scholarly journals Intervención coactiva en el mercado: procesos, modalidades y efectos

2021 ◽  
pp. 165-197
Author(s):  
Jorge Bueso Merino
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Market Process ◽  
Fractional Reserve Banking ◽  
Fractional Reserve ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
Reserve Banking

Developing Böhm-Bawerk’s (1914) Macht oder ökonomisches Ge-setz, we characterize the different intervention modalities as coercive «fixing» of prices, goods (quantities or modes of performing) or persons, also with their effects. Given that the subjective but real forces underlying market processes respond with effects which are opposite to those pursued, the «intervener» or controller would be induced to an in crescendo «fixing» of more and more as-pects of reality. We also show fractional reserve (banking) as another kind of intervention, since it produces or induces the same effects, including a call to implement monopolistic schemes. Key words: Market Process, Böhm-Bawerk, Intervention, Rothbard, Fractional Reserve JEL Classification: B41, B53, D42, D43, D45, L43, L51, G01 Resumen: En desarrollo del trabajo póstumo de Böhm-Bawerk (1914) Macht oder ökonomisches Gesetz, se caracterizan los diferentes tipos de intervención en tanto que «fijación» coactiva de precios, bienes (cantidades o modos de hacer) o personas, junto con sus efectos correspondientes. Como las fuerzas subjetivas pero reales que mueven los procesos de mercado originan efectos contrarios a los eventualmente deseados, el«interventor» se ve inducido a fijar sucesivamente cada vez más aspectos de la realidad. También se muestra a la reserva fraccionaria como otra modalidad más, que produce e induce los mismos efectos, incluido la llamada a implementar esquemas monopolísticos Palabras clave: Proceso de Mercado, Böhm-Bawerk, Intervención, Rothbard, Reserva Fraccionaria Clasificación JEL: B41, B53, D42, D43, D45, L43, L51, G01

scholarly journals Free banking, the real-balance effect, and Walras’ Law

2021 ◽  
pp. 241-258
Author(s):  
Ludwig van den Hauwe
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Free Banking ◽  
Real Balance ◽  
The Real ◽  
Fractional Reserve ◽  
Monetary Systems ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
Erroneous Interpretation

The author of this article draws special attention to two particular claims of the free bankers concerning the supposed working characteristics of a fractional-reserve free banking system which may strike the reader as questionable. The first of these relates to the alleged absence of a real-balance effect under free banking. The second relates to the free bankers’ reference to Walras’ Law as providing a rationale for the free banking system’s «offsetting» actions when confronted with changes in the public’s demand to hold bank liabilities. This rationale is defective since it is based on an erroneous interpretation of Walras’ Law. The author’s conclusion does not imply that it is not at all possible, from a rational viewpoint, to make a plausible case for this variant of free banking, only that the argument should be freed from certain questionable tenets. Key words: Free banking, monetary systems, real-balance effects, Walras’ Law. JEL Classification: E0; E32; E42; E5; E51; E52. Resumen: El autor de esta nota llama la atención sobre dos alegaciones particulares relativas a las supuestas características operativas de una banca libre con reserva fraccionaria que podrían resultar cuestionables al lector. La primera se refiere a la supuesta ausencia de efectos de saldo real en la banca libre. El segundo guarda relación con la referencia de los teóricos de la banca libre con reserva fraccionaria a la Ley de Walras que constituiría la base lógica de las acciones «de compensación» de la banca libre al enfrentarse a cambios en la demanda de medios fiduciarios por parte del público. Esta base lógica es defectuosa puesto que parte de una interpretación errónea de la Ley de Walras. La conclusión del autor no implica que no sea posible en absoluto, desde un punto de vista racional, elaborar una argumentación plausible para esta variante de la banca libre, sino que la argumentación debe estar libre de determinados argumentos cuestionables. Palabras clave: Banca libre, sistemas monetarios, efectos de saldo real, Ley de Walras. Clasificación JEL: E0; E32; E42; E5; E51; E52.

scholarly journals The Wisselbank and Amsterdam Price Volatility: A fractal test of the Austrian fractional-reserve banking hypothesis

2021 ◽  
pp. 13-42
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Guzelian ◽  
Robert F. Mulligan
Keyword(s):  
Commodity Prices ◽  
Price Volatility ◽  
Unexpected Result ◽  
Fractional Reserve Banking ◽  
Reserve Requirements ◽  
Fractional Reserve ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
Commercial Paper ◽  
Reserve Banking ◽  
Bill Of Exchange

Using 1708-1788 historical data, we test the Austrian hypothesis that fractional-reserve banking destabilizes commodity prices, complicating eco­ nomic calculation and entrepreneurial planning, and contributes to boom-bust cycles. The Bank of Amsterdam («Wisselbank», 1609-1819) maintained high reserve requirements until the Fourth Anglo-Dutch War (1780-1784), when its reserve ratio plummeted from nearly 100% in 1778 to around 20% by 1788. We compare price volatilities for 1722-1779 and 1780-1788 using fractal Hurst exponents. For all commodity prices tested, fractal volatility was higher during the lower fractional reserve period, except for rye, wheat, and Hamburg Bills of Exchange. Bill of Exchange stability was likely attributable to Hamburg transport ships’ ability to evade British incursion and to the Wisselbank’s legal monopsony in the secondary commercial paper market. However, rye and wheat prices — directly indicative of bread prices — generally (and contrary to Austrian theory) stabilized even though British blockades significantly re­ duced Dutch bread grain imports. We attribute this unexpected result primarily to emergency wartime provision by the Amsterdam municipal granary. The Wisselbank experience may confirm, or at least does not clearly falsify, the economic relevance of the Austrian Fractional-Reserve Banking Hypothesis. Keywords: Fractional reserve banking, monetary expansion, price stability, equilibrium. JEL Codes: E42, E44, N13, N23, N83. Resumen: Analizando los datos históricos correspondientes al Banco de Áms­ terdam de 1708 a 1788 concluimos que la evidencia empírica confirma (o al menos no refuta) la hipótesis austriaca sobre los negativos efectos de la banca con reserve fraccionaria. Palabras clave: Banca con reserva fraccionaria, expansión monetaria, estabili­ dad de precios, equilibrio. Clasificación JEL: E42, E44, N13, N23, N83.

scholarly journals Keynes and Fractional Reserve Banking: The NPV vs. MEC

2018 ◽  
pp. 39-74
Author(s):  
Edward W. Fuller
Keyword(s):  
Business Cycle ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Business Cycle Theory ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Market Theory ◽  
Fractional Reserve Banking ◽  
John Maynard Keynes ◽  
Fractional Reserve ◽  
Reserve Banking

This paper develops a framework for the economic analysis of frac- tional reserve banking. After introducing the loan market theory and the net present value, the paper shows how fractional reserve banking causes the busi- ness cycle by systematically falsifying net present value rankings. Next, the paper demonstrates that Keynes’s IS-LM model and marginal efficiency of cap- ital rule out fractional reserve banking as the cause of the business cycle. Finally, the paper shows that Keynes’s theory is fundamentally flawed because his theory of investment in incorrect. Keywords: Fractional reserve banking, Austrian business cycle theory, John Maynard Keynes, Keynesian economics, net present value, marginal efficiency of capital. JEL Classification: E12, E22, E32, E43, E51, E58, G30. Resumen: Este trabajo desarrolla un marco para el análisis económico de la banca con reserva fraccionaria. Después de presentar la teoría del mercado de préstamos y el valor presente neto, el documento muestra cómo la banca con reserva fraccionaria causa el ciclo económico al falsificar sistemática- mente las clasificaciones del valor presente neto. A continuación, el docu- mento demuestra que el modelo IS-LM de Keynes y la eficiencia marginal del capital descartan la banca con reserva fraccionaria como la causa del ciclo económico. Finalmente, el artículo muestra que la teoría de Keynes es fundamentalmente defectuosa dado que su teoría de la inversión es inco- rrecta. Palabras clave: Banca con reserva fraccionaria, teoría austriaca del ciclo eco- nómico, John M. Keynes, economía keynesiana, valor actual neto, eficiencia marginal del capital. Clasificación JEL: E12, E22, E32, E43, E51, E58, G30.

scholarly journals A Digital Currency Architecture for Privacy and Owner-Custodianship

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Goodell ◽  
Hazem Danny Al-Nakib ◽  
Paolo Tasca
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Risk ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Fractional Reserve Banking ◽  
Point Of Sale ◽  
Digital Currency ◽  
Fractional Reserve ◽  
Banking Relationships ◽  
Reserve Banking ◽  
Payment Mechanisms

In recent years, electronic retail payment mechanisms, especially e-commerce and card payments at the point of sale, have increasingly replaced cash in many developed countries. As a result, societies are losing a critical public retail payment option, and retail consumers are losing important rights associated with using cash. To address this concern, we propose an approach to digital currency that would allow people without banking relationships to transact electronically and privately, including both e-commerce purchases and point-of-sale purchases that are required to be cashless. Our proposal introduces a government-backed, privately-operated digital currency infrastructure to ensure that every transaction is registered by a bank or money services business, and it relies upon non-custodial wallets backed by privacy-enhancing technology, such as blind signatures or zero-knowledge proofs, to ensure that transaction counterparties are not revealed. Our approach to digital currency can also facilitate more efficient and transparent clearing, settlement, and management of systemic risk. We argue that our system can restore and preserve the salient features of cash, including privacy, owner-custodianship, fungibility, and accessibility, while also preserving fractional reserve banking and the existing two-tiered banking system. We also show that it is possible to introduce regulation of digital currency transactions involving non-custodial wallets that unconditionally protect the privacy of end-users.

El lenguaje como institución. Una aproximación de su función evolutiva, económica y política desde una perspectiva austriaca

2021 ◽  
pp. 305-340
Author(s):  
Nicolás Daniel Fernández Álvarez
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Oral Communication ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Spontaneous Order ◽  
De Re ◽  
Linguistic Rights ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
The World ◽  
The One ◽  
Linguistic Problem

In this paper, we try to give a different perspective to the one that has been studied and offered in linguistics until now. Language starts as the main form of oral communication that is transmitted from generation to generation. Language is in constant evolution. One of the greatest evolutions in the linguistic field has been precisely writing. It represented perfectly the union of graphic ideas and concepts with the beginning of the religious beliefs. We also try to analyze which are the causes and consequences of interventionism in something as personal and private as language. We will try to demonstrate how socialism, even in linguistics, distorts the correct evolution of lan guage, remembering the Universal Declaration of Linguistic Rights (1996) whose consequence is the strengthening of various nationalisms around the world. Finally, conclusions and solutions will be given to a very specific linguistic problem: Spain. Key words: Socialism, planification, spontaneous order, evolution, linguistics, language, pidgin, nationalism, economy, institution. JEL Classification: A1 (General Economics) → A12 (Relation of Economics to other Disciplines). Resumen: Este artículo pretende abordar una perspectiva diferente a la que se viene estudiando y ofreciendo en lingüística, pues el lenguaje comienza a forjarse como forma de comunicación oral que se transmite de generación en generación y que no deja de evolucionar. Está en constante evolución. Una de las mayores evoluciones en el campo de la lingüística fue precisamente la escritura que representaba a la perfección la unión de ideas o conceptos de forma gráfica y el comienzo de las creencias religiosas. En este mismo artículo analizamos cuáles son las causas de una interven - ción desde los poderes públicos en algo tan personal e intransferible como el len guaje, así como sus posibles consecuencias. Intentaremos, pues, demos - trar cómo el socialismo en materia lingüística (o su imposibilidad) distorsiona la correcta evolución del lenguaje, comenzando por la Declaración de De - re chos Lingüísticos del año 1996 que no ha hecho sino fortalecer un gran nú mero de nacionalismos a lo largo y ancho del globo terráqueo. Finalmente, intentaremos humildemente extraer conclusiones y poner posibles soluciones en un ejemplo muy concreto: España. Palabras clave: Socialismo, planificación, órden espontáneo, evolución, lingüística, lenguaje, pidgin, nacionalismo, economía, institución. Clasificación JEL: Dentro de A1 (General Economics), el apartado A12 (Rela tion of Economics to other Disciplines).

Rozeff on free banking: a critique

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-136
Author(s):  
Laura Davidson ◽  
Walter E. Block
Keyword(s):  
Design Methodology ◽  
Free Banking ◽  
Fractional Reserve Banking ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Monetary System ◽  
Fractional Reserve ◽  
Reserve Banking

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to correct Rozeff (2010). He contends that fractional-reserve banking is legitimate and efficacious. The authors demonstrate that it is not. Design/methodology/approach The design of this paper is to quote widely from Rozeff (2010) and then to expose his errors of analysis. Findings The authors demonstrate that fractional-reserve banking is neither legitimate nor efficacious. Originality/value Money is the lifeblood of the economy. If so, then banking is the marrow of the economy, since it is from that sector that money arises in the first place. It is crucially important, then, that the monetary system be based on sound principles. Fractional-reserve banking is a violation of these sound principles. Therefore, it is valuable to demonstrate that this is indeed the case.

scholarly journals Unanswered quibbles: George Selgin still gets it wrong with fractional reserve free banking

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Bagus ◽  
David Howden
Keyword(s):  
Banking System ◽  
Real Income ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Free Banking ◽  
Fractional Reserve Banking ◽  
Credit Expansion ◽  
Investment Projects ◽  
Fractional Reserve ◽  
Monetary Equilibrium ◽  
El Sistema

In this article we reply to George Selgin’s counterarguments to our article «Fractional Reserve Free Banking: Some Quibbles». Selgin regards holding cash as saving while we focus on the real savings necessary to maintain investment projects. Real savings are unconsumed real income. Variations in real savings are not necessarily equal to variations in cash holdings. We show that a coordinated credit expansion in a fractional reserve free banking (FRFB) system is possible and that precautionary reserves consequently do not pose a necessary limit. We discuss various instances in which a FRFB system may expand credit without a prior increase in real savings. These facets all demonstrate why a fractional reserve banking system —even a free banking one— is inherently unstable, and incentivized to impose a stabilizing central bank. We find that at the root of our disagreements with Selgin lies a different approach to monetary theory. Selgin subscribes to the aggregative equation of exchange, which impedes him from seeing the microeconomic problems that the stabilization of «MV» by a FRFB system causes. Key words: Free banking, fractional reserve, monetary equilibrium, credit expansion, economic cycle. JEL Classification: B53, E32, E42, E5, G18, H11, K39, P3, P34. Resumen: En este artículo respondemos a George Selgin, que a su vez respondió a nuestro artículo «Fractional Reserve Free Banking: Some Quibbles». Selgin considera que los saldos de tesorería son ahorros, mientras nosotros nos fijamos en los ahorros reales necesarios para mantener proyectos de inversion. Ahorros reales son ingresos reales no consumidos. Variaciones en los ahorros reales no necesariamente coinciden con las variaciones en los saldos de tesoreria. Mostramos que una expansión crediticia coordinada es posible en un sistema bancario de reserva fraccionaria (FRFB) y que las reservas prudenciales no constituyen necesariamente un limite a la expansión co - ordinada. Discutimos varios escenarios en los que el sistema FRFB puede expandir los créditos sin un aumento previo en los ahorros reales. Todas estas facetas muestran que un sistema bancario de reservas fraccionarias —incluso uno de banca libre— es inherentemente inestable y produce incentivos para imponer un banco central estabilizador. Mostramos que el origen de nuestras diferencias con Selgin está en un enfoque diferente a la teoría monetaria. Selgin es partidario de la ecuación de intercambio que es muy agregada y que le impide ver los problemas microeconomicas que la estabilización de «MV» por parte del sistema FRFB produce. Palabras clave: Banca libre, reserva fraccionaria, equilibrio monetario, expansión crediticia, ciclo económico. Clasificación JEL: B53, E32, E42, E5, G18, H11, K39, P3, P34.

scholarly journals Giffen goods, backward bending supply curves, price controls and praxeology; or, who’s afraid of the big bad boogie man of giffen goods and backward bending supply curves? Not us

2021 ◽  
pp. 353-373
Author(s):  
Walter Block ◽  
William Barnett
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Supply And Demand ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Logical Positivism ◽  
Price Controls ◽  
Resource Misallocation ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
Usual Manner ◽  
Demand Curves ◽  
The Status

What is the status of claims about the effects of minimum wage laws? Empirical or praxeological? We claim the latter. How can the effect of such legislation be best analyzed under the assumption of mis-behaving supply (backward bending) and demand (positively sloped, based on positing Giffen goods) curves? In the usual manner: resource misallocation still occurs. But this is only arguendo. More radically, such curves are themselves problematic. Even more radically, this, too, applies to «well behaved» supply and demand curves as well. Key words: Backward Bending Supply Curves, Price Controls, Praxeology, Giffen Goods, Logical Positivism. JEL Classification: D0. Resumen: ¿Cuál es el status del análisis sobre los efectos de las leyes de salario mínimo? ¿Empírico o praxeológico? Nosotros defendemos lo se gundo. ¿Pueden analizarse mejor los efectos de dichas leyes suponiendo curvas de oferta y demanda anómalas (como las de los bienes Giffen)? Como en el  nálisis tradicional se produce una mala asignación de recursos. En todo caso, tanto tales curvas, como las tradicionales son muy problemáticas. Palabras clave: Control de precios, praxeología, bienes de Giffen, positivismo lógico. Clasificación JEL: D0.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document