scholarly journals Captive and Free: An Interpretation of Human Reality in the Novels of Joyce Cary

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Imam Khan
Keyword(s):  
Research Paper ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Human Reality

The novelist, Joyce Cary, appears to accept human being as free, who is apparently captive, his footing on which his art of novel writing is constructed. It is his one of the inspirations and his source of creation. He projects society as the background of his novels. Protagonists and other characters find themselves at odds with the society. A consistency between free and captive has been very much schematic throughout the novels presenting his point of view. Consequences start moving from intuition to concept. His characters are flat as well as round ones. Moreover, they are free as well as captive. They are peopled with two types of human beings who may be termed as the captive and the free. However, they are real. They are humane. The wholeness of objectivity is very much schematic. The artist in Cary tries to cut deep through the encrustations of facts and life to get at the heart of the truth and reality. However, reality, human reality, appears to be perceptive. Hence, this research paper tries to investigate the purpose of the reality of society in general and reality of human beings in particular. It aims at finding out what reality is for the novelist in question. How the novelist perceives it. In addition, how the different characters of his novels do experience the reality of life?

El Protagonismo Dialéctico-Social del Ser Humano en el Desarrollo Intelectual de Rodolfo Mondolfo

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 125-144
Author(s):  
Jesús Víctor Alfredo Contreras Ugarte
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Social Role ◽  
Academic Work ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Future ◽  
The One ◽  
Descriptive Method

Summary: Reflecting on the role humans take into nowadays society, should be of interest in all our social reflections, even for those that refer to the field of law. Any human indifferent and unconscious of the social role that he ought to play within society, as a member of it, is an irresponsible human detached from everything that surrounds him, regarding matters and other humans. Trying to isolate in an irresponsible, passive and comfortable attitude, means, after all, denying oneself, denying our nature, as the social being every human is. This is the reflection that this academic work entitles, the one made from the point of view of the Italian philosopher Rodolfo Mondolfo. From a descriptive development, starting from this renowned author, I will develop ideas that will warn the importance that human protagonism have, in this human product so call society. From a descriptive development, from this well-known author, I will be prescribing ideas that will warn the importance of the protagonism that all human beings have, in that human product that we call society. I have used the descriptive method to approach the positions of the Italian humanist philosopher and, for my assessments, I have used the prescriptive method from an eminently critical and deductive procedural position. My goal is to demonstrate, from the humanist postulates of Rodolfo Mondolfo, the hypothesis about the leading, decision-making and determining role that the human being has within society. I understand, to have reached the demonstration of the aforementioned hypothesis, because, after the analyzed, there is no doubt, that the human being is not one more existence in the development of societies; its role is decisive in determining the human present and the future that will house the next societies and generations of our historical future.

Vulner-ability: A Systematic Theological Approach to an Ambivalent Term

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-415
Author(s):  
Miriam Leidinger
Keyword(s):  
Jesus Christ ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Son Of God ◽  
Pain And Suffering ◽  
Jon Sobrino ◽  
Guiding Questions

Abstract The term vulnerability is en vogue, both in theology and in mission studies. This contribution systematically analyses the concept and phenomenon of vulnerability and discusses its different aspects; namely materiality and embodiment, pain and suffering, and resilience and resistance. From a Christian theological point of view, these aspects of vulnerability resonate with key theological questions that lead to a closer look at the Christologies of Jürgen Moltmann, Jon Sobrino, and Graham Ward. The guiding questions are: How can we speak about the vulnerable human being in his or her relationship to Jesus Christ, the Son of God made flesh? And how is it possible vice versa to speak about the incarnated God in light of the vulnerability of all human beings? Finally, the argument culminates in a plea for a vulnerable theology in a wounded world.

scholarly journals Reestablishing the Analytical Thinking of Students: A Buddhist Solution to Modern Educational Crisis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kustiani
Keyword(s):  
Point Of View ◽  
Easy Access ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Maximum Capacity ◽  
Modern Education ◽  
The Past ◽  
Educational Crisis ◽  
Analytical Thinking ◽  
The Mind

Education is important aspect for human beings. Education can be done formally or informally. In Buddhist point of view, education should be done as long as the life of a person. It is done throughout the samsaric journey until someone becomes an enlightened one, becoming a non learner (asekha). In the modern education, various facilities are provided to produce a very good graduate. However this easy access is challenged by the emergence of bad habit of students i.e. copying and pasting data from internet without doing analysis.The solution to this bad habit has to be found because it will cut off the analytical thinking of students. The lack of analytical skill makes student become unproductive in many aspects. As the result, they are not having the ability to think comprehensively, and not having the ability to raise a new idea or to solve the problem correctly. That is why many students are just keeping silent in the class without able to rise or to answer question Human is a being with a higher mind than animal. Human being is called manussa in Pali term. Literally, manussa means “higher mind”. It means that a human being has special ability to understand matter relating to the past, present and future by comparing and contrasting well. This definition also indicates that the mind of human can be developed until its maximum capacity, intellectually or spiritually. This article try to explore some alternatives ways in managing modern education to obtain maximum intellectual and spiritual goal for millennial generations.

scholarly journals The Necessity of Philosophy in the Exercise Sciences

Philosophies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Matthew Hickson
Keyword(s):  
Sport Psychology ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Modern Science ◽  
Natural World ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Brain State ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Exercise Science ◽  
The Two Cultures ◽  
Human Reality

The pervasive and often uncritical acceptance of materialistic philosophical commitments within exercise science is deeply problematic. This commitment to materialism is wrong for several reasons. Among the most important are that it ushers in fallacious metaphysical assumptions regarding the nature of causation and the nature of human beings. These mistaken philosophical commitments are key because the belief that only matter is real severely impedes the exercise scientist’s ability to accurately understand or deal with human beings, whether as subjects of study or as data points to be interpreted. One example of materialist metaphysics is the assertion that all causation is physical- one lever moving another lever, one atom striking another atom, one brain state leading to another (Kretchmer, 2005). In such a world, human life is reduced to action and reaction, stimulus and response and as a result, the human being disappears. As such, a deterministic philosophy is detrimental to kinesiologists’ attempts to interpret and understand human behavior, for a materialistic philosophy, must ignore or explain away human motivation, human freedom and ultimately culture itself. In showing how mistaken these philosophic commitments are, I will focus on the sub-discipline of sport psychology for most examples, as that is the field of exercise science of which I am paradigmatically most familiar. It is also the field, when rightly understood that straddles the “two cultures” in kinesiology (i.e., the sciences and the humanities). In referencing the dangers of the materialistic conception of human beings for sport psychology, I will propose, that the materialist’s account of the natural world, causation and human beings stems from the unjustified and unnecessary rejection by the founders of modern science of the Aristotelian picture of the world (Feser, 2012). One reason that this mechanistic point of view, concerning human reality has gained ground in kinesiology is as a result of a previous philosophic commitment to quantification. As philosopher Doug Anderson (2002) has pointed out, many kinesiologists believe that shifting the discipline in the direction of mathematics and science would result in enhanced academic credibility. Moreover, given the dominance of the scientific narrative in our culture it makes it very difficult for us not to conform to it. That is, as Twietmeyer (2015) argued, kinesiologists do not just reject non-materialistic philosophic conceptions of the field, we are oblivious to their possibility. Therefore, I will propose two things; first, Aristotelian philosophy is a viable alternative to materialistic accounts of nature and causation and second, that Aristotle’s holistic anthropology is an important way to wake kinesiologists from their self-imposed philosophic slumber.

scholarly journals LIBERATION AND EMPOWERMENT OR DEBAUCHERY AND EMBOLDENED, IN ANTHROPOECOLOGY

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3(37)) ◽  
pp. 3-26
Author(s):  
Chacon Anchondo Leonel
Keyword(s):  
Mentally Ill ◽  
Laws Of Nature ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Natural Laws ◽  
The Media ◽  
The Relationship

From first writings, a suspiciousness of women is shown towards where the relationship between woman and man (Eve and Adam) is directed. A great historian said: «as soon as women begin to be equal, they will be superior», [Tito Livio, 59 BC. — 17 AD.]. And it is precisely there the error, woman and man, are not equal, each one has its qualities to complement each other, but unfortunately, they have been used to compete for a power that no one can maintain, but it destroys relationships and societies. These sometimes pendular behaviors are contextualized from point of view of Anthropoecology. Feminism is one more current of many there are; Although its purposes are fair and reasonable, it must take care that liberation do not turn into debauchery and empowerment into emboldening, and eliminating millions of femicides that are practiced annually by abortions. Perhaps due to paradigms of interest or because we have become mentally ill, human being has not taken on the task of identifying and defining the laws of nature that should govern their behavior. Animals instinctively only take what is necessary to live, they do not accumulate. Human being because of his greed, takes more than necessary and accumulates, without obeying natural laws. Human being due to his intellectual qualities, is the most destructive and libertine animal. Mistakenly, a competition has been created; influenced by some intellectuals and thinkers, where ideas of all kinds of competition originate, unfortunately in a not very positive way, which are disseminated by the media. Most people say «in this troubled world», excluding themselves from their responsibility for what happen. Way in which concepts are exposed is with intention of questioning, not attacking, to induce a reflection and a reaction on our wrong attitude, evidenced by undeniable problems that we have as a society and damage caused to environment. Only a positive formative education will correct damage that human beings have inflicted on themselves for millennia.

scholarly journals LIBERATION AND EMPOWERMENT OR DEBAUCHERY AND EMBOLDENED, IN ANTHROPOECOLOGY

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (5(38)) ◽  
pp. 27-47
Author(s):  
Chacon Anchondo Leonel
Keyword(s):  
Mentally Ill ◽  
Laws Of Nature ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Natural Laws ◽  
The Media ◽  
The Relationship

From first writings, a suspiciousness of women is shown towards where the relationship between woman and man (Eve and Adam) is directed. A great historian said: «as soon as women begin to be equal, they will be superior», [Tito Livio, 59 BC. — 17 AD.]. And it is precisely there the error, woman and man, are not equal, each one has its qualities to complement each other, but unfortunately, they have been used to compete for a power that no one can maintain, but it destroys relationships and societies. These sometimes pendular behaviors are contextualized from point of view of Anthropoecology. Feminism is one more current of many there are; Although its purposes are fair and reasonable, it must take care that liberation do not turn into debauchery and empowerment into emboldening, and eliminating millions of femicides that are practiced annually by abortions. Perhaps due to paradigms of interest or because we have become mentally ill, human being has not taken on the task of identifying and defining the laws of nature that should govern their behavior. Animals instinctively only take what is necessary to live, they do not accumulate. Human being because of his greed, takes more than necessary and accumulates, without obeying natural laws. Human being due to his intellectual qualities, is the most destructive and libertine animal. Mistakenly, a competition has been created; influenced by some intellectuals and thinkers, where ideas of all kinds of competition originate, unfortunately in a not very positive way, which are disseminated by the media. Most people say «in this troubled world», excluding themselves from their responsibility for what happen. Way in which concepts are exposed is with intention of questioning, not attacking, to induce a reflection and a reaction on our wrong attitude, evidenced by undeniable problems that we have as a society and damage caused to environment. Only a positive formative education will correct damage that human beings have inflicted on themselves for millennia.

scholarly journals As tentações de Jesus em tempos de neoliberalismo e pós-modernidade

2002 ◽  
Vol 62 (246) ◽  
pp. 307
Author(s):  
José Otacílio Leite
Keyword(s):  
Point Of View ◽  
The Other ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Son Of God ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Present Universe ◽  
The Church

O artigo parte das tentações de Jesus, segundo os relatos dos sinóticos, seguindo a ordem de Lucas, para abordar as tentações do homem contemporâneo. O encontro das duas naturezas, em Jesus, e sua fidelidade ao Pai, traçam um roteiro de liberdade libertadora para todas as criaturas humanas. A vida e o próprio ser do Filho de Deus é uma chave de leitura antropológica, iluminada pela fé, capaz de conectar o ser humano com o seu criador. Por outro lado, no conteúdo específico de cada uma das três grandes tentações situadas na historicidade de Jesus, há uma grande ligação com as propostas-mestras de realização do ser humano oferecidas pelos ideais de individualismo e consumismo, hoje reinantes. Estas propostas estão atreladas aos projetos do neoliberalismo e da pós-modernidade. São tentáculos que desafiam a fidelidade do cristão, da Igreja, porque escravizam, corroendo pessoas, sociedade e instituições, afastando-as do projeto amoroso do Pai. Ao resgatar o tema das tentações – e do pecado – a partir dos evangelhos, temos um caminho atraente às novas gerações para refletir e avaliar os valores propugnados no universo atual, bem como a própria sociedade como um todo.Abstract: The article takes off from the temptations of Jesus, according to the synoptical reports, following the order of Lucas, to approach the temptations of contemporary man. The meeting of two natures, in Jesus, and his faithfulness to the Father, trace a root of liberating liberty for all human beings. The life and the being itself of the Son of God is an anthropological key of reading, illuminated by faith, capable of connecting the human being with the Creator. On the other hand, in the specific contents of each of the three great temptations situated in the historicity of Jesus, there is a great connection with the master proposals of realization of the human being offered by the ideals of individualism and consumerism, those which reign today. These proposals are linked to projects of neoliberalism and to the post modernity. They are tentacles which defy the fidelity of the Christian, of the Church, because they enslave, corroding peoples, society and institutions, distancing them from the Father’s loving project. In salvaging the theme of temptations – and of sin – from the point of view of the Gospels, we have a path which is an attractive path to the new generations for reflecting and evaluating the values enhanced in the present universe, as well as society, itself, as a whole.

scholarly journals Homo Economicus

MELINTAS ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-129
Author(s):  
B. Herry Priyono
Keyword(s):  
Human Nature ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Homo Economicus ◽  
Classical Sense ◽  
The Core ◽  
Self Interest ◽  
History Of ◽  
Trading Activities

Human being is driven by many factors, but in trading activities, an individual is driven primarily by self-interest rather than other encouragement. This is the point which then develops into the core of the image of an economic being. However, the whole of human self is never driven only by self-interest. Through the history of the idea of homo economicus, what was originally a particular point of view about humans turned into a claim about the whole of human nature. The actions and behaviours of homo economicus were still driven by self-interest, but what was meant by self-interest was no longer in its classical sense. Its meaning has been much more extensive. This article shows the ambiguity of the idea of homo economicus: what was originally a certain point of view about human being, was applied to human nature and then became an agenda of how human beings and society should be. Humans must be homo economicus, but the latter is definitely not the whole picture of human nature. The image of an economic being is not the real description of the nature of human self, for it has its own territory. It is not the economic beings that gave birth to economics, but the economics that created economic beings.

scholarly journals The Human in the perspective of Freud and its comparison with the Shiite Islam perspective

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 84-93
Author(s):  
Amir Qorbanpoor Lafmejani
Keyword(s):  
Free Will ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Moral Sense ◽  
Ethical Principles ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
The Unconscious ◽  
Human Behaviors

Freud's theory is among the major theories of counseling and psychotherapy. Freud, like other psychotherapists has his own anthropological views. In Freud's theory, man is an instinctive being. A human being is a system of energy, and this energy is the same as the energy of the "id" or "libido. The goal of life is to reduce the tension and gain pleasure. Most human behaviors originate from the unconscious, and humans do not have free will. From this perspective, the person has no tendency to morality within himself, and consequently ethics will be relative. However, From Shi'a point of view, man is the supreme creature of God and is a creature that has two lives. Human beings have free will, so there is a responsibility. Shi'a believes that man is not morally neutral and generally have a common moral sense and are aware of the ethical principles and the ultimate goal of life and Creation is to reach the nearness to God.

scholarly journals Towards a Non - Anthropocentric Paradigm: A Study of Select Narratives

NOTIONS ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-41
Author(s):  
AmrithaVydoori S P
Keyword(s):  
Point Of View ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Robinson Crusoe ◽  
Ang Lee ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Supreme Being

Enthroning human being at the centre stage of the universe gathered momentum with the emergence of humanism. This human centeredness later on gave way to a more anthropological term, viz.: anthropocentrism which considers Man as the Supreme Being. The anthropocentric point of view has created an ecological imbalance on our Earth. To ensure a harmonious coexistence of human beings and animals it is imperative to go beyond the narrow anthropocentric paradigms. A non- anthropocentric view which gives space, accepts and acknowledges the differences of other beings is to be developed. The present paper attempts to make a study of Daniel Defoe‘s Robinson Crusoe, Life of Pi directed by Ang Lee and Instinct by Jon Turteltaub to focus on the basic precepts of humanism, anthropocentrism and non-anthropocentrism in the select narratives.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document