scholarly journals Leakage Reduction Technique and Analysis of CMOS D Flip Flop

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 39-46
Author(s):  
Sridhara K ◽  
Biradar G S
2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 147-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
WEIQIANG ZHANG ◽  
LI SU ◽  
YU ZHANG ◽  
LINFENG LI ◽  
JIANPING HU

The scaling of transistor sizes has resulted in dramatic increase of leakage currents. The sub-threshold and gate leakages have now become a major contributor to total power dissipations. This paper presents two flip-flops based on dual-threshold CMOS and multiple leakage reduction techniques to reduce their leakage dissipations. In the DT-TG FF (Dual-Threshold Transmission Gate Flip-Flop), some transistors on non-critical paths use high-threshold devices to reduce their leakage currents, while the other transistors on critical paths use low-threshold devices to maintain performance. The MLRT FF (Multiple Leakage Reduction Technique Flip-Flop) uses P-type CMOS techniques, MTCMOS (Multi-Threshold CMOS) power-gating and dual-threshold technique to reduce both sub-threshold and gate leakage dissipations. Taken as an example, a practical sequential system realized with the two low-leakage flip-flops is demonstrated using a mode-5 × 5 × 5 counter. The simulation results show that the two flip-flops achieve considerable leakage reductions.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Santosh Kumar ◽  
Suman Lata Tripathi

Abstract The SRAM cells are used in many applications where power consumption will be the main constraint. The Conventional 6T SRAM cell has reduced stability and more power consumption when technology is scaled resulting in supply voltage scaling, so other alternative SRAM cells from 7T to 12T have been proposed which can address these problems. Here a low power 7T SRAM cell is suggested which has low power consumption and condensed leakage currents and power dissipation. The projected design has a leakage power of 5.31nW and leakage current of 7.58nA which is 84.9% less than the 7T SRAM cell without using the proposed leakage reduction technique and it is 22.4% better than 6T SRAM and 22.1% better than 8T SRAM cell when both use the same leakage reduction technique. The cell area of the 7T SRAM cell is 1.25µM2, 6T SRAM is 1.079µM2 and that of 8T SRAM is 1.28µM2all the results are simulated in cadence virtuoso using 18nm technology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document