Abstract
Background: Differentiating central precocious puberty (CPP) patients from normal cases and CPP-like patients “isolated premature thelarche (IPA) and isolated premature thelarche (IPT)” is important for beginning of treatment. Although the GnRH stimulation test is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of CPP, Because of its wide limitations, our study targets to evaluate pelvic sonography parameters as a contributory tool for CPP diagnosis.Methods: We consecutively enrolled 183 cases (93 CPP, 16 IPT, 12 IPA and 62 of age-matched normal controls) in our study over four years. All cases are classified by clinical and laboratory findings and are followed up for at least 2 years. Pelvic sonography parameters included uterine fundus, body and cervix anteroposterior diameter, fundus/cervix ratio, uterine length and transverse diameter, uterine volume, endometrial thickness, ovarian volumes and diameter of the largest follicle are evaluated in all classified groups. One-way ANOVA, post hoc and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the study groups.Results: Our study found that all sonography parameters differ significantly between CPP and normal control cases, also a significant difference is found between CPP compared to IPT or IPA cases in all parameters except in cervix anteroposterior diameter, ovarian volumes and diameter of the largest follicle. In order of best parameters for differentiating CPP compared to study groups, uterine volume (a cut-off of 1.40 ml had a sensitivity of 75.27% and a specificity of 75.56%), transverse diameter (a cut-off of 13.5 mm had a sensitivity of 72.04% and a specificity of 71.11%) and F/C ratio (a cut-off of 0.98 had a sensitivity of 78.49% and a specificity of 70%) was selected. Our study also classified sonography parameters as in equal diagnostic value to uterine volume (as the best diagnostic parameter with area under the curve of 0.826) and not equal diagnostic value to uterine volume.Conclusions: Pelvic Sonography parameters may improve the diagnosis of CPP patients and can have a contributory role in distinguishing treatment needed patients from other patients. The best diagnostic parameter and its cut-off value could change according to different ethnicities and studies.