unit. A multilevel analysis was carried out to verify the association between individual variables (related to users) and contextual variables (related to the OHTs) in relation to the outcome. Results In the final model, of the variables at the individual level, the patient's age over 43 years (OR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.96–2.10) was the one that had the greatest effect on the outcome. In turn, among the contextual variables related to the teams, the ones with the greatest effect on the outcome were 'oral health teams that assisted no more than a single family health team' (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.23–1.36) or 'those in which the dental form constitutes the user's medical record' (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.15–1.26) were predictors of the demand for a dental appointment in Primary Health Care. Conclusion It can be concluded that individual and contextual issues interfere in the demand for dental care. Oral health planning must consider an active search for patients with profiles that do not favor the spontaneous demand for oral health care, such as being older, male gender and non-white ethnicity. It is also concluded that the oral health teams that worked in line with the Brasil Sorridente guidelines are the teams most often sought after by the users.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-326
Author(s):  
Mithun BH Pai ◽  
Ashwini Rao ◽  
Sumeet Bhatt ◽  
Guru R Rajesh ◽  
Vijayendra Nayak

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of this study was to assess factors influencing the oral health and utilization patterns of oral health services by fishermen community in Mangaluru city, Karnataka, India. Materials and methods A house-to-house survey was conducted among 840 individuals in fishermen population. Oral health status was evaluated by employing the World Health Organization basic oral health survey form. A self-administered questionnaire was used to assess patterns of utilization of dental services and their sociodemographic details. Results Mean decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) of the population was 3.78 ± 6.02 and prevalence of caries and periodontal conditions was 55 and 99% respectively. About 55% participants had never visited a dentist. Age, gender, and education of the respondents showed significant associations with DMFT status. Periodontal health showed significant association with age, gender, education, and income of the respondents. Visit to the dentist was associated with age, gender, education, and dental caries. The major barrier recognized in seeking dental care was the perception of not having any dental problem. Conclusion The dental care utilization was poor, and majority of the dental visits were for tooth extraction. Lack of perceived oral health care need was the main barrier to the utilization of dental services. Clinical significance The fishing population had high dental caries and poor periodontal health due to low utilization of dental care. How to cite this article Bhatt S, Rajesh GR, Rao A, Shenoy R, Pai MBH, Nayak V. Factors influencing Oral Health and Utilization of Oral Health Care in an Indian Fishing Community, Mangaluru City, India. World J Dent 2017;8(4):321-326.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document