Re-Examining Self-Reliance: Collective and Individual Self-Making in Rural Thailand since the 1980s

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-356
Author(s):  
Pongphisoot Busbarat ◽  
Simon Creak
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51
Author(s):  
Thomas Barton

In 1965 Wilensky and Lebeaux wrote about Americans having residual and institutional conceptions of social welfare. The former emphasizes individual self-reliance with little assistance from a social welfare system, whereas the latter emphasizes a welfare system that is fully integrated in people's lives to help them develop to their full potential. Viewed as ends on a continuum, these conceptions are helpful in teaching students about characteristics of social policy and programs, policy practice competence, how policies have changed over time, and for prodding them to think about social and economic justice as well as how they would like the social welfare system structured in the future.


Media Wisata ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hari Rachmadi

The strength of character to be entrepreneurs, the strength of the motivation to start and own a business, entrepreneurial perception, the seriousness of the effort to seek opportunities and take advantage of business opportunities and perseverance run Synchronize employment policies, business and academia showed the strategic in building an entrepreneurial culture both in shaping new entrepreneurs, as well as for survival both businesses large and small to create the nation’s economic added value. In addition, the study empires show that entrepreneurship program has a positive effect on the development of entrepreneurial attributes of individual, self-reliance, raise awareness of entrepreneurship as a career option and instil a positive attitude towards entrepreneurship.Opportunities offered competency-based model of entrepreneurial learning and experience (competence-base and experience entrepreneurship learning - CBE2L) are implemented systematically, challenges and implications for policymakers, employers and types discuss in relation to relevant theoretical perspectives. Key implications CBE2L models. is to encourage learning program with policy and institutional commitment of resources, teachers who have the knowledge and experience of entrepreneurship and disseminate issues of education in strengthening involvement entrepreneurial culture among students.


Author(s):  
Robert Wokler

The Enlightenment is frequently portrayed as a campaign on behalf of freedom and reason as against dogmatic faith and its sectarian and barbarous consequences in the history of Western civilization. Many commentators who subscribe to this view find the Enlightenment’s cosmopolitan opposition to priestly theology to be dangerously intolerant itself, too committed to uniform ideals of individual self-reliance without regard to community or diversity, or to recasting human nature in the light of science. Modern debates about the nature of the Enlightenment have their roots in eighteenth-century controversies about the arts and sciences and about ideas of progress and reason and the political consequences of promoting them. Even when they shared common objectives, eighteenth-century philosophers were seldom in agreement on substantive issues in epistemology or politics. If they were united at all, it was by virtue only of their collective scepticism in rejecting the universalist pretensions of uncritical theology and in expressing humanitarian revulsion at crimes committed in the name of sacred truth.


Author(s):  
Elisabetta Alti ◽  
Alessandro Mereu

AbstractWHO defined primary care “as socially appropriate, universally accessible, scientifically sound first level care provided by a suitably trained workforce supported by integrated referral systems and in a way that gives priority to those most needed, maximizes community and individual self-reliance and participation and involves collaboration with other sectors, including health promotion, illness prevention, care of the sick, advocacy and community development” [1].


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Lindström

Higher education can function as an important marker of seriousness in fields characterized by diffuse professional standards. Using the case of a fine arts institute, the article outlines the role of higher education in promoting the interconnection of a professional and individual subjectivity; being an artist is not merely something one does but something one is. By primarily examining interview material, it explores how an ideal position of individual self-reliance relates to the alumni of the institute. Some respondents were not “in sync” with this position and needed to seek out other resources in order to construct themselves as professional artists. However, they seldom rejected the kind of subjectivity promoted by their education, but rather renegotiated it as part of the uncertainty of their chosen field.Keywords: arts professionals, artistic education, self-reliance, discursive repertoire 


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela B. DeGuzman ◽  
David L. Vogel ◽  
Veronica Bernacchi ◽  
Margaret A. Scudder ◽  
Mark J. Jameson

Objectives: Even when technology allows rural cancer survivors to connect with supportive care providers from a distance, uptake of psychosocial referrals is low. During our telemedicine-delivered intervention aimed at identifying rural survivors with high distress and connecting them with psychosocial care, fewer than 1/3 of those with high distress accepted a referral. The purpose of this research was to examine the reasons rural cancer survivors did not accept a psychosocial referral. Methods: We utilized a qualitative descriptive design to analyze data from interviews conducted with participants who had been offered a psychosocial referral during the intervention. Interviews were conducted 6 weeks following the intervention (n=14) and 9 months after the completion of the intervention (n=6). Results: Ultimately, none of the rural cancer survivors in our study engaged with a psychosocial care provider, including those who had originally accepted a referral for further psychosocial care. When explaining their decisions, survivors minimized their distress, emphasizing their self-reliance and the need to handle distress on their own. They expressed a preference for dealing with distress via informal support networks, which was often limited to close family members. No survivors endorsed public stigma as a barrier to accepting psychosocial help, but several suggested that self-stigma associated with not being able to handle their own distress was a reason for not seeking care. Significance of Results: Rural cancer survivors' willingness to accept a psychosocial referral may be mediated by the rural cultural norm of self-reliance, and by self-stigma. Interventions to address referral uptake may benefit from further illumination of these relationships as well as a strength-based approach that emphasizes positive aspects of the rural community and individual self-affirmation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Baker DeGuzman ◽  
David L Vogel ◽  
Veronica Bernacchi ◽  
Margaret A. Scudder ◽  
Mark J Jameson

BACKGROUND Even when technology allows rural cancer survivors to connect with supportive care providers from a distance, uptake of psychosocial referrals is low. During our telemedicine-delivered intervention aimed at identifying rural survivors with high distress and connecting them with psychosocial care, fewer than 1/3 of those with high distress accepted a referral. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this research was to examine the reasons rural cancer survivors did not accept a psychosocial referral. METHODS We utilized a qualitative descriptive design to analyze data from interviews conducted with participants who had been offered a psychosocial referral during the intervention. Interviews were conducted 6 weeks following the intervention (n=14) and 9 months after the completion of the intervention (n=6). RESULTS Ultimately, none of the rural cancer survivors in our study engaged with a psychosocial care provider, including those who had originally accepted a referral for further psychosocial care. When explaining their decisions, survivors minimized their distress, emphasizing their self-reliance and the need to handle distress on their own. They expressed a preference for dealing with distress via informal support networks, which was often limited to close family members. No survivors endorsed public stigma as a barrier to accepting psychosocial help, but several suggested that self-stigma associated with not being able to handle their own distress was a reason for not seeking care. CONCLUSIONS Rural cancer survivors’ willingness to accept a psychosocial referral may be mediated by the rural cultural norm of self-reliance, and by self-stigma. Interventions to address referral uptake may benefit from further illumination of these relationships as well as a strength-based approach that emphasizes positive aspects of the rural community and individual self-affirmation. CLINICALTRIAL not applicable


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document