scholarly journals Misdiagnosed Injuries in the Prehospital Trauma Care: Better Training needs to be Implemented

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 93-96
Author(s):  
Adonis Nasr ◽  
Phillipe Abreu-Reis ◽  
Iwan Collaço ◽  
Flavio Saavedra Tomasich
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Trauma Care ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Training Needs ◽  
System Capacity ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Prehospital Trauma Care

ABSTRACT Background It is not always that prehospital trauma life support (PHTLS) principles are applied to daily practice. Lack of training to health care providers and a high amount of patients overwhelming the system capacity may let malpractice behavior to happen. It is the aim of this study to assess injuries misdiagnosed by prehospital trauma care in a capital city in southern Brazil. Study design A prospective observational non-controlled study with 174 random trauma cases that were brought to a level 1 trauma center in the city of Curitiba, between May 28th and June 10th 2006. We analyzed data registered in the prehospital rescue team form. The including criteria were all patients delivered to the trauma center by ambulances. The excluding criteria were patients not transported by ambulances and those without the proper form filled out. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square for discrete, and the students’ t-test for continuous variables. Results Of the 174 patients who met the including criteria, 75% were men with a mean age of 27-year-old. Of the 11 injuries to the neck identified in the Hospital evaluation, eight were missed by the prehospital care (OR 0.26 CI 95% 0.07-0.94). Also, only 7/20 injuries to the back were identified by the PHTLS team (OR 0.32 CI 95% 0.13-0.78). Similarly, only 6/26 injuries to the chest (OR 0.20 CI 95% 0.08-0.50), 4/15 to the abdomen (OR 0.24 CI 95% 0.08-0.76), 4/16 to the pelvis (OR 0.23 CI 95% 0.07-0.70), 13/33 to the upper body (OR 0.34 CI 95% 0.17- 0.68),7/39 to the lower body (OR 0.14 CI 95% 0.06-0.33) and 17/55 (OR 0.23 CI 95% 0.12-0.42) were correctly identified in the prehospital scenario. Conclusion Although it is known PHTLS principles, which save lives when applied in practice, further training and remarks to its importance is needed to fully implement efficient trauma systems. Electronic data collection shall make checklists consistently filled out, so that patient care will be improved. How to cite this article Abreu-Reis P, Nasr A, Tomasich FS, Collaco I. Misdiagnosed Injuries in the Prehospital Trauma Care: Better Training needs to be Implemented. Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg 2014;3(3):93-96.

Emergency Care of the Child

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 572-576
Author(s):  
MARTHA BUSHORE
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Emergency Care ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Transport Services ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Field Triage ◽  
Pediatric Emergency Care

Optimal emergency care of the child requires a well-developed EMS-C system. The components are easy to identify. We need macroregions with institutions acknowledging their institutional capabilities for pediatric emergency care and supporting field triage and transfer agreements. We need highly educated and skilled prehospital care providers, from emergency medical technicians in the field to air and ground transport services with specialized pediatric transport teams. In addition to having an appropriate hospital emergency department attending physician staff, hospitals must develop networks of cooperation between emergency departments appropriate for pediatrics and childern's emergency care centers. These centers strive for quality care through systematic record keeping, chart reviews, and audits identifying care deficiencies and appropriate remedies. Subsequent reviews document improved care. There are meetings of prehospital and hospital-based providers to discuss the management of challenging cases. Comprehensive pediatric emergency care involves integration of emergency stabilization patient care with community and hospital social services, patient education programs (such as Child Life), and comprehensive rehabilitation programs, as well as community accident prevention and basic life support programs. As we strive to develop optimal emergency medical services for our country to best serve our people, comprehensive emergency care of children must have separate consideration from comprehensive emergency care of adults. If we are to assure optimal outcome for the life-threatened child, we need to continuously assess regional needs and capabilities and encourage optimal involvement of health care providers and institutions.

Prehospital Trauma Care

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 158-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
SM Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Care ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Air Ambulances ◽  
Prehospital Trauma Care ◽  
Trained Staff ◽  
The Developed Countries ◽  
Accident Site

ABSTRACT The global human population is spread all over the world, but cities, towns, and large villages have dense concentrations of human inhabitation. The inhabitants of cities and towns do have easy and satisfactory access for the management of traumatized patients. However, trauma victims in remote and distant regions, generally, do not have ambulance services or treatment centers nearby to deal effectively with injuries. Even on highways, at accident sites, the injured may succumb to the injuries due to delay in rescue and nonavailability of vital basic life support compounded by delay in transportation of the patient to appropriate hospital or dedicated trauma center. Other factors which add to mortality are nonavailability of trained and experienced personnel at the accident site, inadequate and improper resuscitation during transportation, and referral to a hospital ill-equipped to treat traumatized patients. Trauma is the leading cause of death for patients in their first four decades of life. Prehospital trauma care to save life has not received the necessary attention in developing world due to diverse reasons, including lack of trained staff, inadequate funding, lack of awareness, ignorance, lack of will, and unpredictability of occurrence of accidents. Trauma management remains neglected in third world countries; however, the developed countries have made continuous efforts to save lives of traumatized patients by systematized prehospital care at the site of accident, rescue, and extrication of victims, rendering lifesaving resuscitation on the spot and quick and safe evacuation of the patients to trauma centers by surface and air ambulances depending upon the terrain and distance of the site of occurrence from hospital with continuous monitoring of the patient onboard. Prehospital trauma care needs focused attention to evolve a system and institutions which would impart care to the wounded inclusive of rescue, resuscitation, stabilization of vital parameters, and safe transportation to a dedicated hospital to save life and prevent morbidity. How to cite this article Sharma SM. Prehospital Trauma Care. Int J Adv Integ Med Sci 2016;1(4):158-163.

scholarly journals Prehospital Trauma Care Registry Problems in South Brazil

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-100
Author(s):  
Adonis Nasr ◽  
Phillipe Abreu-Reis ◽  
Iwan Collaço ◽  
Flavio Saavedra Tomasich
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Care ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Gunshot Wounds ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Electronic Data Collection ◽  
Prehospital Trauma Care ◽  
Care Assessment ◽  
South Brazil

ABSTRACT Background Trauma registry remains a great problem to most countries that are implementing trauma systems. Nondigital data assessment and storage may lead to information deterioration along the process. In order to verify the missing registry in prehospital trauma rescuers’ form, we ran this study. Study design A prospective observational noncontrolled study with 288 random trauma cases brought to a Level 1 Trauma Center in Curitiba, between May 28th and June 10th 2006. We analyzed data registered in the prehospital rescue team form. The including criteria were all patients delivered to the trauma center by ambulances. The excluding criteria were patients not transported by ambulances and those without the proper form filled out. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square for discrete, and the student's t-test for continuous variables. Results Two hundred and eighty-eight trauma cases were observed. Twelve patients were excluded. Of the 276 patients who met the including criteria, 75% were men with a mean age of 27-year-old. In only 8.34% of times patients were brought by doctors, while in 91.66% by paramedics. 63.4% of patients were traffic injuries victims, followed by 12.31% falls, 6.52% falls from the high, 5.79% gunshot wounds, 5.34% assaults, 3.62% stab wounds, 2.89% others. Impressively, 16 patients (5.89%) had no records of respiratory rate from the prehospital care assessment, 20 (7.24%) had no data of systolic blood pressure and 13(4.71%)had no pulse registry. Furthermore, 31.25% of the RR not registered were abnormal in the hospital admission evaluation, as well as 15% of the SBPs, and 23% of HR. None of the cases had information regarding time from the scene to the hospital. Conclusion Electronic data collection shall make checklists consistently filled out. It is not well understood the importance of registering data for most of healthcare providers working in the field, especially when they do not follow the in-hospital care of trauma patients. How to cite this article Abreu-Reis P, Tomasich FS, Nasr A, Collaco I. Prehospital Trauma Care Registry Problems in South Brazil. Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg 2014;3(3):97-100.

Abstract P862: Successes and Impact of a Statewide Stroke Education Campaign for Healthcare Providers

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia N Jones ◽  
Janna Pietrzak ◽  
Kylie Picou ◽  
Mindy Cook ◽  
Adela Santana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North Dakota ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Systems Of Care ◽  
Everyday Practice ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Treatment Methods ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: The North Dakota Mission: Lifeline Stroke program is a 3-year initiative which aims to improve statewide stroke systems of care. Due to complexities in recognizing and treating stroke patients, effective education of prehospital and hospital health care providers on guideline-based assessments and treatment methods were identified as an essential intervention. In person lectures, conferences, workshops, stroke simulation trainings, online courses, webinars, and a stroke certification program were deployed throughout the project. Purpose: The purpose of the post-education survey was to determine the impact, value, and success of different types of education provided during the project. Methods: North Dakota healthcare professionals (n=221) completed a 20-question online survey about their experiences participating in the stroke trainings provided from 2017 to 2020. Results: Survey respondents consisted of 76 Emergency Medical Service (EMS) providers and 145 hospital-based healthcare professionals. The majority of hospital-based staff respondents were nurses (80.1%), while most EMS-based respondents were paramedics or EMTs (75.0%). Half of all respondents (49.8%) participated in 2 or more educational offerings. Respondents were asked to rank the educational offerings in which they participated in by order of the benefit to their everyday practice. The two highest ranking educational offerings were the Advanced Stroke Life Support Class (mean rank=1.6) and Simulation in Motion (SIM) ND (mean rank=2.3). More than 90% of respondents stated that these trainings were extremely or very applicable to their everyday practice. When asked about the overall impact of all the educational offerings they participated in, almost all (92.6%) respondents indicated they agree that because of the trainings they have a better understanding of the key issues related to caring for stroke patients. Conclusions: Overall, the comprehensive survey provides concrete evidence and feedback that multi-modal education campaigns are well-received and effective in furthering awareness of guideline-based stroke assessments and treatment methods. Activities with a kinesthetic learning approach were found to be especially well-received.

Pediatric Prehospital Care in Urban and Rural Areas

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 681-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Seidel ◽  
Deborah Parkman Henderson ◽  
Patrick Ward ◽  
Barbara Wray Wayland ◽  
Beverly Ness
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medical Services ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Emergency Medical

There are limited data concerning pediatric prehospital care, although pediatric prehospital calls constitute 10% of emergency medical services activity. Data from 10 493 prehospital care reports in 11 counties of California (four emergency medical services systems in rural and urban areas) were collected and analyzed. Comparison of urban and rural data found few significant differences in parameters analyzed. Use of the emergency medical services system by pediatric patients increased with age, but 12.5% of all calls were for children younger than 2 years. Calls for medical problems were most common for patients younger than 5 years of age; trauma was a more common complaint in rural areas (64%, P = .0001). Frequency of vital sign assessment differed by region, as did hospital contact (P < .0001). Complete assessment of young pediatric patients, with a full set of vital signs and neurologic assessment, was rarely performed. Advanced life support providers were often on the scene, but advanced life support treatments and procedures were infrequently used. This study suggests the need for additional data on which to base emergency medical services system design and some directions for education of prehospital care providers.

Prehospital Care and In-hospital Mortality of Trauma Patients in Iran

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 473-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Paravar ◽  
Mehrdad Hosseinpour ◽  
Mahdi Mohammadzadeh ◽  
Azade Sadat Mirzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Advanced Trauma Life Support ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Publication Type ◽  
Transport Time ◽  
Severe Injuries

AbstractIntroductionThe aim of this study was to determine the effect of prehospital time and advanced trauma life support interventions for trauma patients transported to an Iranian Trauma Center.MethodsThis study was a retrospective study of trauma victims presenting to a trauma center in central Iran by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and hospitalized more than 24 hours. Demographic and injury characteristics were obtained, including accident location, damaged organs, injury mechanism, injury severity score, prehospital times (response, scene, and transport), interventions and in-hospital outcome.ResultsTwo thousand patients were studied with an average age of 36.3 (SD = 20.8) years; 83.1% were male. One hundred twenty patients (6.1%) died during hospitalization. The mean response time, at scene time and transport time were 6.6 (SD = 3), 11.1 (SD = 5.2) and 12.8 (SD = 9.4), respectively. There was a significant association of longer transport time to worse outcome (P = .02). There was a trend for patients with transport times >10 minutes to die (OR: 0.8; 95% CI, 0.1-6.59). Advanced Life Support (ALS) interventions were applied for patients with severe injuries (Revised Trauma Score ⩽7) and ALS intervention was associated with more time on scene. There was a positive association of survival with ALS interventions applied in suburban areas (P = .001).ConclusionIn-hospital trauma mortality was more common for patients with severe injuries and long prehospital transport times. While more severely injured patients received ALS interventions and died, these interventions were associated with positive survival trends when conducted in suburban and out-of-city road locations with long transport times.HosseinpourM, ParavarM, MohammadzadehM, MirzadehAS. Prehospital care and in-hospital mortality of trauma patients in Iran. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(5):1-5.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document