scholarly journals Constraining a lumped rainfall-runoff model with piezometry to improve low-flow simulation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Pelletier ◽  
Vakzen Andréassian
Keyword(s):  
Flow Simulation ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Low Flows ◽  
Sample Test ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model

<p>Most lumped hydrological models are focused on the rainfall-runoff relationship, since climatic conditions are the driving force of the hydrological behaviour of a catchment. Many hydrological models, like the ones used by the French national PREMHYCE platform, only take climatic variables as inputs – daily rainfall and potential evaporation – to simulate and forecast low-flows. Yet, a hydrological drought is generally a medium- to long-term phenomenon, which is the consequence of long records of dry climatic conditions. Daily lumped hydrological models often struggle to integrate these records to reproduce catchment memory.</p><p>In many French catchments, it was observed that this memory of past hydroclimatic conditions is well represented in piezometric signals that are broadly available over the national territory. Indeed, aquifers, especially the large ones, do store water on the long, feeding rivers during droughts: aquifers are not only <em>water carriers</em> – the etymology for the word <em>aquifer </em>– they are also <em>memory carriers</em>. A dataset of 108 catchments, each of them being associated with one or several piezometers, was used to investigate whether the GR6J daily lumped rainfall-runoff model could be constrained by piezometric time series to improve low-flow simulations. We found that a particular state of the model, the exponential store, is particularly well correlated with piezometry in most studied catchments.</p><p>In order to get a univocal relationship between the exponential store and piezometry, a multi-objective calibration approach was implemented, optimising both (i) flow simulation with a criterion focused on low-flows and (ii) affine correspondence between the exponential store level and piezometry. For that purpose, a new parameter was added to the model. The modified calibration was then evaluated through a split-sample test and the performance in simulating particular drought events. The calibrated store-piezometry relationship can now be used for data assimilation to improve low-flow forecasting.</p>

scholarly journals Analysis of low flow indices under varying climatic conditions in Poland

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 373-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marzena Osuch ◽  
Renata Romanowicz ◽  
Wai K. Wong
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Rcp 8.5 ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model ◽  
Simulated Time

Abstract Changes in low flow indices under future climates are estimated for eight catchments in Poland. A simulation approach is used to derive daily flows under changing climatic conditions, following RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 emission scenarios. The HBV rainfall–runoff model is used to simulate low flows. The model is calibrated and validated using streamflow observations from periods 1971–2000 and 2001–2010. Two objective functions are used for calibration: Nash–Sutcliffe and log transformed Nash–Sutcliffe. Finally, the models are run using the bias-corrected precipitation and temperature data simulated by GCM/RCM models for the periods 2021–2050 and 2071–2100. We estimate low flow indices for the simulated time series, including annual minima of 7-day mean river flows and number, severity and duration of low flow events. We quantify the biases of low flow indices by N-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis and Tukey test. Results indicate a large effect of climate models, as well as objective functions, on the low flow indices obtained. A comparison of indices from the two future periods with the reference period 1971–2000 confirms the trends obtained in previous studies, in the form of a projected decrease in the frequency and intensity of low flow events.

scholarly journals Component Combination Test to Investigate Improvement of the IHACRES and GR4J Rainfall–Runoff Models

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 2126
Author(s):  
Mun-Ju Shin ◽  
Chung-Soo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Flow Simulation ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Effective Rainfall ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Flow Simulations ◽  
New Models ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model

Rainfall–runoff models are not perfect, and the suitability of a model structure depends on catchment characteristics and data. It is important to investigate the pros and cons of a rainfall–runoff model to improve both its high- and low-flow simulation. The production and routing components of the GR4J and IHACRES models were combined to create two new models. Specifically, the GR_IH model is the combination of the production store of the GR4J model and the routing store of the IHACRES model (vice versa in the IH_GR model). The performances of the new models were compared to those of the GR4J and IHACRES models to determine components improving the performance of the two original models. The suitability of the parameters was investigated with sensitivity analysis using 40 years’ worth of spatiotemporally different data for five catchments in Australia. These five catchments consist of two wet catchments, one intermediate catchment, and two dry catchments. As a result, the effective rainfall production and routing components of the IHACRES model were most suitable for high-flow simulation of wet catchments, and the routing component improved the low-flow simulation of intermediate and one dry catchments. Both effective rainfall production and routing components of the GR4J model were suitable for low-flow simulation of one dry catchment. The routing component of the GR4J model improved the low- and high-flow simulation of wet and dry catchments, respectively, and the effective rainfall production component improved both the high- and low-flow simulations of the intermediate catchment relative to the IHACRES model. This study provides useful information for the improvement of the two models.

scholarly journals Impact of the Mean Areal Rainfall Calculation on a Modular Rainfall-Runoff Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 980
Author(s):  
Jose Valles ◽  
Gerald Corzo ◽  
Dimitri Solomatine
Keyword(s):  
Divide And Conquer ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Areal Rainfall ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Runoff Model

Hydrological models are based on the relationship between rainfall and discharge, which means that a poor representation of rainfall produces a poor streamflow result. Typically, a poor representation of rainfall input is produced by a gauge network that is not able to capture the rainfall event. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the mean areal rainfall on a modular rainfall-runoff model. These types of models are based on the divide-and-conquer approach and two specialized hydrological models for high and low regimes were built and then combined to form a committee of model that takes the strengths of both specialized models. The results show that the committee of models produces a reasonable reproduction of the observed flow for high and low flow regimes. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis reveals that Ilopango and Jerusalem rainfall gauges are the most beneficial for discharge calculation since they appear in most of the rainfall subset that produces low Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values. Conversely, the Puente Viejo and Panchimalco rainfall gauges are the least beneficial for the rainfall-runoff model since these gauges appear in most of the rainfall subset that produces high RMSE value.

scholarly journals Estimating the Relative Uncertainties Sourced from GCMs and Hydrological Models in Modeling Climate Change Impact on Runoff

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Teng ◽  
Jai Vaze ◽  
Francis H. S. Chiew ◽  
Biao Wang ◽  
Jean-Michel Perraud
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Climate Change Impact ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Runoff Modeling ◽  
Change Impact ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Climate Series

Abstract This paper assesses the relative uncertainties from GCMs and from hydrological models in modeling climate change impact on runoff across southeast Australia. Five lumped conceptual daily rainfall–runoff models are used to model runoff using historical daily climate series and using future climate series obtained by empirically scaling the historical climate series informed by simulations from 15 GCMs. The majority of the GCMs project a drier future for this region, particularly in the southern parts, and this is amplified as a bigger reduction in the runoff. The results indicate that the uncertainty sourced from the GCMs is much larger than the uncertainty in the rainfall–runoff models. The variability in the climate change impact on runoff results for one rainfall–runoff model informed by 15 GCMs (an about 28%–35% difference between the minimum and maximum results for mean annual, mean seasonal, and high runoff) is considerably larger than the variability in the results between the five rainfall–runoff models informed by 1 GCM (a less than 7% difference between the minimum and maximum results). The difference between the rainfall–runoff modeling results is larger in the drier regions for scenarios of big declines in future rainfall and in the low-flow characteristics. The rainfall–runoff modeling here considers only the runoff sensitivity to changes in the input climate data (primarily daily rainfall), and the difference between the hydrological modeling results is likely to be greater if potential changes in the climate–runoff relationship in a warmer and higher CO2 environment are modeled.

scholarly journals Impact of downscaled rainfall biases on projected runoff changes

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 2981-2997
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Charles ◽  
Francis H. S. Chiew ◽  
Nicholas J. Potter ◽  
Hongxing Zheng ◽  
Guobin Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Supply ◽  
Grid Point ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Rainfall Frequency ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Projected Changes ◽  
Runoff Model ◽  
Regional Water

Abstract. Realistic projections of changes to daily rainfall frequency and magnitude, at catchment scales, are required to assess the potential impacts of climate change on regional water supply. We show that quantile–quantile mapping (QQM) bias-corrected daily rainfall from dynamically downscaled WRF simulations of current climate produce biased hydrological simulations, in a case study for the state of Victoria, Australia (237 629 km2). While the QQM bias correction can remove bias in daily rainfall distributions at each 10 km × 10 km grid point across Victoria, the GR4J rainfall–runoff model underestimates runoff when driven with QQM bias-corrected daily rainfall. We compare simulated runoff differences using bias-corrected and empirically scaled rainfall for several key water supply catchments across Victoria and discuss the implications for confidence in the magnitude of projected changes for mid-century. Our results highlight the imperative for methods that can correct for temporal and spatial biases in dynamically downscaled daily rainfall if they are to be suitable for hydrological projection.

scholarly journals Sensitivity Analysis to Investigate the Reliability of the Grid-Based Rainfall-Runoff Model

Water ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mun-Ju Shin ◽  
Yun Choi
Keyword(s):  
Water Movement ◽  
Parameter Sensitivity ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Runoff Simulation ◽  
Rainfall Events ◽  
Flow Calculation ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model ◽  
Grid Based

This study aimed to assess the suitability of the parameters of a physically based, distributed, grid-based rainfall-runoff model. We analyzed parameter sensitivity with a dataset of eight rainfall events that occurred in two catchments of South Korea, using the Sobol’ method. Parameters identified as sensitive responded adequately to the scale of the rainfall events and the objective functions employed. Parameter sensitivity varied depending on rainfall scale, even in the same catchment. Interestingly, for a rainfall event causing considerable runoff, parameters related to initial soil saturation and soil water movement played a significant role in low flow calculation and high flow calculation, respectively. The larger and steeper catchment exhibited a greater difference in parameter sensitivity between rainfall events. Finally, we found that setting an incorrect parameter range that is physically impossible can have a large impact on runoff simulation, leading to substantial uncertainty in the simulation results. The proposed analysis method and the results from our study can help researchers using a distributed rainfall-runoff model produce more reliable analysis results.

scholarly journals Conceptual Rainfall–Runoff Model Performance with Different Spatial Rainfall Inputs

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1100-1112 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Vaze ◽  
D. A. Post ◽  
F. H. S. Chiew ◽  
J.-M. Perraud ◽  
J. Teng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Model Simulation ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Grid Cell ◽  
Rainfall Series ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Rainfall Time Series ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model

Abstract Different methods have been used to obtain the daily rainfall time series required to drive conceptual rainfall–runoff models, depending on data availability, time constraints, and modeling objectives. This paper investigates the implications of different rainfall inputs on the calibration and simulation of 4 rainfall–runoff models using data from 240 catchments across southeast Australia. The first modeling experiment compares results from using a single lumped daily rainfall series for each catchment obtained from three methods: single rainfall station, Thiessen average, and average of interpolated rainfall surface. The results indicate considerable improvements in the modeled daily runoff and mean annual runoff in the model calibration and model simulation over an independent test period with better spatial representation of rainfall. The second experiment compares modeling using a single lumped daily rainfall series and modeling in all grid cells within a catchment using different rainfall inputs for each grid cell. The results show only marginal improvement in the “distributed” application compared to the single rainfall series, and only in two of the four models for the larger catchments. Where a single lumped catchment-average daily rainfall series is used, care should be taken to obtain a rainfall series that best represents the spatial rainfall distribution across the catchment. However, there is little advantage in driving a conceptual rainfall–runoff model with different rainfall inputs from different parts of the catchment compared to using a single lumped rainfall series, where only estimates of runoff at the catchment outlet is required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document