scholarly journals Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Cost of Equity of ASEAN-5 Public Companies

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 334
Author(s):  
Randi Anto ◽  
Irene Rini Demi Pangestuti ◽  
Sugeng Wahyudi ◽  
Rezy Ayu Ramadhanti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Cost Of Equity ◽  
Public Companies ◽  
Concentrated Ownership ◽  
Book To Market Ratio ◽  
Corporate Social

This research aims to analyze the influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure, leverage, and ownership structure – consisting of institutional ownership, managerial ownership and concentrated ownership – on cost of equity with book-to-market ratio and firm size as control variables. The population was non-financial public companies listed in ASEAN. There was a total of 76 companies obtained using a purposive sampling technique. The data was analyzed using the multiple regression technique. The results show that the data is normally distributed and has met the requirements for using the multiple linear regression models. The findings indicate that the CSR and leverage have a positive and significant influence on cost of equity. Similarly, the institutional ownership also has a positive and significant influence on cost of equity. However, the managerial ownership and concentrated ownership have a negative and significant influence on cost of equity. Meanwhile, the book-to-market ratio has a negative and significant influence on cost of equity. In contrast, the firm size has a positive and significant influence on cost of equity.

scholarly journals The Effect of Firm Size and Corporate Governance Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reghita Nabilla Shafira ◽  
Siti Nur Azizah ◽  
Sri Wahyuni ◽  
Hadi Pramono
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Governance Structure ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Corporate Governance Structure ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

The purpose of this study is to empirically prove the effect of firm size and corporate governance structure (such as board of commissioner size, institutional ownership and managerial ownership) on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure. The samples in this study were the mining companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019 using the purposive sampling method. Based on the criteria, there were 58 samples of research data. The data analysis technique used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicated that company size, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership have no effect on CSR disclosure. Meanwhile, the size of the board of commissioners has a positive effect on CSR disclosure.

PENGARUH KARAKTERISTIK PERUSAHAAN TERHADAP PENGUNGKAPAN TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL DENGAN KEPEMILIKAN INSTITUSIONAL SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 201-214
Author(s):  
Niki Ratnasari ◽  
Iren Meita
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Firm Age ◽  
Size Firm ◽  
Corporate Social

The research aims to analyze the influence of corporate characteristic on the disclosure of corporate social responsibility with institutional ownership as a moderating variable. The population of this research is manufacture companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDK) 2011-2015. Research sampling used purposive sampling technique. There are 22 samples that meet the criteria as a sample of research with 5 years of observation. The total sample studied was 110. The multiple regression analysis was used for hypothesis testing. The results indicate that firm size, firm age, and leverage have a significant influence on the corporate social responsibility; and simultaneously firm size, firm age, and leverage have a significant influence on the corporate social responsibility. Meanwhile, institutional ownership weakens the effect of firm size on the disclosure of social responsibility. While institutional ownership weakens the effect of firm age and leverage on the disclosure of social responsibility. Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Firm Size, Firm Age, Leverage, Institutional ownership

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRUKTUR GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DAN KINERJA LINGKUNGAN TERHADAP PENGUNGKAPAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (Studi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2011-2015)

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-131
Author(s):  
Anna Sukasih ◽  
Eko Sugiyanto
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Environmental Performance ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Global Reporting Initiative ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Corporate Social

The aim of this research is to analysis the influence of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit committee, size of board of commissioners, and environmental performance on the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The measurement of corporate social responsibility based on the Global Reporting Initiative disclosure index (GRI) 2013 as seen from the company’s annual report. The population of this research is manufacture companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDK) 2011-2015. Research sampling used purposive sampling technique and found 24 companies, with 5 years of observation. So, the total sample studied was 120. The collected data was analysis using classic assumption test then do hypothesis test. Testing the hypothesis in this study using multiple regression analysis with t-test, f, and coefficient of determination. The result indicate that managerial ownership and institutional ownership have a significant influence on the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Meanwhile, audit committee, size of board of commissioners, and environmental performance don’t have significant influence on the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit committee, size of board of commissioners, and environmental performance.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility, Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance, Nilai Perusahaan, Ukuran Perusahaan dan Leverage terhadap Return Saham

JURNAL PUNDI ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sari Octavera ◽  
Febri Rahadi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Stock Return ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Corporate Value ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) represents the role and concern of the company towards the social and environmental aspects related to the operations of the company that interacts with the environment and society and the efforts towards sustainable development. In addition, no less important in the company's operations and its relation in meeting stakeholder trust and stimulating investors to invest is the emphasis on Corporate Governance (GCG) mechanisms in achieving good corporate governance. Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance mechanism and corporate image, as seen from the company's value (Tobin's Q), Company Size (LnSIZE) and Leverage (DER) will help achieve the objectives of establishing the company and improve the welfare of its owner or shareholder by increasing stock return. The sample of this research is 10 oil palm plantation sub-sector period 2012-2014 period. Testing simultaneously shows CSR, Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, Corporate Value, Size and Leverage effect on stock return of 24.4%. Partially, CSR, managerial ownership and corporate value have a negative effect while institutional ownership has a positive effect on stock return. However, these findings have not been shown to have a significant effect. Meanwhile, firm size and leverage proved to have a positive and significant effect on stock return. Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Good Corporate Governance, Firm Value, Firm Size, Leverage, Stock Return. 

Corporate Governance, Karakteristik Perusahaan dan Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (02) ◽  
pp. 203-217
Author(s):  
Heti Herawati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Sampling Procedure ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Firm Age ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Corporate Social

A B S T R A C T The issue of corporate responsibility disclosure (CSRD) grows widely. The purpose of this research is to examine empirically wether institutional ownership, independent board, profitability, firm size and firm age have influence toward CSRD of mining companies listed at IDX. This research has causal characteristic, that is is reviewing the relationship between institutional ownership, independent board, profitability, firm size and firm age has an effect CSRD. The population of this research is mining companies at IDX up to 2013. Sampling procedure utilities sampling purposive method. The number of sample uses 90 data and analyzed by multiple regression analysis. The result of hypothesis test shows that institutional ownership and independent board doesn’t have influence toward CSRD, whereas profitability, company size and age partially have influence towards CSRD. A B S T R A K Isu tentang pengungkapan corporate social responsibility berkembang dengan cepat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji secara empiris, apakah kepemilikan institusional, dewan komisaris independen, profitabilitas, size perusahaan dan umur perusahaan mempunyai pengaruh terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility perusahaan pertambangan yang listing di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Penelitian ini bersifat kausal yaitu mengkaji hubungan antara kepemilikan institusional, dewan komisaris independen, profitabilitas, size perusahaan dan umur perusahaan mempunyai pengaruh terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan-perusahaan pertambangan yang telah terdaftar di BEI sampai dengan tahun 2013. Prosedur pemilihan sampel menggunakan metode purposive sampling. Jumlah sampel yang digunakan 90 dan dianalisis dengan metode regresi linier. Hasil pengujian hipotesis menunjukkan bahwa variabel kepemilikan institusional dan dewan komisaris independen yang tidak berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility, sedangkan profitabilitas, size perusahaan dan umur perusahaan secara parsial berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility. JEL Classification: G34, M14

The effect of managerial and institutional ownership on corporate social responsibility disclosure

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 979-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurleni Nurleni ◽  
Agus Bandang ◽  
Darmawati Darmawati ◽  
Amiruddin Amiruddin
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

PurposeThis study aims to analyze the effect of ownership structure that consists of managerial ownership and institutional ownership of the extensive of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure.Design/methodology/approachThe population in this study is manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI), as the manufacturing companies are considered to have great potential on environmental damage (Mathews, 2000). The selected sample were the companies which meet certain criteria (purposive sampling) which published the complete annual financial statements from 2011 to 2015. This study used an analysis method using partial least square (WarpPLS) to assess the effect of the structure of ownership consists of managerial ownership and institutional ownership on the extent of the CSR disclosure.FindingsThe results showed that there is a direct effect of a negative and significant correlation between managerial ownership on CSR disclosure, and there is a direct effect of a positive and significant correlation between institutional ownership on CSR disclosure.Originality/valueOriginality of this paper shows PLS (WarpPLS) that applied to determine the effect between variables managerial and institutional ownership on CSR disclosure. This research is collected data financial statements and annual reports of manufacturing companies obtained from the Indonesia Capital Market Reference Center (PRPM), which is located in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), which there has not been research by the methods and the same location.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility, Leverage, Dan Kepemilikan Manajerial Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denny Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Tax Aggressiveness ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

This research is using quantitative study aimed to see whether there are influences of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Leverage, and Managerial Ownership on Tax Aggressiveness. In this research, tax aggressiveness is measured using Cash Effective Tax Rates, corporate social responsibility disclosure is measured using Corporate Social Responsibility Index, leverage is measured using Debt to Total Assets, and Managerial Ownership is measured using dummy variable. This research uses consumer goods industry sector in manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2015-2017 financial year. Number of observation of 81 samples obtained through non-probability sampling method is purposive sampling method. Testing the hypothesis in this study was used Multiple Linear Regression Analysis using SPSS 25 analysis tool with a significant level of 5% (0,05). The results of these tests indicate that (1) corporate social responsibility disclosure has a positive significant influence on tax aggressiveness, (2) leverage has no significant influence on tax aggressiveness, (3) managerial ownership has a negative influence on tax aggressivenessKeywords : Tax Aggressiveness, Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Leverage, Managerial Ownership

scholarly journals The Influence of Ownership Structure and Income Management on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 1074-1079
Author(s):  
Fathimah F. Farhah ◽  
Iranti Safriyana
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Foreign Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Corporate Social

The purpose of this study is to provide evidence of the influence of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, foreign ownership, and earnings management of corporate social responsibility disclosure. The sample used was 15 companies with a purposive sampling method. The data used in this study uses secondary data in the form of annual financial reports and annual reports of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2014-2017. The study results found that managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and earnings management have no significant impact on corporate social responsibility disclosure. However, foreign ownership has a significant effect on corporate social responsibility disclosure.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility terhadap Cost Of Equity Perusahaan

Telaah Bisnis ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitta Ariyani ◽  
Yeterina Widi Nugrahanti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Equity Capital ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Cost Of Equity Capital ◽  
Cost Of Equity ◽  
Financial Leverage ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

AbstractThe purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure on Cost of Equity Capital. CSR disclosure index is measured based on Global Reporting Initiative standards, while Cost of Equity Capital is measured by Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). This study uses manufacturing companies which is listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2010. By purposive sampling, this research obtained 72 companies as a samples. The control variables used are financial leverage and firm size. Multiple regression analysis by SPSS 16 was run for testing the hypothesis. The result show that CSR disclosure and financial leverage have no effect to Cost of Equity. Then, firm size have positive effect to Cost of Equity.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance dan Pengungkapan Coporate Social Responsibility terhadap Return Saham

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-263
Author(s):  
Ramadhian Dwi Putra ◽  
Mayar Afriyenti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Stock Return ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social

Stock return is profits obtained by investors after investing. This research aims to test and analyze the effect of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, proportion of independent commissioners, and corporate social responsibility disclosure. The population in this study was the Property Company which was listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2016-2018, which amounted to 138 companies and the sample used amounted to 51 companies. The sampling technique used in the study was the purposive sampling method. The analytical method used is multiple linear regression using SPSS 25 software. The results show that the institutional ownership affect the stock return. While managerial ownership, proportion of independent commissioners and corporate social responsibility disclosure have no effect on stock return.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document