In situ probing and evaluation of two different electrode materials in bio electrochemical systems by means of Optical Coherence Tomography on automated robotic platform

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinpeng Liu ◽  
Harald Horn ◽  
Michael Wagner

<p>Carbon-based and stainless steel-based materials are widely utilized as anode/cathode electrodes in bio electrochemical systems (BESs) due to its low capital cost, high conductivity and large specific surface area. Carbon-based materials such as carbon veil are mostly applied in lab-scale reactors because of its versatile shape and configuration. Moreover, stainless steel type materials show higher strength and are easier to incorporate within flow field. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) as an image technique is a suitable method to monitor biofilm growth and fluid-structure interactions at the meso-scale. In BESs, investigating bulk-biofilm interface (fluid-structure interactions) is of particular interest to optimize the mass transfer under suitable hydrodynamic condition and enhances the overall effectivity of BESs systems. To extend the knowledge about the influence of different anode electrodes as substratum on OCT monitoring and quantification, the biofilm structural properties analyzed by OCT image processing and bioelectrochemical systems performance were compared.  </p> <p>A custom-designed dual-chamber setup was constructed by two transparent optical flow cells and fixed in the automated monitoring platform (Evobot). Herein, we applied OCT to in-situ characterize and quantify the biofilm structure properties on two different anode electrodes (carbon veil-CV and porous stainless steel-SS) as substratum in microbial fuel cell (MFC) mode.  3D OCT dataset analysis presented 3 structural parameters for biofilm-carbon veil interface and 5 structural parameters for biofilm-stainless steel interface, separately. Biofilm volume (BioV) was calculated to compare CV and SS anode electrodes.</p> <p>In this study, a time-series of biofilm development was performed on both CV and SS materials. At the fourth day, the biofilm almost covered the entire anode surface and achieved 97% substratum coverage. Afterwards the biofilm grew mostly in vertical direction. With the further biofilm growth along height the electric resistance increased and power production gradually reached the equilibrium. Nevertheless, both materials did not show predominant advantage on power production. Furthermore, a relatively small error appeared on quantitative analysis of Biofilm volume using stainless steel. Whereas, the predictability of biofilm volume on the carbon veil anodes was hindered by the appearance of shadowing effects. Thus, it can be concluded that stainless steel flat plate electrode is preferable as anode material to investigate the interaction between biofilm structure, hydrodynamic conditions and mass transfer in BESs via OCT.</p>

1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 115-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Picioreanu ◽  
M. C. M. van Loosdrecht ◽  
J. J. Heijnen

A fully quantitative two- and three-dimensional approach for biofilm growth and structure formation has been developed. The present model incorporates the flow over the irregular biofilm surface, convective and diffusive mass transfer of substrate, bacterial growth and biomass spreading. A future model will also include a mechanism for biofilm detachment due to biofilm deformation stress. Any arbitrary shape of the carrier surface can be accommodated in the model, as well as multispecies and multisubstrate biofilms. Results of model simulations show that the ratio between nutrient transfer rate to the biofilm and the bacterial growth rate influences to a great extent the biofilm roughness and porosity. A low mass transfer rate, i.e., low Reynolds numbers or high values of Thiele modulus, results in the development of a rough and open biofilm. When the biofilm growth is not limited by the substrate availability but by the rate of bacterial metabolism, the biofilm forms as a compact and homogeneous structure. The multidimensional biofilm modelling approach we used is very suitable for theoretical investigation of factors that affect biofilm structure and ecology.


1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zbigniew Lewandowski ◽  
Derek Webb ◽  
Martin Hamilton ◽  
Gary Harkin

This article defines some quantitative parameters for describing the structure of a biofilm. The parameters can be calculated from a two-dimensional cross-sectional image on a plane parallel to the substratum within an in situ biofilm. Such images can be acquired using a confocal scanning laser microscope (CSLM). The parameters will eventually be used for eliciting relationships between the biofilm's structure and its biochemical function, and for computer model evaluation. The results shown here indicate that the structural parameters appear to be reaching steady-state conditions as the biofilm grows to a steady state.


2012 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1069-1074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuharu Shiwa ◽  
Hiroyuki Masuda ◽  
Hisashi Yamawaki ◽  
Kaita Ito ◽  
Manabu Enoki

1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan N. Jordan ◽  
Eric P. Nichols ◽  
Alfred B. Cunningham

Bioavailability is herein defined as the accessibility of a substrate by a microorganism. Further, bioavailability is governed by (1) the substrate concentration that the cell membrane “sees,” (i.e., the “directly bioavailable” pool) as well as (2) the rate of mass transfer from potentially bioavailable (e.g., nonaqueous) phases to the directly bioavailable (e.g., aqueous) phase. Mechanisms by which sorbed (bio)surfactants influence these two processes are discussed. We propose the hypothesis that the sorption of (bio)surfactants at the solid-liquid interface is partially responsible for the increased bioavailability of surface-bound nutrients, and offer this as a basis for suggesting the development of engineered in-situ bioremediation technologies that take advantage of low (bio)surfactant concentrations. In addition, other industrial systems where bioavailability phenomena should be considered are addressed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 53-58
Author(s):  
Kirill Kurgan ◽  
Anatoliy Klopotov ◽  
Vasiliy Klimenov ◽  
Michael Slobodyan ◽  
Artem Ustinov ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document