Vatakantaka and its management through Ayurveda- A Case review.

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr Chandrakant Chate ◽  
Dr Rajesh Gundre ◽  
Dr Pragati Kasat
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Short Duration ◽  
Plantar Fascia ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Heel Pain ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Common Cause ◽  
Calcaneal Spur ◽  
Repeated Injury ◽  
Painful Heel

Vatakantaka is characterized by pain in the heel region and included in Vatavyadhi by Acharya Sushruta. It causes due to silent and repeated injury resulting into inflammation of plantar fascia which results in the painful heel. It is a common cause of heel pain occurs in about 10% of the general population. Women are twice more prevalent than men. Vatakantaka is mainly caused due to vitiation of Vatadosha and continuous pressure on the heel region. It can be correlated with Chronic planter fasciitis or Calcaneal spur. It is more prevalent in female gender and having Sthul akruti (obesity). Various chikitsa measures for management of Vatakantaka are given in classics of Ayurveda. Here bahya and abhyantar chikitsa with Agnikarma gives improvement in subjective criteria  like  vedana  (pain),  stambha (stiffness), shotha (swelling)  and kriyahani (restricted movements) in short duration  of time.

Effect of Foot Orthoses as Treatment for Plantar Fasciitis or Heel Pain

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Anderson ◽  
Justin Stanek
Keyword(s):  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Plantar Fascia ◽  
The United States ◽  
Heel Pain ◽  
Foot Orthoses ◽  
Clinical Scenario ◽  
Clinical Question ◽  
Common Cause ◽  
Viable Treatment

Clinical Scenario:Plantar fasciitis is a debilitating and painful problem present in the general population. It most often presents with moderate to severe pain in the proximal inferior heel region and is most commonly associated with repeated trauma to the plantar fascia. Plantar fasciitis, itself, is an injury at the site of attachment at the medial tubercle of the calcaneus, often due to excessive and repetitive traction. Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of heel pain and is estimated to affect 2 million people in the United States alone.Focused Clinical Question:For adults suffering from plantar fasciitis, are foot orthoses a viable treatment option to reduce pain?

Detection of Normal Plantar Fascia Thickness in Adults via the Ultrasonographic Method

2015 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kadir Abul ◽  
Devrim Ozer ◽  
Secil Sezgin Sakizlioglu ◽  
Abdul Fettah Buyuk ◽  
Mehmet Akif Kaygusuz
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Plantar Fascia ◽  
Heel Pain ◽  
Common Cause ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Right ◽  
Thickness Measurements

Background Heel pain is a prevalent concern in orthopedic clinics, and there are numerous pathologic abnormalities that can cause heel pain. Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of heel pain, and the plantar fascia thickens in this process. It has been found that thickening to greater than 4 mm in ultrasonographic measurements can be accepted as meaningful in diagnoses. Herein, we aimed to measure normal plantar fascia thickness in adults using ultrasonography. Methods We used ultrasonography to measure the plantar fascia thickness of 156 healthy adults in both feet between April 1, 2011, and June 30, 2011. These adults had no previous heel pain. The 156 participants comprised 88 women (56.4%) and 68 men (43.6%) (mean age, 37.9 years; range, 18–65 years). The weight, height, and body mass index of the participants were recorded, and statistical analyses were conducted. Results The mean ± SD (range) plantar fascia thickness measurements for subgroups of the sample were as follows: 3.284 ± 0.56 mm (2.4–5.1 mm) for male right feet, 3.3 ± 0.55 mm (2.5–5.0 mm) for male left feet, 2.842 ± 0.42 mm (1.8–4.1 mm) for female right feet, and 2.8 ± 0.44 mm (1.8–4.3 mm) for female left feet. The overall mean ± SD (range) thickness for the right foot was 3.035 ± 0.53 mm (1.8–5.1 mm) and for the left foot was 3.053 ± 0.54 mm (1.8–5.0 mm). There was a statistically significant and positive correlation between plantar fascia thickness and participant age, weight, height, and body mass index. Conclusions The plantar fascia thickness of adults without heel pain was measured to be less than 4 mm in most participants (~92%). There was no statistically significant difference between the thickness of the right and left foot plantar fascia.

scholarly journals Role of Agnikarma in the management of Calcaneal spur: A Case Report

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangram Indore
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Constant Pressure ◽  
Heel Pain ◽  
Calcium Deposition ◽  
Common Source ◽  
Calcaneal Spur ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Heel Bone ◽  
Painful Heel

Vatkantaka (Calcaneal spur ) is common source of heel pain causes excruciating type of pain in the heel and disability. Vatkantaka is one of the vatvyadhi. During walking or running on uneven road if the foot landed improperly, the vata  ceases in khudukapradesh or gulf sandhi produces as if prick by the thorn hence it termed as a Vatkantaka. Calcaneus is the heel bone. When it is met with constant pressure, calcium deposition occurs beneath this bone and if the pressure continues, the deposition takes the shape of spur, causing pain. Pain on standing or while walking is the characteristic feature. People who need to stand for a long period of time, or those who walk on uneven surfaces tend to cause pressure beneath the heel bone, triggering calcaneal spur. Calcaneal spur condition of painful heel can be understood under the term Vatkantaka. In Ayurvedic  literature. Acharya Sushruta has advised Agnikarma as a treatment modality for the management of Vatkantaka. This Agnikarma therapy is local management which relieves pain instantly I.e Sadyafaldayi chikitsa.

scholarly journals Platelet rich plasma is better than corticosteroid in longterm outcome in planter fasciitis: A study in a tertiary level teaching hospital at Dhaka, Bangladesh

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Number 2) ◽  
pp. 11-14
Author(s):  
Md. Johurul Hoque ◽  
Muhammad Emam Zaman ◽  
Ripon Kumar Das ◽  
Mohammad Sayeed AL Mahmud ◽  
Mahbuba Khatun
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Plantar Fascia ◽  
Heel Pain ◽  
P Value ◽  
Heel Pad ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
And Function

This is a prospective comparative study to compare the efficacy of PRP injection versus corticosteroid injection for planter fasciitis. 35 male and 25 female (Mean Age 35.5 yrs.) presenting with planter fasciitis were randomized to receive there Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection (2ml PRP with 2ml of 2% xylocaine) given by a single surgeon. Patients were assessed before (Days0) and after (Days 30, 60, 90) treatment for chronic heel pain more than 6 months. Patients where followed up 1 year to assess heel pain over the calcaneal tuberocity. In the present study of 60 patients there were 35 male and 25 female. In the present study of 60 patients the mean age was 35.5 years (Range between 35 to 65 years). Infection, rupture of plantar fascia, heel pad atrophy and neurovascular damage where not found. Five patient reported pain for unto 9 days after PRP injection. In both groups heel pain improved dramatically after treatment, but the mode of improvement different. Compared with PRP injection. Corticosteroid injection improve at a faster rate over the first 30 days and then started to decline slightly until 90 days. After PRP injection heel pain, function improve steadily and where eventually better. PRP injection and Corticosteroid injection 30 days and faster rate 60 days of both group P-Value 0.0001. Almost high grater rate 60 days, group comparison with heel pain and function of the patients. PRP was more effective over the long term follow up period then corticosteroid injection in improving heel pain and function. That’s way we recommend PRP in a first line injection treatment because it is very simple, cheap and more effective.

scholarly journals A Randomised-Controlled Clinical Study Examining the Effect of High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) on the Management of Painful Calcaneal Spur with Plantar Fasciitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 4891
Author(s):  
Piotr Tkocz ◽  
Tomasz Matusz ◽  
Łukasz Kosowski ◽  
Karolina Walewicz ◽  
Łukasz Argier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Heel Pain ◽  
The Other ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Calcaneal Spur ◽  
High Intensity Laser ◽  
Intensity Laser

Calcaneal spur and plantar fasciitis are the most common causes of plantar heel pain. There are many effective physical modalities for treating this musculoskeletal disorder. So far, the are no clear recommendations confirming the clinical utility of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) in the management of painful calcaneal spur with plantar fasciitis. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of HILT in pain management in patients with calcaneal spur and plantar fasciitis. A group of 65 patients was assessed for eligibility based on the CONSORT guidelines. This study was prospectively registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry platform (registration number ACTRN12618000744257, 3 May 2018). The main eligibility criteria were: cancer, pregnancy, electronic and metal implants, acute infections, impaired blood coagulation, cardiac arrhythmias, taking analgesic or anti-inflammatory medications, non-experience of heel pain, or presence of other painful foot conditions. Finally, 60 patients were randomly assigned into two groups: study group (n = 30, mean age 59.9 ± 10.1), treated with HILT (7 W, 149.9 J/cm2, 1064 nm, 4496 J, 12 min), and placebo-controlled group (n = 30, mean age 60.4 ± 11.9), treated with sham HILT therapy. Both groups received ultrasound treatments (0.8 W/cm2, 1 MHz frequency, 100% load factor, 5 min). Treatment procedures were performed once a day, five times per week for three weeks (total of 15 treatment sessions). Study outcomes focused on pain intensity and were assessed before (M1) and after (M2) the treatment as well as after 4 (M3) and 12 (M4) weeks using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Laitinen Pain Scale (LPS). According to VAS, a statistically significant decrease in the study group was observed between M1 and M2 by 3.5 pts, M1 and M3 by 3.7 pts, and M1 and M4 by 3.2 pts (p < 0.001). On the other hand, the control group showed a statistically significant decrease (p < 0.001) between M1 and M2 by 3.0 pts, M1 and M3 by 3.4 pts, and M1 and M4 by 3.2 pts. According to LPS, a statistically significant decrease in the study group was observed between M1 and M2 by 3.9 pts, M1 and M3 by 4.2 pts, and M1 and M4 by 4.0 pts (p < 0.001). On the other hand, the control group showed a statistically significant decrease between M1 and M2 by 3.2 pts (p = 0.002), M1 and M3 by 4.0 pts (p < 0.001), and M1 and M4 by 3.9 pts (p < 0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in VAS and LPS (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the HILT does not appear to be more effective in pain management of patients with calcaneal spurs and plantar fasciitis than the conservative standard physiotherapeutic procedures.

An Anatomic Analysis of Endoscopic Plantar Fascia Release

1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 552-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan J. Hawkins ◽  
Richard J. Langermen ◽  
Timothy Gibbons ◽  
Jason H. Calhoun
Keyword(s):  
Plantar Fascia ◽  
Heel Pain ◽  
Deep Fascia ◽  
Abductor Hallucis ◽  
Lateral Plantar Nerve ◽  
Local Structures ◽  
Abductor Hallucis Muscle ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
Plantar Fascia Release ◽  
Partial Release

Eighteen fresh-frozen cadaver foot specimens underwent release of the plantar fascia via a newly described endoscopic technique. A 75% release was attempted on each specimen in order to represent a partial fascial release. Each specimen was then dissected to assess the success of the procedure. Five separate measurements were recorded evaluating the reproducibility of the procedure, adequacy of the release considering accepted etiologies for chronic heel pain, and the possibility of damage to local structures. Partial release was noted to be possible, but controlling the exact percentage of the incision was difficult. The release averaged 82% of the width of the fascia, with a range of 53% to 100%. There was no damage in any specimen to the first branch of the lateral plantar nerve, the structure considered most at risk during the procedure. Release of the deep fascia of the abductor hallucis muscle was not possible with this approach.

Abstract P113: Female Gender is Associated with a Low Ankle Brachial Index in the General Population

Circulation ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 133 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ridhima Kapoor ◽  
Colby Ayers ◽  
Jacquelyn Kulinski
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gender Differences ◽  
General Population ◽  
Ankle Brachial Index ◽  
Hdl Cholesterol ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Cvd Risk Factors ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Health And Nutrition ◽  
And Gender

Background: The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a predictor of cardiovascular events, mortality and functional status. Gender differences in ABI have been reported in some population studies. Differences in height might account for these observed gender differences, but findings are conflicting. Objective: This study investigated the association between gender, height and ABI in the general population, independent of traditional cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Methods: Participants ≥ 40 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2004 with ABI data, were included. A low ABI was defined as a value < 1.0 (including borderline values). Sample-weighted multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed with low ABI as the dependent variable and height and gender as primary predictor variables of interest. A backward elimination model selection technique was performed to identify significant covariates. Results: There were 3,052 participants with ABI data (mean age 57, 51% female (1570 of 3052). The sample-weighted mean (±SE) ABI was 1.09 (±0.006) and 1.13 (±0.005) for females and males, respectively. Women were more likely to have a low ABI compared to men, 42% (659 of 1570) versus 28% (415 of 1482), respectively (p<0.0001). Female gender was associated with a low ABI (OR 1.34, [95% CI, 1.04-1.72]; p=0.025), independent of traditional CVD risk factors (see Figure). Age, diabetes, tobacco use, known CVD, BMI and black race were also associated with a low ABI (all p<0.003). Self-reported hypertension and non-HDL cholesterol levels, however, were not associated with a low ABI. An interaction between height and body mass index (BMI) was identified. Conclusions: Female gender is associated with a low ABI in the general population. This association appears to be independent of height and other traditional CVD risk factors and warrants further investigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document