scholarly journals Diagnostic value of routine pre-operative investigations used in combination in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 374-381
Author(s):  
Lucy C. Walker ◽  
Nick D. Clement ◽  
Munawar Hashmi ◽  
Julie Samuel ◽  
David J. Deehan
Keyword(s):  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Inflammatory Marker ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Algorithm ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Individual Values ◽  
Joint Aspiration ◽  
Subsequent Revision

The primary aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of joint aspiration culture, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), individually, and in combination for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A consecutive patient series with pre-operative inflammatory marker levels, an aspiration culture of either hip or knee arthroplasty and intra-operative culture samples from subsequent revision surgery was compiled. This retrospective patient cohort analysis included 128 aspiration. The data were analysed to compare pre-operative aspiration cultures, serum ESR and CRP levels to the chosen gold standard for PJI diagnosis of intra-operative culture samples. A diagnostic algorithm was created using the above tests combined with clinical suspicion index. The values that had the highest sensitivity and specificity of predicting PJI were >5 for CRP and >16 for ESR. CRP used individually had the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of any test (75.0% and 75.9%, respectively). ESR + aspirate had the highest specificity and positive predictive value (PPV), of 100% for both. Using all three tests together the specificity and PPV were higher than the test individual values (95.3% and 85.0% respectively). Based on subgroup analyses the combination of ESR or CRP plus joint aspiration has superior PPV compared to individual tests. ESR and CRP had the highest NPV when used in isolation. An algorithm has been developed to guide clinical diagnosis.

scholarly journals Different diagnostic performance of plasma fibrinogen and D-dimer in periprosthetic joint infection: a propensity score matched study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Chen ◽  
Wenwei Qian ◽  
Xisheng Weng ◽  
Jin Lin ◽  
Jin Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Culture Positive ◽  
Culture Negative ◽  
D Dimer

Abstract Background Fibrinogen (Fbg) and D-dimer have been used as biomarkers for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, previous research has reported conflicting results on the diagnostic value of D-dimer in comparison to Fbg, C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Aim This study aimed to: (1) determine the optimal threshold of plasma Fbg and D-dimer in the diagnosis of PJI and compare their diagnostic value to that of CRP and ESR; and (2) investigate whether Fbg and D-dimer perform differently than CRP and ESR as diagnostic indicators for different types of PJI. Methods A total of 115 revision cases after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were identified. Based on demographic characteristics, 25 culture-positive cases were matched to 50 culture-negative cases using propensity score matching. Sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristics (ROC), negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated and compared. Results The optimal thresholds were 2.72 mg/L for D-dimer, 3.655 g/L for Fbg, 12.64 mg/L for CRP, and 27 mm/h for ESR. Levels of plasma Fbg, D-dimer, CRP, and ESR were significantly higher in the culture-positive group than the culture-negative group. Fbg, D-dimer, CRP, and ESR showed sensitivity of 0.92, 0.56, 0.92, and 0.88, respectively, and showed specificity of 0.84, 0.96, 0.94, and 0.80, respectively. The ROC curve showed that CRP has the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.94), followed by Fbg (0.90), ESR (0.87), and D-dimer (0.81). Conclusions Plasma Fbg exhibited a similar diagnostic performance compared to CRP and ESR in predicting culture-positive results in PJI. Plasma D-dimer showed high specificity but low sensitivity. In our study, Fbg and D-dimer did not show better diagnostic performance with different pathogens and different types of PJI. Further studies are required to investigate the difference between serum D-dimer and plasma D-dimer in the arthroplasty population.

33 The Diagnostic Value of Biopsy and Joint Aspiration in Periprosthetic Joint Infection

2015 ◽  
pp. 407-415
Author(s):  
Ricardo Varatojo ◽  
Ricardo Telles de Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Joint Aspiration

scholarly journals Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a predictor for diagnosis of early Periprosthetic joint infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bao-Zhan Yu ◽  
Jun Fu ◽  
Wei Chai ◽  
Li-Bo Hao ◽  
Ji-Ying Chen
Keyword(s):  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Early Postoperative Period ◽  
Infected Group ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Musculoskeletal Infection ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a catastrophic complication after total knee or hip arthroplasty. The diagnosis of PJI is very difficult, especially in the early postoperative period. The value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is useful for diagnosing infectious diseases. The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the NLR for the diagnosis of early PJI after total knee or hip arthroplasty. Methods We retrospectively evaluated consecutive primary total knee or hip arthroplasty and identified the patients who readmitted within the first 90 days postoperatively between January 2011 and October 2018.There were 20 cases diagnosed early PJI and 101 uninfected cases on the basis of the modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. The serum parameters including C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), white blood-cell (WBC) count, NLR and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to estimate the optimal cutoff values for each parameter. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for each parameter were calculated. Results The CRP, ESR, WBC, NLR and IL-6 values were all significally higher in the infected group than the uninfected group. The median of CRP was 66.6 mg/l in the infected group and 8.6 mg/l in the uninfected group (p < 0.001). The median of ESR was 34.8 mm/hr. in the infected group and 17.4 mm/hr. in the uninfected group (p < 0.001). In the infected group and uninfected group, the median of WBC was 8.2X109 /L and 6.1 X109 /L (p = 0.002), respectively; while the median of NLR was 5.2 and 2.1 (p < 0.001). The median of IL-6 was 46 pg/ml and 6.4 pg/ml (p < 0.001),respectively. The best parameter for the diagnosis of early PJI was IL-6 (AUC = 0.814) followed by the NLR (AUC =0.802), CRP (AUC =0.793), ESR (AUC =0.744) and WBC (AUC = 0.632). Conclusions This study is the first to show that NLR values are more accurate than CRP and may be considered as useful parameters for the diagnosis of early PJI because it is a cheap and convenient parameter to be calculated in daily practice without extra costs.

scholarly journals The Preoperative Microbial Detection is No Prerequisite for the Indication of Septic Revision in Cases of Suspected Periprosthetic Joint Infection

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Karczewski ◽  
Tobias Winkler ◽  
Carsten Perka ◽  
Michael Müller
Keyword(s):  
Preoperative Diagnosis ◽  
Microbial Growth ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Diagnostic Algorithm ◽  
Important Criterion ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Joint Aspiration ◽  
Septic Revision

Aim of This Study. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) require a special antimicrobial regimen, fundamentally different from an aseptic treatment, making a correct preoperative diagnosis essential. However, a successful preoperative microbe detection is not always possible. We wanted to find out (1) if a preoperative microbe detection is a prerequisite before starting a septic revision in suspected PJIs or if the preoperative diagnosis can solely be based on (para)clinical signs (persistent CRP >1 mg/dl, early X-ray loosening signs in the first 5 years, leucocytes joint aspiration >1700/µl, conspicuous history, and clinical signs like redness, pain, hyperthermia, swelling, and loss of function); (2) if patients with and without preoperative microbe detection have a different outcome; and (3) if the microbial growth is the most important criterion of a multifactorial PJI definition. Methods. We included all first-line two-stage hip (49) and knee (47) revisions, performed in our department from 06/2013 on, with an available 2-year follow-up. A PJI was defined as one of the following four criteria: fistula or purulence, Krenn Morawietz type 2 or 3, joint aspirate > 2000/μl leukocytes or >70% granulocytes, and microbial growth. This multifactorial PJI definition was based on the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS). The standardized diagnostic algorithm is described in detail. Results. (1) 24 hip and 16 knee cases were treated without preoperative microbe detection solely on the basis of a (para)clinical diagnosis (see above). In the hip 91.6% (22 of 24 cases) showed an intraoperative microbe detection. In the knee, in 68.7% (11 of 16 cases) a microbe was detected intraoperatively and in 93.7% (15 of 16) at least one secure PJI criterion could be confirmed intraoperatively. (2) No statistical significant (p .517) difference between patients with (n = 56, reinfection rate 8.9%) and without (n = 40, 15%) preoperative microbe detection was found in a 2-year follow-up. (3) Microbial growth remains the overall (pre- and intraoperatively) most important criterion (hip 95.9%; knee 89.3%), followed by Krenn Morawietz for the intraoperative diagnosis (hip 67.3%, knee 48.9%), and joint aspiration for the knee and fistula for the hip, respectively, as preoperative criteria. Conclusion. High rates of intraoperatively fulfilled EBJIS PJI criteria show that a preoperative microbe detection is not necessary before intervening in suspected PJIs. The indication for a septic revision can solely be based on (para)clinical signs. The new established diagnostic algorithm based on a multifactorial PJI definition showed high precision in finding PJIs.

scholarly journals Predictive value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Vaginitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eren Pek ◽  
Fatma Beyazit ◽  
Nilay Sen Korkmaz
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Vaginosis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Inflammatory Marker ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Platelet To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Distribution Width ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Significant Difference

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic value of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in vaginitis patients. Methods: This cross-sectional retrospective study was performed in Afyon Dinar State Hospital between July 2016 to August 2017. A total of 64 bacterial vaginosis (BV) patients, 66 vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) patients and 65 age-matched control subjects were enrolled. NLR, PLR, mean platelet volume (MPV), red cell distribution width (RDW) and other conventional inflammatory marker values were recorded for all patients before and after treatment. Results: In the BV group, NLR values were found to be elevated compared to VVC and healthy controls [2.9 (1.2-14.7), 2.1 (1.1-11.7) and 2.1 (0.8-7.0), respectively] (p=0.008). Although not found to be statistically significant, the median NLR levels of BV patients decreased from 2.9 (1.2-14.7) to 2.4 (1.2-7.0) after treatment. PLR levels did not show a statistically significant difference between the three groups (p=0.970). The cut-off value of the NLR for BV was 2.19, with 67.2% sensitivity and 63.8% specificity. Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that NLR levels are elevated in bacterial vaginosis and NLR levels can be used as a reflection of systemic inflammatory response in vaginosis patients. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.2774 How to cite this:Pek E, Beyazit F, Korkmaz NS. Predictive value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Vaginitis. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(1):250-255. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.2774 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

scholarly journals Meta-analysis of serum and/or plasma D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Li ◽  
Donara Margaryan ◽  
Cristina Ojeda-Thies ◽  
Carsten Perka ◽  
Andrej Trampuz
Keyword(s):  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Degradation Products ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Medical Subject Headings ◽  
D Dimer

Abstract Background The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic value of D-dimer in detecting periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Methods A systematic search and screen of relevant studies was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases using the following medical subject headings (MeSH) or keywords: “arthroplasty or joint prosthesis or joint replacement or periprosthetic joint or prosthetic joint”, “infection or infectious or infected”, and “D-dimer or serum D-dimer or plasma D-dimer or fibrin degradation products”. Then, the data were analysed and processed by Meta-Disc software. Results A total of 7 studies with 1285 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70 to 0.79), 0.69 (95% CI: 0.66 to 0.72), 3.01 (95% CI: 1.84 to 4.93), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.19 to 0.53) and 10.20 (95% CI: 3.63 to 28.64), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that use of serum D-dimer had better sensitivity and specificity than plasma D-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI (0.86, 0.84 vs. 0.67, 0.60, respectively). Conclusion Serum D-dimer had a better diagnostic value than plasma D-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI.

scholarly journals Meta-analysis of serum and/or plasma D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Li ◽  
Donara Margaryan ◽  
Cristina Ojeda-Thies ◽  
Carsten Perka ◽  
Andrej Trampuz
Keyword(s):  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Degradation Products ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Medical Subject Headings ◽  
D Dimer

Abstract Background The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic value of D-dimer in detecting periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Methods A systematic search and screening of relevant studies was performed in the databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase using the following medical subject headings (MeSH) or keywords: “arthroplasty or joint prosthesis or joint replacement or periprosthetic joint or prosthetic joint”, “infection or infectious or infected”, and “D-dimer or serum D-dimer or plasma D-dimer or fibrin degradation products”. Data were subsequently analysed and processed using Meta-Disc. Results Seven studies with 1285 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70–0.79), 0.69 (95% CI: 0.66–0.72), 3.01 (95% CI: 1.84–4.93), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.19–0.53), and 10.20 (95% CI: 3.63–28.64), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the use of serum D-dimer had better sensitivity and specificity than plasma D-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI . Conclusion Serum D-dimer was shown to have a better diagnostic value than plasma D-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI. Further research is required for clarification.

scholarly journals Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio as a predictor for diagnosis of early Periprosthetic Joint Infection

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
BaoZhan Yu ◽  
Jun Fu ◽  
Wei Chai ◽  
LiBo Hao ◽  
Jiying Chen
Keyword(s):  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Optimal Cutoff ◽  
Musculoskeletal Infection ◽  
Cutoff Value ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a catastrophic complication after total knee or hip arthroplasty. The diagnosis of PJI is very difficult, especially in the early postoperative period. The value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is useful for diagnosing infectious diseases. The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the NLR for the diagnosis of early PJI after total knee or hip arthroplasty. Methods We retrospectively evaluated consecutive primary total knee or hip arthroplasty and identified the patients who readmitted within the first 90 days postoperatively between January 2011 and October 2018. There were 20 cases diagnosed early PJI and 101 uninfected cases on the basis of the modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. The serum parameters including C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), white blood-cell (WBC) count, NLR, interleukin-6 (IL-6) were compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to estimate the optimal cutoff values for each parameter. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for each parameter were calculated. Results The CRP, ESR, WBC, NLR and IL-6 values were all significally higher in the infected group than the uninfected group. The mean CRP (infected = 59.06, uninfected = 10.09), ESR (infected = 35, uninfected = 17), WBC(infected = 7.95 × 109,uninfected = 6.16 × 109), NLR (infected = 4.89, uninfected = 2.18), IL-6 (infected = 40.68, uninfected = 7.46).. The best parameter for the diagnosis of early PJI was IL-6 (AUC = 81.4%; optimal cutoff value 8.07 pg/ml) followed by the NLR (AUC = 80.2%; optimal cutoff value 2.13), CRP (AUC = 79.3%; optimal cutoff value 9.27 mg/l), ESR (AUC = 74.4%; optimal cutoff value 22 mm/h) and WBC (AUC = 63.2%; optimal cutoff value 8.91 × 109). Conclusions This study is the first to show that NLR values are more accurate than CRP and may be considered as useful parameters for the diagnosis of early PJI because it is a cheap and convenient parameter to be calculated in daily practice without extra costs.

The diagnostic value of routine preliminary biopsy in diagnosing late prosthetic joint infection after hip and knee arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (3) ◽  
pp. 329-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Fink ◽  
Philipp Schuster ◽  
Rüdiger Braun ◽  
Eli Tagtalianidou ◽  
Michael Schlumberger
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Musculoskeletal Infection ◽  
Prosthetic Joint

Aims Biopsy of the periprosthetic tissue is an important diagnostic tool for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) as it enables the detection of the responsible microorganism with its sensitivity to antibiotics. We aimed to investigate how often the bacteria identified in the tissue analysis differed between samples obtained from preoperative biopsy and intraoperative revision surgery in cases of late PJI; and whether there was a therapeutic consequence. Methods A total of 508 patients who required revision surgery of total hip arthroplasty (THA) (n = 231) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (n = 277) because of component loosening underwent biopsy before revision surgery. The tissue samples collected at biopsy and during revision surgery were analyzed according to the criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS). Results In total, 178 (113 THA, 65 TKA) were classified as infected. The biopsy procedure had a sensitivity of 93.8%, a specificity of 97.3%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 94.9%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.7%, and an accuracy of 96.1%. Of the 178 infected patients, 26 showed a difference in the detected bacteria from the biopsy and the revision surgery (14.6%). This difference required a change to antibiotic therapy in only two cases (1.1%). Conclusion Biopsy is a useful tool to diagnose PJI, but there may be a difference in the detected bacteria between the biopsy and revision surgery. However, this did not affect the choice of antibiotic therapy in most cases, rendering the clinical relevance of this phenomenon as low. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):329–335

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document