scholarly journals Information content of stream level class data for hydrological model calibration

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilja van Meerveld ◽  
Marc Vis ◽  
Jan Seibert
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Citizen Science ◽  
Model Calibration ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Distributed Data ◽  
Vertical Resolution ◽  
Level Data

Abstract. Citizen science can provide spatially distributed data over large areas, including hydrological data. Stream levels are easier to measure than streamflow and can be observed more easily by citizen scientists. However, the challenge with crowd-based stream level data is that observations are taken at irregular time intervals and with a limited vertical resolution. The latter is especially the case at sites where no staff gauge is available and relative stream levels are observed based on (in)visible features in the stream, such as rocks. In order to assess the potential value of crowd-based stream level observations for model calibration, we pretended that stream level observations were available at a limited vertical resolution by transferring streamflow data into stream level classes. A bucket-type hydrological model was calibrated with these hypothetical data sets and subsequently evaluated on the observed streamflow records. Our results indicate that stream level data can result in good streamflow simulations, even with a reduced vertical resolution of the observations. Time series of only two stream level classes, e.g. above or below a rock in the stream, were already informative, especially when the class boundary was chosen towards the highest stream levels. There was some added value in using up to five stream level classes but there was hardly any improvement in model performance when using more level classes. These results are encouraging for citizen science projects and provide a basis for designing observation systems that collect data that are as informative as possible for deriving model-based streamflow time series for previously ungauged basins.

scholarly journals Information content of stream level class data for hydrological model calibration

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 4895-4905 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. Ilja van Meerveld ◽  
Marc J. P. Vis ◽  
Jan Seibert
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Citizen Science ◽  
Model Calibration ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Distributed Data ◽  
Vertical Resolution ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Spatially Distributed

Abstract. Citizen science can provide spatially distributed data over large areas, including hydrological data. Stream levels are easier to measure than streamflow and are likely also observed more easily by citizen scientists than streamflow. However, the challenge with crowd based stream level data is that observations are taken at irregular time intervals and with a limited vertical resolution. The latter is especially the case at sites where no staff gauge is available and relative stream levels are observed based on (in)visible features in the stream, such as rocks. In order to assess the potential value of crowd based stream level observations for model calibration, we pretended that stream level observations were available at a limited vertical resolution by transferring streamflow data to stream level classes. A bucket-type hydrological model was calibrated with these hypothetical stream level class data and subsequently evaluated on the observed streamflow records. Our results indicate that stream level data can result in good streamflow simulations, even with a reduced vertical resolution of the observations. Time series of only two stream level classes, e.g. above or below a rock in the stream, were already informative, especially when the class boundary was chosen towards the highest stream levels. There was some added value in using up to five stream level classes, but there was hardly any improvement in model performance when using more level classes. These results are encouraging for citizen science projects and provide a basis for designing observation systems that collect data that are as informative as possible for deriving model based streamflow time series for previously ungauged basins.

scholarly journals On constraining a lumped hydrological model with both piezometry and streamflow: results of a large sample evaluation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Pelletier ◽  
Vazken Andréassian
Keyword(s):  
Groundwater Level ◽  
Model Calibration ◽  
Additional Data ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Calibration Process ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Streamflow Simulation

Abstract. The role of aquifers in the seasonal and multiyear dynamics of streamflow is undisputed: in many temperate catchments, aquifers store water during the wet periods and release it all year long, making a major contribution to low flows. The complexity of groundwater modelling has long prevented surface hydrological modellers from including groundwater level data, especially in lumped rainfall–runoff models. In this article, we investigate whether using groundwater level data in the daily GR6J model, through a composite calibration framework, can improve the performance of streamflow simulation. We tested the new calibration process on 107 French catchments. Our results show that these additional data are superfluous for streamflow simulation, since for catchments, model performance is not significantly improved. However, parameter stability is ameliorated and the model shows a surprising ability to simulate groundwater level with a satisfying performance, in a wide variety of hydrogeological and hydroclimatic contexts. Finally, we make several recommendations regarding the model calibration process to be used in a given situation.

scholarly journals Hydrological model calibration for derived flood frequency analysis using stochastic rainfall and probability distributions of peak flows

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 353-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Haberlandt ◽  
I. Radtke
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Model Calibration ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Rainfall Data ◽  
Flood Frequency Analysis ◽  
Peak Flows ◽  
Hourly Rainfall

Abstract. Derived flood frequency analysis allows the estimation of design floods with hydrological modeling for poorly observed basins considering change and taking into account flood protection measures. There are several possible choices regarding precipitation input, discharge output and consequently the calibration of the model. The objective of this study is to compare different calibration strategies for a hydrological model considering various types of rainfall input and runoff output data sets and to propose the most suitable approach. Event based and continuous, observed hourly rainfall data as well as disaggregated daily rainfall and stochastically generated hourly rainfall data are used as input for the model. As output, short hourly and longer daily continuous flow time series as well as probability distributions of annual maximum peak flow series are employed. The performance of the strategies is evaluated using the obtained different model parameter sets for continuous simulation of discharge in an independent validation period and by comparing the model derived flood frequency distributions with the observed one. The investigations are carried out for three mesoscale catchments in northern Germany with the hydrological model HEC-HMS (Hydrologic Engineering Center's Hydrologic Modeling System). The results show that (I) the same type of precipitation input data should be used for calibration and application of the hydrological model, (II) a model calibrated using a small sample of extreme values works quite well for the simulation of continuous time series with moderate length but not vice versa, and (III) the best performance with small uncertainty is obtained when stochastic precipitation data and the observed probability distribution of peak flows are used for model calibration. This outcome suggests to calibrate a hydrological model directly on probability distributions of observed peak flows using stochastic rainfall as input if its purpose is the application for derived flood frequency analysis.

scholarly journals Scale effect challenges in urban hydrology highlighted with a distributed hydrological model

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 331-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdellah Ichiba ◽  
Auguste Gires ◽  
Ioulia Tchiguirinskaia ◽  
Daniel Schertzer ◽  
Philippe Bompard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scale Effect ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Scale Effects ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Scale Dependence ◽  
Urban Hydrology ◽  
Distributed Data ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Multi Scale ◽  
Scale Modelling

Abstract. Hydrological models are extensively used in urban water management, development and evaluation of future scenarios and research activities. There is a growing interest in the development of fully distributed and grid-based models. However, some complex questions related to scale effects are not yet fully understood and still remain open issues in urban hydrology. In this paper we propose a two-step investigation framework to illustrate the extent of scale effects in urban hydrology. First, fractal tools are used to highlight the scale dependence observed within distributed data input into urban hydrological models. Then an intensive multi-scale modelling work is carried out to understand scale effects on hydrological model performance. Investigations are conducted using a fully distributed and physically based model, Multi-Hydro, developed at Ecole des Ponts ParisTech. The model is implemented at 17 spatial resolutions ranging from 100 to 5 m. Results clearly exhibit scale effect challenges in urban hydrology modelling. The applicability of fractal concepts highlights the scale dependence observed within distributed data. Patterns of geophysical data change when the size of the observation pixel changes. The multi-scale modelling investigation confirms scale effects on hydrological model performance. Results are analysed over three ranges of scales identified in the fractal analysis and confirmed through modelling. This work also discusses some remaining issues in urban hydrology modelling related to the availability of high-quality data at high resolutions, and model numerical instabilities as well as the computation time requirements. The main findings of this paper enable a replacement of traditional methods of “model calibration” by innovative methods of “model resolution alteration” based on the spatial data variability and scaling of flows in urban hydrology.

Multi-objective calibration of a distributed eco-hydrological model using several remotely sensed information

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Félix Francés ◽  
Carlos Echeverría ◽  
Maria Gonzalez-Sanchis ◽  
Fernando Rivas
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Model Calibration ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Temporal Information ◽  
Temporal Data ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Validation Period ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Calibration Approach

<p>Calibration of eco-hydrological models is difficult to carry on, even more if observed data sets are scarce. It is known that calibration using traditional trial-and-error approach depends strongly of the knowledge and the subjectivity of the hydrologist, and automatic calibration has a strong dependency of the objective-function and the initial values established to initialize the process.</p><p>The traditional calibration approach mainly focuses on the temporal variation of the discharge at the catchment outlet point, representing an integrated catchment response and provides thus only limited insight on the lumped behaviour of the catchment. It has been long demonstrated the limited capabilities of such an approach when models are validated at interior points of a river basin. The development of distributed eco-hydrological models and the burst of spatio-temporal data provided by remote sensing appear as key alternative to overcome those limitations. Indeed, remote sensing imagery provides not only temporal information but also valuable information on spatial patterns, which can facilitate a spatial-pattern-oriented model calibration.</p><p>However, there is still a lack of how to effectively handle spatio-temporal data when included in model calibration and how to evaluate the accuracy of the simulated spatial patterns. Moreover, it is still unclear whether including spatio-temporal data improves model performance in face to an unavoidable more complex and time-demanding calibration procedure. To elucidate in this sense, we performed three different multiobjective calibration configurations: (1) including only temporal information of discharges at the catchment outlet (2) including both temporal and spatio-temporal information and (3) only including spatio-temporal information. In the three approaches, we calibrated the same distributed eco-hydrological model (TETIS) in the same study area: Carraixet Basin, and used the same multi-objective algorithm: MOSCEM-UA. The spatio-temporal information obtained from satellite has been the surface soil moisture (from SMOS-BEC) and the leaf area index (from MODIS).</p><p>Even though the performance of the first calibration approach (only temporal information included) was slightly better than the others, all calibration approaches provided satisfactory and similar results within the calibration period. To put these results into test, we also validated the model performance by using historical data that was not used to calibrate the model (validation period). Within the validation period, the second calibration approach obtained better performance than the others, pointing out the higher reliability of the obtained parameter values when including spatio-temporal data (in this case, in combination with temporal data) in the model calibration. It is also reliable to mention that the approaches considering only spatio-temporal information provided interesting results in terms of discharges, considering that this variable was not used at all for calibration purposes.</p>

scholarly journals Analysing the temporal dynamics of model performance for hydrological models

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 3169-3211 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. E. Reusser ◽  
T. Blume ◽  
B. Schaefli ◽  
E. Zehe
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Performance Assessment ◽  
Performance Measures ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Temporal Dynamics ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
High Dimensional ◽  
High Temporal Resolution ◽  
Headwater Catchment

Abstract. The temporal dynamics of hydrological model performance gives insights into errors that cannot be obtained from global performance measures assigning a single number to the fit of a simulated time series to an observed reference series. These errors can include errors in data, model parameters, or model structure. Dealing with a set of performance measures evaluated at a high temporal resolution implies analyzing and interpreting a high dimensional data set. This paper presents a method for such a hydrological model performance assessment with a high temporal resolution and illustrates its application for two very different rainfall-runoff modeling case studies. The first is the Wilde Weisseritz case study, a headwater catchment in the eastern Ore Mountains, simulated with the conceptual model WaSiM-ETH. The second is the Malalcahuello case study, a headwater catchment in the Chilean Andes, simulated with the physics-based model Catflow. The proposed time-resolved performance assessment starts with the computation of a large set of classically used performance measures for a moving window. The key of the developed approach is a data-reduction method based on self-organizing maps (SOMs) and cluster analysis to classify the high-dimensional performance matrix. Synthetic peak errors are used to interpret the resulting error classes. The final outcome of the proposed method is a time series of the occurrence of dominant error types. For the two case studies analyzed here, 6 such error types have been identified. They show clear temporal patterns which can lead to the identification of model structural errors.

scholarly journals Multi-variable SWAT model calibration with remotely sensed evapotranspiration and observed flow

RBRH ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Clara Lazzari Franco ◽  
Nadia Bernardi Bonumá
Keyword(s):  
Model Calibration ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Swat Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Single Variable ◽  
Daily Step ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Negro River ◽  
Monthly Streamflow

ABSTRACT Although intrinsic, uncertainty for hydrological model estimation is not always reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of satellite-based evapotranspiration on SWAT model calibration, regarding uncertainty and model performance in streamflow simulation. The SWAT model was calibrated in a monthly step and validated in monthly (streamflow and evapotranspiration) and daily steps (streamflow only). The validation and calibration period covers the years from 2006 to 2009 and the study area is the upper Negro river basin, situated in Santa Catarina and Paraná. SWAT-CUP was used to calibrate and validate the model, using SUFI-2 with KGE (Kling-Gupta Efficiency) as objective function. Different calibration strategies were evaluated, considering single-variable and multi-variable calibration, using streamflow and evapotranspiration. Compared to conventional single-variable calibration (streamflow only), multi-variable calibration (streamflow and evapotranspiration, simultaneously) produce better streamflow performance, especially for low flow periods and daily step validation. Despite that, no evidence of reduction of streamflow prediction uncertainty was observed. SWAT model calibration using solely evapotranspiration still requires further studies.

scholarly journals Investigation of the transferability of hydrological models and a method to improve model calibration

2005 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 83-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Hartmann ◽  
A. Bárdossy
Keyword(s):  
Model Calibration ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Optimal Parameter ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Calibration Procedure ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Distributed Hydrological Model ◽  
Improve Model ◽  
Spatially Distributed ◽  
Measure Of Performance

Abstract. In order to find a model parameterization such that the hydrological model performs well even under different conditions, appropriate model performance measures have to be determined. A common performance measure is the Nash Sutcliffe efficiency. Usually it is calculated comparing observed and modelled daily values. In this paper a modified version is suggested in order to calibrate a model on different time scales simultaneously (days up to years). A spatially distributed hydrological model based on HBV concept was used. The modelling was applied on the Upper Neckar catchment, a mesoscale river in south western Germany with a basin size of about 4000 km2. The observation period 1961-1990 was divided into four different climatic periods, referred to as "warm", "cold", "wet" and "dry". These sub periods were used to assess the transferability of the model calibration and of the measure of performance. In a first step, the hydrological model was calibrated on a certain period and afterwards applied on the same period. Then, a validation was performed on the climatologically opposite period than the calibration, e.g. the model calibrated on the cold period was applied on the warm period. Optimal parameter sets were identified by an automatic calibration procedure based on Simulated Annealing. The results show, that calibrating a hydrological model that is supposed to handle short as well as long term signals becomes an important task. Especially the objective function has to be chosen very carefully.

scholarly journals Objective functions used as performance metrics for hydrological models: state-of-the-art and critical analysis

RBRH ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paloma Mara de Lima Ferreira ◽  
Adriano Rolim da Paz ◽  
Juan Martín Bravo
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Model Calibration ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Flow Rates ◽  
Daily Streamflow ◽  
Synthetic Time Series

ABSTRACT Hydrological models (HMs) can be applied for different purposes, and a key step is model calibration using objective functions (OF) to quantify the agreement between observed and calculated discharges. Fully understanding the OF is important to properly take advantage of model calibration and interpret the results. This study evaluates 36 OF proposed in the literature, considering two watersheds of different hydrological regimes. Daily simulated streamflow time-series, using a distributed hydrological model (MGB-IPH), and ten daily streamflow synthetic time-series, generated from the observed and calculated streamflows, were used in the analysis of each watershed. These synthetic data were used to evaluate how does each metric evaluate hypothetical cases that present isolated very well known error behaviors. Despite of all NSE-derived (Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency) metrics that use the square of the residuals in their formulation have shown higher sensitivity to errors in high flows, the ones that use daily and monthly averages of flow rates in absolute terms were more stringent than the others to assess HMs performance. Low flow errors were better evaluated by metrics that use the flow logarithm. The constant presence of zero flow rates deteriorate them significantly, with the exception of the metrics TRMSE (Transformed root mean square error) did not demonstrate this problem. An observed limitation of the formulations of some metrics was that the errors of overestimation or underestimation are compensated. Our results reassert that each metric should be interpreted specifically thinking about the aspects it has been proposed for, and simultaneously taking into account a set of metrics would lead to a broader evaluation of HM ability (e.g. multiobjective model evaluation). We recommend that the use of synthetic time series as those proposed in this work could be useful as an auxiliary step towards better understanding the evaluation of a calibrated hydrological model for each study case, taking into account model capabilities and observed hydrologic regime characteristics.

scholarly journals Hydrological model optimization using multi-gauge calibration (MGC) in a mountainous region

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sead Ahmed Swalih ◽  
Ercan Kahya
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Model Calibration ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Spatial Dimension ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Predictive Capacity ◽  
Black Sea Region ◽  
The Impact

Abstract It is a challenge for hydrological models to capture complex processes in a basin with limited data when estimating model parameters. This study aims to contribute in this field by assessing the impact of incorporating spatial dimension on the improvement of model calibration. Hence, the main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of multi-gauge calibration in hydrological model calibration for Ikizdere basin, Black Sea Region in Turkey. In addition, we have incorporated the climate change impact assessment for the study area. Four scenarios were tested for performance assessment of calibration: (1) using downstream flow data (DC), (2) using upstream data (UC), (3) using upstream and downstream data (Multi-Gauge Calibration – MGC), and (4) using upstream and then downstream data (UCDC). The results have shown that using individual gauges for calibration (1 and 2) improve the local predictive capacity of the model. MGC calibration significantly improved the model performance for the whole basin unlike 1 and 2. However, the local gauge calibrations statistical performance, compared to MGC outputs, was better for local areas. The UCDC yields the best model performance and much improved predictive capacity. Regarding the climate change, we did not observe an agreement amongst the future climate projections for the basin towards the end of the century.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document