scholarly journals Extreme events in gross primary production: a characterization across continents

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1869-1907 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Zscheischler ◽  
M. D. Mahecha ◽  
S. Harmeling ◽  
A. Rammig ◽  
E. Tomelleri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South America ◽  
Primary Production ◽  
Extreme Events ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Climate Extremes ◽  
Terrestrial Ecosystems ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Early Summer ◽  
Seasonal Effects ◽  
Data Sets

Abstract. Climate extremes can affect the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems, for instance via a reduction of the photosynthetic capacity or alterations of respiratory processes. Yet the dominant regional and seasonal effects of hydrometeorological extremes are still not well documented. Here we quantify and characterize the role of large spatiotemporal extreme events in gross primary production (GPP) as triggers of continental anomalies. We also investigate seasonal dynamics of extreme impacts on continental GPP anomalies. We find that the 50 largest positive (increase in uptake) and negative extremes (decrease in uptake) on each continent can explain most of the continental variation in GPP, which is in line with previous results obtained at the global scale. We show that negative extremes are larger than positive ones and demonstrate that this asymmetry is particularly strong in South America and Europe. Most extremes in GPP start in early summer. Our analysis indicates that the overall impacts and the spatial extents of GPP extremes are power law distributed with exponents that vary little across continents. Moreover, we show that on all continents and for all data sets the spatial extents play a more important role than durations or maximal GPP anomaly when it comes to the overall impact of GPP extremes. An analysis of possible causes implies that across continents most extremes in GPP can best be explained by water scarcity rather than by extreme temperatures. However, for Europe, South America and Oceania we identify also fire as an important driver. Our findings are consistent with remote sensing products. An independent validation against a literature survey on specific extreme events supports our results to a large extent.

scholarly journals Extreme events in gross primary production: a characterization across continents

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2909-2924 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Zscheischler ◽  
M. Reichstein ◽  
S. Harmeling ◽  
A. Rammig ◽  
E. Tomelleri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South America ◽  
Primary Production ◽  
Extreme Events ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Climate Extremes ◽  
Terrestrial Ecosystems ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Seasonal Effects ◽  
Carbon Uptake ◽  
Uptake Rates

Abstract. Climate extremes can affect the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems, for instance via a reduction of the photosynthetic capacity or alterations of respiratory processes. Yet the dominant regional and seasonal effects of hydrometeorological extremes are still not well documented and in the focus of this paper. Specifically, we quantify and characterize the role of large spatiotemporal extreme events in gross primary production (GPP) as triggers of continental anomalies. We also investigate seasonal dynamics of extreme impacts on continental GPP anomalies. We find that the 50 largest positive extremes (i.e., statistically unusual increases in carbon uptake rates) and negative extremes (i.e., statistically unusual decreases in carbon uptake rates) on each continent can explain most of the continental variation in GPP, which is in line with previous results obtained at the global scale. We show that negative extremes are larger than positive ones and demonstrate that this asymmetry is particularly strong in South America and Europe. Our analysis indicates that the overall impacts and the spatial extents of GPP extremes are power-law distributed with exponents that vary little across continents. Moreover, we show that on all continents and for all data sets the spatial extents play a more important role for the overall impact of GPP extremes compared to the durations or maximal GPP. An analysis of possible causes across continents indicates that most negative extremes in GPP can be attributed clearly to water scarcity, whereas extreme temperatures play a secondary role. However, for Europe, South America and Oceania we also identify fire as an important driver. Our findings are consistent with remote sensing products. An independent validation against a literature survey on specific extreme events supports our results to a large extent.

scholarly journals Vegetation modulates the impact of climate extremes on gross primary production

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milan Flach ◽  
Alexander Brenning ◽  
Fabian Gans ◽  
Markus Reichstein ◽  
Sebastian Sippel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Primary Production ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Climate Extremes ◽  
Co2 Flux ◽  
Terrestrial Ecosystems ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
The One ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Heat Events

Abstract. Drought and heat events affect the uptake and sequestration of carbon in terrestrial ecosystems. Factors such as the duration, timing and intensity of extreme events influence the magnitude of impacts on ecosystem processes such as gross primary production (GPP), i.e. the ecosystem uptake of CO2. Preceding soil moisture depletion may exacerbate these impacts. However, some vegetation types may be more resilient to climate extremes than others. This effect is insufficiently understood at the global scale and is the focus of this study. Using a global upscaled product of GPP that scales up in-situ land CO2 flux observations with global satellite remote sensing, we study the impact of climate extremes at the global scale. We find that GPP in grasslands and agricultural areas is generally reduced during heat and drought events. However, we also find that forests, if considered globally, appear not in general to be particularly sensitive to droughts and heat events that occurred during the analyzed period or even show increased GPP values during these events. On the one hand, this is in many cases plausible, e.g. when no negative preconditioning has occurred. On the other hand, however, this may also reflect a lack of sensitivity in current remote sensing derived GPP products to the effects of droughts and heatwaves. The overall picture calls for a differentiated consideration of different land cover types in the assessments of risks of climate extremes for ecosystem functioning.

scholarly journals Vegetation modulates the impact of climate extremes on gross primary production

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-53
Author(s):  
Milan Flach ◽  
Alexander Brenning ◽  
Fabian Gans ◽  
Markus Reichstein ◽  
Sebastian Sippel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Primary Production ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Climate Extremes ◽  
Co2 Flux ◽  
Terrestrial Ecosystems ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
The One ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Heat Events

Abstract. Drought and heat events affect the uptake and sequestration of carbon in terrestrial ecosystems. Factors such as the duration, timing, and intensity of extreme events influence the magnitude of impacts on ecosystem processes such as gross primary production (GPP), i.e., the ecosystem uptake of CO2. Preceding soil moisture depletion may exacerbate these impacts. However, some vegetation types may be more resilient to climate extremes than others. This effect is insufficiently understood at the global scale and is the focus of this study. Using a global upscaled product of GPP that scales up in situ land CO2 flux observations with global satellite remote sensing, we study the impact of climate extremes at the global scale. We find that GPP in grasslands and agricultural areas is generally reduced during heat and drought events. However, we also find that forests, if considered globally, appear in general to not be particularly sensitive to droughts and heat events that occurred during the analyzed period or even show increased GPP values during these events. On the one hand, normal-to-increased GPP values are in many cases plausible, e.g., when conditions prior to the event have been particularly positive. On the other hand, however, normal-to-increased GPP values in forests may also reflect a lack of sensitivity in current remote-sensing-derived GPP products to the effects of droughts and heatwaves. The overall picture calls for a differentiated consideration of different land cover types in the assessments of risks of climate extremes for ecosystem functioning.

scholarly journals Tipping the ENSO into a permanent El Niño can trigger state transitions in global terrestrial ecosystems

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mateo Duque-Villegas ◽  
Juan F. Salazar ◽  
Angela M. Rendón
Keyword(s):  
Primary Production ◽  
El Niño ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
El Nino ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Terrestrial Ecosystems ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
State Transitions

Abstract. Some large-scale components of the Earth's climate system have been identified as policy-relevant tipping elements, meaning that anthropogenic forcing and perturbations may push them across a tipping point threshold, with potential global scale impact on ecosystems and concomitant environmental and social phenomena. A pronounced change in the amplitude and/or frequency of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is among such tipping elements. Here we use the Planet Simulator (PlaSim), an Earth system model of intermediate complexity, to investigate the potential impact on global climate and terrestrial ecosystems of shifting the current dynamics of the ENSO into a permanent El Niño. When forced with sea surface temperature (SST) derived from observations, the PlaSim model yields a realistic representation of large-scale climatological patterns, including realistic estimates of the global energy and water balances, and gross primary production. In a permanent El Niño state, we found significant differences in the global distribution of water and energy fluxes, and associated impacts on gross primary production, indicating that vegetation productivity decreases in the tropics whereas it increases in temperate and boreal regions. We identify regions in which these El Niño-induced changes are consistent with potential state transitions in global terrestrial ecosystems, including potential dieback of the Amazon rainforest, southward expansion of the Sahel, and further aridification of Australia.

scholarly journals Investigating uncertainties in global gridded datasets of climate extremes

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 2171-2199 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. H. Dunn ◽  
M. G. Donat ◽  
L. V. Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Climate Extremes ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Spatially Correlated ◽  
Related Data ◽  
Methodological Choices ◽  
Surface Time ◽  
Station Density

Abstract. We assess the effects of different methodological choices made during the construction of gridded data sets of climate extremes, focusing primarily on HadEX2. Using global land-surface time series of the indices and their coverage, as well as uncertainty maps, we show that the choices which have the greatest effect are those relating to the station network used or that drastically change the values for individual grid boxes. The latter are most affected by the number of stations required in or around a grid box and the gridding method used. Most parametric changes have a small impact, on global and on grid box scales, whereas structural changes to the methods or input station networks may have large effects. On grid box scales, trends in temperature indices are very robust to most choices, especially in areas which have high station density (e.g. North America, Europe and Asia). The precipitation indices, being less spatially correlated, can be more susceptible to methodological choices, but coherent changes are still clear in regions of high station density. Regional trends from all indices derived from areas with few stations should be treated with care. On a global scale, the linear trends over 1951–2010 from almost all choices fall within the 5–95th percentile range of trends from HadEX2. This demonstrates the robust nature of HadEX2 and related data sets to choices in the creation method.

scholarly journals A few extreme events dominate global interannual variability in gross primary production

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 035001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Zscheischler ◽  
Miguel D Mahecha ◽  
Jannis von Buttlar ◽  
Stefan Harmeling ◽  
Martin Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Production ◽  
Interannual Variability ◽  
Extreme Events ◽  
Gross Primary Production

Response of tropical terrestrial gross primary production to the super El Niño event in 2015

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiawen Zhu ◽  
Minghua Zhang ◽  
Yao Zhang ◽  
Xiaodong Zeng ◽  
Xiangming Xiao
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Cycle ◽  
Primary Production ◽  
Tropical Forests ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Terrestrial Ecosystem ◽  
Terrestrial Ecosystems ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Climate Data

<p>The Gross Primary Production (GPP) in tropical terrestrial ecosystems plays a critical role in the global carbon cycle and climate change. The strong 2015–2016 El Niño event offers a unique opportunity to investigate how GPP in the tropical terrestrial ecosystems responds to climatic forcing. This study uses two GPP products and concurrent climate data to investigate the GPP anomalies and their underlying causes. We find that both GPP products show an enhanced GPP in 2015 for the tropical terrestrial ecosystem as a whole relative to the multi-year mean of 2001–2015, and this enhancement is the net result of GPP increase in tropical forests and decrease in non-forests. We show that the increased GPP in tropical forests during the El Nino event is consistent with increased photosynthesis active radiation as a result of a reduction in clouds, while the decreased GPP in non-forests is consistent with increased water stress as a result of a reduction of precipitation and an increase of temperature. These results reveal the strong coupling of ecosystem and climate that is different in forest and non-forest ecosystems, and provide a test case for carbon cycle parameterization and carbon-climate feedback simulation in models.</p>

Inferring non-steady-state terrestrial vegetation carbon turnover times from multi-decadal space-borne observations on global scale

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naixin Fan ◽  
Simon Besnard ◽  
Maurizio Santoro ◽  
Oliver Cartus ◽  
Nuno Carvalhais
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Carbon Fixation ◽  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Terrestrial Ecosystems ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Turnover Time ◽  
Terrestrial Vegetation ◽  
Time Step

<p>The global biomass is determined by the vegetation turnover times (τ) and carbon fixation through photosynthesis. Vegetation turnover time is a central parameter that not only partially determines the terrestrial carbon sink but also the response of terrestrial vegetation to the future changes in climate. However, the change of magnitude, spatial patterns and uncertainties in τ as well as the sensitivity of these processes to climate change is not well understood due to lack of observations on global scale. In this study, we explore a new dataset of annual above-ground biomass (AGB) change from 1993 to 2018 from spaceborne scatterometer observations. Using the long-term, spatial-explicit global dynamic dataset, we investigated how τ change over almost three decades including the uncertainties. Previous estimations of τ under steady-state assumption can now be challenged acknowledging that terrestrial ecosystems are, for the most of cases, not in balance. In this study, we explore this new dataset to derive global maps of τ in non-steady-state for different periods of time. We used a non-steady-state carbon model in which the change of AGB is a function of Gross Primary Production (GPP) and τ (ΔAGB = α*GPP-AGB/ τ). The parameter α represents the percentage of incorporation of carbon from GPP to biomass. By exploring the AGB change in 5 to 10 years of time step, we were able to infer τ and α from the observations of AGB and GPP change by solving the linear equation. We show how τ changes after potential disturbances in the early 2000s in comparison to the previous decade. We also show the spatial distributions of α from the change of AGB. By accessing the change in biomass, τ and α as well as their associated uncertainties, we provide a comprehensive diagnostic on the vegetation dynamics and the potential response of biomass to disturbance and to climate change.   </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document