Business property relief and agricultural property relief

Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Iryna Nazarova

The paper considers various interpretations of the essence of equity capital. The concept of equity capital is viewed from the perspective of property as a venture capital, i. e. business property, which does not guarantee profits and dividends, and for which there is no clear schedule of returning funds to investors and shareholders. The most common equity capital components in national and foreign practice are examined and compared. It is pointed out that the equity components mainly used in Ukraine are defined by the National Accounting Standards. Alternatively, the structure of equity capital components in foreign practice relies on the Conceptual Framework of Financial Statements, but it is further detailed by national standards of each country and depends on its policy and accounting characteristics. The structure of equity capital in foreign practice may be influenced by shareholders’ decisions on the establishment of funds (additional capital), allocation of profits, transactions with treasury shares. It is made clear that in most countries equity capital components include joint stock capital, surplus reserves, and retained profit. The article reviews the classification of equity capital, viewed as the key factor, and determines its influence on accounting principles and policies. It is concluded that in regulatory documents, there are no clear lines between types of equity capital. The paper also discusses various views of scholars on equity capital arrangement. It is found that in research works, equity capital is classified based on various characteristics, but the majority of researchers consider sources of equity capital to be the main criterion. In addition, there is no consensus among academics as to what types of equity capital can be singled out by the criterion described. Taking into consideration some proposals of scholars and foreign practice related to ac- counting of equity capital, the author develops a generalized structure of equity capital which is based on the sources of capital formation and includes: invested capital, particularly registered capital (statutory and mandatory share capital), corrective capital (unpaid and withdrawn capital), additional capital (capital received from investors for stock that exceeds the par value of the stock, i.e. additional equity capital); acquired capital (assets received for free, capital formed from revaluation of assets, other capital) and reinvested capital (retained profits (uncovered losses) and surplus reserves). The above equity structure can be used to prepare financial statements in order to increase its informational value. Proposals are given on how to improve methods for accounting of equity capital, in particular accounting of additional capital invested by founders in the account entitled “Non-registered investments of owners”.


2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly G. Key ◽  
Teresa A. Lightner

ABSTRACT This study examines the relation between commercial and industrial property values and local property taxes using 1999 to 2009 data for the state of Georgia. Results show a negative relation between commercial values and property taxes, consistent with the new view of capital tax prediction that these taxes are borne, at least in part, by property owners. Incidence estimates show very high to full capitalization. There is little evidence of a relation between industrial property values and property taxes, contrary to prior research. This study is the first to provide empirical evidence of differences in commercial and industrial property tax incidence. The study contributes to the understanding of the capitalization of business taxes, which has been the subject of very little prior research. The results can inform policymakers who consider trade-offs in tax revenue needs, economic development, and issues of fairness in their localities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Wang

With the continuous progress of the economy of China and the full integration with the system of socialism with Chinese characteristics, Chinese economy has been further developed and gradually tends to be improved. Under the background of the new era, there are great differences between the public economy and the non-public sector of the economy that is including the private economy and the individual economy. The non-public sector of the economy is mainly to pursue the maximization of operating profits. In fact, it defers to the intention of managers. Therefore, the planning of business freedom becomes a power to protect the business property and business freedom, which is the most important issue to be considered in the context of the new era.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Renli Ferrari Daud Sondakh ◽  
David Paul Elia Saerang ◽  
Lidia M. Mawikere

In a government organization requires their internal control systems due to their system of internal control activities undertaken by government agencies more effective and avoid fraud and keep the business property of parties who are not responsible. The object of this research is the Dinas Pendapatan Daerah Kabupaten Minahasa Utara. The purpose of this study to analyze the effectiveness of the internal control system on the performance of government agencies in the Dinas Pendapatan Daerah Kabupaten Minahasa Utara. The method used is descriptive qualitative. The results showed that the internal control system used Dinas Pendapatan Daerah Kabupaten Minahasa Utara effective and sufficient for compliance with the Internal Control System of the Government that has been set by the government based on Government Regulation No. 60 of 2008, so that the achievement of revenue receipts and the realization of the region in 2015 is said to be very effective. Keywords: Government Accounting, Internal Control System of the Government, Performance, effectiveness, Dinas Pendapatan Daerah


2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 446-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Ho Eom ◽  
William Duncombe ◽  
Phuong Nguyen-Hoang ◽  
John Yinger

New York’s School Tax Relief Program, STAR, provides state-funded property tax relief for homeowners. Like a matching grant, STAR changes the price of education, thereby altering the incentives of voters and school officials and leading to unintended consequences. Using data for New York State school districts before and after STAR was implemented, we find that STAR increased student performance, school district inefficiency, and school spending by 2 to 4 percent in most districts, leading to an average school property tax rate increase of 14 percent. The STAR-induced tax rate increases offset about one third of the initial STAR tax savings and boosted property taxes for business property. STAR did little to offset the existing inequities in New York State’s education finance system, particularly compared to an equal-cost increase in state aid. This article should be of interest to policy makers involved in property taxes or other aspects of education finance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document