scholarly journals An Investigation of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus Grown in Rectal Screening Samples and Clinical Samples: Seven-Years Surveillance, A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

ANKEM Dergisi ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Özlem Kirişçi ◽  
Ahmet Çalışkan
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Rectal Swab ◽  
Vancomycin Resistance ◽  
Hospital Environment ◽  
Automated System ◽  
Joint Fluid ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Enterococcus Spp ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are multidrug-resistant microorganisms that cause nosocomial infections, prolong hospital stay and cause mortality. Current recommendations are active surveillance, screening and contact isolation to prevent the spread of VRE positivity among patients. It has been observed that the failure of the systematic screening caused the spread of VRE and increased costs. It was aimed to determine vancomycin resistance rates in Enterococcus spp., which was grown from rectal swab samples and clinical samples sent for screening of hospitalized patients between January 2013 and May 2019, to investigate the distribution of resistant isolates to departments. A rectal swab sample for VRE screening was obtained from each patient admitted to intensive care units in our hospital, and subcultured onto VRE chromogenic medium (Gül Laboratories, Turkey). The susceptibility of the isolates to vancomycin (30 μg) was detected by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria. The VITEK2 Compact automated system was used to determine the vancomycin susceptibility of enterococci isolated from clinical samples. VRE growth was detected in 316 (6 %) of the 5249 rectal swab samples sent to the laboratory, and vancomycin resistance was detected in 51 (3.9 %) of 1306 Enterococcus spp. from clinical specimens. Of the 51 isolates with vancomycin resistance, 80 % were isolated from urine, 14 % from blood, 4 % from wound, and 2% from joint fluid. While the VRE rate in rectal swab samples was 5.5 % in 2013, it increased to 11.6 % in 2019. Vancomycin resistance was 1.6 % in 2013 and peaked at 7.7 % in 2017 in Enterococcus spp. Twenty nine percent of the 51 clinical VRE isolates were grown from patients with VRE positive rectal swabs. The highest rate of VRE growth in rectal swab samples and culture samples was observed in the Anesthesia Intensive Care Unit. No relationship was found between VRE positivity decrease and increase rates of rectal swab and clinical samples over the years. In order to prevent the spread of VRE in the hospital environment, it is necessary to take surveillance cultures regularly in centers, to provide necessary training to hospital staff, to control the use of antimicrobials, and to ensure good cooperation between the microbiology laboratory and services.

scholarly journals A study on virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance pattern among enterococci isolated from various clinical specimens from a tertiary care hospital

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 2969
Author(s):  
Hemalatha G. ◽  
Bhaskaran K. ◽  
Sowmiya M. ◽  
Anusheela Howlader ◽  
Sethumadhavan K.
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Virulence Factors ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Vancomycin Resistance ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Hospital Environment ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Drain Tube ◽  
Care Hospital

Background: Enterococci, adult faeces commensal are important nosocomial pathogens. E. faecalis is the most common cause of infection, followed by E. faecium. In the past two decades, they have developed resistance to many commonly used antimicrobial agents. Understanding virulence factors and monitoring antimicrobial resistance among Enterococci is essential for controlling the spread of bacterial resistance and important for epidemiological surveillance within the hospital environment. The aim of the study is to evaluate antibiotic resistance and virulence factors exhibited by Enterococcus sp.Methods: One hundred consecutive isolates of Enterococci isolated from different clinical samples of patients attending AVMC and H, a tertiary care center at Pondicherry in a period of 20 months were included in the study. Enterococcus sp were identified as per standard conventional bacteriologic methods and detected for the production of virulence factors such as Hemolysin production, Gelatinase production. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out by disc diffusion method and MIC of vancomycin and teicoplanin was determined by E-test strips.Results: Among 100 Enterococcal isolates included in the study, 81% were E. faecalis and 19% were E. faecium which were isolated from urine (44%), Pus (51%) and others specimen (5%, which includes blood 80% and drain tube 20%). In this study, overall 15% of E. faecalis and 1% of E. faecium showed hemolysin production and Gelatinase was produced by 6% of E. faecalis and 4% of E. faecium. Majority of E. faecalis and E. faecium strains isolated in our study, had increased sensitivity were to be exhibited for Linezolid, Vancomycin followed by high level gentamycin and high degree of resistance to penicillin, ciprofloxacin and cotrimoxazole. Analyzing the results of MIC of vancomycin and teicoplanin, 5 isolates were classified phenotypically as VanB phenotype that possess only moderate to high levels of vancomycin resistance and one isolate obtained from drain tube which showed MIC of vancomycin as 120µg/ml and teicoplanin 16µg/ml was grouped into VanA.Conclusions: Though the prevalence of vancomycin resistant Enterococcci (VRE) is very low in our study, yet regular monitoring of vancomycin resistance is very crucial for early detection, treatment, application of preventive and control measures and most importantly to check the spread of virulent multidrug resistant Enterococcus species.

DETECTION AND CHARACTERISATION OF VANCOMYCIN RESISTANT ENTEROCOCCAL ISOLATES OF CLINICAL SAMPLES FROM A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

2021 ◽  
pp. 76-79
Author(s):  
R.Beaula Lilly ◽  
V.K.M. Banu
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Drug Resistance ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Vancomycin Resistance ◽  
Therapeutic Options ◽  
Hospital Environment ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Multiple Drug ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

The emergence of Vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) has posed serious threats to the community because they exhibit multiple drug resistance, thus limiting the therapeutic options for the clinicians. As Vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) also have ampicillin resistance and high level aminoglycoside resistance, they are the most difcult to treat. The therapeutic options are limited by elimination of the synergy between aminoglycoside and the beta lactum drugs which is the treatment of choice for enterococcal infections which is of great concern. More antibiotic resistance makes these pathogens excellent survivors in hospital environment and cause nosocomial infections. Atotal of 142 enterococcal isolates from various clinical samples were identied to their species level and subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing to various antibiotics. Initial screening for Vancomycin resistance was done using the Vancomycin Screen Agar and the isolates showing resistance were subjected to Vancomycin and Teicoplanin MIC and later these isolates showing resistance were conrmed by genotypic methods for Vancomycin resistant genes.Total VRE isolates as per Vancomycin MIC value were 19 and the prevalence rate was 13.3% (19/142).In PCR assay, a total of 16 isolates including 13 E.faecium and 3 E.faecalis were found to be of Van B genotype and the remaining 3 isolates including 2 E.faecium and 1 E.faecalis were found to be of Van A genotype. In this study, the prevalence of Vancomycin resistance in Enterococcal species is 13.3% as per vancomycin MIC by Micro broth dilution technique. The phenotypic detection of Vancomycin resistance by MIC of Vancomycin and Teicoplanin correlates with the genotypic method of detection of Vancomycin resistant genes (VanA, VanB).

scholarly journals Comparison of Different Phenotypic Methods for Detection of Vancomycin Drug Resistance in Enterococcus Species

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 289-293
Author(s):  
Deepa Pramod Devhare ◽  
Sae Pol
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Vancomycin Resistance ◽  
Automated System ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Enterococcus Species ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Phenotypic Methods

Introduction: Vancomycin resistant enterococci have emerged as an important cause of nosocomial infection worldwide. Vancomycin drug resistance needs to be detected accurately in all Enterococcus species in order to prevent its spread in health care setting. Present study was conducted to compare three different phenotypic methods for detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci. Material and methods: Study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital over a period of one year. Enterococcus species isolated from clinical samples like urine, pus, blood and sterile body fluids were tested by three different methods namely disk diffusion, E-strip and Phoenix automated system for detection of vancomycin resistance. Results: 400 Enterococcus species were isolated from clinical samples. 19(4.8%) Enterococcus species were found to be vancomycin resistant and one (0.25%) strain was found to be intermediate resistant to vancomycin by all three methods resulting in 100% sensitivity and 100%specificity. Conclusion: Present study recommends vancomycin disk diffusion as screening and E-strip as good confirmatory tests in resource poor settings for detection of vancomycin drug resistance. Keywords: VRE, vancomycin, disk diffusion, E strip, Phoenix automated system..

scholarly journals TO STUDY ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY PATTERN OF NONFERMENTATIVE GRAM NEGATIVE BACILLI FROM VARIOUS CLINICAL SAMPLES IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL, JAIPUR.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirti Hemwani ◽  
P. S. Nirwan ◽  
Preeti Shrivastava ◽  
Abhiraj Ramchandani
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Antibiotic Sensitivity ◽  
Polymyxin B ◽  
Hospital Environment ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Pathogenic Potential ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Sensitivity Pattern

Background: Nonfermentative gram negative bacilli (NFGNB) frequently considered as commensals or contaminants but the pathogenic potential of nonfermenters has been proved beyond doubt. They are resistant to commonly used antimicrobials. Aim: This study was undertaken to identify the nonfermenters isolated from various clinical samples and to know their Antibiotic sensitivity pattern. Materials and Methods: The present study was carried out on 150 strains of Nonfermenters isolated from 1200 various non repetitive clinical samples received in Department of Microbiology, NIMS Jaipur. Nonfermenters were identified using a standard protocol and their antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed with the help of the modified Bauer disc diffusion method. Results: Out of 150 nonfermenters isolated, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common isolate 134 (89.33%) followed by Acinetobacter baumannii 16 (10.67%). Among all clinical samples Pus and Wound Discharge yield maximum isolates of NFGNB i.e. 54 (36%) % followed by sputum (39.0%). Most sensitive drug against NFGNB was Polymyxin-B (100%) followed by Imipenem (86 %) and Amikacin (71.33 %). Conclusion: Nonfermenters have a great potential to survive in a hospital environment so implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs and strict infection control practices will be required to prevent or slow down their emergence and spread. Keywords:  Nonfermenters,  Polymyxin-B, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter.

scholarly journals PATIENTS' MICROFLORA COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS AT THE NATIONAL HOSPITAL OF PEDIATRICS IN HANOI, VIETNAM

2019 ◽  
pp. 43-48
Author(s):  
L.V. Kataeva ◽  
A.P. Rebeshchenko ◽  
T.F. Stepanova ◽  
O.V. Posoiuznykh ◽  
Le Thanh Hai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Hospital Environment ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
National Hospital ◽  
Statistical Research ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative

We studied the microflora structure and resistance gathered from the biomaterial of patients and the environment objects of various departments at the National hospital of Pediatrics in Hanoi. 140 clinical samples of biomaterials from 74 patients treated in the intensive care unit, the infectious diseases and the gastroenterology departments were studied. A systematic approach including microbiological, epidemiological and statistical research methods was used in carrying out the study. Bacteria of the Enterobacteriaceae family (38.5 per cent) prevailed in the biomaterial of intensive care unit patients. Nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria (46.5 per cent) occupied the leading positions in the infectious diseases department and Gram-positive bacteria (39.3 per cent) were in the gastroenterology department. Gram-positive flora (60.2 per cent in the intensive care unit and 50.7 per cent in the infectious diseases department) prevailed in the microflora structure gathered from hospital environment objects. We identified the prevalence of bacteria of the genus Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria with a wide spectrum of resistance in the departments of the National Hospital of Pediatrics.

PREVALENCE OF HIGH LEVEL AMINOGLYCOSIDE RESISTANCE AND VANCOMYCIN RESISTANT ENTEROCOCCI IN ENTEROCOCCAL ISOLATES IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

2021 ◽  
pp. 3-5
Author(s):  
Sunita Agarwal ◽  
Nazneen Pathan ◽  
Shivra Batra ◽  
Rajni Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Automated System ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Enterococcus Species ◽  
Aminoglycoside Resistance ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
High Level

Introduction: The emergence of High Level Aminoglycoside Resistance (Resistant to Gentamycin and Streptomycin) and Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci among Indoor and Intensive Care Unit admitted patient presents a serious challenge for clinicians. Objective: To determine Enterococcal burden in blood and urine specimens and to detect the prevalence of High Level Aminoglycoside Resistance and Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci. Material & Methods: One hundred ten Enterococci were isolated from blood and urine samples and processed according to standard laboratory protocol. Species identication and sensitivity was done using the VITEK 2 automated system (Biomerieux France) with the cards GPID and AST 67 respectively. Results: Out of 110 Enterococci isolates, 36 were from blood and 74 from urine were detected. Different Species isolated were Enterococcal faecium (59%), Enterococcal faecalis (34%), Enterococcal rafnosus (2.7%), Enterococcal gallinarum (1.8%), Enterococcal casseliavus (0.9%) and Enterococcal duran (0.9%).Out of 36 blood isolates, 14 (38%) were found to be both High Level Gentamycin Resistant (HLGR) & High Level Streptomycin Resistant (HLSR), 10 (27%) were only HLGR and 8 (22%) were only HLSR. 20 strain (55%) of Enterococcus species isolated in blood were VRE. All VRE strains were found to be resistant to both aminoglycosides ( HLAR).Among the 74 urinary isolates, 24 (34%) were found to be both HLGR & HLSR, only HLGR was observed in 20 (27%) and HLSR was observed in 11 (14%) isolates. 24 strains (34%) of Enterococcus species were found to be vancomycin resistant in urine. 23 strains out of 24 were resistant to high level of aminoglycosides. Conclusion: The prevalence of HLAR and VRE is very high among Enterococcus specimens from indoor/ intensive care unit patients. Early species identication and antibiotic sensitivity result can help in better clinical outcome.

scholarly journals Vancomycin and high-level aminoglycoside resistance in Enterococcus species

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyda Ozarslan Kurtgoz ◽  
Burcin Ozer ◽  
Melek Inci ◽  
Nizami Duran ◽  
Erkan Yula
Keyword(s):  
Vancomycin Resistance ◽  
Automated System ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Beta Lactamase ◽  
Aminoglycoside Resistance ◽  
Disk Diffusion Method ◽  
Gradient Diffusion ◽  
Gentamicin Resistance ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
High Level

The aim of the study was to investigate vancomycin and high-level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR) in <em>Enterococcus</em> species by phenotypic and genotypic methods. A hundred <em>Enterococcus</em> strains were included in the study. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of strains were investigated by automated system, betalactamase production was investigated by nitrocefin disks, vancomycin resistance and HLAR were investigated by gradient diffusion method (GDM) and disk diffusion method, respectively. For detection of vancomycin and high-level gentamicin resistance (HLGR) genes, polymerase chain reaction was used. Teicoplanin linezolid, vancomycin, ampicillin, penicillin are the most susceptible antibiotics and strains were detected not to produce beta lactamase. Vancomycin resistance was detected in ten isolates by automated system and in only five isolates by GDM. Five isolates carrying <em>VanA</em> gene were determined. The ratio of HLGR and high-level streptomycin resistance was found 40 and 63% respectively. <em>aac (6’)-1eaph (2’’)-1a</em> gene was detected in 58% of strains. <em>E. faecium</em> strains were found more resistant to the antibiotics than the other species. Beta lactamase was detected in none of strains. The automated system detected vancomycin resistance in more strains than GDM. Therefore it is concluded that strains, which were detected to be resistant to vancomycin, should be confirmed by GDM. The ratio of <em>VanA</em> gene in strains is consistent with other studies. The HLAR ratio was found in about half of strains. The ratio of<em> aac(6’)-1e-aph(2’’)-1a</em> gene, which is the most reported gene in our country and other countries and one of the HLGR genes investigated in our study, was detected 58%.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for New Detection of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in Acute-Care Hospitals That Employ Strict Infection Control Procedures

2003 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 2492-2498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander A. Padiglione ◽  
Rory Wolfe ◽  
Elizabeth A. Grabsch ◽  
Di Olden ◽  
Stephen Pearson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Rectal Swab ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

ABSTRACT Accurate assessment of the risk factors for colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) among high-risk patients is often confounded by nosocomial VRE transmission. We undertook a 15-month prospective cohort study of adults admitted to high-risk units (hematology, renal, transplant, and intensive care) in three teaching hospitals that used identical strict infection control and isolation procedures for VRE to minimize nosocomial spread. Rectal swab specimens for culture were regularly obtained, and the results were compared with patient demographic factors and antibiotic exposure data. Compliance with screening was defined as “optimal” (100% compliance) or “acceptable” (minor protocol violations were allowed, but a negative rectal swab specimen culture was required within 1 week of becoming colonized with VRE). Colonization with VRE was detected in 1.56% (66 of 4,215) of admissions (0.45% at admission and 0.83% after admission; the acquisition time was uncertain for 0.28%), representing 1.91% of patients. No patients developed infection with VRE. The subsequent rate of new acquisition of VRE was 1.4/1,000 patient days. Renal units had the highest rate (3.23/1,000 patient days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54 to 6.77/1,000 patient days). vanB Enterococcus faecium was the most common species (71%), but other species included vanB Enterococcus faecalis (21%), vanA E. faecium (6%), and vanA E. faecalis (2%). The majority of isolates were nonclonal by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis. Multivariate analysis of risk factors in patients with an acceptable screening suggested that being managed by a renal unit (hazard ratio [HR] compared to the results for patients managed in an intensive care unit, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 17.0 [P = 0.02]) and recent administration of either ticarcillin-clavulanic acid (HR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 11.6 [P = 0.03]) or carbapenems (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.0, 8.0 [P = 0.05]), but not vancomycin or broad-spectrum cephalosporins, were associated with acquisition of VRE. The relatively low rates of colonization with VRE, the polyclonal nature of most isolates, and the possible association with the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics are consistent with either the endogenous emergence of VRE or the amplification of previously undetectable colonization with VRE among high-risk patients managed under conditions in which the risk of nosocomial acquisition was minimized.

Antibiogram of Urinary Enterococcus isolates from a tertiary care hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanditha Rajaram Bhat ◽  
Shruthi Bhat Kodur Shivashankar ◽  
Biranthabail Dhanashree
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Clinical Problem ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Biochemical Tests ◽  
Serious Infections ◽  
Enterococcus Spp ◽  
Agar Dilution ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
High Level

Purpose: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the serious infections caused by enterococci. VancomycinResistant Enterococci (VRE), is a persevering clinical problem globally. This study aims to detect high-level aminoglycoside and vancomycin resistance in uropathogenic Enterococcus spp. Methodology: A total of 75 clinically relevant Enterococcus spp. grown from urine samples, were collected following convenience non-random sampling method. Identified by standard biochemical tests and susceptibility to antibiotics was studied by Kirby Bauer’s disc diffusion method. The MIC of vancomycin was detected by agar dilution test. Van A, and Van B genes in VREs were detected by PCR. Results: Among the 75 Enterococcal isolates, 43 (57.3%) were E.faecalis, 12 (16%) were E.faecium, six (8%) each were E.pseudoavium and E.casseliflavus, five (6.66%) were E.dispar and three (4%) were E.durans. E.faecalis (n=19) and E.faecium (n=3) were resistant to High Level Streptomycin (HLS). E.faecalis (n=21) and E.faecium (n=6) were resistant to High Level Gentamicin (HLG). Four (9.3%) E.faecalis were vancomycin-resistant, of which three were of Van A, and one was both Van A and Van B genotype. Conclusion: Isolation of high level aminoglycoside resistant (HLAR) Enterococci is a challenge for the treating physician because aminoglycoside cannot be used in combination with glycopeptide or ampicillin for such isolates. The occurrence of HLAR, Van A and Van B VRE genotypes is a cause of concern as they may transfer drug resistance genes to other bacterial isolates, thus leading to limited therapeutic options.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document