scholarly journals Retail Therapy: How a Trip to the Store Can Make You Feel Better in the Evolving Health Care Landscape Created by the Affordable Care Act

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-260
Author(s):  
Cynthia Liba
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Poverty Level ◽  
Health Clinics ◽  
Medicaid Eligibility ◽  
Individual Mandate ◽  
The Individual

As the ACA expands Medicaid eligibility by creating a national Medicaid minimum eligibility level of 133% of the federal poverty level and requires U.S. citizens to purchase health insurance as a result of the individual mandate, the shortage of primary care physicians will become painfully apparent for those seeking treatment. As a result, many health policy analysts and lawmakers are examining the potential ability of retail health clinics (RHCs) to address the consequences of primary care physician shortages in the United States, among other deficiencies in the provision of health care.

scholarly journals Medical Cannabis for the Primary Care Physician

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 215013271988483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepika Slawek ◽  
Senthil Raj Meenrajan ◽  
Marika Rose Alois ◽  
Paige Comstock Barker ◽  
Irene Mison Estores ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physician ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Chronic Health Conditions ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Medical Cannabis ◽  
Number Of Patients

Medical cannabis use is common in the United States and increasingly more socially acceptable. As more patients seek out and acquire medical cannabis, primary care physicians will be faced with a growing number of patients seeking information on the indications, efficacy, and safety of medical cannabis. We present a case of a patient with several chronic health conditions who asks her primary care provider whether she should try medical cannabis. We provide a review of the pharmacology of medical cannabis, the state of evidence regarding the efficacy of medical cannabis, variations in the types of medical cannabis, and safety monitoring considerations for the primary care physician.

Likelihood of Normal ABI Increases With Physiologic Testing Referrals From Rural Primary Care Physicians

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 123-127
Author(s):  
Robert P. Scissons ◽  
Abraham Ettaher ◽  
Sophia Afridi
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Care Physician ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Ankle Brachial Index ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Health Care Facilities ◽  
Rural Primary Care ◽  
And Gender

Disparities in diagnostic capabilities have been noted between rural and urban health care facilities. We believe the clinical evaluation of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) by rural physicians may be similarly affected. Patients referred for arterial physiologic testing in an urban and rural regional health care network for a consecutive 7-month period were reviewed. Patients were classified into 3 groups based on referring physician specialty: (1) vascular surgeon or vascular medicine specialist (Vasc), (2) urban primary care physician (Urban), and (3) rural primary care physician (Rural). Normal patients were defined by a posterior tibial (PT) or dorsalis pedis (DP) ankle-brachial index (ABI) of ⩾0.90, bilaterally. Abnormal patients had both PT and DP ABI <0.90 in one or both extremities. Group comparisons were made for normal and abnormal patients, age (⩾65 years old), and gender. Patients with history of amputations, angioplasty, bypass graft, stent, calcification (PT or DP ABI ⩾1.30), and previous physiologic testing outside the designated period of analysis were considered a separate subclassification and analyzed separately. Emergency room referrals, inpatients, and patients with incomplete examination data were excluded from the analysis. A total of 430 patient exams were evaluated. Group-Rural had significantly greater numbers of normal ABI patients compared with Group-Urban ( P = .0028) and Group-Vasc ( P = .0000). No significant differences were noted between all groups for age and gender. Substantial disparities were noted in normal and abnormal ABI patients between rural health care physicians and their urban primary care and vascular specialist counterparts. Significantly greater numbers of normal ABI referrals by rural primary care physicians may warrant enhanced PAD diagnosis education or telemedicine alternatives.

scholarly journals The Role of Primary Care Physicians (DLP) in Community Care

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Dhanasari Vidiawati Trisna Sanyoto ◽  
Nur Afrainin Syah
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Medical Training ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Family Doctors ◽  
Postgraduate Medical Training ◽  
Care Services

Dokter Layanan Primer (DLP) or Primary Care Physician (PCP) is a newly introduced term by the Indonesian government in 2013 since the enforcement of Medical Education Law 20/2013. DLP is a physician who solidifies his/ her education and career in primary care. They have postgraduate medical training in primary care and are experts in this field. In most countries, to be a generalist physician practising at primary care facilities such as health centres and primary care clinics, medical school graduates have to take postgraduate medical training to be proficient in terms of knowledge and skills in primary care services. Family medicine is the main body of knowledge of the primary care postgraduate training program in those countries even though their graduates are called differently among countries. These physicians are called family doctors or family physicians in the United States of America (USA), general practitioners (GPs) in Commonwealth countries, huisarts in the Netherlands. In Indonesia, where social, economic, and cultural diversity is very high in various regions, in addition to Family Medicine, Community Medicine and Public Health....

scholarly journals Health Care Professionals� Clinical Perspectives on Glycemic Control and Satisfaction With a New Blood Glucose Meter With a Color Range Indicator: Online Evaluation in India, Russia, China, and the United States (Preprint)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Grady ◽  
Laurence Barry Katz ◽  
Pamela Anderson ◽  
Brian Leonard Levy
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
The United States ◽  
Color Features ◽  
Glucose Meter ◽  
Diabetes Educators

BACKGROUND We previously demonstrated in patients with diabetes that displaying blood glucose results in association with color improved their ability to interpret glucose results. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to investigate the perceptions of health care professionals (HCPs) in specific countries about the value of color on a new glucose meter and to determine if HCP perspectives among countries differ on the value of this approach in clinical practice. METHODS A total of 180 HCPs, including 105 endocrinologists, 34 primary care physicians, 25 diabetes educators, and 16 pharmacists, were recruited from India (n=50), Russia (n=50), China (n=50), and the United States (n=30). These HCPs experienced the OneTouch Select Plus Simple glucose meter online from their own office computer using interactive demonstrations (webpages, meter simulator, and video clips). After providing demographic and current clinical practice insights, HCPs responded to questions about the utility of the color-enhanced glucose meter. RESULTS Mean age and years in their current professional role for the 180 HCPs was 41.3 (SD 8.1) and 13.3 (SD 6.8) years for endocrinologists, 41.3 (SD 8.3) and 14.1 (SD 6.8) years for primary care physicians, 37.5 (SD 8.7) and 12.7 (SD 6.8) years for diabetes educators, and 35.9 (SD 5.3) and 9.5 (SD 5.2) years for pharmacists. In all, 88% (44/50) of Russian and 83% (25/30) of American HCPs said their patients find it easy to recognize low, in-range, or high blood glucose results compared to 56% (28/50) of HCPs in China and 42% (21/50) in India. Regardless of country, HCPs had less confidence that their patients act on blood glucose results with 52% (26/50) in Russia, 63% (19/30) in the United States, 60% (30/50) in China, and 40% (20/50) in India responding positively. During the interactive online meter experience, HCPs from all countries responded positively to questions about a meter with color features. After reflecting on the value of this meter, most HCPs strongly agreed or agreed their patients would be more inclined to act on results using a meter with color features (Russia: 92%, 46/50; United States: 70%, 21/30; China: 98%, 49/50; India: 94%, 47/50). They also said that color was particularly useful for patients with lower numeracy or education who may struggle with interpreting results (Russia: 98%, 49/50; United States: 77%, 23/30; China: 100%, 50/50; India: 82%, 41/50). CONCLUSIONS This multicountry online study provides evidence that HCPs had high overall satisfaction with the OneTouch Select Plus glucose meter, which uses color-coded information to assist patients with interpreting blood glucose results. This may be especially helpful in patient populations with low numeracy or literacy and limited access to health care and direct interaction with HCPs.

scholarly journals Clinician-selected Electronic Information Resources do not Guarantee Accuracy in Answering Primary Care Physicians' Information Needs

2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Martha Ingrid Preddie
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Information Needs ◽  
The United States ◽  
Information Resources ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Electronic Information Resources ◽  
Clinical Questions

A review of: McKibbon, K. Ann, and Douglas B. Fridsma. “Effectiveness of Clinician-selected Electronic Information Resources for Answering Primary Care Physicians’ Information Needs.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 13.6 (2006): 653-9. Objective – To determine if electronic information resources selected by primary care physicians improve their ability to answer simulated clinical questions. Design – An observational study utilizing hour-long interviews and think-aloud protocols. Setting – The offices and clinics of primary care physicians in Canada and the United States. Subjects – 25 primary care physicians of whom 4 were women, 17 were from Canada, 22 were family physicians, and 24 were board certified. Methods – Participants provided responses to 23 multiple-choice questions. Each physician then chose two questions and looked for the answers utilizing information resources of their own choice. The search processes, chosen resources and search times were noted. These were analyzed along with data on the accuracy of the answers and certainties related to the answer to each clinical question prior to the search. Main results – Twenty-three physicians sought answers to 46 simulated clinical questions. Utilizing only electronic information resources, physicians spent a mean of 13.0 (SD 5.5) minutes searching for answers to the questions, an average of 7.3 (SD 4.0) minutes for the first question and 5.8 (SD 2.2) minutes to answer the second question. On average, 1.8 resources were utilized per question. Resources that summarized information, such as the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, UpToDate and Clinical Evidence, were favored 39.2% of the time, MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed) 35.7%, and Internet resources including Google 22.6%. Almost 50% of the search and retrieval strategies were keyword-based, while MeSH, subheadings and limiting were used less frequently. On average, before searching physicians answered 10 of 23 (43.5%) questions accurately. For questions that were searched using clinician-selected electronic resources, 18 (39.1%) of the 46 answers were accurate before searching, while 19 (42.1%) were accurate after searching. The difference of one correct answer was due to the answers from 5 (10.9%) questions changing from correct to incorrect, while the answers to 6 questions (13.0%) changed from incorrect to correct. The ability to provide correct answers differed among the various resources. Google and Cochrane provided the correct answers about 50% of the time while PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, UpToDate, Ovid Evidence Based Medicine Reviews and InfoPOEMs were more likely to be associated with incorrect answers. Physicians also seemed unable to determine when they needed to search for information in order to make an accurate decision. Conclusion – Clinician-selected electronic information resources did not guarantee accuracy in the answers provided to simulated clinical questions. At times the use of these resources caused physicians to change self-determined correct answers to incorrect ones. The authors state that this was possibly due to factors such as poor choice of resources, ineffective search strategies, time constraints and automation bias. Library and information practitioners have an important role to play in identifying and advocating for appropriate information resources to be integrated into the electronic medical record systems provided by health care institutions to ensure evidence based health care delivery.

scholarly journals Cancer Care and Cancer Survivorship Care in the United States: Will We Be Able to Care for These Patients in the Future?

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence N. Shulman ◽  
Linda A. Jacobs ◽  
Sheldon Greenfield ◽  
Barbara Jones ◽  
Mary S. McCabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
The United States ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Number Of Patients

The combination of a shortfall in oncologists and primary care physicians and an increased number of patients using more health care resources raises concerns about our health care system's ability to accommodate future patients with cancer and cancer survivors.

scholarly journals Benefits of Teledermatology for Geriatric Patients: Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study

10.2196/16700 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. e16700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mara G Bianchi ◽  
Andre Santos ◽  
Eduardo Cordioli
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Care Physician ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Skin Lesions ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Pigmentary Disorders ◽  
The World ◽  
Skin Conditions

Background Teledermatology is a health care tool that has been increasingly used around the world, mostly because dermatology has an emphasis on visual diagnosis. Many studies have shown that access to specialized care improves using teledermatology, which provides accurate diagnosis and reduces the time taken for treatment, with high patient satisfaction. As the population around the world grows old, there will be even more demand for dermatologists in years to come. It is essential to know which are the most prevalent skin conditions in the primary care population and if they can be addressed through teledermatology. Objective Our main goal was to evaluate the proportion of lesions in individuals aged 60 years and older that could be managed using teledermatology in conjunction with primary care physicians. Second, we aimed to assess the most frequent skin lesions, the most common treatments provided to patients, and the distribution and causes of referrals made by the teledermatologists. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study from July 2017 to July 2018 in São Paulo, Brazil. We included 6633 individuals aged 60 years and older who presented with 12,770 skin lesions. Teledermatologists had three options to refer patients: (1) to undergo biopsy directly, (2) to an in-person dermatologist visit, and (3) back to the primary care physician with the most probable diagnosis and treatment. Results Teledermatology managed 66.66% (8408/12614) of dermatoses with the primary care physician without the need for an in-presence visit; 27.10% (3419/12614) were referred to dermatologists, and 6.24% (787/12614) directly to biopsy. The most frequent diseases were seborrheic keratosis, solar lentigo, onychomycosis, melanocytic nevus, benign neoplasms, actinic keratosis, epidermoid cyst, xerosis, leucoderma, and wart, with significant differences between sexes. Malignant tumors increased with age and were the leading cause for biopsies, while infectious skin conditions and pigmentary disorders decreased. Emollient was the most frequent treatment prescribed, in 31.88% (909/2856) of the cases. Conclusions Teledermatology helped to treat 67% of the dermatoses of older individuals, addressing cases of minor complexity quickly and conveniently together with the primary care physician, thus optimizing dermatological appointments for the most severe, surgical, or complex diseases. Teledermatology does not aim to replace a face-to-face visit with the dermatologist; however, it might help to democratize dermatological treatment access for patients and decrease health care expenses.

scholarly journals Benefits of Teledermatology for Geriatric Patients: Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mara G Bianchi ◽  
Andre Santos ◽  
Eduardo Cordioli
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Care Physician ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Skin Lesions ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Pigmentary Disorders ◽  
The World ◽  
Skin Conditions

BACKGROUND Teledermatology is a health care tool that has been increasingly used around the world, mostly because dermatology has an emphasis on visual diagnosis. Many studies have shown that access to specialized care improves using teledermatology, which provides accurate diagnosis and reduces the time taken for treatment, with high patient satisfaction. As the population around the world grows old, there will be even more demand for dermatologists in years to come. It is essential to know which are the most prevalent skin conditions in the primary care population and if they can be addressed through teledermatology. OBJECTIVE Our main goal was to evaluate the proportion of lesions in individuals aged 60 years and older that could be managed using teledermatology in conjunction with primary care physicians. Second, we aimed to assess the most frequent skin lesions, the most common treatments provided to patients, and the distribution and causes of referrals made by the teledermatologists. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study from July 2017 to July 2018 in São Paulo, Brazil. We included 6633 individuals aged 60 years and older who presented with 12,770 skin lesions. Teledermatologists had three options to refer patients: (1) to undergo biopsy directly, (2) to an in-person dermatologist visit, and (3) back to the primary care physician with the most probable diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS Teledermatology managed 66.66% (8408/12614) of dermatoses with the primary care physician without the need for an in-presence visit; 27.10% (3419/12614) were referred to dermatologists, and 6.24% (787/12614) directly to biopsy. The most frequent diseases were seborrheic keratosis, solar lentigo, onychomycosis, melanocytic nevus, benign neoplasms, actinic keratosis, epidermoid cyst, xerosis, leucoderma, and wart, with significant differences between sexes. Malignant tumors increased with age and were the leading cause for biopsies, while infectious skin conditions and pigmentary disorders decreased. Emollient was the most frequent treatment prescribed, in 31.88% (909/2856) of the cases. CONCLUSIONS Teledermatology helped to treat 67% of the dermatoses of older individuals, addressing cases of minor complexity quickly and conveniently together with the primary care physician, thus optimizing dermatological appointments for the most severe, surgical, or complex diseases. Teledermatology does not aim to replace a face-to-face visit with the dermatologist; however, it might help to democratize dermatological treatment access for patients and decrease health care expenses.

scholarly journals Teaching Chronic Pain in the Family Medicine Residency

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
Kimberly Zoberi ◽  
Kelly M. Everard
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Family Medicine Residency

Background and Objectives: Chronic pain is a significant condition affecting many Americans. Primary care physicians play an important role in chronic pain management, but many residents and physicians feel poorly prepared to manage it. Methods: Data were collected as part of the 2016 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) Program Director Survey, which was sent electronically to 484 program directors in the United States. The authors sought to determine whether residency directors’ attitudes about treating chronic pain were associated with the amount of time devoted to teaching family medicine residents about chronic pain assessment, therapy (use of opioids, use adjuvant pain medications, use of other nonopioids, use of nonpharmacological treatments), and risk management (risk assessment, use of pain management contracts, informed consent when prescribing opioids, and urine drug monitoring). Attitudes were assessed by asking whether: (1) chronic pain is best managed by a primary care physician (PCP); (2) prescribing opioid medications is time consuming; (3) prescribing opioids is high-risk; (4) prescribing opioids contributes to opioid misuse; and (4) effective nonopioid treatments exist. An additional question assessed confidence in treating chronic pain. Results: The response rate was 53%. The average family medicine residency devotes about 33 hours to education about pain management topics including 5.4 hours on chronic pain assessment, 16.2 hours on therapy, and 11.4 hours on risk assessment. Residency directors’ belief that there are effective nonopioid treatments for chronic pain was the only attitude item that was associated with teaching about chronic pain. Conclusions: Residency directors’ attitudes do not predict the time devoted to teaching chronic pain in family medicine residencies.

Do patients with and without a regular primary care physician have their psychological distress looked after differently?

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Sing Sun ◽  
Tai Pong Lam ◽  
Kwok Fai Lam ◽  
Tak Lam Lo ◽  
David Vai Kiong Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Continuity Of Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Psychological Problems

Abstract Background While qualitative studies suggested that continuity of care by primary care physicians (PCPs) facilitated consultations for psychological problems, there was limited quantitative evidence. This survey compared management of psychological distress between patients with and without a regular PCP. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted with 1626 adult primary care attenders from 13 private and 6 public clinics in Hong Kong. Management of psychological distress between respondents with a regular PCP and those without were compared. Effects of demographic factors were adjusted for by multivariable logistic regression. Results Among the 1626 respondents, 650 (40.0%) reported that they had ever experienced psychological distress. Of the 650 respondents experienced distress, 307 (47.2%) had a regular PCP. A significantly higher proportion of patients with a regular PCP than those without reported: (i) their PCPs sometimes/often asked about psychological problems [37.7 versus 20.1%, adjusted OR = 2.241]; (ii) they sometimes/often mentioned their psychological problems to PCPs [45.2 versus 24.9%, adjusted OR = 2.503]; and (iii) their distress had been treated by PCPs [22.1 versus 13.4%, adjusted OR = 1.702]. Conclusion Patients with a regular PCP have around double odds of receiving mental health care. Continuity of care by PCPs should be emphasized in mental health care delivery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document