scholarly journals A seasonal algorithm of the snow-covered area fraction for mountainous terrain

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 4607-4624
Author(s):  
Nora Helbig ◽  
Michael Schirmer ◽  
Jan Magnusson ◽  
Flavia Mäder ◽  
Alec van Herwijnen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Snow Cover ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Ground Surface ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Mountainous Terrain ◽  
Fine Scale ◽  
Seasonal Trends ◽  
Snow Covered Area ◽  
Covered Area ◽  
Mean Square Errors

Abstract. The snow cover spatial variability in mountainous terrain changes considerably over the course of a snow season. In this context, fractional snow-covered area (fSCA) is an essential model parameter characterizing how much ground surface in a grid cell is currently covered by snow. We present a seasonal fSCA algorithm using a recent scale-independent fSCA parameterization. For the seasonal implementation, we track snow depth (HS) and snow water equivalent (SWE) and account for several alternating accumulation–ablation phases. Besides tracking HS and SWE, the seasonal fSCA algorithm only requires subgrid terrain parameters from a fine-scale summer digital elevation model. We implemented the new algorithm in a multilayer energy balance snow cover model. To evaluate the spatiotemporal changes in modeled fSCA, we compiled three independent fSCA data sets derived from airborne-acquired fine-scale HS data and from satellite and terrestrial imagery. Overall, modeled daily 1 km fSCA values had normalized root mean square errors of 7 %, 12 % and 21 % for the three data sets, and some seasonal trends were identified. Comparing our algorithm performances to the performances of the CLM5.0 fSCA algorithm implemented in the multilayer snow cover model demonstrated that our full seasonal fSCA algorithm better represented seasonal trends. Overall, the results suggest that our seasonal fSCA algorithm can be applied in other geographic regions by any snow model application.

scholarly journals A seasonal algorithm of the snow-covered area fraction for mountainous terrain

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Helbig ◽  
Michael Schirmer ◽  
Jan Magnusson ◽  
Flavia Mäder ◽  
Alec van Herwijnen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Snow Cover ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Ground Surface ◽  
Grid Cell ◽  
Mountainous Terrain ◽  
Fine Scale ◽  
Snow Covered Area ◽  
Covered Area ◽  
Mean Square Errors

Abstract. The snow cover spatial variability in mountainous terrain changes considerably over the course of a snow season. In this context, fractional snow-covered area (fSCA) is therefore an essential model parameter characterizing how much of the ground surface in a grid cell is currently covered by snow. We present a seasonal fSCA algorithm using a recent scale-independent fSCA parameterization. For the seasonal implementation we track snow depth (HS) and snow water equivalent (SWE) and account for several alternating accumulation-ablation phases. Besides tracking HS and SWE, the seasonal fSCA algorithm only requires computing subgrid terrain parameters from a fine-scale summer digital elevation model. We implemented the new algorithm in a multilayer energy balance snow cover model. For a spatiotemporal evaluation of modelled fSCA we compiled three independent fSCA data sets. Evaluating modelled 1 km fSCA seasonally with fSCA derived from airborne-acquired fine-scale HS data, satellite- as well as terrestrial camera-derived fSCA showed overall normalized root mean square errors of respectively 9 %, 20 % and 22 %, and represented seasonal trends well. The overall good model performance suggests that the seasonal fSCA algorithm can be applied in other geographic regions by any snow model application.

scholarly journals Nimbus-7 SMMR Derived Global Snow Cover Parameters

1987 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.T.C. Chang ◽  
J.L. Foster ◽  
D.K. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Snow Cover ◽  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Theoretical Calculations ◽  
Winter Season ◽  
Western China ◽  
High Plains ◽  
Snow Covered Area ◽  
Covered Area ◽  
Snow Water

Snow covers about 40 million km2of the land area of the Northern Hemisphere during the winter season. The accumulation and depletion of snow is dynamically coupled with global hydrological and climatological processes. Snow covered area and snow water equivalent are two essential measurements. Snow cover maps are produced routinely by the National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA/NESDIS) and by the US Air Force Global Weather Center (USAFGWC). The snow covered area reported by these two groups sometimes differs by several million km2, Preliminary analysis is performed to evaluate the accuracy of these products.Microwave radiation penetrating through clouds and snowpacks could provide depth and water equivalent information about snow fields. Based on theoretical calculations, snow covered area and snow water equivalent retrieval algorithms have been developed. Snow cover maps for the Northern Hemisphere have been derived from Nimbus-7 SMMR data for a period of six years (1978–1984). Intercomparisons of SMMR, NOAA/NESDIS and USAFGWC snow maps have been conducted to evaluate and assess the accuracy of SMMR derived snow maps. The total snow covered area derived from SMMR is usually about 10% less than the other two products. This is because passive microwave sensors cannot detect shallow, dry snow which is less than 5 cm in depth. The major geographic regions in which the differences among these three products are the greatest are in central Asia and western China. Future study is required to determine the absolute accuracy of each product.Preliminary snow water equivalent maps have also been produced. Comparisons are made between retrieved snow water equivalent over large area and available snow depth measurements. The results of the comparisons are good for uniform snow covered areas, such as the Canadian high plains and the Russian steppes. Heavily forested and mountainous areas tend to mask out the microwave snow signatures and thus comparisons with measured water equivalent are poorer in those areas.

scholarly journals Nimbus-7 SMMR Derived Global Snow Cover Parameters

1987 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.T.C. Chang ◽  
J.L. Foster ◽  
D.K. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Snow Cover ◽  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Theoretical Calculations ◽  
Winter Season ◽  
Western China ◽  
High Plains ◽  
Snow Covered Area ◽  
Covered Area ◽  
Snow Water

Snow covers about 40 million km2 of the land area of the Northern Hemisphere during the winter season. The accumulation and depletion of snow is dynamically coupled with global hydrological and climatological processes. Snow covered area and snow water equivalent are two essential measurements. Snow cover maps are produced routinely by the National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA/NESDIS) and by the US Air Force Global Weather Center (USAFGWC). The snow covered area reported by these two groups sometimes differs by several million km2, Preliminary analysis is performed to evaluate the accuracy of these products.Microwave radiation penetrating through clouds and snowpacks could provide depth and water equivalent information about snow fields. Based on theoretical calculations, snow covered area and snow water equivalent retrieval algorithms have been developed. Snow cover maps for the Northern Hemisphere have been derived from Nimbus-7 SMMR data for a period of six years (1978–1984). Intercomparisons of SMMR, NOAA/NESDIS and USAFGWC snow maps have been conducted to evaluate and assess the accuracy of SMMR derived snow maps. The total snow covered area derived from SMMR is usually about 10% less than the other two products. This is because passive microwave sensors cannot detect shallow, dry snow which is less than 5 cm in depth. The major geographic regions in which the differences among these three products are the greatest are in central Asia and western China. Future study is required to determine the absolute accuracy of each product.Preliminary snow water equivalent maps have also been produced. Comparisons are made between retrieved snow water equivalent over large area and available snow depth measurements. The results of the comparisons are good for uniform snow covered areas, such as the Canadian high plains and the Russian steppes. Heavily forested and mountainous areas tend to mask out the microwave snow signatures and thus comparisons with measured water equivalent are poorer in those areas.

scholarly journals Fractional snow-covered area: scale-independent peak of winter parameterization

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 615-632
Author(s):  
Nora Helbig ◽  
Yves Bühler ◽  
Lucie Eberhard ◽  
César Deschamps-Berger ◽  
Simon Gascoin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Snow Depth ◽  
Hydrological Modeling ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Empirical Relationship ◽  
Ground Surface ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Snow Covered Area ◽  
Covered Area ◽  
Geographical Regions

Abstract. The spatial distribution of snow in the mountains is significantly influenced through interactions of topography with wind, precipitation, shortwave and longwave radiation, and avalanches that may relocate the accumulated snow. One of the most crucial model parameters for various applications such as weather forecasts, climate predictions and hydrological modeling is the fraction of the ground surface that is covered by snow, also called fractional snow-covered area (fSCA). While previous subgrid parameterizations for the spatial snow depth distribution and fSCA work well, performances were scale-dependent. Here, we were able to confirm a previously established empirical relationship of peak of winter parameterization for the standard deviation of snow depth σHS by evaluating it with 11 spatial snow depth data sets from 7 different geographic regions and snow climates with resolutions ranging from 0.1 to 3 m. An enhanced performance (mean percentage errors, MPE, decreased by 25 %) across all spatial scales ≥ 200 m was achieved by recalibrating and introducing a scale-dependency in the dominant scaling variables. Scale-dependent MPEs vary between −7 % and 3 % for σHS and between 0 % and 1 % for fSCA. We performed a scale- and region-dependent evaluation of the parameterizations to assess the potential performances with independent data sets. This evaluation revealed that for the majority of the regions, the MPEs mostly lie between ±10 % for σHS and between −1 % and 1.5 % for fSCA. This suggests that the new parameterizations perform similarly well in most geographical regions.

Towards a scale-independent fractional snow-covered area parameterization for complex terrain

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Helbig ◽  
Yves Bühler ◽  
Lucie Eberhard ◽  
César Deschamps-Berger ◽  
Simon Gascoin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Snow Depth ◽  
Hydrological Modeling ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Ground Surface ◽  
Longwave Radiation ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Depth Data ◽  
Snow Covered Area ◽  
Covered Area ◽  
Wide Range

<p>Whenever there is snow on the ground, there will be large spatial variability in snow depth. The spatial distribution of snow is significantly influenced by topography due to wind, precipitation, shortwave and longwave radiation, and even snow avalanches relocate the accumulated snow. Fractional snow-covered area (fSCA) is an important model parameter characterizing the fraction of the ground surface that is covered by snow and is crucial for various model applications such as weather forecasts, climate simulations and hydrological modeling.</p><p>We recently suggested an empirical fSCA parameterization based on two spatial snow depth data sets acquired at peak of winter in Switzerland and Spain, which yielded best performance for spatial scales larger than 1000 m. However, this parameterization was not validated on independent snow depth data. To evaluate and improve our fSCA parameterization, in particular with regards to other spatial scales and snow climates (or geographic regions), we used spatial snow depth data sets form a wide range of mountain ranges in USA, Switzerland and France acquired by 5 different measuring methods. Pooling all snow depth data sets suggests that a scale-dependent parameter should be introduced to improve the fSCA parameterization, in particular for sub-kilometer spatial scales. Extending our empirical fSCA parameterization to a broader range of scales and snow climates is an important step towards accounting for spatio-temporal variability in snow depth in multiple snow model applications.</p>

scholarly journals Forward-Looking Assimilation of MODIS-Derived Snow-Covered Area into a Land Surface Model

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin F. Zaitchik ◽  
Matthew Rodell
Keyword(s):  
Snow Cover ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Energy Fluxes ◽  
Snow Covered Area ◽  
Covered Area ◽  
Snow Water

Abstract Snow cover over land has a significant impact on the surface radiation budget, turbulent energy fluxes to the atmosphere, and local hydrological fluxes. For this reason, inaccuracies in the representation of snow-covered area (SCA) within a land surface model (LSM) can lead to substantial errors in both offline and coupled simulations. Data assimilation algorithms have the potential to address this problem. However, the assimilation of SCA observations is complicated by an information deficit in the observation—SCA indicates only the presence or absence of snow, not snow water equivalent—and by the fact that assimilated SCA observations can introduce inconsistencies with atmospheric forcing data, leading to nonphysical artifacts in the local water balance. In this paper, a novel assimilation algorithm is presented that introduces Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) SCA observations to the Noah LSM in global, uncoupled simulations. The algorithm uses observations from up to 72 h ahead of the model simulation to correct against emerging errors in the simulation of snow cover while preserving the local hydrologic balance. This is accomplished by using future snow observations to adjust air temperature and, when necessary, precipitation within the LSM. In global, offline integrations, this new assimilation algorithm provided improved simulation of SCA and snow water equivalent relative to open loop integrations and integrations that used an earlier SCA assimilation algorithm. These improvements, in turn, influenced the simulation of surface water and energy fluxes during the snow season and, in some regions, on into the following spring.

scholarly journals A Landsat-Era Sierra Nevada Snow Reanalysis (1985–2015)

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1203-1221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A. Margulis ◽  
Gonzalo Cortés ◽  
Manuela Girotto ◽  
Michael Durand
Keyword(s):  
Sierra Nevada ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Reanalysis Dataset ◽  
In Situ Data ◽  
Snow Covered Area ◽  
Covered Area ◽  
Snow Water ◽  
Fully Bayesian ◽  
Mean Square Errors

Abstract A newly developed state-of-the-art snow water equivalent (SWE) reanalysis dataset over the Sierra Nevada (United States) based on the assimilation of remotely sensed fractional snow-covered area data over the Landsat 5–8 record (1985–2015) is presented. The method (fully Bayesian), resolution (daily and 90 m), temporal extent (31 years), and accuracy provide a unique dataset for investigating snow processes. The verified dataset (based on a comparison with over 9000 station years of in situ data) exhibited mean and root-mean-square errors less than 3 and 13 cm, respectively, and correlation greater than 0.95 compared with in situ SWE observations. The reanalysis dataset was used to characterize the peak SWE climatology to provide a basic accounting of the stored snowpack water in the Sierra Nevada over the last 31 years. The pixel-wise peak SWE volume over the domain was found to be 20.0 km3 on average with a range of 4.0–40.6 km3. The ongoing drought in California contains the two lowest snowpack years (water years 2014 and 2015) and three of the four driest years over the examined record. It was found that the basin-average peak SWE, while underestimating the total water storage in snowpack over the year, accurately captures the interannual variability in stored snowpack water. However, the results showed that the assumption that 1 April SWE is representative of the peak SWE can lead to significant underestimation of basin-average peak SWE both on an average (21% across all basins) and on an interannual basis (up to 98% across all basin years).

scholarly journals Estimated seasonal snow cover and snowfall in Japan

1993 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 179-184
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Nakamura ◽  
Osamu Abe
Keyword(s):  
Snow Cover ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Heavy Snowfall ◽  
Seasonal Snow ◽  
Snow Covered Area ◽  
Covered Area ◽  
Prone Area ◽  
Snow Water ◽  
Seasonal Snow Cover

The average amounts of seasonal snow cover and snowfall in Japan were calculated as 7.9 × 1013kg and 1.2 × 1014kg, respectively. The mass of seasonal snow cover of a heavy-snowfall winter, 1980–81 (56-Gosetsu), was calculated as 1.3 × 1014kg. The amount of 7.9 × 1013kg was converted to water equivalent of 230 mm on the whole snow-covered area, including snow-prone area. A mean of 370 mm in snow water equivalent was calculated for the snow area where mean snow depth on the ground was more than 10 cm.

scholarly journals Representing Variability in Subgrid Snow Cover and Snow Depth in a Global Land Model: Offline Validation

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 3318-3330 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Nitta ◽  
K. Yoshimura ◽  
K. Takata ◽  
R. O’ishi ◽  
T. Sueyoshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Snow Cover ◽  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Snow Cover Fraction ◽  
Snow Covered Area ◽  
Covered Area ◽  
Global Land

Abstract Subgrid snow cover is one of the key parameters in global land models since snow cover has large impacts on the surface energy and moisture budgets, and hence the surface temperature. In this study, the Subgrid Snow Distribution (SSNOWD) snow cover parameterization was incorporated into the Minimal Advanced Treatments of Surface Interaction and Runoff (MATSIRO) land surface model. SSNOWD assumes that the subgrid snow water equivalent (SWE) distribution follows a lognormal distribution function, and its parameters are physically derived from geoclimatic information. Two 29-yr global offline simulations, with and without SSNOWD, were performed while forced with the Japanese 25-yr Reanalysis (JRA-25) dataset combined with an observed precipitation dataset. The simulated spatial patterns of mean monthly snow cover fraction were compared with satellite-based Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) observations. The snow cover fraction was improved by the inclusion of SSNOWD, particularly for the accumulation season and/or regions with relatively small amounts of snowfall; snow cover fraction was typically underestimated in the simulation without SSNOWD. In the Northern Hemisphere, the daily snow-covered area was validated using Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) snow analysis datasets. In the simulation with SSNOWD, snow-covered area largely agreed with the IMS snow analysis and the seasonal cycle in the Northern Hemisphere was improved. This was because SSNOWD formulates the snow cover fraction differently for the accumulation season and ablation season, and represents the hysteresis of the snow cover fraction between different seasons. The effects of including SSNOWD on hydrological properties and snow mass were also examined.

scholarly journals Estimated seasonal snow cover and snowfall in Japan

1993 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 179-184
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Nakamura ◽  
Osamu Abe
Keyword(s):  
Snow Cover ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Heavy Snowfall ◽  
Seasonal Snow ◽  
Snow Covered Area ◽  
Covered Area ◽  
Prone Area ◽  
Snow Water ◽  
Seasonal Snow Cover

The average amounts of seasonal snow cover and snowfall in Japan were calculated as 7.9 × 1013kg and 1.2 × 1014kg, respectively. The mass of seasonal snow cover of a heavy-snowfall winter, 1980–81 (56-Gosetsu), was calculated as 1.3 × 1014kg. The amount of 7.9 × 1013kg was converted to water equivalent of 230 mm on the whole snow-covered area, including snow-prone area. A mean of 370 mm in snow water equivalent was calculated for the snow area where mean snow depth on the ground was more than 10 cm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document