A comparative study between tranversus abdominis block with 0.25% bupivacaine versus local infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries

2021 ◽  
pp. 146-148
Author(s):  
Bhavini Shah ◽  
Rakesh Donadhi ◽  
Ruchir Sakhrani ◽  
Dipanjali Mahanta
Keyword(s):  
Hemodynamic Instability ◽  
Hemodynamic Parameters ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Surgical Wound ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Local Infiltration ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Adequate Management

Background: Adequate post operative analgesia is essential part of holistic care in patients undergoing any surgeries. Adequate management of pain is associated with lesser hospital stay and better patient satisfaction. Various methods of regional analgesic techniques are in use today for management of post operative pain. Methods: A total of 90 patients were included in this study and equally divided in to two groups of 45 each. One group received TAP block using 0.25% Bupivacaine various second group received local infiltration of surgical wound with 0.25% bupivacaine. Patients of either gender between 18 to 65 years, having ASA grade I or II were included in the study. Visual analogue scale was evaluated at 2 hours, 4 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours post operatively. Any adverse event or hemodynamic instability was noted. Results: Patients who received TAP block using 0.25% Bupivacaine had significantly better pain scores at 2nd, 4th, 12th and 24th hour post operatively. There were no serious adverse events noted in any of the procedure. There was no significant difference in hemodynamic parameters in both the groups. Conclusion: TAP block using 0.25% Bupivacaine can be a useful technique in management of pain post operatively in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.

Pre-emptive Effects of Ibuprofen Syrup and Lidocaine Infiltration on Postoperative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Adenotonsillectomy

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Kedek ◽  
A Derbent ◽  
M Uyar ◽  
C Bilgen ◽  
M Uyar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Food Intake ◽  
Oral Feeding ◽  
Bleeding Control ◽  
Local Infiltration ◽  
Adverse Side Effects ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Lidocaine Solution ◽  
Duration Of Operation

We aimed to compare the effects of lidocaine and adrenaline with ibuprofen syrup (administered before adenotonsillectomy) on post-operative analgesia and initiation of oral feeding. One group of 20 children received 100 g/5 ml ibuprofen suspension (10 mg/kg) 1 h before anaesthesia; bleeding control was provided by pre-incisional administration of 1:200000 adrenaline solution (10 ml). The same amount of 0.5% lidocaine solution plus 1:200000 adrenaline was applied pre-incisionally in a similar manner in a second group of 20 children. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the duration of operation and anaesthesia, post-operative pain scores, paracetamol requirements, times to initiation of liquid and solid food intake, or adverse side-effects. We conclude that ibuprofen syrup applied pre-incisionally and local infiltration with lidocaine are equally effective for post-operative analgesia.

scholarly journals Comparison of analgesic efficacy between TAP block and local site infiltration post operatively in caesarean section

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabanita Das ◽  
Usha Shukla ◽  
Dheer Singh ◽  
Urvashi Yadav
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Local Site ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Pain ◽  
Study Population

Background: Patients undergoing caesarean section need to be alert, comfortable and mobile in order to take care of their babies, for which they must be pain free in post operative period. The aim of present study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of TAP block with local anaesthetic infiltration specifically in LSCS patients in reducing patient pain postoperatively, as well as to decrease the analgesic requirements.Methods: The study population consisted of 60 patients posted for elective and emergency caesarean section. They were blindly divided into two groups of 30 patients each. Group T received 40ml 0.25% Ropivacaine in Transverses abdominis plane (TAP) block for postoperative analgesia and group I received 40ml 0.25% ropivacaine as infiltration at incision site for postoperative analgesia. Patients were observed for numeric pain score NPS, analgesic requirements, total analgesic consumption and adverse effects if any.Results: There was highly significant difference in numeric pain scores at 2nd, 6th, 12th and 24th hours (p<0.0001). Both the time for first rescue analgesic and total amount of analgesic consumed are statistically significant (p<0.0001).Conclusions: TAP block is an effective postoperative analgesic procedure for post caesarean section patients.

scholarly journals Circumcision in children: postoperative analgesic efficiency of transversus abdominis plan block vs caudal epidural block: a prospective observational study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Caudal Epidural

Background and objective: Circumcision is one of the most common operations and can cause postoperative pain, fear, and anxiety for children. This study aims to compare the effects of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and caudal epidural (CE) anesthesia on postoperative analgesia after circumcision in providing postoperative pain control. Methods: Eighty boys aged 1 to 14 years who underwent elective circumcision surgery under general anesthesia either with USG-guided TAP block or with CE block for postoperative analgesia were enrolled consecutively to this prospective observational study equally in each group. Postoperative pain scores and need for rescue analgesia were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in mean age and Aldrete scores (p > 0.05). Body mass index (BMI) of the caudal block group was statistically lower than the TAP group (p < 0.05). While there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in 30th-minute VAS values (p > 0.05), the CE block group's 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, 18th, and 24th hour VAS values were statistically lower than the TAP block group's (p < 0.05). Conclusion: USG-guided TAB block under general anesthesia was not associated with lower postoperative pain scores and delayed rescue analgesia need compared with CE block in patients who underwent elective circumcision surgery. CE block provided superior analgesia than the USG-guided TAP block after elective circumcision surgery in this study.

scholarly journals Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Infiltration of Local Anaesthetic into Surgical Wound In Emergency Laparotomies: A Randomized Control Trial

Esculapio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4 (oct 2020 - dec 2020)) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anum Anwar ◽  
Hina Nabi Ahmed ◽  
Lala Rukh Bangash ◽  
Farah Arshad ◽  
Sahira Nawaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Randomized Control Trial ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Surgical Wound ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Randomized Control

Objective: To compare mean pain score of bilateral TAP block versus infiltration of local anaesthetic into surgical wound on for emergency laparotomies. Method: Randomized control trial. Emergency Operation Theatre in Department of Anaesthesiology at Mayo Hospital, Lahore from 1st April 2016 to 31st October 2016. Laparotomy 150 patients were arbitrarily allocated two groups Group T (receiving bilateral TAP block) and Group L (local infiltration) by random number table method after informed consent. TAP block was administered bilaterally by using 20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine in group T using a 21-gauge needle with the help of “Double Pop Technique” at midaxillary point at height of umbilicus. While in group L surgical incision site was injected with 20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine immediately after closure of skin. Pain was evaluated by Visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6-hour interval postoperatively. Results were statistically analysed using SPSS version 20.0 and t-test was applied to compare mean pain score of two groups. Results: Mean pain score in patients receiving bilateral TAP block 3.000±0.717 were significantly reduced (p value 0.003) versus mean scores in patients receiving infiltration of local anaesthetic into surgical wound in emergency laparotomies 6.08±1.171. Conclusion: Bilateral TAP block reduced post-operative pain significantly in patients undergone emergency laparotomy. Key Words: Emergency laparotomy, TAP block, local anaesthetic, bupivacaine, post-operative pain, analgesia. How to Cite: Anwar A, Nabi H.A, Bangash L.R, Arshad F, Nawaz S. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block versus infiltration of local anaesthetic into surgical wound in emergency laparotomies: a randomized control trial. Esculapio.2020;16(04):8-13.

P91 Post-operative pain in neurosurgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. e46.1-e46
Author(s):  
PM Haigh ◽  
F Al-Hatimi ◽  
H Stewart ◽  
S Rajagopal ◽  
S Khalifa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Spinal Surgery ◽  
Foramen Magnum ◽  
P Value ◽  
Inflammatory Agent ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Period ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

ObjectivesAre the analgesic guidelines for those neurosurgical operations associated with major and complex major pain consistently followed? Is there a correlation between adherence and post-operative pain?DesignPatients undergoing spinal surgery and foramen magnum decompressions were visited on the first post-operative day (D1). They provided their pain score subjectively (0=nil; 10=worst ever experienced); objectively we recorded whether they could move in/out of bed without pain limitation.Subjectsn=57 consecutive patients undergoing elective major and complex major pain neurosurgery between April and June 2018 at the NHNN, Queen Square.MethodsA proforma was completed on D1. The patients consented to take part and answered three questions. We examined what (if any) analgesics they were admitted on, and what had been prescribed to cover the post-operative period. This was compared against the appropriate guideline for that category of operation.ResultsGuidelines were only followed in 16/57 (28.1%) cases; not followed in 41/57 (71.9%). On an unpaired T-test: 2-tailed P value=0.0195. Where guidelines were followed, the mean pain score reported was: 3.75 (SD 2.72) Where not followed, the mean pain score was 5.46 (SD 2.29). So with a 95% confidence interval −3.41 to −0.29, there is a significant difference between the pain in those prescribed according to the guidelines and those that were not.ConclusionsThe pain guidelines are not routinely followed. Most commonly this was due to no prescription for a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent. We suggest regular sessions of education of the guidelines. Cycle 2 closed the loop of the audit. We re-reviewed adherence and pain scores and found guidelines were followed in 34% of cases, which represented a 6% improvement. On a paired two-tailed P value=0.0794. The mean pain score where guidelines were followed=3.42 (SD1.62) against a mean=4.74 (SD 1.89) where guidelines were not followed.

scholarly journals Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Çağdaş Baytar ◽  
Canan Yılmaz ◽  
Derya Karasu ◽  
Serra Topal
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Quadratus Lumborum ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Analgesia Requirement

Background. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided (USG) subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and quadratus lumborum (QL) block as preventive analgesia methods after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods. A total of 120 patients, 18–75 years of age, were separated into 2 groups preoperatively. Patients in group TAP (n = 60) received 0.3 ml/kg bupivacaine with USG bilateral subcostal TAP block; patients in group QL (n = 60) received 0.3 ml/kg bupivacaine with USG bilateral QL block. Patients were assessed 24 h postoperatively, and pain scores, time to first analgesia requirement, total analgesia dose, and postoperative complications during the first 24 h were recorded. Results. Fifty-three patients in group TAP and 54 in group QL were ultimately evaluated. No statistically significant difference was found in at rest and dynamic visual analog scale scores between the groups. There was also no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to total analgesia consumption. Although the duration of anesthesia was significantly longer in group QL, no statistically significant difference was found in the duration of surgery between the groups (p<0.05). Conclusions. Results of this study demonstrated that USG subcostal TAP and QL blocks similarly reduced postoperative pain scores and analgesia consumption, with high patient satisfaction. However, subcostal TAP block could be considered preferable to QL block because it can be applied easily and in a shorter time.

Assessment of Effect of Port Site and Intraperitoneal Instillation of Bupivacaine in Reduction of Post-Operative Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nippun Roy
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Local Infiltration ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Intraperitoneal Instillation

Aim: Effective postoperative pain control is an essential component for care of surgical patients. Inadequate pain control may result in increased morbidity or mortality. Analgesic effects of periportal infiltration of local anesthetics, infiltration of periportal parietal peritoneum, intraperitoneal spraying at subdiaphragmatic space and subhepatic space covering the area of hepatoduodenal ligament have been reported. The present controlled study aimed at assessing the effect of port site injection and intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine in reduction of post-operative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: The present study was conducted among a group of 180 patients diagnosed to have symptomatic cholelithiasis and who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. In group 1, pre-incisional local infiltration of 20ml 0.5% bupivacaine at the port sites; and in group 2, local infiltration of 20ml 0.5% bupivacaine at the port sites with intraperitonial installation. In group 3, no local infiltration was done and treated as control group. Pain assessment is based on a Universal Pain Assessment Tool. Analysis of our study was performed one-way ANOVA & Post HOC test (Scheffe's HSD) & Chi square tests as and when indicated. Results: Mean pain scores at 30 minutes were significantly lower in groups 1 & 2 compared to control group; but however, the values were not significantly different when compared to each other. Similarly, the mean pain scores at 4th, 8th, 16th and 24th hours for the preincisional and preclosure groups, didn't signify any inter-group advantage. Therefore, bupivacaine provides a substantial reduction of pain intensity up to 24 hours postoperatively; and was found to be statistically significant. However, timing of anesthesia was found to be statistically insignificant in terms of preclosure vs pre incisional of the port sites. Conclusion: Instillation of bupivacaine at the port sites in laparoscopic cholecystectomy irrespective of the timing of instillation is an effective method of achieving pain control in the post-operative period as long as 24 hours after surgery. There was no statistically significant reduction of post-operative pain between the pre-incisional and pre-closure groups.

Clinical trial to assess role of ketamine in post operative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (05) ◽  
pp. 421-432
Author(s):  
Dr. Mohammad Kheiri Mahmod ◽  
◽  
Dr. Bashar Naser Hussein ◽  
Dr. Ammar Hamid Hanoosh ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Analgesic Effect ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: The physiological consequences of post-operative pain including Stress response to surgery, Respiratory complications, cardiovascular complications, Thromboembolic complications, Gastrointestinal complications, Musculoskeletal complications and Psychological complications, all of which could delay or impair postoperative recovery and increase the economic cost of surgery as a result of the longer period of hospitalization. Inadequate post-operative pain control may also lead to the development of chronic pain after surgery .Aim of This study: is to evaluate the preemptive analgesic effect of intravenous ketamine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients and Methods: double blinded randomized clinical trial conducted at Al-Yarmouk teaching hospital, over a period of one year from March 2013 to March 2014 on a total of 120 adult patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Patients were divided in to three groups of 40 patients each, the study drug administered intravenously during induction. Groups A and B received ketamine in a dose of 1 and 0.5 mg/kg, respectively, whereas group C received isotonic saline. The degree of pain at rest and deep breathing postoperatively were estimated using VAS, time of first analgesic dose, total opioid consumption, nausea, vomiting and hallucination were recorded for 24 h postoperatively. Results: postoperative pain scores were significantly low in group A when compared with the other groups at most times in the first 24 hours. Highest pain score was in group C at 0 h. Postoperative analgesic consumption was minimum in group A then group B and highest in group C. There was little significant difference in the pain scores between groups B and C. Group A had a significantly higher blood MAP than group B at 0, 0.5 and 1 h. 7.5% incidence of hallucinations were in group A. Conclusion: According to this study we conclude that preemptive ketamine in a dose of 1 mg/kg has a definitive role in reducing postoperative pain and analgesic requirement in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A low dose of 0.5 mg/kg had little significant in preemptive analgesic effect and in reducing analgesic requirement.

scholarly journals Comparative study of ropivacaine versus dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine combination in transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain control in plastic surgery patients undergoing abdominoplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 4393
Author(s):  
Summaira Jan ◽  
Tawheed Ahmad ◽  
Saima Rashid
Keyword(s):  
Test Group ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Initial Onset

Background: Requirement of postoperative analgesic medication is decreased by the use of regional nerve blocks. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an effective way to provide postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgeries. TAP block using ropivacaine alone has not been consistently proven to be effective in alleviating pain after abdominal surgeries. The objective of the study was to compare the combination of dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine to ropivacaine alone in TAP block for abdominoplasty patients. Time to onset of post-operative pain and time interval for need of rescue analgesia were compared.Methods: Sixty ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) grade I or II patients undergoing abdominoplasty were allocated to two groups with thirty patients in each group. In this randomized, controlled, double-blinded study, the test group received TAP block using 20 ml (100 mgs) 0.5 percent of ropivacaine mixed with 50 µg of dexmedetomidine while as Control group received TAP block with 20 ml (100 mgs) of 0.5 percent of ropivacaine alone. Patient demographics, time to initial reporting of post-operative pain, time to need of first rescue analgesia, quality of pain block and side effects were recorded.Results: Time to initial onset of pain and time to need of first rescue analgesia were significantly longer in the test group than control group. The two groups were similar in demographics and quality of pain block, with no significant difference in side effects.Conclusions: Addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine for TAP block in abdominoplasty patients prolong the time to initial onset of pain and time to need for first rescue analgesia.

scholarly journals Influence of maintaining apical patency in post-endodontic pain

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Snigdha Shubham ◽  
Manisha Nepal ◽  
Ravish Mishra ◽  
Kishor Dutta
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Preoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Number Of Visits

Abstract Background The concept of instrumentation beyond the apical foramen by small flexible file to prevent apical blockage is apical patency. However, this procedure might endow postoperative pain, thus to maintain apical patency or not is the matter of dilemma. Hence, the primary objective of this study was to compare postoperative pain between apical patency and non-patency groups and secondary objective was to evaluate the influence of number of visits, vitality of teeth, group of teeth and preoperative pain on post-operative pain. Methods Preselected (n = 178) patients based on group of teeth and status of pulp were randomly divided into 2 groups, apical patency and non-patency which was further treated in either single or multiple visits. After exclusion, 160 patients were included. Each group (n = 80) was subdivided in single visit (n = 40) and multiple visits (n = 40), including vital (n = 20) and non-vital teeth (n = 20) and single-rooted (n = 10) and multiple-rooted teeth (n = 10). Apical patency was maintained with a size 10 K-file during conventional hand filing step-back shaping procedure. Intensity of pain was recorded before treatment and on days 1, 2, and 7 after treatment using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11). Statistical analysis was done using Mann–Whitney U test, Spearman correlation and Multiple linear regression analysis. Results The primary outcome of this study showed statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in postoperative pain scores between patency and non-patency groups with higher pain scores in patency group on 1st, 2nd and 7th day follow up. The secondary outcome showed postoperative pain in patency-maintained group was influenced by status of the pulp and preoperative pain only. Vital teeth of patency-maintained group treated in multiple visits showed statistically significant (p = 0.02) post-operative pain in day 1 follow up. Pre-operative pain showed positive correlation with postoperative pain with statistically significant difference. Conclusions Our study concluded that maintenance of apical patency increased postoperative pain. Evaluation of influence of number of visits, status of pulp, group of tooth and preoperative pain revealed status of pulp and preoperative pain as influencing factors for postoperative pain in patency group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document