Constraints on European temperature and rainfall changes from attributed changes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Hegerl ◽  
Andrew Ballinger ◽  
Sabine Undorf
Keyword(s):  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Internal Variability ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
The North ◽  
Mitigation And Adaptation ◽  
The North Atlantic Oscillation

<p>Quantifying and reducing the uncertainty of climate projections will benefit both mitigation and adaptation decisions. Observed climate change provides evaluation of climate model simulated change, but the contribution by different external forcing factors needs to be reliably separated in order to use observational constraints. We revisit this ASK (for Allen et al., 2000; Stott and Kettleborough, 2002) approach to use attributed responses to greenhouse gas forcing to constrain future predictions.</p><p>We derive constraints on the projected near-surface summer temperature change over Europe as well as over three European subregions. The temperature responses to different external forcings (natural and greenhouse-gas (GHG) or combined anthropogenic) are estimated as the multi-model means of historical simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 and incoming CMIP6, and the range of factors by which they can be scaled and still be consistent with observations since 1950 (E-OBS) given internal variability is calculated and applied to future RCP8.5 simulations.</p><p>Results show that both the response to GHG-only and to the combined anthropogenic (including aerosols etc.) forcing are detectable in the observed temperature change over Europe, and that the response over the Mediterranean region might be underestimated. Observed precipitation changes over Europe are also detected over some regions, although the confounding effects of the North Atlantic Oscillation need to be considered carefully. The results demonstrate the successful application of the ASK method for constraining projections of regional change over Europe.</p><p> </p>

Linking marine fog variability in Atlantic Canada to changes in large-scale atmospheric and marine features

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Duplessis ◽  
Minghong Zhang ◽  
William Perrie ◽  
George A Isaac ◽  
Rachel Y W Chang
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Internal Variability ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Atlantic Canada ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
The North ◽  
Marine Traffic ◽  
Highly Correlated

<p>Marine and coastal fog forms mainly from the cooling of warm and moist air advected over a colder sea surface. Atlantic Canada is one of the foggiest regions of the world due to the strong temperature contrast between the two oceanic currents in the vicinity. Recurring periods of low visibility notably disrupt off-shore operations and marine traffic, but also land and air transportation. On longer time-scales, marine fog variability also has a significant impact on the global radiative budget. Clouds, including fog, are the greatest source of uncertainty in the current climate projections because of their complex feedback mechanisms. Meteorological records indicate a significant negative trend in the occurrence of foggy conditions over the past six decades at most airports in Atlantic Canada, with large internal variability, including interannual and interdecadal variations. Using the airport observations, reanalysis data and climate model outputs, we investigated the various variabilities on the trend, at interannual and interdecadal scales, and attempted to address what caused these changes in fog frequency. Our results show that the strength and position of the North Atlantic Subtropical High as well as the sea-surface temperature of the cold and warm waters near Atlantic Canada were highly correlated with fog occurrence. We applied the derived fog indices on climate model outputs and projected the fog trends and variability in the different future climate scenarios. The results from this study will be compared with those obtained from other methods and the implications will be discussed.</p>

scholarly journals Probabilistic Concepts in Intermediate-Complexity Climate Models: A Snapshot Attractor Picture

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 259-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mátyás Herein ◽  
János Márfy ◽  
Gábor Drótos ◽  
Tamás Tél
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Internal Variability ◽  
Co2 Concentration ◽  
Ensemble Average ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Intermediate Complexity ◽  
The North

Abstract A time series resulting from a single initial condition is shown to be insufficient for quantifying the internal variability in a climate model, and thus one is unable to make meaningful climate projections based on it. The authors argue that the natural distribution, obtained from an ensemble of trajectories differing solely in their initial conditions, of the snapshot attractor corresponding to a particular forcing scenario should be determined in order to quantify internal variability and to characterize any instantaneous state of the system in the future. Furthermore, as a simple measure of internal variability of any particular variable of the model, the authors suggest using its instantaneous ensemble standard deviation. These points are illustrated with the intermediate-complexity climate model Planet Simulator forced by a CO2 scenario, with a 40-member ensemble. In particular, the leveling off of the time dependence of any ensemble average is shown to provide a much clearer indication of reaching a steady state than any property of single time series. Shifts in ensemble averages are indicative of climate changes. The dynamical character of such changes is illustrated by hysteresis-like curves obtained by plotting the ensemble average surface temperature versus the CO2 concentration. The internal variability is found to be the most pronounced on small geographical scales. The traditionally used 30-yr temporal averages are shown to be considerably different from the corresponding ensemble averages. Finally, the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index, related to the teleconnection paradigm, is also investigated. It is found that the NAO time series strongly differs in any individual realization from each other and from the ensemble average, and climatic trends can be extracted only from the latter.

scholarly journals The Downward Influence of Stratospheric Sudden Warmings*

2014 ◽  
Vol 71 (10) ◽  
pp. 3856-3876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hitchcock ◽  
Isla R. Simpson
Keyword(s):  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Similar Response ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Annular Mode ◽  
The North ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Stratospheric Sudden Warmings ◽  
Downward Influence ◽  
The North Atlantic Oscillation

Abstract The coupling between the stratosphere and the troposphere following two major stratospheric sudden warmings is studied in the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model using a nudging technique by which the zonal-mean evolution of the reference sudden warmings are artificially induced in an ~100-member ensemble spun off from a control simulation. Both reference warmings are taken from a freely running integration of the model. One event is a displacement, the other is a split, and both are followed by extended recoveries in the lower stratosphere. The methodology permits a statistically robust study of their influence on the troposphere below. The nudged ensembles exhibit a tropospheric annular mode response closely analogous to that seen in observations, confirming the downward influence of sudden warmings on the troposphere in a comprehensive model. This tropospheric response coincides more closely with the lower-stratospheric annular mode anomalies than with the midstratospheric wind reversal. In addition to the expected synoptic-scale eddy feedback, the planetary-scale eddies also reinforce the tropospheric wind changes, apparently responding directly to the stratospheric anomalies. Furthermore, despite the zonal symmetry of the stratospheric perturbation, a highly zonally asymmetric near-surface response is produced, corresponding to a strongly negative phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation with a much weaker response over the Pacific basin that matches composites of sudden warmings from the Interim ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim). Phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project models exhibit a similar response, though in most models the response’s magnitude is underrepresented.

Using a nested single-model large ensemble to assess the internal variability of the North Atlantic Oscillation and its climatic implications for Central Europe

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Böhnisch ◽  
Ralf Ludwig ◽  
Martin Leduc
Keyword(s):  
North Atlantic ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Internal Variability ◽  
Single Model ◽  
Large Ensemble ◽  
Central European ◽  
The North ◽  
Temperature And Precipitation ◽  
The North Atlantic Oscillation

<p>The ClimEx-project ("Climate change and hydrological extreme events"; www.climex-project.org) provides a single-model initial-condition ensemble that is unprecedented in terms of size, resolution and domain coverage: 50 members of the Canadian Earth System Model version 2 (CanESM2 Large Ensemble, 2.8° spatial resolution) are downscaled using the Canadian Regional Climate Model version 5 (CRCM5 Large Ensemble, 0.11° spatial and up to hourly temporal resolution) over two domains, Europe and northeastern North America. The high-resolution climate information serves as input for hydrological simulations to investigate the impact of internal variability and climate change on hydrometeorological extremes.</p><p>This study evaluates the downscaling of a teleconnection which affects northern hemisphere climate variability, the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), within the nested single-model large ensemble of the ClimEx project. The overall goal of this study is to assess whether the range of NAO internal variability is represented consistently between the driving global climate model (GCM, i.e., the CanESM2) and the nested regional climate model (RCM, i.e., the CRCM5).</p><p>The NAO pressure dipole is quantified in the CanESM2-LE; responses of mean surface air temperature and total precipitation sum to changes in the NAO index are evaluated within a Central European domain in both the CanESM2-LE and the CRCM5-LE. NAO–response relationships are expressed via Pearson correlation coefficients and the change per unit index change for historical (1981–2010) and future (2070–2099) winters.</p><p>Results show that statistically robust NAO patterns are found in the CanESM2-LE under current forcing conditions, and reproductions of the NAO flow pattern present in the CanESM2-LE produce plausible temperature and precipitation responses in the high-resolution CRCM5-LE. The NAO–response relationship is more strongly evolved in the CRCM5-LE than in the CanESM2-LE, but the inter-member spread shows no significant differences: thus internal variability expressed as inter-member spread can be seen as being represented consistently between the GCM and RCM. NAO–response relationships weaken in the future period in both the CanESM2-LE and CRCM5-LE, suggesting that the NAO influence on Central European temperature and precipitation decreases.</p><p>The results stress the advantages of a single-model ensemble regarding the evaluation of internal variability. They also strengthen the validity of the nested ensemble for further impact modelling using RCM data only, since important large-scale teleconnections present in the driving GCM propagate properly to the fine scale dynamics in the RCM.</p>

scholarly journals Using a nested single-model large ensemble to assess the internal variability of the North Atlantic Oscillation and its climatic implications for central Europe

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 617-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Böhnisch ◽  
Ralf Ludwig ◽  
Martin Leduc
Keyword(s):  
Regional Climate Model ◽  
North Atlantic ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Internal Variability ◽  
Single Model ◽  
Central European ◽  
The North ◽  
The North Atlantic Oscillation

Abstract. Central European weather and climate are closely related to atmospheric mass advection triggered by the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), which is a relevant index for quantifying internal climate variability on multi-annual timescales. It remains unclear, however, how large-scale circulation variability affects local climate characteristics when downscaled using a regional climate model. In this study, 50 members of a single-model initial-condition large ensemble (LE) of a nested regional climate model are analyzed for a NAO–climate relationship. The overall goal of the study is to assess whether the range of NAO internal variability is represented consistently between the driving global climate model (GCM; the Canadian Earth System Model version 2 – CanESM2) and the nested regional climate model (RCM; the Canadian Regional Climate Model version 5 – CRCM5). Responses of mean surface air temperature and total precipitation to changes in the NAO index value are examined in a central European domain in both CanESM2-LE and CRCM5-LE via Pearson correlation coefficients and the change per unit index change for historical (1981–2010) and future (2070–2099) winters. Results show that statistically robust NAO patterns are found in the CanESM2-LE under current forcing conditions. NAO flow pattern reproductions in the CanESM2-LE trigger responses in the high-resolution CRCM5-LE that are comparable to reanalysis data. NAO–response relationships weaken in the future period, but their inter-member spread shows no significant change. The results stress the value of single-model ensembles for the evaluation of internal variability by pointing out the large differences of NAO–response relationships among individual members. They also strengthen the validity of the nested ensemble for further impact modeling using RCM data only, since important large-scale teleconnections present in the driving data propagate properly to the fine-scale dynamics in the RCM.

scholarly journals The Interpretation and Use of Biases in Decadal Climate Predictions

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 2931-2947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ed Hawkins ◽  
Buwen Dong ◽  
Jon Robson ◽  
Rowan Sutton ◽  
Doug Smith
Keyword(s):  
Climate Model ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Internal Variability ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Start Time ◽  
Transient Climate Response ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Decadal Climate ◽  
Highly Correlated ◽  
Hadley Centre

Abstract Decadal climate predictions exhibit large biases, which are often subtracted and forgotten. However, understanding the causes of bias is essential to guide efforts to improve prediction systems, and may offer additional benefits. Here the origins of biases in decadal predictions are investigated, including whether analysis of these biases might provide useful information. The focus is especially on the lead-time-dependent bias tendency. A “toy” model of a prediction system is initially developed and used to show that there are several distinct contributions to bias tendency. Contributions from sampling of internal variability and a start-time-dependent forcing bias can be estimated and removed to obtain a much improved estimate of the true bias tendency, which can provide information about errors in the underlying model and/or errors in the specification of forcings. It is argued that the true bias tendency, not the total bias tendency, should be used to adjust decadal forecasts. The methods developed are applied to decadal hindcasts of global mean temperature made using the Hadley Centre Coupled Model, version 3 (HadCM3), climate model, and it is found that this model exhibits a small positive bias tendency in the ensemble mean. When considering different model versions, it is shown that the true bias tendency is very highly correlated with both the transient climate response (TCR) and non–greenhouse gas forcing trends, and can therefore be used to obtain observationally constrained estimates of these relevant physical quantities.

scholarly journals Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 491-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flavio Lehner ◽  
Clara Deser ◽  
Nicola Maher ◽  
Jochem Marotzke ◽  
Erich M. Fischer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coupled Model ◽  
Internal Variability ◽  
Potential Method ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Future Climate Change ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Good Representation ◽  
Transient Climate Response ◽  
Large Ensembles ◽  
Method Bias

Abstract. Partitioning uncertainty in projections of future climate change into contributions from internal variability, model response uncertainty and emissions scenarios has historically relied on making assumptions about forced changes in the mean and variability. With the advent of multiple single-model initial-condition large ensembles (SMILEs), these assumptions can be scrutinized, as they allow a more robust separation between sources of uncertainty. Here, the framework from Hawkins and Sutton (2009) for uncertainty partitioning is revisited for temperature and precipitation projections using seven SMILEs and the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project CMIP5 and CMIP6 archives. The original approach is shown to work well at global scales (potential method bias < 20 %), while at local to regional scales such as British Isles temperature or Sahel precipitation, there is a notable potential method bias (up to 50 %), and more accurate partitioning of uncertainty is achieved through the use of SMILEs. Whenever internal variability and forced changes therein are important, the need to evaluate and improve the representation of variability in models is evident. The available SMILEs are shown to be a good representation of the CMIP5 model diversity in many situations, making them a useful tool for interpreting CMIP5. CMIP6 often shows larger absolute and relative model uncertainty than CMIP5, although part of this difference can be reconciled with the higher average transient climate response in CMIP6. This study demonstrates the added value of a collection of SMILEs for quantifying and diagnosing uncertainty in climate projections.

Comparison of different infiltration schemes in the regional climate model REMO

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Abel ◽  
Katrin Ziegler ◽  
Felix Pollinger ◽  
Heiko Paeth
Keyword(s):  
Regional Climate Model ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Root Zone ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Soil Hydrology ◽  
Spatiotemporal Resolution ◽  
Development Fund ◽  
Near Surface

&lt;p&gt;The European Regional Development Fund-Project BigData@Geo aims to create highly resolved climate projections for the model region of Lower Franconia in Bavaria, Germany. These projections are analyzed and made available to local stakeholders of agriculture, forestry, and viniculture as well as general public. Since regional climate models&amp;#8217; spatiotemporal resolution often is too coarse to deal with such local issues, the regional climate model REMO is improved within the frame of the project in cooperation with the Climate Service Center Germany (GERICS).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Accurate and highly resolved climate projections require realistic modeling of soil hydrology. Thus, REMO&amp;#8217;s original bucket scheme is replaced by a 5-layer soil scheme. It allows for the representation of water below the root zone. Evaporation is possible solely from the top layer instead of the entire bucket and water can flow vertically between the layers. Consequently, the properties and processes change significantly compared to the bucket scheme. Both, the bucket and the 5-layer scheme, use the improved Arno scheme to separate throughfall into infiltration and surface runoff.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this study, we examine if this scheme is suitable for use with the improved soil hydrology or if other schemes lead to better results. For this, we (1) modify the improved Arno scheme and further introduce the infiltration equations of (2) Philip as well as (3) Green and Ampt. First results of the comparison of these four different schemes and their influence on soil moisture and near-surface atmospheric variables are presented.&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals The Linear Sensitivity of the North Atlantic Oscillation and Eddy-Driven Jet to SSTs

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (19) ◽  
pp. 6491-6511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh S. Baker ◽  
Tim Woollings ◽  
Chris E. Forest ◽  
Myles R. Allen
Keyword(s):  
Indian Ocean ◽  
North Atlantic Oscillation ◽  
North Atlantic ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Internal Variability ◽  
The North ◽  
The Indian Ocean ◽  
The North Atlantic ◽  
The North Atlantic Oscillation ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and eddy-driven jet contain a forced component arising from sea surface temperature (SST) variations. Due to large amounts of internal variability, it is not trivial to determine where and to what extent SSTs force the NAO and jet. A linear statistical–dynamic method is employed with a large climate ensemble to compute the sensitivities of the winter and summer NAO and jet speed and latitude to the SSTs. Key regions of sensitivity are identified in the Indian and Pacific basins, and the North Atlantic tripole. Using the sensitivity maps and a long observational SST dataset, skillful reconstructions of the NAO and jet time series are made. The ability to skillfully forecast both the winter and summer NAO using only SST anomalies is also demonstrated. The linear approach used here allows precise attribution of model forecast signals to SSTs in particular regions. Skill comes from the Atlantic and Pacific basins on short lead times, while the Indian Ocean SSTs may contribute to the longer-term NAO trend. However, despite the region of high sensitivity in the Indian Ocean, SSTs here do not provide significant skill on interannual time scales, which highlights the limitations of the imposed SST approach. Given the impact of the NAO and jet on Northern Hemisphere weather and climate, these results provide useful information that could be used for improved attribution and forecasting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document