scholarly journals Effect of kinetin on the course of cell cycle in successive developmental stages of the antheridial filaments of Chara vulgaris L.

2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirosław Godlewski
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Plant Growth ◽  
Plant Growth Regulator ◽  
Developmental Stages ◽  
Thymidine Incorporation ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Nuclei ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Chara Vulgaris ◽  
Stimulation Of

Effects of kinetin on the course of cell cycle in successive developmental stages of the antheridial filaments of <em>Chara vulgaris</em> L. were investigated. A shortening of the duration of cell cycles has been observed, particularly in initial. and final developmental stages. S phase. shortened in all stages whereas G<sub>2</sub> phase+mitosis shortened in early but become longer in late developmental stages of filaments. Incorporation of <sup>14</sup>C-adenine into cell nuclei increased after kinetin treatment in 4- and 8-celled filaments whereas that of <sup>3</sup>H-phenylalanine increased in 8- and particularly 16-celled ones. This plant growth regulator stimulated also the <sup>3</sup>H-thymidine incorporation into cells in studied developmental stages of filaments. The stimulation of radioactive phenylalanine incorporation into nucleus and cytoplasm was stronger in late G<sub>2</sub> phase. A participation of cytokinins in the control of cell cycle in relation to process of differentiation of antheridial cells is discussed. A possibility of changes in the cytokinin content in antheridia and antheridial filament cells during their; development has been postulated.

scholarly journals Histone mRNAs Do Not Accumulate during S Phase of either Mitotic or Endoreduplicative Cycles in the Chordate Oikopleura dioica

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 5391-5403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariacristina Chioda ◽  
Fabio Spada ◽  
Ragnhild Eskeland ◽  
Eric M. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Model Organisms ◽  
Promoter Elements ◽  
Oikopleura Dioica ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Transcript Levels ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Histone Mrnas ◽  
Complete Cell

ABSTRACT Metazoan histones are generally classified as replication-dependent or replacement variants. Replication-dependent histone genes contain cell cycle-responsive promoter elements, their transcripts terminate in an unpolyadenylated conserved stem-loop, and their mRNAs accumulate sharply during S phase. Replacement variant genes lack cell cycle-responsive promoter elements, their polyadenylated transcripts lack the stem-loop, and they are expressed at low levels throughout the cell cycle. During early development of some organisms with rapid cleavage cycles, replication-dependent mRNAs are not fully S phase restricted until complete cell cycle regulation is achieved. The accumulation of polyadenylated transcripts during this period has been considered incompatible with metazoan development. We show here that histone metabolism in the urochordate Oikopleura dioica does not accord with some key tenets of the replication-dependent/replacement variant paradigm. During the premetamorphic mitotic phase of development, expressed variants shared characteristics of replication-dependent histones, including the 3′ stem-loop, but, in contrast, were extensively polyadenylated. After metamorphosis, when cells in many tissues enter endocycles, there was a global downregulation of histone transcript levels, with most variant transcripts processed at the stem-loop. Contrary to the 30-fold S-phase upregulation of histone transcripts described in common metazoan model organisms, we observed essentially constant histone transcript levels throughout both mitotic and endoreduplicative cell cycles.

scholarly journals Cell Cycle Regulation by Light inProchlorococcus Strains

2001 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 782-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphan Jacquet ◽  
Frédéric Partensky ◽  
Dominique Marie ◽  
Raffaella Casotti ◽  
Daniel Vaulot
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
High Irradiance ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Low Light ◽  
Close Coupling ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Flow Cytometric ◽  
Initiation Of Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycling ◽  
Cycle Regulation

ABSTRACT The effect of light on the synchronization of cell cycling was investigated in several strains of the oceanic photosynthetic prokaryote Prochlorococcus using flow cytometry. When exposed to a light-dark (L-D) cycle with an irradiance of 25 μmol of quanta · m−2 s−1, the low-light-adapted strain SS 120 appeared to be better synchronized than the high-light-adapted strain PCC 9511. Submitting L-D-entrained populations to shifts (advances or delays) in the timing of the “light on” signal translated to corresponding shifts in the initiation of the S phase, suggesting that this signal is a key parameter for the synchronization of population cell cycles. Cultures that were shifted from an L-D cycle to continuous irradiance showed persistent diel oscillations of flow-cytometric signals (light scatter and chlorophyll fluorescence) but with significantly reduced amplitudes and a phase shift. Complete darkness arrested most of the cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, indicating that light is required to trigger the initiation of DNA replication and cell division. However, some cells also arrested in the S phase, suggesting that cell cycle controls in Prochlorococcus spp. are not as strict as in marine Synechococcus spp. ShiftingProchlorococcus cells from low to high irradiance translated quasi-instantaneously into an increase of cells in both the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle and then into faster growth, whereas the inverse shift induced rapid slowing of the population growth rate. These data suggest a close coupling between irradiance levels and cell cycling in Prochlorococcus spp.

scholarly journals Stat Proteins Control Lymphocyte Proliferation by Regulating p27Kip1 Expression

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1996-2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark H. Kaplan ◽  
Carla Daniel ◽  
Ulrike Schindler ◽  
Michael J. Grusby
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Proliferative Response ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Interleukin 4 ◽  
Activated T Cells ◽  
Stat Proteins ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Proliferation Of Lymphocytes ◽  
Cytokine Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

ABSTRACT The proliferation of lymphocytes in response to cytokine stimulation is essential for a variety of immune responses. Recent studies with signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (Stat6)-deficient mice have demonstrated that this protein is required for the normal proliferation of lymphocytes in response to interleukin-4 (IL-4). In this report, we show that the impaired IL-4-induced proliferative response of Stat6-deficient lymphocytes is not due to an inability to activate alternate signaling pathways, such as those involving insulin receptor substrates, or to a failure to upregulate IL-4 receptor levels. Cell cycle analysis showed that the percentage of Stat6-deficient lymphocytes that transit from the G1 to the S phase of the cell cycle following IL-4 stimulation is lower than that of control lymphocytes. Although the regulation of many genes involved in the control of cytokine-induced proliferation is normal in Stat6-deficient lymphocytes, protein levels of the cdk inhibitor p27Kip1 were found to be markedly dysregulated. p27Kip1 is expressed at significantly higher levels in Stat6-deficient lymphocytes than in control cells following IL-4 stimulation. The higher level of p27Kip1 expression seen in IL-4-stimulated Stat6-deficient lymphocytes correlates with decreased cdk2-associated kinase activity and is the result of the increased accumulation of protein rather than altered mRNA expression. Similarly, higher levels of p27Kip1 protein expression are also seen following IL-12 stimulation of Stat4-deficient lymphocytes than are seen following stimulation of control cells. These data suggest that Stat proteins may control the cytokine-induced proliferative response of activated T cells by regulating the expression of cell cycle inhibitors so that cyclin-cdk complexes may function to promote transition from the G1 to the S phase of the cell cycle.

scholarly journals Adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate content and actions in the division cycle of synchronized HeLa cells.

1976 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 515-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
C E Zeilig ◽  
R A Johnson ◽  
E W Sutherland ◽  
D L Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cyclic Amp ◽  
Hela Cells ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Intracellular Camp ◽  
Specific Effects ◽  
Low Concentrations ◽  
High Concentrations ◽  
Camp Levels ◽  
Stimulation Of

The involvement of adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate (cAMP) in the regulation of the cell cycle was studied by determining intracellular fluctuations in cAMP levels in synchronized HeLa cells and by testing the effects of experimentally altered levels on cell cycle traverse. Cyclic AMP levels were lowest during mitosis and were highest during late G-1 or early S phase. These findings were supported by results obtained when cells were accumulated at these points with Colcemid or high levels of thymidine. Additional fluctuations in cAMP levels were observed during S phase. Two specific effects of cAMP on cell cycle traverse were found. Elevation of cAMP levels in S phase or G-2 caused arrest of cells in G-2 for as long as 10 h and lengthened M. However, once cells reached metaphase, elevation of cAMP accelerated the completion of mitosis. Stimulation of mitosis was also observed after addition of CaCl2. The specificity of the effects of cAMP was verified by demonstrating that: (a) intracellular cAMP was increased after exposure to methylisobutylxanthine (MIX) before any observed effects on cycle traverse; (b) submaximal concentrations of MIX potentiated the effects of isoproterenol; and (c) effects of MIX and isoproterenol were mimicked by 8-Br-cAMP. MIX at high concentrations inhibited G-1 traverse, but this effect did not appear to be mediated by cAMP. Isoproterenol slightly stimulated G-1 traverse and partially prevented the MIX-induced delay. Moreover, low concentrations of 8-Br-cAMP (0.10-100 muM) stimulated G-1 traverse, whereas high concentrations (1 mM) inhibited. Both of these effects were also observed with the control, Br-5'-AMP, at 10-fold lower concentrations.

scholarly journals The jun and fos protein families are both required for cell cycle progression in fibroblasts.

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 4466-4472 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kovary ◽  
R Bravo
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Serum Stimulation ◽  
Fos Protein ◽  
Stimulation Of

The expression of different members of the Jun and Fos families of transcription factors is rapidly induced following serum stimulation of quiescent fibroblasts. To determine whether these proteins are required for cell cycle progression, we microinjected affinity-purified antibodies directed against c-Fos, FosB, Fra-1, c-Jun, JunB, and JunD, and antibodies that recognize either the Fos or the Jun family of proteins, into Swiss 3T3 cells and determined their effects in cell cycle progression by monitoring DNA synthesis. We found that microinjection of anti-Fos and anti-Jun family antibodies efficiently blocked the entrance to the S phase of serum-stimulated or asynchronously growing cells. However, the antibodies against single members of the Fos family only partially inhibited DNA synthesis. In contrast, all three Jun antibodies prevented DNA synthesis more effectively than did any of the anti-Fos antibodies.

scholarly journals The trans cell cycle effects of PARP inhibitors underlie their selectivity toward BRCA1/2-deficient cells

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Simoneau ◽  
Rosalinda Xiong ◽  
Lee Zou
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Multiple Cell

PARP inhibitor (PARPi) is widely used to treat BRCA1/2-deficient tumors, but why PARPi is more effective than other DNA-damaging drugs is unclear. Here, we show that PARPi generates DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) predominantly in a trans cell cycle manner. During the first S phase after PARPi exposure, PARPi induces single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps behind DNA replication forks. By trapping PARP on DNA, PARPi prevents the completion of gap repair until the next S phase, leading to collisions of replication forks with ssDNA gaps and a surge of DSBs. In the second S phase, BRCA1/2-deficient cells are unable to suppress origin firing through ATR, resulting in continuous DNA synthesis and more DSBs. Furthermore, BRCA1/2-deficient cells cannot recruit RAD51 to repair collapsed forks. Thus, PARPi induces DSBs progressively through trans cell cycle ssDNA gaps, and BRCA1/2-deficient cells fail to slow down and repair DSBs over multiple cell cycles, explaining the unique efficacy of PARPi in BRCA1/2-deficient cells.

The induction of DNA synthesis in the chick red cell nucleus in heterokaryons during the first cell cycle after fusion with HeLa cells

1975 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-490
Author(s):  
R.T. Johnson ◽  
A.M. Mullinger
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Hela Cells ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Red Cells ◽  
Red Cell ◽  
Embryonic Chick ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Phase Protein ◽  
Different Parts

Induction of DNA synthesis in embryonic chick red cells has been examined during the first and second cell cycles after fusion with HeLa cells synchronized in different parts of G1 and S-phase. The data indicate that: (i) the younger the embryonic blood the more rapidly the red cells are induced into DNA synthesis; (ii) the greater the ratio of HeLa to chick nuclei in the heterokaryon, the more rapidly the induction occurs; (iii) DNA synthesis in the chick nucleus can continue after the HeLa nucleus has left S-phase and entered either G2 or mitosis; (iv) the induction potential of late S-phase HeLa is somewhat lower than that of early or mid S-phase cells; (v) less than 10% of the chick DNA is replicated during the first cycle after fusion and only a small proportion (15%) of the chick nuclei approach the 4C value of DNA during the second cycle after fusion; (vi) the newly synthesized DNA is associated either with the condensed regions of the nucleus or with the boundaries between condensed and non-condensed regions; (vii) the chick chromosomes at the first and second mitosis after fusion are in the form of PCC prematurely condensed chromosomes); they are never fully replicated and are often fragmentary; (viii) DNA synthesis in the chick nuclei is accompanied by an influx of protein (both G1 and S-phase protein) from the HeLa component of the heterokaryon.

scholarly journals Stimulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase in mouse uterine epithelial cells by oestradiol-17 β

1984 ◽  
Vol 218 (3) ◽  
pp. 849-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
P A Wilce ◽  
L Leijten ◽  
L Martin
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Enzyme Activity ◽  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Hormone Treatment ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Uterine Epithelial Cells ◽  
Coa Reductase ◽  
Two Peaks ◽  
Stimulation Of

The characteristics of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase from mouse uterine epithelial cells were studied. Preliminary experiments showed that enzyme activity was stimulated approx. 10-fold 18h after administration of 100ng of oestradiol-17 beta. This activity was associated with all particulate fractions of the uterine luminal cell. The Km for D-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA was 5.54 +/- 1.12 microM. The detailed time-course of oestrogen stimulation showed two peaks of activity, 9 and 15h after hormone treatment. The DNA content of the epithelial cells doubled between 6 and 12h after hormone treatment, whereas the protein content increased linearly over the 18h period. The peak of enzyme activity at 9h is associated with early S phase of the epithelial cells; the peak at 15h may be associated with a second S phase or with mitosis. Pretreatment with progesterone for 3 days before injection of oestradiol-17 beta (a treatment which inhibits uterine epithelial DNA synthesis) reduced the oestrogenic stimulation of enzyme activity by 63%; progesterone treatment alone did not stimulate enzyme activity. These data suggest that uterine epithelial 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase may play an important role in the cell cycle in this tissue.

scholarly journals Disruption of the Rb-Raf-1 Interaction Inhibits Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (21) ◽  
pp. 9527-9541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piyali Dasgupta ◽  
Jiazhi Sun ◽  
Sheng Wang ◽  
Gina Fusaro ◽  
Vicki Betts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase ◽  
Tubule Formation ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Quiescent Cells ◽  
Stimulation Of

ABSTRACT The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (Rb) plays a vital role in regulating mammalian cell cycle progression and inactivation of Rb is necessary for entry into S phase. Rb is inactivated by phosphorylation upon growth factor stimulation of quiescent cells, facilitating the transition from G1 phase to S phase. Although the signaling events after growth factor stimulation have been well characterized, it is not yet clear how these signals contact the cell cycle machinery. We had found previously that growth factor stimulation of quiescent cells lead to the direct binding of Raf-1 kinase to Rb, leading to its inactivation. Here we show that the Rb-Raf-1 interaction occurs prior to the activation of cyclin and/or cyclin-dependent kinases and facilitates normal cell cycle progression. Raf-1-mediated inactivation of Rb is independent of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade, as well as cyclin-dependent kinases. Binding of Raf-1 seemed to correlate with the dissociation of the chromatin remodeling protein Brg1 from Rb. Disruption of the Rb-Raf-1 interaction by a nine-amino-acid peptide inhibits Rb phosphorylation, cell proliferation, and vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated capillary tubule formation. Delivery of this peptide by a carrier molecule led to a 79% reduction in tumor volume and a 57% reduction in microvessel formation in nude mice. It appears that Raf-1 links mitogenic signaling to Rb and that disruption of this interaction could aid in controlling proliferative disorders.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document