LEGAL STATUS OF EMPLOYEES OF THE CRIMINAL EXECUTIVE SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

В статье изучаются особенности прохождения службы сотрудниками уголовно-исполнительной системы в соответствии с Федеральным законом от 19.07.2018 № 197-ФЗ «О службе в уголовно-исполнительной системе Российской Федерации и о внесении изменений в Закон Российской Федерации "Об учреждениях и органах, исполняющих уголовные наказания в виде лишения свободы"». Авторами исследуются принципы прохождения службы в уголовно-исполнительной системе, положения, благодаря которым реализуются данные принципы, а также нормы, касающиеся правового статуса сотрудника уголовно-исполнительной системы. В статье особое внимание уделяется ограничениям и запретам, связанным с принятием на службу. Подробно рассматривается понятие «контракт», особенности его заключения, продления и основания для прекращения его действия. Изучается такое понятие, как испытательный срок, выясняется, от чего зависит его продолжительность. Рассматриваются социальные гарантии сотрудников уголовно-исполнительной системы. В ходе исследования авторы приходят к выводу, что изучаемый закон устанавливает правовые, организационные и финансово-экономические начала прохождения службы в уголовно-исполнительной системе, а также определяет правоотношения, которые возникают при поступлении граждан Российской Федерации на службу в УИС, и гарантии социальной защиты сотрудников УИС. In the article, the authors study the features of service by employees of the criminal Executive system in accordance with the Federal law of 19.07.2018, no. 197-ФЗ «On service in the penitentiary system of the Russian Federation and on introducing amendments to Russian Federation Law "On institutions and bodies executing criminal penalties of imprisonment"». The authors study the principles of service in the criminal Executive system, as well as study the provisions by which these principles are implemented. The norms concerning the legal status of an employee of the criminal Executive system are being studied. In the article special attention is paid to the limitations and prohibitions associated with the adoption of the service. The concept of a «contract» is considered in detail, as well as the specifics of its conclusion, extension, and grounds for termination. The authors study such a concept as a probation period, and find out what determines its duration. Social guarantees of employees of the criminal Executive system are considered. In this study, the authors conclude that the study of the law establishes the legal, organizational and financial-economic start of the service in criminally-Executive system, and also determines such legal relations that arise when the citizens of the Russian Federation entered the service in the penal system, consequently become employees of the UIS and receive guarantees of social protection.

The Certainty of the Legal Status of Court Secretary and Court Clerk in Federal Courts

RUSSIAN JUSTICE ◽

10.37399/issn2072-909x.2020.6.26-34 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 6 ◽

pp. 26-34

Author(s):

E. V. Gerasenko ◽

Keyword(s):

Russian Federation ◽

Legal Status ◽

System Analysis ◽

Civil Service ◽

Federal Courts ◽

Scientific Methods ◽

Level Of Education ◽

Additional Qualification ◽

The Status ◽

The Russian Federation

Employees of the federal courts' apparatus, in accordance with the current regulations, are public civil servants. In practice and in existing scientific research there is an approach to determining the legal status of this category of public servants through their duties, without specifying the specific requirements for candidates for the position to be filled. The purpose of this study is to define additional qualification requirements to be imposed on the applicant for the position of State Civil Service «Court Secretary» in court, in addition to those contained in the Federal Law «On State Civil Service of the Russian Federation» and orders of the Judicial Department of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. The tasks of this work are to study the theoretical foundations of the concept of «status of a State civil servant », to compare federal legislation, decrees of the President of the Russian Federation, decisions and other acts of ministries and departments in the field of the State civil service in the apparatus of federal courts; Justification for the need to include in the status of a public servant serving in the court apparatus additional requirements for the level of education. The methodological basis of the present study was the general scientific methods such as analogy, derivation, system analysis, as well as the private scientific methods: formal-logical, technical-legal and comparativelegal in their various combinations. The study concluded that it was necessary to distinguish the status of federal court staff according to the level of education required to replace a public civil service post, in particular the «Registrar of the Court».

Improvement of criminal-procedural legislation, regulating the activities of employees, establishments and bodies of the penal system

Vestnik Kuzbasskogo instituta ◽

10.53993/2078-3914/2019/1(38)/111-118 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 111-118

Author(s):

Александр Борисович Диваев

Keyword(s):

Russian Federation ◽

Preventive Measures ◽

Criminal Procedure ◽

Criminal Investigation ◽

Penal System ◽

House Arrest ◽

Effective Implementation ◽

Procedure Code ◽

The Status ◽

The Russian Federation

В представленной статье рассмотрен ряд вопросов совершенствования регламентации процессуальных полномочий органов и учреждений уголовно-исполнительной системы Российской Федерации. Высказаны предложения по модернизации ряда норм, устанавливающих статус органов и учреждений уголовно-исполнительной системы и их должностных лиц как органов дознания. Рассмотрен круг проблем, связанных с более четким процессуальным регулированием механизма исполнения меры пресечения в виде домашнего ареста. Даны предложения по внесению изменения в уголовно-процессуальное законодательство, которые должны содействовать более эффективной реализации полномочий по контролю за арестованными со стороны уголовно-исполнительных инспекций. Сформулировано предложение по устранению терминологической неточности, допущенной в ст. 397 Уголовно-процессуального кодекса Российской Федерации. The article deals with a number of issues of improving the regulation of procedural powers of bodies and institutions of the penal system of the Russian Federation. In particular the proposals for the modernization of a number of rules establishing the status of the bodies and institutions of penal system, and their officials, as criminal investigation bodies. In addition, the range of problems associated with a more precise procedural regulation of the mechanism of execution of preventive measures in the form of house arrest. In this regard, proposals were made to amend the criminal procedure legislation, which should contribute to a more effective implementation of the powers to control arrested persons by the penal inspections. In conclusion, a proposal to eliminate the terminological inaccuracy in article 397 of the Criminal procedure code of the Russian Federation is formulated.

Territories with special status within Federal States (constitutional and legal research)

10.12737/monography_5c3dc6e37850a6.50744079 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Игорь Ирхин ◽

Igor Irkhin

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Russian Federation ◽

Legal Status ◽

The United States ◽

Legal Regulation ◽

Public Law ◽

Legal Research ◽

Federal States ◽

The Status ◽

The Russian Federation

This monograph comprehensively examines the constitutional and legal status of territories with a special status within the Federal States in the context of the Institute of territorial autonomy. The study is based on the experience of constitutional and legal regulation of the status of Autonomous districts in the "composite subjects" of the Russian Federation, administrative-territorial units with a special status in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, Autonomous districts in India, Nunavut territory in Canada, unincorporated territories of the United States This monograph is one of the first works in the domestic jurisprudence, in which the study was conducted from the perspective of territorial autonomy. The publication is intended for researchers, postgraduates and students, all readers interested in constitutional (public) law, theory of state and law.

RATIO OF THE LEGAL AND PROCEDURAL STATUS OF THE HEAD OF INVESTIGATIVE BODY

Proceedings of Southwest State University ◽

10.21869/2223-1560-2018-22-2-158-165 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 22 (2) ◽

pp. 158-165

Author(s):

T. Yu. Popova

Keyword(s):

Russian Federation ◽

Legal Status ◽

Criminal Liability ◽

Criminal Procedure ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Legal Proceedings ◽

The Status ◽

The Russian Federation ◽

Legal Sense

Article is devoted to search of author's determination of the criminal procedure status of the head of investigative body. Determination of the status is given in it is general legal sense, types of legal statuses, such as the general (constitutional), special (patrimonial), individual, the status of the foreigner and branch legal statuses are allocated. The discussion about a ratio of legal status and a legal status on the basis of which conclusions the author has divided concepts of legal and procedural status per se is given. Are carried to number of elements of legal status of the head of investigative body: the rights and duties provided by the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and specified departmental standard legal by acts of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, SK of Russia and FSB of Russia; the criminal liability regulated by the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the disciplinary responsibility provided by subordinate regulations for non-execution or inadequate execution of the procedural powers; procedural and administrative accountability of activity of the head of investigative body to the head of higher investigative body. Elements of the criminal procedure status of the designated participant of criminal trial, according to the author, are the rights and duties provided by the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation; the accountability of activity of the head of investigative body to the head of higher investigative body regulated by the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. The author has also mentioned a discussion about existence of criminal procedure responsibility of participants of criminal legal proceedings. In article the maintenance of each of elements of the status and justification of reference of each of them to this or that type of the status is opened. Proceeding from the considered structure, the concept of the criminal procedure status of the head of investigative body as the position of the head of the investigative body including his procedural laws, duties and accountability to the head of higher investigative body regulated only by the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation is formulated.

Constitutional status of persons who are not citizens of the Russian Federation

Izvestiya of Saratov University New Series Series Economics Management Law ◽

10.18500/1994-2540-2021-21-1-100-105 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

pp. 100-105

Author(s):

Andrei D. Bezuglov ◽

Keyword(s):

Russian Federation ◽

Legal Status ◽

Legal Regulation ◽

Social Rights ◽

International Treaties ◽

Economic Rights ◽

Constitutional Level ◽

The Status ◽

The Russian Federation ◽

Stateless Person

Introduction. The constitutional and legal status of persons who are not citizens of Russia is directly related to their political, social, personal and economic rights and freedoms. This raises the problem of correctly determining the status of persons who do not have Russian citizenship due to the fact that the legislation contains many provisions covering the totality of legal relations related to the status of a foreign citizen and a stateless person, where the personal and social rights of a person do not depend on his / her citizenship of another state. Theoretical analysis. The article examines the content of the constitutional status of non-citizens on the territory of Russia. It follows from the content of the first chapter of the Constitution of the Russian Federation that the concept of personality includes any person who is both a citizen and a foreign citizen, or a stateless person, therefore, the rights and obligations established in relation to a person apply to non-citizens. Empirical analysis. The analysis of many rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation revealed that they are not related to citizenship and apply to all people, therefore, non-citizens should have the ability, enshrined at the constitutional level, to protect their rights in case of their violation by contacting state bodies and local self-government bodies. Results. Non-citizens enjoy the rights and bear obligations on the equal basis with the citizens of the Russian Federation, taking into account the peculiarities and restrictions established by federal laws and international treaties. There is a promising opportunity to improve Russian legislation by identifying an independent term of “non-citizens”, which will unite foreign citizens and stateless persons in order to implement comprehensive legal regulation for this category of persons.

Some aspects of the constitutional and legal status of the institution of the commissioner for the protection of the rights of entrepreneurs in Russia

Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University ◽

10.17803/2311-5998.2021.80.4.230-235 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 230-235

Author(s):

V. A. Fadeeva

Keyword(s):

Russian Federation ◽

Legal Status ◽

Legal Regulation ◽

Business Community ◽

Annual Reports ◽

The Status ◽

The Russian Federation

The Institute of the Business Ombudsman in Russia has been functioning in the Russian Federation for more than eight years. His work is positively evaluated by the business community. The article outlines some issues of legal regulation of the status of the Business Ombudsman in Russia. The analysis of the indicators of the annual reports of the federal business Ombudsman allows us to draw a conclusion about the effectiveness and relevance of the institute under study. The author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to further improve the legal regulation of the status of the federal business ombudsman.

FEATURES OF THE LEGAL STATUS OF MINOR PARENTS

EurasianUnionScientists ◽

10.31618/esu.2413-9335.2020.5.72.651 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 5 (3(72)) ◽

pp. 53-57

Author(s):

A.I. Mamoshin

Keyword(s):

Russian Federation ◽

Legal Status ◽

Scientific Article ◽

Knowledge Analysis ◽

Legal Situation ◽

The Family ◽

Analysis And Synthesis ◽

The Status ◽

The Russian Federation ◽

Comprehensive Study

Background. The purpose of this scientific article is a comprehensive study of some peculiarities of the legal situation of minor parents under the family legislation of the Russian Federation. Methods of scientific research have drawn up general-theoretic methods of knowledge: analysis and synthesis, derivation and induction, as well as a method of prediction. Private-legal methods include formal-logical and legaldogmatic methods. The results of scientific knowledge are that the author analysed the peculiarities of the legal status of minor parents and identified some gaps in the current legislation concerning the implementation of the rights and obligations of minor parents Conclusions. Summing up the work, we concluded that it is necessary to make some changes to the current legislation and recognize the status of minor parents as a significant basis for recognizing minor citizens as fully capable.

The right of Police officers and the Criminal-executive system to use firearms: some issues of theory and practice

Law Нerald of Dagestan State University ◽

10.21779/2224-0241-2021-39-3-136-143 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (3) ◽

pp. 136-143

Author(s):

A. А. Alimov ◽

◽

S. A. Yunusov ◽

Keyword(s):

Russian Federation ◽

Police Officers ◽

Legal Regulation ◽

Theory And Practice ◽

Penal System ◽

Federal Law ◽

The Russian Federation ◽

Executive System ◽

The Law ◽

The Right

The article is devoted to the analysis of the Federal Law «On the Police» and the law of the Russian Federation «On Institutions and Bodies Executing Criminal Sentences in the Form of Imprisonment», which empowers the police and the penal system with the right to use firearms. Possible problems of the implementation of the provisions of the legislation are identified, specific measures are proposed to improve the efficiency of legal regulation of the use of firearms by police officers and the penal system

Some issues of legal regulation (of the legal status) control and accounting bodies of municipalities

Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia ◽

10.35750/2071-8284-2020-2-82-88 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2020 (2) ◽

pp. 82-88

Author(s):

Oleg Kozhevnikov

Keyword(s):

Russian Federation ◽

Legal Status ◽

Legal Regulation ◽

Regulatory Framework ◽

Legal Analysis ◽

Federal Law ◽

Government Organization ◽

The Past ◽

The Status ◽

The Russian Federation

Almost three decades have passed since the appearance of the Law of the Russian Federation from 06.07.1991 No. 1550-1 «On local self-government in the Russian Federation». Over the past historical stage, the regulatory framework of local self-government and its bodies has significantly transformed: this applies to the concept of local self-government, territorial and organizational foundations, and of course the legal status of individual local self-government bodies. This article provides a comparative legal analysis of certain provisions of Federal law No. 131-FZ of 06.102.2003 «On General principles of local self-government organization in the Russian Federation» and Federal law No. 6-FZ of 07.02.2011 «On General principles of organization and activity of control and accounting bodies of subjects of the Russian Federation and municipalities» in the part concerning control and accounting bodies of municipalities. Based on the results of this analysis, significant contradictions were identified in the basic Federal normative legal acts regulating the legal status of the control and accounting body of a municipality, which need to be corrected by the Federal legislator in order to increase the level of unity and consistency in the legal regulation of the status of one of the most important bodies in the system of local self-government-the control and accounting body of a municipality.