International Business Activity and Firm Value: The Impact of Ownership and Capital Structure

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-104
Author(s):  
Steen Thomsen
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
International Business ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Business Activity ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Competing Hypotheses ◽  
The Impact

Theoretically, the effect of international business activity on firm value depends on ownership and capital structure. Companies may over-invest in international business activity because of agency problems or under-invest, if they are capital-rationed. This paper examines how these competing hypotheses fit a sample of 237 very large European and US companies over the period 1991-1997. The results indicate that internationalization may sometimes destroy value from a shareholder viewpoint and that financial leverage may have a negative effect on value creation by internationalization whereas the effects of ownership concentration on value gains from internationalization were found to depend on system effects. However, the magnitude of the effects is small, and the results were found to be sensitive to estimation methods.

scholarly journals Does capital structure affect firm value in Vietnam?

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-41
Author(s):  
Tien Dat Dang ◽  
Thi Van Trang Do
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Stock Exchanges ◽  
Enterprise Value ◽  
Control Factors ◽  
Beverage Industry ◽  
Food And Beverage ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Impact

This study aims to examine whether the capital structure and several factors have significant influences on firm value in Vietnam. To achieve this objective, 435 non-financial listed companies have been selected from 2012 to 2019 on Vietnamese stock exchanges. Four groups of firms continue to be chosen from the total to investigate the differences in the outcomes among industries. The results altogether using the GMM method show that the impact of capital structure and other control variables on firm value is significant, yet different across industries: capital structure has a significant positive impact on firm value in the food and beverage industry, but has a significant negative effect on the value of the firm in wholesale trade and construction, as well as real estate industry, while has an insignificant influence on enterprise value considering all industries. Apart from the firm size, the impact of other control factors on firm value also indicates mixed results.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF INTERNAL FACTORS ON CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND ITS IMPACT ON FIRM VALUE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE FOOD AND BAVERAGES INDUSTRY LISTED ON INDONESIAN STOCK EXCHANGE 2013-2017

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 173-191
Author(s):  
M.Noor Salim ◽  
Rina Susilowati
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Positive Effect

This research aims to analyze the effects of profitability (ROA), liquidity (CR), assets growth, and firm size towards capital structure (DER) and the impact on firm value (PBV).This research uses secondary data from yearly financial statement of food and baverages companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange for period 2013-2017. The research design uses descriptive quantitative research and causality. Sampling method uses purposive sampling method, with some predetermined criteria, the number of sample is 17 manufacturing companies. The analysis technique used is panel data regression. The research results shows that the profitability (ROA) and firm size partially have negative effect and not significant on capital structure (DER). The liquidity (CR) and assets growth partially have negative effect and significantly on capital structure (DER). Then the capital structure (DER) partially have positive effect but not significantly influences the firm value (PBV). The profitability (ROA) partially have positive effect and significant on firm value (PBV). The liquidity (CR) and assets growth partially have negative and significant effect on firm value (PBV), and firm size partially have negative and not significant effect on firm value (PBV). Simultaneously profitability (ROA), liquidity (CR), assets growth and firm size effect on capital structure (DER). On the other side, simultaneously profitability (ROA), liquidity (CR), assets growth and firm size have effect on firm value (PBV).

scholarly journals PENGARUH PROFITABILITAS DAN UKURAN PERUSAHAAN TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN DENGAN STRUKTUR MODAL SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING (STUDI PADA PERUSAHAAN ANEKA INDUSTRI YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI 2012-2019)

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-28
Author(s):  
Fitri Diana Tri Anisa ◽  
Indra Siswanti
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
The Other ◽  
Direct Result ◽  
Company Size ◽  
Significant Positive Effect ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Positive Effect

The purpose of the research is to obtain empirical evidence about the impact of profitability, company size , capital structure on firm value. And the other purpose of this research too is to determine the effect of profitability, company size on firm value mediated by capital structure.  The sample in this research is manufacturing company on Miscellaneous industry sector which listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2012 –2019. With using  purposive sampling data this research got  twelve companies as sample research. The source of the data of this research was conducted from annual report and financial report.This research is using quantitative approach with path analysis method and using SmartPLS 3.0 as analyisis tool.The result in this research has two kind of result,for direct result found that profitabilty has significant positive effect on firm value, company size has significant positive effect on firm value, capital structure has significant negative effect to firmvalue. And the result for indirect result are Capital structure is able to mediate profitability on firm value. But on the other hand capital structure is not able to mediate company size on firm value.

scholarly journals Tata kelola perusahaan dan pengaruhnya terhadap struktur modal

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-143
Author(s):  
Widijaya Widijaya ◽  
Peny Peny
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Family Ownership ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Board Size ◽  
Director Ownership ◽  
The Impact

This research aims to determine the impact of board composition, ownership structure, and firm characteristics on the capital structure of non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Board independence, Board size, audit committee, director tenure, ownership concentration, family ownership, and director ownership are used as independent variables in this study. Firm size, firm age, firm performance, firm risk, and agency costs are the control variables. Data were collected using the purposive sampling method with a total of 1,695 observational data that met the criteria for 5 years. The Panel regression method is used to analyze the impact of each independent variable on the dependent variable. The fixed-effects model is found to be the best regression model in this research. This study found that board size, director tenure, and family ownership had a significant negative impact on capital structure, while board independence, audit committee, ownership concentration, and director ownership did not impact significantly on capital structure. A larger board size forms strong corporate governance which leads to less risky capital structure decisions. Longer director tenure improves the decision quality of a capital structure, and family ownership helps to maintain firm value by ensuring capital structure decisions made are the best for the company. Ownership factors are encouraged in future studies such as foreign ownership, government ownership, and institutional ownership in examining the impact on capital structure.

scholarly journals Capital Structure-Firm Value Nexus: Moderating Role of Profitability

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-386
Author(s):  
Hamed Ahmad Almahadin ◽  
Yazan Salameh Oroud
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Panel Data Analysis ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Ample Evidence ◽  
Functional Models ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Moderating Role

This study aims to investigate the moderating role of profitability in the relationship between capital structure and firm value in Jordan, as an example of an emerging economy. For this purpose, two functional models were formulated to capture the direct relationship as well as the interaction impact of capital structure on firm value. The robust empirical findings of panel data analysis provide strong evidence of an adverse relationship between capital structure and firm value. The findings confirm that the impact of capital structure appears to be complicated in nature and difficult to examine without controlling for the interaction of profitability as one of the major determinants. Therefore, studying the interaction effect provides ample evidence and enhances the understanding of the link between firm value and capital structure. The empirical results of the study may provide important insights and policy implications to decision-makers.

scholarly journals Capital Structure and Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Kuwait Stock Exchange (KSE)

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Mejbel Al-Saidi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Government Ownership ◽  
Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Kuwait Stock Exchange ◽  
Corporate Capital Structure ◽  
The Impact

The study investigated the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on the corporate capital structure of the Kuwait Stock Exchange (KSE). Specifically, this study linked five corporate governance mechanisms—large shareholder ownership concentration, government ownership concentration, board size, board independence, and family directors—with capital structure for 81 non-financial listed firms between 2017 and 2018. The data indicated that only government ownership concentration and family directors affect capital structure.

scholarly journals The Influence of Good Corporate Governance and Capital Structure on Firm Value: The Mediation Role of Financial Performance

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 230
Author(s):  
Ridwan Nurazi ◽  
Intan Zoraya ◽  
Akram Harmoni Wiardi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Company Value ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Impact

<pre>The objective of this study is empirically identify the impacts of Good Corporate Governance and capital structure on firm value with financial performance as intervening variable. We operate quantitative approach within the scope of manufacturing company of metal, chemical, and plastic packaging sector which listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2017-2018 periods as the population. Samples are chosen by purposive sampling method inwhich the company must report the financial statement in a row, obtained 79 observations. The data analysis technique used is financial ratio analysis to determine the condition of the business financial ratios of the variables studied. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. The result shows that corporate governance and capital structure influence the firm value, moreover the use of institutional ownership ratio and capital structure will increase the value of the firm. The result also shows that the impact of Corporate governance and capital structure on the company value are mediated by financial performance. It means that the value of the firm can increase if the company able became an effective monitoring tool.</pre>

scholarly journals The Impact Of Dividend Policy, Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership To Capital Structure On Manufacturing Company In Indonesia Stock Exchange (Idx) Period 2012-2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-39
Author(s):  
Ratna Putri Indah Puspita ◽  
Suherman Suherman
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Significant Negative Effect ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Capital Structure

This study aims to determine the effect of dividend policy, managerial ownership and institutional ownership on the capital structure of manufacturing companies listed on the IDX for the 2012-2016 period. The data used in this study is an annual report of the Manufacturing Sector listed on the IDX for the period 2012-2016. By using purposive sampling method, 56 companies were obtained and consisted of 280 observations. The model used in this research is panel data analysis using the Random Effect Model approach. The results of this study indicate that the dividend policy has a positive but not significant effect on DER, but has a significant positive effect on DAR. While managerial ownership is influential but not significantly negative on the capital structure (DER and DAR). Institutional ownership has a significant negative effect on DER, but has a negative but not significant effect on DAR. Profitability has a significant negative effect on the capital structure (DER and DAR), while the structure of assets and company size does not have a significant effect on the capital structure. (DER and DAR).

scholarly journals The influence of firm, industry and concentrated ownership on dynamic capital structure decision in emerging market

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Razali Haron ◽  
Naji Mansour Nomran ◽  
Anwar Hasan Abdullah Othman ◽  
Maizaitulaidawati Md Husin ◽  
Ashurov Sharofiddin
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Dynamic Environment ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Dynamic Panel Model ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Dynamic Capital Structure

Purpose This study aims to evaluate the impact of firm, industry level determinants and ownership concentration on the dynamic capital structure decision in Indonesia and analyses the governing theories. Design/methodology/approach This study uses the dynamic panel model of generalized method of moments-System (one-step and two-step) by using a panel data from 2000 to 2014 to examine the relationship between the determinants and leverage. The results are robust to the various definitions of leverage, heterogeneity, autocorrelation, multicollinearity and endogeneity concern. Findings Growing firms and firms operating in a highly concentrated industry use high level of debt, taking advantage of the tax shield (trade-off theory). However, if the firms are operating in a highly dynamic environment, they take on less debt as to avoid bankruptcy risk. Firms in Indonesia opt for debt financing perhaps to act as a controlling mechanism to mitigate agency conflicts that may exist between the large controlling shareholders and the minority. Aged and highly profitable firms with high tangible and intangible assets and liquidity level operating in a high dynamic environment follow the pecking order theory. Research limitations/implications This study does not perform each industry regression individually. All the industries are pooled together, as the main focus of this study is to examine the factors affecting leverage of firms in general without giving particular attention to individual industry. Originality/value The insights on the impact of ownership concentration and industry characteristics are novel especially on Indonesia, thus fill the gap in the literature.

The influence of capital structure on firm profitability in USA and Bangladesh engineering industry

2021 ◽  
pp. 2150029
Author(s):  
Abdelkader Derbali
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Engineering Industry ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Return On Equity ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Real Picture ◽  
The Impact

The aim of this paper is not only to determine and compare the nature of capital structure but also its effect on company performance of engineering industry of USA and Bangladesh. We utilize a panel data methodology based on a sample of 34 listed engineering companies of Bangladesh on Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) and a mixture of 34 (small, medium and large) engineering companies listed in NASDAQ in USA during the period of study from 2012 to 2019. Our empirical results indicate that the capital structure of engineering industry of USA and that of Bangladesh is different. Also, we demonstrate that capital structure has negative effect on company profitability of engineering industry of USA. Capital structure presents a negative effect on Earning per Share and Return on Assets (ROA) and positive influence on Return on Equity (ROE) and Tobin’s Q of engineering industry of Bangladesh. We conclude that the impact of capital structure on company’s profitability by only one sector and then compare the findings to know the real picture of the link. Investors, auditors, analysts and practitioners should consider many factors to examine the banking performance. Our results from this study may relate to Asian countries with similarities in engineering industry to that in Bangladesh.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document