Comparison of Efficacy of Ondansetron Pre-treatment in Alleviating Pain due to Propofol during General Anaesthesia with Placebo

Background: Ondansetron is a 5HT3 receptor blocker and has multifaceted action like sodium channel blocker and µ - opioid agonist. Objective: To compare the efficiency of ondansetron pre-treatment in alleviating pain caused by propofol during induction of general anaesthesia with placebo. Material & Method: In this randomized controlled trail 120 patients of ASA grade I & II undergoing elective surgery were included and divided into two equal groups A & B by using lottery method. Each group comprised of 60 patients. In group A two ml 0.9 % normal saline and in group B, 2 ml ondansetron (4mg) given intravenously. In both groups propofol was given in a dose of 2.5 mg / Kg intravenously. Results: The mean age of patients in group A was 29.95 ± 4.79 year and in group B was 30.30 ± 4.87 year. Majority of patients 67(55.83 %) were between 18 to 30 year of age. Out of 120 patients. 63 (52.50 %) were ASA I & 52 (47.50 %) were ASA II. Efficacy of group A (placebo) was seen in 11 (18.33 %) while in group B (ondansetron) was seen in 56 (93.33 %). Conclusion: Ondansetron pre-treatment in alleviating pain cause by propofol is very effective. Keywords: Pain, ondansetron, propofol, general anaesthesia.

Download Full-text

Conventional treatment versus vacuum therapy for diabetic foot ulcers treatment

International Surgery Journal ◽

10.18203/2349-2902.isj20175482 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. 49 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Vigna Sai Potula

Keyword(s):

Therapy Group ◽

Vacuum Therapy ◽

College Hospital ◽

Medical College ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Group A ◽

Randomized Controlled Trail ◽

The Mean ◽

Group B

Background: This study compares the efficacy of vacuum therapy against conventional iodine povidone dressing with respect to area and time of ulcer.Methods: This study is a randomized controlled trail which was conducted in Meenakshi Medical College hospital and research institute Enathur Kanchipuram. The number of patients selected were 50, which were divided into 2 groups, Group A which consisted of 25 and received vacuum therapy, Group B which consisted of 25 and received povidone-iodine solution.Results: This study was a 16 days study, mean area of ulcer on day 0 was 11.25 cm2 in group B, 10.89 cm2 in group A. On day 6, mean area of ulcer was 10.44 cm2 in group B, 8.98 cm2 in group A. Mean area of ulcer was 10.39 cm2 in group B, 7.66 cm2 in group A on the end of the day 16. The results show that both the groups showed decrease in the area of ulcers, but patients in group A who underwent vacuum therapy have shown greater decrease in the mean area of ulcer. The decrease in surface area of ulcer was statistically significant i.e. p=0.025. There was a greater decrease in infection in group A on 16th day compared to group A on 16th day. On day 0, 48% and 60% growth of microorganisms was observed in patients of group B and group A respectively (p=0.428). On day 16, 28% and 8% growth of microorganisms was observed in patients of group B and group A respectively (p=0.034).Conclusions: Vacuum therapy was more effective compared to conventional method of povidone-iodone solution dressing in rate of healing and time of healing.

Download Full-text

Is Nasogastric Tube essential in abdominal surgeries? Randomized controlled trail.

The Professional Medical Journal ◽

10.29309/tpmj/2021.28.10.4701 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 28 (10) ◽

pp. 1397-1400

Author(s):

Muhammad Bilal ◽

Viqar Aslam ◽

Zaheeruddin ◽

Waqas Jan

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Nasogastric Tube ◽

P Value ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Group A ◽

Randomized Controlled Trail ◽

The Mean ◽

Group B ◽

Study Setting ◽

Tube Study

Objective: Objective was to compare mean hospital stay in patients with abdominal surgeries with and without Nasogastric tube. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trail study. Setting: DHQ Charsadda. Period: Jan to Nov 2018. Material & Methods: One hundred and thirty two patients who underwent abdominal surgeries according to a preset inclusion criteria were in this study. These Patients were randomly assigned using sealed opaque envelopes containing computer‐generated random numbers into with and without NG tube. Mean hospital stay was noted in both groups. Student ‘t’ test was used to compare the mean hospital stay of both groups. Results: Mean age of patients in group A was 28.50 ± 9.28 years and for group B was 30.12+_9.09 years. Mean hospital stay for group A was 5.64+_2.32days and for group B was 8.73+_3.43 days with a p-value of < 0.000. Conclusion: Patient with nasogastric tube stay longer in hospital than without tube.

Download Full-text

Clinical Efficacy Of Ceftriaxone Versus Ciprofloxacin In Paediatric Enteric Fever

Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College ◽

10.51985/jbumdc2018031 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 08 (02) ◽

pp. 67-71

Author(s):

Anila Farhat ◽

Asma Shaukat ◽

Tariq Mahmood Khan

Keyword(s):

Enteric Fever ◽

Research Study ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Clinical Effectiveness ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Group A ◽

The Mean ◽

Group B ◽

Objective Determination

Objective: Determination of the clinical effectiveness of ciprofloxacin versus ceftriaxone in children with enteric fever on the basis of defervescence within 72 hours of commencement of treatment. Duration and Place of Study: This randomized controlled trial was carried out from 15th May to 15th November 2017 in pediatrics units of Benazir Bhutto Shaheed Teaching Hospital Abbottabad and Jinnah International Hospital Abbottabad. Methodology: 90 children with uncomplicated enteric fever were admitted and divided randomly into two groups, Group A was administered I/V Ceftriaxone 75mg/kg OD and Group B was given I/V Ciprofloxacin 10mg/kg BD for seven days. Response to drug was taken as defervescence within 72 hours while continued fever after 72 hours was taken as no response. The data was analyzed by using SPSS Version 21.00. Results: In our research study 53(58.9%) children were male and 37(41.1%) patients were female. The mean age was 8.43±3.17 years encompassing 4 to 14 years, mean weight of the patients in kg was 29.54±10.8 kg. Efficacy of ceftriaxone group was 93.3% while in ciprofloxacin group 62.2% patients became afebrile in 72 hours. The proportion of achieving defervescence within 72 hours was higher with ceftriaxone than with ciprofloxacin Conclusion: Ceftriaxone is more efficacious in terms of achieving defervescence than ciprofloxacin in children having enteric fever.

Download Full-text

Comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in haemorrhoidectomy patients

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association ◽

10.47391/jpma.03-1303 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Muhammad Ahmad ◽

Syed Tatheer Abbas ◽

Amna Javaid ◽

Naveed Arshad ◽

Falak Shair

Keyword(s):

Wound Healing ◽

Operative Time ◽

Harmonic Scalpel ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

P Value ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Group A ◽

The Mean ◽

Complete Wound Healing ◽

Group B

Objectives: To assess the comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy. Methodology: This randomized controlled trial study was conducted at General Hospital, Lahore, from March 2019 to September 2019. Informed consent was obtained from eligible 60 patients. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In group-A, haemorrhoidectomy was conducted according to the harmonic scalpel method. In group-B, open haemorrhoidectomy was performed by the Milligan Morgan procedure. Data was assembled through a designed questionnaire and investigated via SPSS version 25. Data were stratified for descriptive statistics, level of haemorrhoids and period of haemorrhoids. Post-stratification, independent sample t-test was used. Results: Mean age of both groups patients were 44.6±7.6 and 43.8±8.2 years, respectively. In group-A, mean operative time was 20.8±2.8 minutes, while 26.5±2.8 minutes in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. In group-A, mean convalescence period was 9.7±2.9 days, while 13.4±3.7 days in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. The mean convalescence period with harmonic scalpel method was 7.4 days (range 5–14, SD 3.6) versus 18.6 days (range 7–30, SD 5.4) with Milligan Morgan technique (P?0.001). This research observed that harmonic scalpel method required almost six weeks for complete wound healing, whereas in Milligan Morgan technique, complete wound healing was achieved after three months (P<0.05). Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy found an advantageous method when assessing the operative time and convalescence period. Hence, Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy can be adapted as a safe and effective alternative method for treating symptomatic haemorrhoids. Continuous...

Download Full-text

Incidence of post-operative cardiac complications in cardiac patients undergoing urological procedures

International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research ◽

10.7439/ijasr.v1i2.1810 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 80

Author(s):

Mastan Saheb Shaik ◽

Venkata Rama Rao M ◽

Sailaja K

Keyword(s):

General Anaesthesia ◽

Regional Anaesthesia ◽

Cardiac Complications ◽

Anesthetic Techniques ◽

Ecg Changes ◽

Arterial Blood ◽

Group A ◽

Urological Procedures ◽

The Mean ◽

Group B

Context: There are limited studies indicating the incideance of post operative morbidity and mortality in high risk patients. Urological procedures constitute a major portion of geriatric surgeries where a cardiac obligation is almost inevitable and selected for this study purpose.Aims: To compare the incidence of post operative cardiovascular complications during regional and general anesthetic techniques in patients with known cardiac risk undergoing urological surgeriesSettings and Design: Prospective randomized double blind study.Methods and Material: 40 patients aged above 50 years posted for elective urological surgeries were enrolled in the study after obtaining approval from hospital ethics committee and written informed consent from the patients. Patients were divided into two groups A& B. Group A (n=20) received general and group B (n=20) received regional anaesthesia (spinal/ Epidural). All the patients received standard premedication and their basal vitals( BP, HR, ECG pattern) were recorded. The same parameters were monitored in the post operative period at regular intervals.Statistical analysis used: Student T test is used to test the significance of stastical difference in the variables between the two groups.Results: The mean heart rate and the mean arterial blood pressure were increased (P<0.01) in the general anaesthesia group. Group A showed 10% incidence of ECG changes and group B showed 35% incidence of ECG changes. But the changes in the hemodynamics were not significant.Conclusions: There is no difference between regional anaesthesia and general anaesthesia regarding the post operative outcome after urological procedures with respective hemodynamic changes.

Download Full-text

Venous thromboembolism prevention protocol for adapting prophylaxis recommendations to the potential risk post total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial

Pharmacy Practice ◽

10.18549/pharmpract.2020.3.2025 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 18 (3) ◽

pp. 2025

Author(s):

Mariam A. Alameri ◽

Syed A. Syed Sulaiman ◽

Abdullah M. Ashour ◽

Ma’ad F. Al-Saati

Keyword(s):

Randomized Controlled Trial ◽

Patient Education ◽

Risk Stratification ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Education Programs ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Group A ◽

Total Knee ◽

The Mean ◽

Group B

Background: Total knee replacement (TKR) is a major orthopedic surgery that is considered high risk for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes that resulted from the use of a new proposed VTE risk stratification protocol for selecting a suitable extended VTE prophylaxis for post TKR surgery patients administered in conjunction with patient education programs. Method: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in two medical centers in Saudi Arabia. A total of 242 patients were enrolled in the study, 121 patients in each group. The experimental group (A) was assessed by using the proposed VTE risk stratification protocol and also took part in patient education programs about TKR and its complications. The control group (B) was assessed by using the 2005 Caprini risk assessment tool and no education programs were given to this group. Both groups were followed for 35 days post operation. Results: The mean age of the participants was 65.86 (SD 8.67) and the majority of them were female 137 (56.6%). The mean body mass index of the study sample was 32.46 (SD 5.51). There were no significant differences between the two groups except for surgery type; the proportion of bilateral TKR in group A was higher than in group B (69/121 (28.5%) vs. 40/121(16.5%), p˂0.05). There were no confirmed pulmonary embolism cases in the study sample and diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis was confirmed in 12/242 (5.0%) of patients: 1/121 (0.8%) in group A and 11/121 (9.1%) in group B (p˂0.05). The readmission rate for all patients was 2.5% (6/242), all of whom were in group B (p˂0.05). Conclusion: The proposed VTE risk stratification protocol that was applied in conjunction with patient education programs reduced VTE complications and readmission events, post TKR surgery. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04031859.

Download Full-text

Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Transurethral Eneucleation and Resection of Prostate and Trans-urethral Resection of Prostate in the Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

BIRDEM Medical Journal ◽

10.3329/birdem.v7i3.33783 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 7 (3) ◽

pp. 216-220

Author(s):

Md Mehedi Hasan ◽

Samira Rahat Afroze ◽

Muhammad Abdur Rahim ◽

Muhammad Abdus Salam

Keyword(s):

Controlled Trial ◽

Ethical Review ◽

Control Group ◽

Controlled Clinical Trial ◽

Transurethral Resection Of Prostate ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

The Mean ◽

Group B

Background: Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) is the predominant surgical procedure for benign prostatic hypertension (BPH) but is not devoid of complications like capsular perforation, drop in Hb%, drop in Na+, residual adenoma; hence endeavors are evolving to combat such complications. A newer technique transurethral enucleation and resection of prostate (TUERP) has been devised to solve these problems. This study was designed to compare the safety and the efficacy of newer technique, TUERP with widely practiced TURP Methods: This randomized controlled trial was done at BSMMU, after getting ethical approval from the ethical review committee of the institute, from January to October, 2009. A total of 60 BPH patients were purposively enrolled in this study, after obtaining informed written consent and they were randomized as control, Group A (30 patients, underwent TURP) and experimental group, Group B (30 patients, underwent TEURP).Results: The mean preoperative Hb% level of Group A was 15.1 gm% (SD ± 0.5) and perioperative Hb% level was 13.04 gm% (SD ± 6.06). There was significant difference (P <0.05). The mean preoperative Hb% of Group B was 15.2 gm% (SD ± 0.5) and perioperative Hb% was 15.2 gm% (SD ± 0.48). There was no difference (P >0.05). The mean preoperative Na + of Group A was 140 mmol/l (SD ± 4.1) and perioperative Na+ was 126 mmol/l (SD ± 6.8). There was significant difference (P<0.01). The mean preoperative Na+ of Group B was 136 mmol/l (SD ± 4) and perioperative Na+ was 136 mmol/l (SD ± 2.70). There was no difference (P >0.05).Conclusion: TUERP eliminates drop in Hb% and Na+which are usual consequences following TURP. Thus TUERP can be advocated in the treatment of BPH as it also allows completeresection down to surgical capsule.Birdem Med J 2017; 7(3): 216-220

Download Full-text

POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN CHILDREN

The Professional Medical Journal ◽

10.29309/tpmj/2018.25.07.136 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 25 (07) ◽

pp. 1069-1072

Author(s):

Mohsin Riaz Askri ◽

Shumyala Maqbool ◽

Muhammad Afzal Mirza ◽

Muhammad Rauf

Keyword(s):

Randomized Controlled Trial ◽

Postoperative Analgesia ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Study Group ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Caudal Analgesia ◽

Group A ◽

The Mean ◽

Group B ◽

Independent University

Objectives: To compare the mean duration of pain relief using caudal bupivacainewith and without neostigmine for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing infra-umbilicalsurgery. Study design: Randomized Controlled trial. Settings: Department of AnaesthsiaChildren Hospital/Institute of child health Faisalabad& Independent university hospitalFaisalabad. Duration of Study: Six months from July 2017 to December 2017. Methods: 60patients (30 in each group) were included in this study. Group-A given 1ml/kg of 0.25% caudalbupivacaine and Group-B given 1ml/kg of 0.25% caudal bupivacaine and 2μg/kg neostigmine.Results: Mean age was 4.20±1.09 and 4.13±1.07 years in group-A and B, respectively. Sexdistribution shows, 22 patients (73.3%) in group-A and 9 (30.0%) in group-B were male while 8patients (26.7%) of group-A and 11 patients (36.7%) of group-B were female. Mean duration ofrelief of pain (hours) in group-A was 6.70±2.12 hours and in group-B was 11.97±3.80 hours.Difference between group-A and group-B was considered statistically significant (P<0.001).Conclusion: Neostigmine with bupivacaine caudally in paediatric patients increases theduration of analgesia. However, neostigmine may be used for prolongation of caudal analgesia.

Download Full-text

Comparative evaluation of the clinical effects of high Air-Through soft diaper and standard diaper in Indian babies with diaper rash

IP Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dermatology ◽

10.18231/j.ijced.2021.066 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (4) ◽

pp. 353-359

Author(s):

Salvi Anjali N ◽

Rajiv Joshi ◽

Amit Bhawe ◽

Rinko Takagi ◽

Haruko Toyoshima ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Effect ◽

Clinical Effects ◽

Diaper Dermatitis ◽

Treatment Groups ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Change In The Mean ◽

Group A ◽

The Mean ◽

The Difference ◽

Group B

The incidence of diaper dermatitis (rash) in India is reported to be in the range of four to thirty-five per cent in children up to 2 years of age. To evaluate the clinical effect of using High Air-Through Soft Diaper and babies’ favourite diaper (Standard diaper) on Indian babies’ skin. This was a single-blinded, randomized, controlled, cross-over study. Eligible babies were randomized in two treatment groups. Babies in Group A used High Air-Through Soft Diaper for the first two weeks and then used standard diaper for the next 2 weeks. Babies in Group B used a standard diaper for the first two weeks and then used a High Air-Through Soft Diaper for the next 2 weeks. The study was completed with 105 babies. Theevaluation of the skin using the scoring system and photographs for representative purposes. At baseline, the mean total diaper rash scores were comparable in both Group A and Group B viz. 3.04 ± 1.00 and 3.30 ± 1.04 respectively and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.195). After 2 weeks, the mean total diaper rash score increased significantly from the baseline in both Group A and Group B (5.05 ± 1.97; p = 0.001 and 6.16 ± 2.22, p = 0.001 respectively); the rise in the mean total diaper rash score was significantly more in Group B than that in Group A (p = 0.045). After 4 weeks, a significant increase in the mean total diaper rash score (1.31 ± 2.69; p =0.001) was observed from what it was at 2 weeks in the Group A and there was an insignificant decrease in the mean total diaper rash score (-0.52 ± 2.54; p =0.153) in Group B from what it was at 2 weeks; the change in the mean total diaper rash score was significantly more in Group A than that in Group B (P = 0.001). Both High Air-Through Soft Diaper and standard diaper in babies caused a significant increase in mean total diaper rash score. However, the extent and the degree of rash induced with the use of High Air-Through Soft Diaper was significantly less than that during the usage of the standard diaper. Thus, High Air-Through Soft Diaper due to technologies used in it appears to be superior to the standard diaper in reducing the mean total diaper rash score.

Download Full-text

Increase of PlGF (Placental Growth Factor) Level After Administration of Dydrogesterone in Pregnancy

KnE Medicine ◽

10.18502/kme.v1i1.530 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Dewi Karlina Rusly

Keyword(s):

Folic Acid ◽

Controlled Clinical Trial ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Before And After ◽

Group A ◽

Study Population ◽

The Mean ◽

Group B ◽

In Pregnancy

Aim: To observe the effect of Dydrogesterone administration in pregnancy on PlGF levelMethods: This is a randomized controlled clinical trial. Study population has been divided into two groups. Group A consists of 20 women who receive only Folic acid 5 mg a day for 4 weeks time. Group B consists of 20 women who receive Dydrogesterone 2x10 mg a day and Folic acid 5 mg a day for 4 weeks. PlGF has been measured twice. First measurement was done before drug administration, while the second measurement has been done during 18th weeks of pregnancy. The changes on PlGF level before and after treatment from each group has been analyzed using SPSS 17.Results: 40 pregnant women have been recruited for this study. There are no differences based on the patient’s age, number of pregnancy and parity, gestational age and body weight between each group. The mean levels of PlGF in both groups before intervention shows no significant difference (p = 0091 or p> 0.05), 40.80 pg/mL vs. 25.95 pg / mL. The mean levels of PlGF in group A after 4 weeks administration of Folic acid is 89.60 pg / mL. It shows the escalation of 48.8 pg / mL. The elevation of PlGF level in group A shows significant difference (p = 0.000 or p <0.05) after 4 weeks Folic acid treatment.The mean levels of PlGF in group B after 4 weeks administration of Dydrogesterone and Folic acid is 212.15 pg / mL. It shows the escalation of 186.20 pg / mL. The elevation of PlGF level in group B shows significant difference (p = 0.000 or p <0.05) after 4 weeks Dydrogesterone and Folic acid treatment.Conclusion: Dydrogesterone treatment can increase the level of PlGF.

Download Full-text