Take one dispersing plume and add some precipitation: using ensembles to simulate deposition uncertainty

Author(s):  
Susan Leadbetter ◽  
Peter Bedwell ◽  
Gertie Geertsema ◽  
Irene Korsakissok ◽  
Jasper Tomas ◽  
...  

<p>In the event of an accidental airborne release of radioactive material, dispersion models would be used to simulate the spread of the pollutant in the atmosphere and its subsequent deposition. Typically, meteorological information is provided to dispersion models from numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. As these NWP models have increased in resolution their ability to resolve short-lived, heavy precipitation events covering smaller areas has improved. This has led to more realistic looking precipitation forecasts. However, when traditional statistics comparing precipitation predictions to measurements at a point (e.g. an observation site) are used, these high-resolution models appear to have a lower skill in predicting precipitation due to small differences in the location and timing of the precipitation with respect to the observations. This positional error is carried through to the dispersion model resulting in predictions of high deposits where none are observed and vice versa; a problem known as the double penalty problem in meteorology.</p><p>Since observations are not available at the onset of an event, it is crucial to gain insight into the possible location and timing errors. One method to address this issue is to use ensemble meteorological data as input to the dispersion model. Meteorological ensembles are typically generated by running multiple model integrations where each model integration starts from a perturbed initial state and uses slightly different model parametrisations to represent uncertainty in the atmospheric state and its evolution. Ensemble meteorological data provide several possible predictions of the precipitation that are all considered to be equally likely and this allows the dispersion model to produce several possible predictions of the deposits of radioactive material.</p><p>As part of the Euratom funded project, CONFIDENCE, a case study involving the passage of a warm front, where the timing of the front is uncertain in relation to a hypothetical nuclear accident in Europe was examined. In this study a ten-member meteorological ensemble was generated using time lagged forecasts to simulate perturbations in the initial state and two different model parameterisations. This meteorological ensemble was used as input to a single dispersion model to generate a dispersion model ensemble. The resulting ensemble dispersion output and methods to communicate the uncertainty in the deposition and the resulting uncertainty in the air concentration predictions are presented. The results demonstrate how high-resolution meteorological ensembles can be combined with dispersion models to simulate the maximum impact of precipitation and the uncertainty in its position and timing.</p>

2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 577-596
Author(s):  
Susan J. Leadbetter ◽  
Andrew R. Jones ◽  
Matthew C. Hort

Abstract. Atmospheric dispersion model output is frequently used to provide advice to decision makers, for example, about the likely location of volcanic ash erupted from a volcano or the location of deposits of radioactive material released during a nuclear accident. Increasingly, scientists and decision makers are requesting information on the uncertainty of these dispersion model predictions. One source of uncertainty is in the meteorology used to drive the dispersion model, and in this study ensemble meteorology from the Met Office ensemble prediction system is used to provide meteorological uncertainty to dispersion model predictions. Two hypothetical scenarios, one volcanological and one radiological, are repeated every 12 h over a period of 4 months. The scenarios are simulated using ensemble meteorology and deterministic forecast meteorology and compared to output from simulations using analysis meteorology using the Brier skill score. Adopting the practice commonly used in evaluating numerical weather prediction (NWP) models where observations are sparse or non-existent, we consider output from simulations using analysis NWP data to be truth. The results show that on average the ensemble simulations perform better than the deterministic simulations, although not all individual ensemble simulations outperform their deterministic counterpart. The results also show that greater skill scores are achieved by the ensemble simulation for later time steps rather than earlier time steps. In addition there is a greater increase in skill score over time for deposition than for air concentration. For the volcanic ash scenarios it is shown that the performance of the ensemble at one flight level can be different to that at a different flight level; e.g. a negative skill score might be obtained for FL350-550 and a positive skill score for FL200-350. This study does not take into account any source term uncertainty, but it does take the first steps towards demonstrating the value of ensemble dispersion model predictions.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Jansen ◽  
Giovanni Coppini ◽  
Nadia Pinardi

Abstract. On the 7th of March 2014 (UTC), Malaysia Airlines flight 370 vanished without a trace. The aircraft is believed to have crashed in the southern Indian Ocean, but despite extensive search operations the location of the wreckage is still unknown. The only part of the aircraft that has been recovered so far is a small piece of the right wing. It was discovered 17 months after the disappearance on the island of Réunion, approximately 4,000 km from the assumed crash site. This paper presents a numerical simulation using high resolution oceanographic and meteorological data to predict the movement of floating debris from the accident. It combines multiple model realisations into a superensemble, and includes the discovery of debris on Réunion to improve the final result. The superensemble is used to predict the distribution of debris at various moments in time. The results for the initial probability density show good agreement with the current underwater search area. Results at later times show that the most probable locations to discover washed up debris are along the African west-coast and the southeast of Australia. The debris remaining at sea from late 2015 is spread out over a wide area and its distribution changes only slowly.


2016 ◽  
Vol 97 (11) ◽  
pp. 2149-2161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Ingleby ◽  
Patricia Pauley ◽  
Alexander Kats ◽  
Jeff Ator ◽  
Dennis Keyser ◽  
...  

Abstract Some real-time radiosonde reports are now available with higher vertical resolution and higher precision than the alphanumeric TEMP code. There are also extra metadata; for example, the software version may indicate whether humidity corrections have been applied at the station. Numerical weather prediction (NWP) centers and other users need to start using the new Binary Universal Form for Representation of Meteorological Data (BUFR) reports because the alphanumeric codes are being withdrawn. TEMP code has various restrictions and complexities introduced when telecommunication speed and costs were overriding concerns; one consequence is minor temperature rounding errors. In some ways BUFR reports are simpler: the whole ascent should be contained in a single report. BUFR reports can also include the time and location of each level; an ascent takes about 2 h and the balloon can drift 100 km or more laterally. This modernization is the largest and most complex change to the worldwide reporting of radiosonde observations for many years; international implementation is taking longer than planned and is very uneven. The change brings both opportunities and challenges. The biggest challenge is that the number and quality of the data from radiosonde ascents may suffer if the assessment of the BUFR reports and two-way communication between data producers and data users are not given the priority they require. It is possible that some countries will only attempt to replicate the old reports in the new format, not taking advantage of the benefits, which include easier treatment of radiosonde drift and a better understanding of instrument and processing details, as well as higher resolution.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 40-48
Author(s):  
Kim Long Pham ◽  
Hao Quang Nguyen ◽  
Duy Hien Pham ◽  
Xuan Anh Do ◽  
Duc Thang Duong ◽  
...  

FLEXPART is a Lagrangian transport and dispersion model suitable for the simulation of a large range of atmospheric transport processes. FLEXPART has been researched and applied   in simulation of the long-range dispersion of radioactive materials. It can be applicable to the problem of radioactive materials released from the nuclear power plants impact on Vietnam. This report presents simulation of radioactive dispersion from the accident assumed Fangchenggang and Changjiang nuclear power plants in China with the FLEXPART, using meteorological data from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP). The results of simulations and analyzing showed good applicability of FLEXPART for a long-range radioactive materials dispersion. The preliminary simulation results show that the impact of the radioactive material dispersion in Vietnam varies by the well-known characteristics of the monsoon of our country. Winter is the time when the dominant northeast winds up radioactive dispersion most towards our country, its sphere of influence extends from the Northeast (Quang Ninh) to North Central (Da Nang).


2020 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. S51-S55 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.J. Leadbetter ◽  
S. Andronopoulos ◽  
P. Bedwell ◽  
K. Chevalier-Jabet ◽  
G. Geertsema ◽  
...  

During the pre-release and early phase of an accidental release of radionuclides into the atmosphere there are few or no measurements, and dispersion models are used to assess the consequences and assist in determining appropriate countermeasures. However, uncertainties are high during this early phase and it is important to characterise these uncertainties and, if possible, include them in any dispersion modelling. In this paper we examine three sources of uncertainty in dispersion modelling; uncertainty in the source term, uncertainty in the meteorological information used to drive the dispersion model and intrinsic uncertainty within the dispersion model. We also explore the possibility of ranking these uncertainties dependent on their impact on the dispersion model outputs.


2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Szintai ◽  
P. Kaufmann ◽  
M. W. Rotach

Abstract. At MeteoSwiss an integrated modelling system is used to simulate the dispersion of radioactive material in emergency situations. For the prediction of the atmospheric flow, the COSMO numerical weather prediction model is used. The model is run operationally at 6.6 and 2.2 km horizontal resolution, respectively and uses a 1.5 order turbulence closure with a prognostic equation for turbulent kinetic energy. Both versions of the COSMO model are coupled off-line with a Lagrangian particle dispersion model (LPDM). The aim of this study is to investigate the sensitivity of the dispersion model to different interfacing approaches between LPDM and the COSMO model. The diagnosed turbulence variables are validated on an ideal convective case and two measurement campaigns. Simulations of hypothetical pollutant releases show that the different interfacing approaches can lead to substantial changes in the forecasted concentrations.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Beckett ◽  
Ralph Burton ◽  
Fabio Dioguardi ◽  
Claire Witham ◽  
John Stevenson ◽  
...  

<p>Atmospheric transport and dispersion models are used by Volcanic Ash Advisory Centers (VAACs) to provide timely information on volcanic ash clouds to mitigate the risk of aircraft encounters. Inaccuracies in dispersion model forecasts can occur due to the uncertainties associated with source terms, meteorological data and model parametrizations. Real-time validation of model forecasts against observations is therefore essential to ensure their reliability. Forecasts can also benefit from comparison to model output from other groups; through understanding how different modelling approaches, variations in model setups, model physics, and driving meteorological data, impact the predicted extent and concentration of ash. The Met Office, the National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS) and the British Geological Survey (BGS) are working together to consider how we might compare data (both qualitatively and quantitatively) from the atmospheric dispersion models NAME, FALL3D and HYSPLIT, using meteorological data from the Met Office Unified Model and the NOAA Global Forecast System (providing an effective multi-model ensemble). Results from the model inter-comparison will be used to provide advice to the London VAAC to aid forecasting decisions in near real time during a volcanic ash cloud event. In order to facilitate this comparison, we developed a Python package (ash-model-plotting) to read outputs from the different models into a consistent structure. Here we present our framework for generating comparable plots across the different partners, with a focus on total column mass loading products. These are directly comparable to satellite data retrievals and therefore important for model validation. We also present outcomes from a recent modelling exercise and discuss next steps for further improving our forecast validation.</p>


Author(s):  
Ranga Rajan Thiruvenkatachari ◽  
Yifan Ding ◽  
David Pankratz ◽  
Akula Venkatram

AbstractAir pollution associated with vehicle emissions from roadways has been linked to a variety of adverse health effects. Wind tunnel and tracer studies show that noise barriers mitigate the impact of this pollution up to distances of 30 times the barrier height. Data from these studies have been used to formulate dispersion models that account for this mitigating effect. Before these models can be incorporated into Federal and State regulations, it is necessary to demonstrate their applicability under real-world conditions. This paper describes a comprehensive field study conducted in Riverside, CA, in 2019 to collect the data required to evaluate the performance of these models. Eight vehicles fitted with SF6 tracer release systems were driven in a loop on a 2-km stretch of Interstate 215 that had a 5-m tall noise barrier on the downwind side. The tracer, SF6, was sampled at over 40 locations at distances ranging from 5 to 200 m from the barrier. Meteorological data were measured with several 3-D sonic anemometers located upwind and downwind of the highway. The data set, corresponding to 10 h collected over 4 days, consists of information on emissions, tracer concentrations, and micrometeorological variables that can be used to evaluate barrier effects in dispersion models. An analysis of the data using a dispersion model indicates that current models are likely to overestimate concentrations, or underestimate the mitigation from barriers, at low wind speeds. We suggest an approach to correct this problem.


2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 645-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen N. Webster ◽  
Thomas Whitehead ◽  
David J. Thomson

AbstractIn atmospheric dispersion models driven by meteorological data from numerical weather prediction (NWP) models, it is necessary to include a parameterization for plume spread that is due to unresolved mesoscale motions. These are motions that are not resolved by the input NWP data but are larger in size than the three-dimensional turbulent motions represented by turbulence parameterizations. Neglecting the effect of these quasi-two-dimensional unresolved mesoscale motions has been shown to lead to underprediction of plume spread and overprediction of concentrations within the plume. NWP modeling is conducted at a range of resolutions that resolve different scales of motion. This suggests that any parameterization of unresolved mesoscale motions should depend on the resolution of the input NWP data. Spectral analysis of NWP data and wind observations is used to assess the mesoscale motions unresolved by the NWP model. Appropriate velocity variances and Lagrangian time scales for these motions are found by calculating the missing variance in the energy spectra and analyzing correlation functions. A strong dependence on the resolution of the NWP data is seen, resulting in larger velocity variances and Lagrangian time scales from the lower-resolution models. A parameterization of unresolved mesoscale motions on the basis of the NWP resolution is proposed.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Janet Leadbetter ◽  
Andrew R. Jones ◽  
Matthew C. Hort

Abstract. Atmospheric dispersion model output is frequently used to provide advice to decision makers, for example, about the likely location of volcanic ash erupted from a volcano or the location of deposits of radioactive material released during a nuclear accident. Increasingly scientists and decision makers are requesting information on the uncertainty of these dispersion model predictions. One source of uncertainty is in the meteorology used to drive the dispersion model and in this study ensemble meteorology from the Met Office ensemble prediction system is used to provide meteorological uncertainty to dispersion model predictions. Two hypothetical scenarios, one volcanological and one radiological, are repeated every 12 hours over a period of 4 months. The scenarios are simulated using ensemble meteorology and deterministic forecast meteorology and compared to output from simulations using analysis meteorology using the Brier skill score. Adopting the practice commonly used in evaluating numerical weather prediction models (NWP) where observations are sparse or non-existent we consider output from simulations using analysis NWP data to be truth. The results show that on average the ensemble simulations perform better than the deterministic simulations although not all individual ensemble simulations outperform their deterministic counterpart. The results also show that greater skill scores are achieved by the ensemble simulation for later time steps rather than earlier time steps and at those later time steps for deposition than for air concentration. For the volcanic ash scenarios it is shown that the performance of the ensemble at one flight level can be different to that at a different flight level, e.g. a negative skill score might be obtained for FL350-550 and a positive skill score for FL200-350. This study does not take into account any source term uncertainty but it does take the first steps towards demonstrating the value of ensemble dispersion model predictions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document