scholarly journals PECULIARITIES OF GRANTING EMPLOYMENT LEAVE IN CASE OF SARS-COV-2 INFECTION UNDER ROMANIAN REGULATION. LESSONS FOR THE FUTURE

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 50-507
Author(s):  
Sorin-Alexandru VERNEA ◽  

Through this paper, the author analyzes the nature of medical leave granted under the conditions of Emergency Ordinance no. 158/2005 on leave and social health insurance benefits and under Law no. 136/2020 on the establishment of measures in the field of public health at epidemiological and biological risk. The paper is divided into two sections, the first aimed at identifying the nature of medical leave as regulated in Romanian legislation, and the second following the particularities of medical leave granted in case of infection with Sars-CoV-2. Finally, brief conclusions were drawn regarding the reliability of the regulatory framework regarding medical leave for quarantine or isolation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Posselt ◽  
E Kuhlmann

Abstract Background This presentation analyses the dynamics of digital health from a governance perspective. It aims to explore the driving forces for the implementation of digital health in Germany. Germany is chosen as a case study of a social health insurance system, which is based on joint self-governance of sickness funds and providers, and strong corporatist power of the medical profession. Methods A qualitative explorative approach is applied, drawing on document analysis and other secondary sources. The research is based on a governance approach adapted from Glassman and Buse's model of public health policy reform. Results The WHO Global Strategy for Digital Health 2020-2024 serves as a key international policy framework. However, the analysis reveals firstly that implementation is shaped by national healthcare systems and may create different results; secondly, the global strategy provides only a weak guidance on the national level. In Germany, strong corporatism and weak state intervention is supporting market forces and private actors. Poorly developed digital health governance has opened a window of opportunity for market powers as driving forces for digital health, thus creating new risks of social inequalities. There is an urgent need for public health to step up advocacy for health literacy to improve the accessibility to digital health for all citizens. Conclusions National healthcare systems strongly shape the implementation of international digital health frameworks, which makes digital health an issue of governance. Stronger public health orientation and a people-centred approach are needed to counteract new emergent social inequalities created by market power. Key messages Market power and private actors are important drivers of digital health in the German healthcare system. Social health insurance systems may be vulnerable to market powers and new digital health inequalities.


Author(s):  
Xian Huang

Chapter 6 investigates the coverage and generosity of Chinese social health insurance in the first decade of the 2000s, with a focus on the regional (i.e., cross-provincial) variation using a cross-sectional time-series research design. First, a cluster analysis provides supportive evidence for the existence of four models of social health insurance expansion in China. The clustering of Chinese provinces in social health insurance expansion also corresponds to the differences among local political economies. Second, the chapter makes detailed inter-regional comparisons and intra-regional studies to reconstruct the mechanism linking a local political economy to the local distributive patterns of health insurance benefits—that is, local socioeconomic conditions shape local leaders’ policy preferences and choices for allocating social health insurance benefits in their jurisdictions. Finally, a regression analysis demonstrates significant correlations between local social risks and social health insurance coverage, and between local fiscal resources and social health insurance generosity.


1997 ◽  
Vol 27 (106) ◽  
pp. 29-53
Author(s):  
Tomas Steffens

While public health insurance (PHI) fees keep increasing, it is not the material structural problems of the PHI system but strategies towards the privatization of sickness risks which deterrnine the discussion in health policy. This article analyzes the effects of an introduction of free-market steering mechanisms on the planning principles of a social health insurance.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyuan Hou ◽  
Haiqin Wang ◽  
Di Liang ◽  
Donglan Zhang

Abstract Background: Universal coverage through social health insurance is promoted by many researchers and policymakers to improve health equity within a country or region. In China, the mass internal migration since 1980s has posed challenges for the social health insurance to ensure equitable benefits for migrant population. This study evaluated the benefit distribution of social health insurance among internal migrants in China.Methods: Using the 2014 China National Internal Migrants Dynamic Monitoring Survey, , by applying a two-part model, we conducted a benefit analysis of social health insurance among a representative sample of migrants in China.Results: The study found that the broader the geographic scope of migration, the lower the probability of receiving reimbursements from the social health insurance and the reimbursement ratio; but among those who received reimbursements, the broader the geographic scope of migration, the larger amounts they were reimbursed for health care use. We attributed this unequal benefit distribution to the current insurance design that replies on localized administration and patients paying services up-front and requesting reimbursement later.Conclusion: To improve the equity in social insurance benefits between migrants and non-migrants and among migrants, policies that promote the insurance portability across regions and immediate reimbursement are warranted, while at the same time efforts should be done to control inflation of health care expenditures and to prevent inverse government subsidies from the regions that have more out-migration to regions that have in-migration.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Wasem ◽  
Hans-Dieter Nolting ◽  
Yvonne Grabbe ◽  
Stefan Loos

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. e004117
Author(s):  
Aniqa Islam Marshall ◽  
Kanang Kantamaturapoj ◽  
Kamonwan Kiewnin ◽  
Somtanuek Chotchoungchatchai ◽  
Walaiporn Patcharanarumol ◽  
...  

Participatory and responsive governance in universal health coverage (UHC) systems synergistically ensure the needs of citizens are protected and met. In Thailand, UHC constitutes of three public insurance schemes: Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme, Social Health Insurance and Universal Coverage Scheme. Each scheme is governed through individual laws. This study aimed to identify, analyse and compare the legislative provisions related to participatory and responsive governance within the three public health insurance schemes and draw lessons that can be useful for other low-income and middle-income countries in their legislative process for UHC. The legislative provisions in each policy document were analysed using a conceptual framework derived from key literature. The results found that overall the UHC legislative provisions promote citizen representation and involvement in UHC governance, implementation and management, support citizens’ ability to voice concerns and improve UHC, protect citizens’ access to information as well as ensure access to and provision of quality care. Participatory governance is legislated in 33 sections, of which 23 are in the Universal Coverage Scheme, 4 in the Social Health Insurance and none in the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme. Responsive governance is legislated in 24 sections, of which 18 are in the Universal Coverage Scheme, 2 in the Social Health Insurance and 4 in the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme. Therefore, while several legislative provisions on both participatory and responsive governance exist in the Thai UHC, not all schemes equally bolster citizen participation and government responsiveness. In addition, as legislations are merely enabling factors, adequate implementation capacity and commitment to the legislative provisions are equally important.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e044322
Author(s):  
Wenqi Fu ◽  
Jufang Shi ◽  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Chengcheng Liu ◽  
Chengyao Sun ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo determine the incidence and intensity of household impoverishment induced by cancer treatment in China.DesignAverage income and daily consumption per capita of the households and out-of-pocket payments for cancer care were estimated. Household impoverishment was determined by comparing per capita daily consumption against the Chinese poverty line (CPL, US$1.2) and the World Bank poverty line (WBPL, US$1.9) for 2015. Both pre-treatment and post-treatment consumptions were calculated assuming that the households would divert daily consumption money to pay for cancer treatment.ParticipantsCancer patients diagnosed initially from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016 who had received cancer treatment subsequently. Those with multiple cancer diagnoses were excluded.Data sourcesA household questionnaire survey was conducted on 2534 cancer patients selected from nine hospitals in seven provinces through two-stage cluster/convenience sampling.Findings5.89% (CPL) to 12.94% (WBPL) households were impoverished after paying for cancer treatment. The adjusted OR (AOR) of post-treatment impoverishment was higher for older patients (AOR=2.666–4.187 for ≥50 years vs <50 years, p<0.001), those resided in central region (AOR=2.619 vs eastern, p<0.01) and those with lower income (AOR=0.024–0.187 in higher income households vs the lowest 20%, p<0.001). The patients without coverage from social health insurance had higher OR (AOR=1.880, p=0.040) of experiencing post-treatment household impoverishment than those enrolled with the insurance for urban employees. Cancer treatment is associated with an increase of 5.79% (CPL) and 12.45% (WBPL) in incidence of household impoverishment. The median annual consumption gap per capita underneath the poverty line accumulated by the impoverished households reached US$128 (CPL) or US$212 (WBPL). US$31 170 395 (CPL) or US$115 238 459 (WBPL) were needed to avoid household impoverishment induced by cancer treatment in China.ConclusionsThe financial burden of cancer treatment imposes a significant risk of household impoverishment despite wide coverage of social health insurance in China.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. e000582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj Sood ◽  
Zachary Wagner

Life-saving technology used to treat catastrophic illnesses such as heart disease and cancer is often out of reach for the poor. As life expectancy increases in poor countries and the burden from chronic illnesses continues to rise, so will the unmet need for expensive tertiary care. Understanding how best to increase access to and reduce the financial burden of expensive tertiary care is a crucial task for the global health community in the coming decades. In 2010, Karnataka, a state in India, rolled out the Vajpayee Arogyashree scheme (VAS), a social health insurance scheme focused on increasing access to tertiary care for households below the poverty line. VAS was rolled out in a way that allowed for robust evaluation of its causal effects and several studies have examined various impacts of the scheme on poor households. In this analysis article, we summarise the key findings and assess how these findings can be used to inform other social health insurance schemes. First, the evidence suggests that VAS led to a substantial reduction in mortality driven by increased tertiary care utilisation as well as use of better quality facilities and earlier diagnosis. Second, VAS significantly reduced the financial burden of receiving tertiary care. Third, these benefits of social health insurance were achieved at a reasonable cost to society and taxpayers. Several unique features of VAS led to its success at improving health and financial well-being including effective outreach via health camps, targeting expensive conditions with high disease burden, easy enrolment process, cashless treatment, bundled payment for hospital services, participation of both public and private hospitals and prior authorisation to improve appropriateness of care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document