Prevalence of Maxillofacial Fractures in Southern Provinces of India

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-7
Author(s):  
VN Shankar ◽  
Ashwini LNU
Keyword(s):  
Oral Health ◽  
Common Type ◽  
Maxillofacial Trauma ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
Trauma Centers ◽  
Peak Incidence ◽  
Zygomatic Bone ◽  
Midface Fractures ◽  
Maxillofacial Fractures ◽  
Frequent Site

ABSTRACT Objective The study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of maxillofacial fractures in southern provinces of India. Materials and methods Data of a total of 2,037 patients were analyzed retrospectively over a period of 3 years, i.e., from 2010 to 2013, from various maxillofacial trauma centers of Karnataka, India. Results Study revealed that the maxillofacial fractures had male (87.5%) preponderance and its peak incidence was during 20 to 30 years of age. Isolated mandibular fractures were the most common type of fractures with 1,035 patients (50.81%), followed by isolated midface fractures in 526 patients (25.82%). Among midface fractures, zygomatic bone and arch were most frequently involved. Conclusion Mandible was the frequent site involved. Among maxillary fractures, zygomatic bone and arch were more often involved. How to cite this article Shankar VN, Ashwini. Prevalence of Maxillofacial Fractures in Southern Provinces of India. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2017;11(1):5-7.

Patterns of Pediatric Facial Fractures

2021 ◽  
pp. 194338752199173
Author(s):  
Kevin Hong ◽  
James Jeong ◽  
Yehudah N. Susson ◽  
Shelly Abramowicz
Keyword(s):  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Maxillofacial Trauma ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Facial Fractures ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Motor Vehicle Collisions ◽  
Vehicle Collisions ◽  
Peak Incidence ◽  
Maxillofacial Fractures

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess patterns of maxillofacial trauma in the pediatric population in Atlanta. This information is important to help guide management and allocate resources for treatment of maxillofacial injuries at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta (CHOA). Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review of children who presented from 2006 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age 18 years old or younger, (2) presentation to emergency department, (3) diagnosis of maxillofacial fractures, and (4) evaluation by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Otolaryngology, or Plastic Surgery services. Medical records were reviewed to record demographic, mechanism of injury, fracture location, and yearly incidence of injury. Descriptive statistics were computed to summarize findings and overall trends. Results: During the study period, 39,833 patients were identified. Of them, 1995 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were male (n = 1359, 68%) with an average age of 9.4 years old (range of 1 month to 18 years old). Mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle collisions (MVC) (n = 597, 29.9%), fall (n = 565, 28.3%), sports injury (n = 317, 15.9%), pedestrian struck (n = 215, 10.8%), assault/abuse (n = 204, 10.2%), other (n = 81, 4.1%), or gunshot wound (n = 16, 0.8%). Fracture sites were mandible (n = 519, 26%), complex (n = 479, 24%), nasal (n = 419, 21%), dentoalveolar (n = 279, 14%), orbital (n = 259, 13%), and maxilla (n = 40, 2%). Males had a higher incidence of assault than females (n = 185, 91% of assaults). The incidence of maxillofacial trauma increased with age with a peak incidence in 13 to 16-year-olds (n = 566, 28.3%). During the years examined, there was an upward trend in MVCs as the etiology with a peak incidence of facial fractures due to MVCs occurring in 2015. All other mechanisms remained constant during this time period. Conclusions: There was an increase in pediatric facial fractures secondary to motor vehicle collisions from 2007 to 2015 despite improvements in regulations, traffic safety, and technology.

Isolated Tympanic Plate Fracture Frequency and Its Relationship to Mandibular Trauma

2014 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 360-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Canan Altay ◽  
Nezahat Erdoğan ◽  
Ozan Batkı ◽  
Erdem Eren ◽  
Sedat Altay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Images ◽  
Maxillofacial Trauma ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
Condylar Process ◽  
Plate Fracture ◽  
Maxillofacial Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mandible Fractures ◽  
The Right ◽  
Communications System

PurposeThis study evaluated the prevalence of isolated tympanic fractures and their correlation with mandibular fractures by using maxillofacial computed tomography (CT).Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the maxillofacial CT of 1590 patients who presented to our emergency department with maxillofacial trauma between December 2010 and December 2012. Maxillofacial CT was used as the criterion standard for evaluating patients with maxillofacial fractures. The CT images were evaluated by using an electronic picture archiving and communications system and interpreted independently by 2 radiologists.ResultsThe maxillofacial CT images revealed mandibular fractures in 167 of the patients and isolated tympanic plate fractures in 35 of these 167 patients. Four patients (11%) had a bilateral tympanic plate fracture, and 31 patients (89%) had unilateral tympanic plate fracture. Of all the tympanic plate fractures, 19 (54%) were on the right side and 16 (46%) were on the left side ( P > .05). In our results, a significant correlation between the presence of a right-sided tympanic plate fracture and fracture of the ipsilateral condylar process was found ( P = .036). However, a statistically significant difference between the presence of a tympanic plate fracture and other mandible fractures, additional soft-tissue findings, or the number of fractures was not determined ( P > .05). Sex had no impact on the presence of tympanic plate fracture ( P > .05).ConclusionThe frequency of isolated tympanic plate fractures in maxillofacial trauma is low, but it is an important anatomic location. Condyle fractures are significantly associated with isolated tympanic plate fractures. The presence of these injuries should raise suspicion of a concomitant isolated tympanic plate fracture.

scholarly journals Updates on the Epidemiology and Pattern of Traumatic Maxillofacial Injuries in a Nigerian University Teaching Hospital: A 12-Month Prospective Cohort In-Hospital Outcome Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
AdeolaAdenike Olusanya ◽  
AmosOlufemi Adeleye ◽  
TimothyOlukunle Aladelusi ◽  
AbiodunOlubayo Fasola
Keyword(s):  
University Teaching ◽  
Maxillofacial Trauma ◽  
Hospital Treatment ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
Associated Injuries ◽  
Maxillofacial Injuries ◽  
Facial Injuries ◽  
Low Resource ◽  
Maxillofacial Fractures ◽  
Clinical Records

Many studies have been undertaken in Nigeria on maxillofacial trauma. However, only a few have considered both the skeletal and soft tissue injuries (in general) involving all the aspects of the maxillofacial region or considered other etiological sources of trauma apart from road traffic crashes. Fewer still have reviewed the outcome of management of facial injuries in our low-resource environment. This study sets out to examine the recent trends in both the clinical and epidemiological patterns of all facial injuries from all causes seen in a low-resource practice of a developing country. It also assessed the in-hospital treatment outcomes, and the levels of the patients’ satisfaction with treatment received in this setting. Over a 12-month period, the clinical records of consecutive patients who were evaluated and treated for maxillofacial injuries in our unit were prospectively acquired, entered into predesigned forms and subsequently analyzed. There were 259 patients (79.5% males) during the study period. The mean age was 32.21(± 16.588) years. Overall, motor bike crashes, 42.1%, were the commonest source of these traumas; and armed robbery was the commonest form (69.0%) of assault. Mandibular fractures were the commonest maxillofacial fractures (37.8%) whereas head injury had the highest frequency among the associated injuries (71.4%). Closed reduction and immobilization was deployed in 88.0% of those who had treatment and majority was satisfied with the esthetic outcome of the treatment received. Mean length of hospital stay was 12.6 (± 4.423) days. Maxillofacial trauma poses a significant socioeconomic burden on affected individuals in this study population. This is made worse by the presence of associated injuries in the other body systems. More local studies on the outcome of management of maxillofacial trauma will improve the available literature in this region.

scholarly journals (A73) Burden of Maxillofacial Trauma at Level Trauma 1 Centre

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S1) ◽  
pp. s20-s21 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Sagar ◽  
M. Singhal ◽  
K. Kataria ◽  
S. Kumar ◽  
A. Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Road Traffic ◽  
Nasal Bone ◽  
Medical Problem ◽  
The Body ◽  
Maxillofacial Trauma ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
Emergency Rooms ◽  
Concomitant Injuries ◽  
Common Location ◽  
Maxillofacial Fractures

BackgroundThere is an upward trend in facial injuries following changes in population pattern, increasing industrialization and urbanization, hence maxillofacial trauma is becoming a burden and a leading medical problem in emergency rooms worldwide.MethodA retrospective study of patients with maxillofacial fractures seen and treated at the Jai Parkash Narayan Apex Trauma Center, AIIMS, New Delhi, India between January 2007 to June 2010. Data extracted from the patients' records include aetiology, age, sex, types and sites of fractures, treatment modality and concomitant injuries.ResultsThere were 795 fractures of the maxillofacial skeleton and 86 concomitant injuries from 542 patients. Road traffic accident (56.8%) was the most common aetiologic factor, followed by falls (22.3%) and fights (18.5%). The age range was from 3 years to 75 years (mean = 34.7) with a peak incidence in the 3rd decade with a male–female sex ratio of 3.7:1. The most common location of maxillofacial fractures was the mandible 615(77%) and middle third 205(23%). With regards to mandibular fractures, the body (29.6%) was the commonest sites, followed by the angle (24.4%), ramus (19.5%), dentoalveolar (14.6%), symphysis (11.0%), condyle (0.8%) while in the middle third, the nasal bone (36.7%) was the most common, followed by zygomatic bone (27.8), Lefort II (14.4), Lefort I (7.8%), dentoalveolar (10.0%) and Lefort III (3.3%). Majority of the patients were treated by Open reduction and internal fixation (70.6). Concomitant injuries were 10.8% with orthopaedic injuries accounting for the majority (63.9%). Head injury was associated with 16.3 % of cases.ConclusionMaxillofacial fractures are on the increase. We advocate the establishment of regionalized trauma centers with basic training available to all surgical residents for initial emergency room management.

scholarly journals A review of cervical spine injury associated with maxillofacial trauma at a UK tertiary referral centre

2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Mukherjee ◽  
K Abhinav ◽  
PJ Revington
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Cervical Spine Injury ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Maxillofacial Trauma ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Maxillofacial Fracture ◽  
Maxillofacial Fractures

Introduction The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and patterns of cervical spine injury (CSI) associated with maxillofacial fractures at a UK trauma centre. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of 714 maxillofacial fracture patients presenting to a single trauma centre between 2006 and 2012. Results Of the 714 maxillofacial fracture patients, 2.2% had associated CSI including a fracture, cord contusion or disc herniation. In comparison, 1.0% of patients without maxillofacial trauma sustained a CSI (odds ratio: 2.2, p=0.01). The majority (88%) of CSI cases of were caused by a road traffic accident (RTA) with the remainder due to falls. While 8.8% of RTA related maxillofacial trauma patients sustained a CSI, only 2.0% of fall related patients did (p=0.03, not significant). Most (70%) of the CSIs occurred at C1/C2 or C6/C7 levels. Overall, 455, 220 and 39 patients suffered non-mandibular, isolated mandibular and mixed mandibular/non-mandibular fractures respectively. Their respective incidences of CSI were 1.5%, 1.8% and 12.8% (p=0.005, significant). Twelve patients with concomitant CSI had their maxillofacial fractures treated within twenty-four hours and all were treated within four days. Conclusions The presence of maxillofacial trauma mandates exclusion and prompt management of cervical spine injury, particularly in RTA and trauma cases involving combined facial fracture patterns. This approach will facilitate management of maxillofacial fractures within an optimum time period.

scholarly journals Burden of Maxillofacial Trauma at Level 1 Trauma Center

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruchi Pathak Kaul ◽  
Sushma Sagar ◽  
Maneesh Singhal ◽  
Abhishek Kumar ◽  
Jiten Jaipuria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
The Body ◽  
Maxillofacial Trauma ◽  
Etiologic Factor ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
New Delhi ◽  
Maxillofacial Injuries ◽  
Concomitant Injuries ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Maxillofacial Fractures

There is an upward trend in facial injuries following changes in population pattern, increasing industrialization and urbanization, hence maxillofacial trauma is becoming a burden and a leading medical problem in emergency rooms worldwide. This study was performed to evaluate the pattern of maxillofacial fractures, associated injuries, and treatment used at Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Center (JPNATC), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India, between January 2007 and June 2010. The study provides basis for establishment of trauma as major etiology of maxillofacial injuries and planning for preventive strategies. A retrospective study of patients seen and treated at JPNATC, AIIMS, New Delhi, between January 2007 and June 2010 was performed. Data extracted from patient records included etiology, age, sex, types and sites of fractures, treatment modality, and concomitant injuries. There were 795 fractures of the maxillofacial skeleton and 86 concomitant injuries from 542 patients. Road traffic accident (RTA) (56.8%) was the most common etiologic factor, followed by falls (22.3%) and fights (18.5%). The age range was from 3 to 75 years (mean, 34.7 years) with a peak incidence in the third decade with a male-to-female ratio of 3.7:1. The most common location of maxillofacial fractures was the mandible 615 (77%) and middle third 180 (23%). With regard to mandibular fractures, the body (29.6%) was the most common site, followed by the angle (24.4%), ramus (19.5%), dentoalveolar (14.6%), symphysis (11.0%), condyle (0.8%) while in the middle third, the nasal bone (36.7%) was the most common, followed by zygomatic bone (27.8), Lefort II (14.4), Lefort I (7.8%), dentoalveolar (10.0%), and Lefort III (3.3%). Majority of the patients were treated by open reduction and internal fixation (70.6). Concomitant injuries were 84 (10.8%) with orthopedic injuries accounting for the majority (63.9%). Head injury was associated in 16.3% of cases. RTA was the major etiologic factor of maxillofacial injuries in our setting and the young adult males were the main victims. Henceforth, establishment of regionalized, efficient, and focused trauma centers in various parts of the country particularly for acute trauma should be emphasized. Also, the laws regarding the precautions such as seat belts, speed limits, and traffic rules must be observed strictly to reduce the incidence of RTA.

A Study on the Oral Health and Maxillofacial Trauma Status of Middle and High School Students

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Min-Ja Kim ◽  
Dong-Il Shin ◽  
Hee-Jeong Yang ◽  
Seung-Youn Lee
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Maxillofacial Trauma ◽  
School Students

scholarly journals Patterns of Maxillofacial Fractures in Road Traffic Crashes in an Indian Rural Tertiary Center

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-58
Author(s):  
A Sagayaraj ◽  
Rijo M Jayaraju ◽  
Mallika P Reddy ◽  
KR Harshitha ◽  
Priyanka Majety
Keyword(s):  
Road Traffic ◽  
Bone Fractures ◽  
Nasal Bone ◽  
Road Traffic Crash ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
Traffic Crashes ◽  
Large Variability ◽  
Road Traffic Crashes ◽  
Maxillofacial Fractures ◽  
Tertiary Center

ABSTRACT Background and objectives Road traffic crashes are reported to be the leading cause of maxillofacial fractures in developing countries. The large variability in reported incidence and etiology is due to a variety of contributing factors, including environmental, cultural and socioeconomic factors. The study aims at describing the patterns of maxillofacial fractures in road traffic crashes by clinical and radiological methods and to study the complications associated with these fractures. Materials and methods The study included 100 road traffic crash patients with maxillofacial injuries. Patients were evaluated for any maxillofacial fracture by clinical assessment and, radiologically, using plain radiographs and computed tomography scan. Results Midfacial skeleton was more prone to fractures. Isolated fractures of the maxilla was the commonest (58%) followed by nasal bone fractures (43%). Among the complex fractures, Le Fort type II was the commonest. Mandibular fractures were seen in 33% of the patients, parasymphysis being the commonest site. Majority of the patients had associated soft tissue injuries. The incidence of complications associated with maxillofacial fractures was 11%, malocclusion being the commonest. Conclusion Maxillofacial fractures are commoner in the mobile population in the most productive age group, more so in two wheeler riders causing significant morbidity and mortality. Midface region is more prone to fractures and is most of the time associated with complications. How to cite this article Jayaraju RM, Sagayaraj A, Reddy MP, Harshitha KR, Majety P. Patterns of Maxillofacial Fractures in Road Traffic Crashes in an Indian Rural Tertiary Center. Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg 2014;3(2):53-58.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Anterior Tooth Fracture due to Trauma

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaheen Abootty ◽  
Shruthi Attavar
Keyword(s):  
Oral Health ◽  
Health Survey ◽  
Common Type ◽  
Etiological Factor ◽  
Anterior Tooth ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Tooth Fracture ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Conservative Dentistry ◽  
Type Of Fracture

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate the prevalence of anterior tooth fracture due to trauma in 2000 patients randomly from the population of south Canara district. Materials and methods The present study was conducted on 2000 patients attending the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, AB Shetty Dental College, Mangalore, and rural satellite centers of Nitte University. Each patient was examined for anterior tooth fracture due to trauma under dental chair in a good illumination of light using sterilized mouth mirror, explorer, tweezer and teeth are isolated by cotton roles. The patient who had anterior tooth fracture were questioned with a standard questionnaire from oral health survey WHO format 2013, to find its relation associated to age, gender, location, occupation, etiology, type of fracture and its relation to molar. Results According to the present study, prevalence of anterior tooth fracture due to trauma in south Canara population was low and found to be 18.8% with increase in prevalence in males (56.2%) between the age group of 36 and 45 years (33.2%), common etiological factor seen was falls (44.7%). The most common type of fracture was enamel-dentine fracture (44.7%) with class 1 molar relation (55.6%). Conclusion The prevalence of anterior tooth fracture due to trauma was most commonly seen in males with increased prevalence in age group between 36 and 45 years, common etiological factor being falls, type of fracture most commonly seen are cases with enamel-dentine fracture with class 1 molar relation. How to cite this article Hegde MN, Abootty S, Attavar S. Prevalence of Anterior Tooth Fracture due to Trauma. World J Dent 2015;6(2):77-81.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document