EFFECTS OF UTILIZATION DEVELOPMENTS AND TRENDS ON THE FOREST
In the last 10 years, I would venture to say, we foresters in the woods industries and governmental forestry services, have seen more developments in forest harvesting methods, wood handling, transportation methods, woods workers' living conditions, and in wood utilization than have been witnessed in the previous 100 years of logging history. Reflect for a moment on some of the more obvious changes of the last 10 years—woods workers and their families living comfortably on the job; power saws superseding bucksaws; tractors and trucks replacing horses; and former nuisance or weed species of trees becoming more useful and therefore more valuable. These are but a few of the changes which we have seen in the last few years.The developments of which I speak are not local ones by any means. This march of progress exists from one end of Canada to the other and I believe that this greatly accelerated progress is causing a degree of confusion in the minds of many foresters who are responsible for the proper management of our forests so as to ensure a continued supply of forest products for future generations of Canadians.The existence of this confusion is illustrated by the fact that while in one part of Canada it is apparently necessary to have Government legislation to ensure sawmills a supply of sawlogs from pulp and paper company cutting operations, in another part of Canada private enterprise has seen fit to invest millions of dollars in a paper mill to be run almost entirely on waste from sawmill operations. Without a doubt foresters played their part in formulating and guiding both of these plans of action.Many surveys and calculations were undoubtedly carried out by Company foresters before a pulpmill was established on the basis of using sawmill and sawlog operation waste. Similarly much time and energy were probably spent by highly placed Government foresters before advising their Parliament of the necessity of enacting legislation to ensure the production of sawlogs on pulp cutting operations thus apparently condoning "wasteful practices" or at least poorer utilization than if the togs were produced as pulpwood.