scholarly journals Assessing the performance of Vienna Mapping Functions 3 for GNSS stations in Indonesia using Precise Point Positioning

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 77-86
Author(s):  
Nabila Putri ◽  
Daniel Landskron ◽  
Johannes Böhm
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Elevation Angle ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Processing Scheme ◽  
Mapping Functions ◽  
Station Coordinates ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Point Positioning

Abstract. Tropospheric delay is one of the major error sources for space geodetic techniques, such as the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). Mapping functions are used to scale the delay from zenith direction to the elevation angle of the signal. Several mapping functions have already been published, including the Global Mapping Functions (GMF) and Vienna Mapping Functions 1 (VMF1). Recently, a refined version of VMF1, VMF3, was released. The tropospheric gradients GRAD were also determined using the same data set as VMF3. This study aims to test the performance of VMF3 on GNSS observations in Indonesia, using observations from 21 stations of the permanent GNSS network in Indonesia, InaCORS. Data processing was carried out using Precise Point Positioning in Bernese GNSS Software, version 5.2 for the year 2014. Station coordinates were estimated daily, while the zenith wet delays were estimated every 30 min and tropospheric gradients were estimated hourly. A similar processing scheme was carried out using GMF and VMF1. Generally, the results from VMF3 agree very well with the results from GMF and VMF1, although small biases can be found, especially for the height component. Based on the repeatability, while there is no significant difference for the latitude and longitude, there are slight improvements for the height, particularly compared to GMF. The estimated gradients tend to fluctuate more compared to gradients from GRAD. The correlation coefficients between the estimated gradients and those from GRAD are small, with the largest being 0.65 at site CUKE.

The Effect of the State-of-the-Art Mapping Functions on Precise Point Positioning

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faruk Can Durmus ◽  
Bahattin Erdogan
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Mapping Function ◽  
Empirical Models ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Mapping Functions ◽  
Point Positioning

<p>Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) are effectively used for different applications of Geomatic Engineering. There are lots of model error sources that affect the performance of the point positioning. Especially for the Precise Point Positioning (PPP) technique, which depends on the absolute point positioning, these errors should be modelled since PPP technique utilizes un-differenced and ionosphere-free combinations. Studies about PPP technique show that the effect of tropospheric delay caused by water vapor and dry air in the troposphere, which affects GNSS signals, is an important parameter should be modelled. Total zenith delay consists of both hydrostatic and wet delay. Hydrostatic delay can be accurately estimated by using atmospheric surface pressure and temperature with empirical models. Although there are many empirical models currently used for the determination of the zenith wet delay, the accuracies of these models are inadequate due to the temporal and spatial variation of atmospheric water vapor. Moreover, the tropospheric delay occurs along the path of GNSS signals and the Mapping Functions (MFs) are used to convert the tropospheric signal delay along the zenith direction to the slant direction. In this study, it is aimed to measure the effect of the globally produced MFs as Niell Mapping Function (NMF), Vienna Mapping Function 1 (VMF1), Global Mapping Function (GMF) and Global Pressure Temperature model 2 (GPT2) for GNSS positioning accuracy. Only GPS satellite system has been taken into account. For the analysis it has planned to process approximately 294 permanent stations from Crustal Dynamics Data Information System (CDDIS) archive with Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s GipsyX v1.2 software. In order to reveal the effect of different season the GPS observations in January, April, July and October, 2018 have been obtained. The solutions were derived for different session durations as 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours for each global MFs and root mean square values have been estimated for each session durations. According to the first results that based on the six points, which the ellipsoidal heights of them are between 20 m and 105 m, although the results of north and east components are close to each other; the results of VMF1 are better than other global MFs for up component.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: State-of-the-Art Mapping Function, Troposphere, Precise Point Positioning, Accuracy, GipsyX</p>

scholarly journals Estimation of Slant Tropospheric Delays from GNSS Observations with Using Precise Point Positioning Method

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 253-266
Author(s):  
Stepan Savchuk ◽  
Alina Khoptar
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Elevation Angle ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Atmospheric Parameters ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Positioning Method ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Tropospheric Delays ◽  
Gnss Observations

AbstractGlobal Navigation Satellite Systems give opportunities for atmospheric parameters analysis in behalf of solving many atmosphere monitoring tasks. The authors of this article demonstrated possibility of slant tropospheric delays determination with using precise point positioning method – PPP. The atmospheric parameters, retrieved from GNSS observations, including zenith tropospheric delays, horizontal gradients, and slant tropospheric delays, are analyzed and evaluated. It was obtained slant tropospheric delays, along the satellite path, for each satellite, at a certain elevation angle and azimuth, at each time, instead of obtaining a single zenith tropospheric delay composed of all visible satellites at one time. The results obtained proved that suggested method was correct.

The Effect of the State-of-the-Art Mapping Functions on Precise Point Positioning

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faruk Can Durmus ◽  
Bahattin Erdogan
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Mapping Function ◽  
Empirical Models ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Mapping Functions ◽  
Point Positioning

<p>Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) are effectively used for different applications of Geomatic Engineering. There are lots of model error sources that affect the performance of the point positioning. Especially for the Precise Point Positioning (PPP) technique, which depends on the absolute point positioning, these errors should be modelled since PPP technique utilizes un-differenced and ionosphere-free combinations. Studies about PPP technique show that the effect of tropospheric delay caused by water vapor and dry air in the troposphere, which affects GNSS signals, is an important parameter should be modelled. Total zenith delay consists of both hydrostatic and wet delay. Hydrostatic delay can be accurately estimated by using atmospheric surface pressure and height with empirical models. Although there are many empirical models currently used for the determination of the zenith wet delay, the accuracies of these models are inadequate due to the temporal and spatial variation of atmospheric water vapor. Moreover, the tropospheric delay occurs along the path of GNSS signals and the Mapping Functions (MFs) are used to convert the tropospheric signal delay along the zenith direction to the slant direction. In this study, it is aimed to measure the effect of the globally produced MFs as Niell Mapping Function (NMF), Vienna Mapping Function 1 (VMF1), Global Mapping Function (GMF) and Global Pressure Temperature model 2 (GPT2) for GNSS positioning accuracy. Only GPS satellite system has been taken into account. For the analysis it has planned to process approximately 294 permanent stations from Crustal Dynamics Data Information System (CDDIS) archive with Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s GipsyX v1.2 software. In order to reveal the effect of different season the GPS observations in January, April, July and October, 2018 have been obtained. The solutions were derived for different session durations as 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours for each global MFs and root mean square values have been estimated for each session durations.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: State-of-the-Art Mapping Function, Troposphere, Precise Point Positioning, Accuracy, GipsyX</p>

scholarly journals Sensitivity of GNSS tropospheric gradients to processing options

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Kačmařík ◽  
Jan Douša ◽  
Florian Zus ◽  
Pavel Václavovic ◽  
Kyriakos Balidakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Elevation Angle ◽  
Mapping Function ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Gradient Estimates ◽  
Post Processing ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Mapping Functions ◽  
Gradient Mapping

Abstract. An analysis of processing settings impacts on estimated tropospheric gradients is presented. The study is based on the benchmark data set collected within the COST GNSS4SWEC action with observations from 430 Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) reference stations in central Europe for May and June 2013. Tropospheric gradients were estimated in eight different variants of GNSS data processing using precise point positioning (PPP) with the G-Nut/Tefnut software. The impacts of the gradient mapping function, elevation cut-off angle, GNSS constellation, observation elevation-dependent weighting and real-time versus post-processing mode were assessed by comparing the variants by each to other and by evaluating them with respect to tropospheric gradients derived from two numerical weather models (NWMs). Tropospheric gradients estimated in post-processing GNSS solutions using final products were in good agreement with NWM outputs. The quality of high-resolution gradients estimated in (near-)real-time PPP analysis still remains a challenging task due to the quality of the real-time orbit and clock corrections. Comparisons of GNSS and NWM gradients suggest the 3∘ elevation angle cut-off and GPS+GLONASS constellation for obtaining optimal gradient estimates provided precise models for antenna-phase centre offsets and variations, and tropospheric mapping functions are applied for low-elevation observations. Finally, systematic errors can affect the gradient components solely due to the use of different gradient mapping functions, and still depending on observation elevation-dependent weighting. A latitudinal tilting of the troposphere in a global scale causes a systematic difference of up to 0.3 mm in the north-gradient component, while large local gradients, usually pointing in a direction of increasing humidity, can cause differences of up to 1.0 mm (or even more in extreme cases) in any component depending on the actual direction of the gradient. Although the Bar-Sever gradient mapping function provided slightly better results in some aspects, it is not possible to give any strong recommendation on the gradient mapping function selection.

scholarly journals The Impact of Different Ocean Tide Loading Models on GNSS Estimated Zenith Tropospheric Delay Using Precise Point Positioning Technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 3080
Author(s):  
Jinglei Zhang ◽  
Xiaoming Wang ◽  
Zishen Li ◽  
Shuhui Li ◽  
Cong Qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Precipitable Water ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Ocean Tide ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Ocean Tide Loading ◽  
Zenith Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact

Global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) have become an important tool to derive atmospheric products, such as the total zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) and precipitable water vapor (PWV) for weather and climate studies. The ocean tide loading (OTL) effect is one of the primary errors that affects the accuracy of GNSS-derived ZTD/PWV, which means the study and choice of the OTL model is an important issue for high-accuracy ZTD estimation. In this study, GNSS data from 1 January 2019 to 31 January 2019 are processed using precise point positioning (PPP) at globally distributed stations. The performance of seven widely used global OTL models is assessed and their impact on the GNSS-derived ZTD is investigated by comparing them against the ZTD calculated from co-located radiosonde observations. The results indicate that the inclusion or exclusion of the OTL effect will lead to a difference in ZTD of up to 3–15 mm for island stations, and up to 1–2 mm for inland stations. The difference of the ZTD determined with different OTL models is quite small, with a root-mean-square (RMS) value below 1.5 mm at most stations. The comparison between the GNSS-derived ZTD and the radiosonde-derived ZTD indicates that the adoption of OTL models can improve the accuracy of GNSS-derived ZTD. The results also indicate that the adoption of a smaller cutoff elevation, e.g., 3° or 7°, can significantly reduce the difference between the ZTDs determined by GNSS and radiosonde, when compared against a 15° cutoff elevation. Compared to the radiosonde-derived ZTD, the RMS error of GNSS-derived ZTD is approximately 25–35 mm at a cutoff elevation of 15°, and 15–25 mm when the cutoff elevation is set to 3°.

scholarly journals Analyzing the Tropospheric Delay Estimates on Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) with Precise Point Positioning (PPP) Services using the goGPS software

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Syachrul Arief ◽  
Andrea Gatti
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Estimation Process ◽  
Gnss Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Gnss Data

The tropospheric delay is an essential source of error for positioning using the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). Scientific applications of GNSS positioning such as the study of earth crust deformation and earthquake prediction require high accuracy in positioning, an analysis of tropospheric delay calculations is needed to improve the accuracy of GNSS positioning. One part of the tropospheric delay is Zenith tropospheric delays (ZTD), which are estimated using the Precise Point Positioning (PPP) method. ZTD estimates can be beneficial for meteorological applications, for example, is the estimation of water vapor levels in the atmosphere from the estimated ZTD. We use GNSS data from the BAKO station in Cibinong and JOG2 station located in Yogyakarta. The GNSS data format is an Independent Exchange Receiver (RINEX), which we extracted using the sophisticated open-source GNSS software, called goGPS version 1.0 Beta from Geomatics Research and Development s.r.l. - Lomazzo, Italy. We validate the results of the extraction process with two international tropospheric products from International GNSS Services (IGS) with commercial software Bernese version 5 and the University of Nevada Reno (UNR) with software from NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) namely GIPSY / OASIS II. Epoch in this study, we use days of the year (DOY) 022-025 / 22-25 January representing the rainy season and DOY 230-233 to coincide on August 17-20 representing the dry season 2018. Our results obtained ZTD values both in January and August, and the two BAKO and JOG2 stations were consistent and worked well at different times and stations. RMS throughout DOY, both at BAKO and JOG2 stations, show small values <2 mm. The RMS value is relatively small, meaning that the troposphere estimation process with goGPS shows a good agreement because it is almost the same as the international troposphere products from UNR and IGS. This means that the ZTD estimation process from goGPS software can be an alternative to paid software. The range of ZTD values in January tends to be higher than in August, meaning the value of ZTD has a strong correlation with changes in the rainy and dry seasons, this shows that ZTD can be useful for meteorological purposes.

scholarly journals GPS AND GLONASS COMBINED STATIC PRECISE POINT POSITIONING (PPP)

2016 ◽  
Vol XLI-B1 ◽  
pp. 483-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Pandey ◽  
R. Dwivedi ◽  
O. Dikshit ◽  
A. K. Singh
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Open Pit ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Dilution Of Precision ◽  
Satellite Visibility ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Gps Observations

With the rapid development of multi-constellation Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs), satellite navigation is undergoing drastic changes. Presently, more than 70 satellites are already available and nearly 120 more satellites will be available in the coming years after the achievement of complete constellation for all four systems- GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou. The significant improvement in terms of satellite visibility, spatial geometry, dilution of precision and accuracy demands the utilization of combining multi-GNSS for Precise Point Positioning (PPP), especially in constrained environments. Currently, PPP is performed based on the processing of only GPS observations. Static and kinematic PPP solutions based on the processing of only GPS observations is limited by the satellite visibility, which is often insufficient for the mountainous and open pit mines areas. One of the easiest options available to enhance the positioning reliability is to integrate GPS and GLONASS observations. This research investigates the efficacy of combining GPS and GLONASS observations for achieving static PPP solution and its sensitivity to different processing methodology. Two static PPP solutions, namely standalone GPS and combined GPS-GLONASS solutions are compared. The datasets are processed using the open source GNSS processing environment <i>gLAB</i> 2.2.7 as well as <i>magicGNSS</i> software package. The results reveal that the addition of GLONASS observations improves the static positioning accuracy in comparison with the standalone GPS point positioning. Further, results show that there is an improvement in the three dimensional positioning accuracy. It is also shown that the addition of GLONASS constellation improves the total number of visible satellites by more than 60% which leads to the improvement of satellite geometry represented by Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP) by more than 30%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document