SPECIFIC FEATURES OF THE RUSSIAN PENAL SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FEDERAL LAW № 197

2020 ◽  
pp. 140-144
Author(s):  
Дмитрий Эдуардович Марченко ◽  
Оганнес Давитович Мкртчян
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Social Protection ◽  
Financial Economic ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Executive System ◽  
Criminal Penalties ◽  
The Law

В статье изучаются особенности прохождения службы сотрудниками уголовно-исполнительной системы в соответствии с Федеральным законом от 19.07.2018 № 197-ФЗ «О службе в уголовно-исполнительной системе Российской Федерации и о внесении изменений в Закон Российской Федерации "Об учреждениях и органах, исполняющих уголовные наказания в виде лишения свободы"». Авторами исследуются принципы прохождения службы в уголовно-исполнительной системе, положения, благодаря которым реализуются данные принципы, а также нормы, касающиеся правового статуса сотрудника уголовно-исполнительной системы. В статье особое внимание уделяется ограничениям и запретам, связанным с принятием на службу. Подробно рассматривается понятие «контракт», особенности его заключения, продления и основания для прекращения его действия. Изучается такое понятие, как испытательный срок, выясняется, от чего зависит его продолжительность. Рассматриваются социальные гарантии сотрудников уголовно-исполнительной системы. В ходе исследования авторы приходят к выводу, что изучаемый закон устанавливает правовые, организационные и финансово-экономические начала прохождения службы в уголовно-исполнительной системе, а также определяет правоотношения, которые возникают при поступлении граждан Российской Федерации на службу в УИС, и гарантии социальной защиты сотрудников УИС. In the article, the authors study the features of service by employees of the criminal Executive system in accordance with the Federal law of 19.07.2018, no. 197-ФЗ «On service in the penitentiary system of the Russian Federation and on introducing amendments to Russian Federation Law "On institutions and bodies executing criminal penalties of imprisonment"». The authors study the principles of service in the criminal Executive system, as well as study the provisions by which these principles are implemented. The norms concerning the legal status of an employee of the criminal Executive system are being studied. In the article special attention is paid to the limitations and prohibitions associated with the adoption of the service. The concept of a «contract» is considered in detail, as well as the specifics of its conclusion, extension, and grounds for termination. The authors study such a concept as a probation period, and find out what determines its duration. Social guarantees of employees of the criminal Executive system are considered. In this study, the authors conclude that the study of the law establishes the legal, organizational and financial-economic start of the service in criminally-Executive system, and also determines such legal relations that arise when the citizens of the Russian Federation entered the service in the penal system, consequently become employees of the UIS and receive guarantees of social protection.

scholarly journals The right of Police officers and the Criminal-executive system to use firearms: some issues of theory and practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 136-143
Author(s):  
A. А. Alimov ◽  
◽  
S. A. Yunusov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Executive System ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to the analysis of the Federal Law «On the Police» and the law of the Russian Federation «On Institutions and Bodies Executing Criminal Sentences in the Form of Imprisonment», which empowers the police and the penal system with the right to use firearms. Possible problems of the implementation of the provisions of the legislation are identified, specific measures are proposed to improve the efficiency of legal regulation of the use of firearms by police officers and the penal system

scholarly journals LEGAL STATUS OF EMPLOYEES OF THE CRIMINAL EXECUTIVE SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2(52)) ◽  
pp. 113-116
Author(s):  
Natalia Evgenievna Kuznetsova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Penal System ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Executive System

The purpose of the study is devoted to the actual problems of the status of employees of the penal system. The paper identifies the problems of determining the status of employees of the penal system, and also suggests some methods and mechanisms for solving these problems.

Termination of the contract on the service in the criminal executive system of the Russian Federation: analysis of legislation and judicial practice

2020 ◽  
pp. 155-161
Author(s):  
Юлия Александровна Борзенко
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Penal System ◽  
The Past ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Personal Opinion ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Executive System ◽  
The Law ◽  
Correction System

1 августа 2020 г. будет ровно два года, как действует долгожданный сотрудниками уголовно-исполнительной системы Федеральный закон от 19.07.2018 № 197-ФЗ «О службе в уголовно-исполнительной системе Российской Федерации и о внесении изменений в Закон Российской Федерации “Об учреждениях и органах, исполняющих уголовные наказания в виде лишения свободы”» (далее - Закон «О службе в УИС»). Прошедший срок уже позволяет сделать выводы об эффективности его положений, коллизиях и пробелах в нормах с позиции правоприменителя и сложившейся судебной практики. К сожалению, отсутствие доктринальных трудов по рассматриваемому вопросу исключает возможность дискуссии в рамках статьи. Безусловно, все положения Закона «О службе в УИС» заслуживают детального внимания, но, по нашему мнению, особую социальную значимость и озабоченность для сотрудников, проходящих службу, вызывают нормы главы 12 Закона «О службе в УИС», регламентирующей основания и порядок прекращения и расторжения контракта о службе в УИС. В статье проведен анализ отдельных норм Закона «О службе в УИС», касающихся расторжения контракта и увольнения сотрудников УИС, выбор анализируемых положений обуславливается сложившейся судебной практикой и личным мнением автора о последовательном изучении ст. 84 рассматриваемого нормативного акта. Не исключено, что в последующем автор вернется к рассматриваемой теме и продолжит исследование не изученных в настоящей статье положений главы 12 Закона «О службе в УИС». On August 1, 2020, there will be exactly two years since the long-awaited Federal Penitentiary System Act of July 19, 2018 N 197-ФЗ On Serving in the Penitentiary System of the Russian Federation and on Amending the Law of the Russian Federation On Institutions and Bodies performing criminal sentences of imprisonment ”(hereinafter - the Law “On Service in the Penal Correction System”). The past term already allows us to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of its provisions, the gaps in the norms, not only on the basis of doctrinal analysis, but also from the perspective of the law enforcer, the prevailing judicial practice. Of course, all the provisions of the Law “On Service in the Penal Administration” deserve detailed attention, but, in our opinion, the norms of chapter 12 of the Law “On Service in the Penal Administration”, which regulates the grounds and procedure for terminating and termination of the service contract in the penal correction system. The article analyzes certain provisions of the Law “On Service in the Penal Correction System” regarding termination of the contract and dismissal of the penal system; the choice of the analyzed provisions is determined by the prevailing judicial practice and the author’s personal opinion on the consistent study of Art. 84 of the considered normative act. It is possible that in the future, the author will return to the subject under consideration and continue the study of the provisions of chapter 12 of the Law “On Service in the Penal Correction System” that are not studied in this article.

Legal Status of Оbjects of Religious Purpose and Their Property in Prism of Securty Law

2020 ◽  
pp. 211-222
Author(s):  
Александр Сергеевич Якунин
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
The State ◽  
Religious Organizations ◽  
Religious Organization ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Property Relations ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Special Rights

Статья раскрывает правовые возможности, условия и основания возвращения имущества религиозного назначения религиозным организациям, находящегося в государственной собственности в пространстве юридического законодательства РФ. Наиболее перспективный и быстрый путь получения информации о проблемах в области передачи имущества религиозного назначения - это изучение законодательства Российской Федерации о правовом положении имущества религиозного назначения. А именно Федерального закона от 30.11.2010 № 327¬ФЗ «О передаче религиозным организациям имущества религиозного назначения, находящегося в государственной или муниципальной собственности». Данный закон предоставил особенные права религиозным организациям в сфере имущественных отношений. Практика применения данного Федерального закона накоплена и составляет на сегодняшний день 10 лет. И даже сегодня органы власти сталкиваются с религиозными организациями по многим трудноразрешимым вопросам при реализации предоставленных прав Федеральным законом № 327¬ФЗ от 30.11.2010 «О передаче религиозным организациям имущества религиозного назначения, находящегося в государственной или муниципальной собственности». Анализ данного законопроекта может дать подробную информацию по рассматриваемой теме. Какое имущество относится к имуществу религиозного назначения? Какие основные проблемы в реализации законодательства о передаче религиозным организациям имущества религиозного назначения? Какие основные критерии отказа в передаче религиозной организации имущества в собственность или в безвозмездное пользование? В данной статье будет предпринята попытка ответить на эти и другие вопросы. The article reveals the legal possibilities, conditions and bases for the return of religious property, which isowned by the state and subjected to the jurisdiction of the Russian Federationto religious organizations. The most promising and quick way to get information about the problems of the transfer of religious property is studying the legislation of the Russian Federation concerning the legal status of religious property owned by the state or municipality, specifical ly the Federal law № 327FZ of 30.11.2010 «About thetransfer of state or municipal property for religious purposes to religious organizations». This law grants special rights to religious organi zations in the sphere of property relations. There have been many cases of applying this Federal law, which is currently 10 years old. But until now the state authorities have facedmany difficult is sues with religious organizations, trying to implement the rights granted by Federal law № 327FZ of 30.11.2010 «About the transfer of state or municipal property for religious purposes to reli gious organizations». An analysis of this draft law can provide detailed information about the top ic in question. What property is classified as religious property? What are the main problems im plementing the law of the transfer of religious property to religious organizations? What are the main criteria for refusing such transfer of property for ownership or gratuitous use to a religious organization? This article attempts to answer these and other questions.

scholarly journals Administrative Restraint Measures Applied by Employees of the Penal System of the Russian Federation in Connection with the Commission of an Administrative Offense

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 650-658
Author(s):  
Sergei A. Starostin ◽  
Nadezhda V. Aniskina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Physical Force ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: the article considers the theory and practice of applying administrative restraint measures implemented by employees of the penal system of the Russian Federation in case of the commission of an administrative offense. We substantiate an idea concerning the impact of the effectiveness of the use of administrative coercion measures by employees of the penal system not only on the overall level of penitentiary security, but also on state security in general. Aim: to reveal the specifics of application of administrative restraint measures in the penal system, taking into account the specifics of the law enforcement sphere. Methods: our research is based on the dialectical method of scientific cognition. The article uses general scientific (analysis, synthesis, induction, etc.), specific scientific and special methods of cognition (comparative legal, formal legal, statistical). Results: we reveal the essence of application of administrative restraint measures in the penal system; we study the practice of implementing the norms concerning the use of administrative restraint measures by employees of the penal system; we reveal the features of their application, taking into account the specifics of the sphere of law enforcement sphere, such as focusing on ensuring penitentiary security, preventing administrative offenses and crimes, application on the territory of penitentiary institutions in most cases, etc. We find out that the legal basis for the application of administrative restraint measures in the penal system of the Russian Federation needs to be improved. Conclusions: in order to increase the effectiveness of the practice of implementing administrative enforcement measures in the penal system, we formulate proposals to improve the norms of the current legislation: namely, Section V of the Law of the Russian Federation of July 21, 993 no. 5473-1 should contain definitions of the terms “use of physical force”, “use of special means”; the terms such as application and use of firearms should be distinguished; the wording “provision of medical first aid” should be replaced with “immediate provision of premedical aid to victims”. We also present arguments in favor of the expediency of supplementing Federal Law 197-FZ of July 19, 2018 “About the service in the Penal System of the Russian Federation...” with a provision that assigns to the employees of the penal system the duty to comply with the norms of criminal legislation (on necessary defense, extreme necessity and other circumstances excluding the criminality of the act) in cases of the implementation of administrative restraint measures.

PUBLIC CONTROL OVER THE ACTIVITIES OF THE PENAL SYSTEM: SUBJECT AND TYPES OF SUBJECTS

2020 ◽  
pp. 66-70
Author(s):  
Наталья Сергеевна Малолеткина ◽  
Андрей Петрович Скиба
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Public Control ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Public Monitoring

В статье анализируются вопросы деятельности членов общественных наблюдательных комиссий, контролирующих соблюдение прав лиц, содержащихся в учреждениях уголовно-исполнительной системы Российской Федерации. Теоретически реализация института общественного контроля необходима для соблюдения законности и повышения эффективности деятельности сотрудников мест принудительного содержания, выполнения ими возложенных на них обязанностей, предупреждения и выявления нарушений законности в их деятельности, а также соблюдения прав содержащихся лиц. В работе определяется перечень субъектов общественного контроля, дается их классификация и приводится предмет общественного контроля, реализуемого общественными наблюдательными комиссиями. С точки зрения правового регулирования деятельности членов общественных наблюдательных комиссий рассматриваются такие нормативные правовые акты, как Уголовно-исполнительный кодекс Российской Федерации и Федеральный закон «Об общественном контроле за обеспечением прав человека в местах принудительного содержания и о содействии лицам, находящимся в местах принудительного содержания». Исследуются положения Уголовно-исполнительного кодекса Республики Казахстан, регулирующие задачи общественного контроля, порядок создания и некоторые аспекты функционирования общественных наблюдательных комиссий в Республике Казахстан. The article analyzes the activities of members of public monitoring commissions that monitor compliance with the rights of persons held in institutions of the Penal system of the Russian Federation. Theoretically, the implementation of the Institute of public control is necessary to comply with the law and improve the efficiency of the employees of places of forced detention, perform their assigned duties, prevent and detect violations of the law in their activities, as well as respect the rights of detainees. The article defines the list of subjects of public control, gives their classification and provides the subject of public control implemented by public monitoring commissions. From the point of view of legal regulation of the activities of members of public monitoring commissions, such normative legal acts as the PenalCode of the Russian Federation and the Federal law «On public control over enforcement of human rights in places of custody and assistance to persons in places of forced detention» are considered. The article examines the provisions of the Penal code of the Republic of Kazakhstan that regulates the tasks of public control, the procedure for creating and some aspects of the functioning of public monitoring commissions in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

scholarly journals THE RIGHT OF JUVENILE CONVICTS TO PERSONAL SAFETY IN PRISONS OF THE FEDERAL PENITENTIARY SERVICE OF RUSSIA: THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ASPECT

THE BULLETIN ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (388) ◽  
pp. 257-267
Author(s):  
Artyom Y. Nesterov, ◽  
◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Personal Safety ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Personal Security ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to one of the urgent problems of ensuring the personal safety of juvenile convicts in prison. The theoretical and methodological study of the analyzed phenomenon allowed us to single out the general opinion of scientists and the factors that determine the current state of personal safety of juvenile convicts in educational colonies of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, in the pre-trial detention centers of the Russian Federal Penitentiary Service, as well as at the stages of going to the place of serving the criminal sentence in in the form of deprivation of liberty and those under investigation for crimes committed in places of deprivation of liberty. The author of the article analyzes the provisions established in article 13 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the right of all convicted persons, as well as persons in custody in the pre-trial detention center of the Russian Federal Penitentiary Service, to trial for personal security is guaranteed by the penitentiary institutions of the Russian Federal Penitentiary Service, and this right is ensured by the following imperatives: 1). Article 13 of the Law of the Russian Federation of July 21, 1993 No. 5473-I "On Institutions and Bodies Executing Criminal Sentences of Imprisonment"; 2). Article 19 of the Federal Law of July 15, 1995 No. 103-FL "On the Detention of Suspects and Accused of Committing Crimes". The article analyzes legal scientific literature on the expression of various opinions of researchers regarding the personal safety of juvenile convicts in prison. The author completely agreed with many of the stated points of theoretical researchers, and at the same time formulating the following proposition. The author, in turn, determines that the problem of personal security of juvenile convicts in places of deprivation of liberty is also of great importance for the relations that are taking shape in the Russian penal system as a whole. This is due to the fact that punishment always involves the restriction of the rights and freedoms of persons who committed crimes in the educational colonies of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, and, as a result, the special nature of the relationship between the staff of the penitentiary institutions of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia and convicts. So, the urgency of the problem today is, first of all, ensuring personal security, as well as the constitutional rights and legitimate interests of juvenile convicts in the investigation of crimes committed in the institutions of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, is also manifested in the fact that depriving citizens of their freedom, the state agrees to comply their legal status, to protect the life and health of the convict. It should be noted that the concentration of persons who committed crimes in prisons, a significant proportion of which are grave and especially grave, as well as a number of other reasons entail a real threat of new crimes committed by prisoners of various nature and degree of public danger. In this regard, there is the possibility of unlawful influence on juvenile convicts who are participants in the criminal process in the framework of a case instituted on the fact of committing a crime in the institution of the Russian penal system. As a result, the author’s concept is formulated - “Ensuring personal security, rights and legal interests of juvenile convicts”. This material presented in the article does not contain information (information) related to state secrets of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals Detention and Remand in Custody: Comparative Legal Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-153
Author(s):  
I. V. Karavaev
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Difference

The paper analyzes the legal regulation of detention in custody of persons confined on suspicion of committing a crime, as well as of persons in respect of whom a measure of restriction in the form of remand in custody was chosen. The norms of the Federal Law “On detention in custody of suspects and accused of committing crimes”, as well as the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation relating to these relations are considered. The differences between the two types of custody are investigated: “detention” and “remand in custody”. The author identifies six fundamental criteria underlying the difference between the two types of custody: the grounds for the detention; a person or body authorized to decide on detention in custody; duration of custody; custodial facility; legal status of persons in custody; grounds for release. It is concluded that it is necessary to revise the Federal Law "On detention in custody of suspects and accused of committing crimes", changing its structure on the basis that the law actually regulates two independent processes: taking into custody when detaining a person and detention in custody when choosing a measure of restriction in the form of remand in custody.

Human Rights Activities as a Function of the Prosecutor’s Office

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 88-93
Author(s):  
K.N. Golikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The subject of this article is the problems of the nature, essence and purpose of prosecutorial activity. The purpose of the article is to study and justify the role of the human rights function in prosecutorial activities in the concept of a modern legal state. At the heart of prosecutorial activity is the implementation of the main function of the Prosecutor’s office – its rights and freedoms, their protection. This means that any type (branch) of Prosecutor's supervision is permeated with human rights content in relation to a citizen, society, or the state. This is confirmed by the fact that the Federal law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation” establishes an independent type of Prosecutor's supervision-supervision over the observance of human and civil rights and freedoms. It is argued that the legislation enshrines the human rights activities of the Prosecutor's office as its most important function. It is proposed to add this to the Law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation”.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document