scholarly journals Miscibility Development Computation in Enhanced Oil Recovery by Flare Gas Flooding

2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 270-286
Author(s):  
Tjokorde Walmiki Samadhi ◽  
◽  
Utjok W.R. Siagian ◽  
Angga P. Budiono
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Flooding

New Approach to Alternating Thickened–Unthickened Gas Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (43) ◽  
pp. 14637-14647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasser M. Al Hinai ◽  
A. Saeedi ◽  
Colin D. Wood ◽  
Matthew Myers ◽  
R. Valdez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Gas Flooding

scholarly journals Minimum miscibility pressure computation in eor by flare gas flooding

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Tjokorde Walmiki Samadhi ◽  
Utjok W.R. Siagian ◽  
Angga P Budiono
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Molar Ratio ◽  
Co2 Injection ◽  
Co2 Flooding ◽  
Minimum Miscibility Pressure ◽  
Gas Flooding ◽  
Model Oil ◽  
Gas Drive

The technical feasibility of using flare gas in the miscible gas flooding enhanced oil recovery (MGF-EOR) is evaluated by comparing the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) obtained using flare gas to the MMP obtained in the conventional CO2 flooding. The MMP is estimated by the multiple mixing cell calculation method with the Peng-Robinson equation of state using a binary nC5H12-nC16H34 mixture at a 43%:57% molar ratio as a model oil. At a temperature of 323.15 K, the MMP in CO2 injection is estimated at 9.78 MPa. The MMP obtained when a flare gas consisting of CH4 and C2H6 at a molar ratio of 91%:9% is used as the injection gas is predicted to be 3.66 times higher than the CO2 injection case. The complete gas-oil miscibility in CO2 injection occurs via the vaporizing gas drive mechanism, while flare gas injection shifts the miscibility development mechanism to the combined vaporizing / condensing gas drive. Impact of variations in the composition of the flare gas on MMP needs to be further explored to confirm the feasibility of flare gas injection in MGF-EOR processes. Keywords: flare gas, MMP, miscible gas flooding, EORAbstrakKonsep penggunaan flare gas untuk proses enhanced oil recovery dengan injeksi gas terlarut (miscible gas flooding enhanced oil recovery atau MGF-EOR) digagaskan untuk mengurangi emisi gas rumah kaca dari fasilitas produksi migas, dengan sekaligus meningkatkan produksi minyak. Kelayakan teknis injeksi flare gas dievaluasi dengan memperbandingkan tekanan pelarutan minimum (minimum miscibility pressure atau MMP) untuk injeksi flare gas dengan MMP pada proses MGF-EOR konvensional menggunakan injeksi CO2. MMP diperkirakan melalui komputasi dengan metode sel pencampur majemuk dengan persamaan keadaan Peng-Robinson, pada campuran biner nC5H12-nC16H34 dengan nisbah molar 43%:57% sebagai model minyak. Pada temperatur 323.15 K, estimasi MMP yang diperoleh dengan injeksi CO2 adalah 9.78 MPa. Nilai MMP yang diperkirakan pada injeksi flare gas yang berupa campuran CH4-C2H6 pada nisbah molar 91%:9% sangat tinggi, yakni sebesar 3.66 kali nilai yang diperoleh pada kasus injeksi CO2. Pelarutan sempurna gas-minyak dalam injeksi CO2 terbentuk melalui mekanisme dorongan gas menguap (vaporizing gas drive), sementara pelarutan pada injeksi flare gas terbentuk melaui mekanisme kombinasi dorongan gas menguap dan mengembun (vaporizing/condensing gas drive). Pengaruh variasi komposisi flare gas terhadap MMP perlu dikaji lebih lanjut untuk menjajaki kelayakan injeksi flare gas dalam proses MGF-EOR.Kata kunci: flare gas, MMP, miscible gas flooding, EOR

The Effect of CO2 Gas Flooding on Three Phase Trapping Mechanisms for Enhanced Oil Recovery and CO2 Storage

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Peksa ◽  
K.-H. A. A. Wolf ◽  
M. Daskaroli ◽  
P. L. J. Zitha
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Gas Flooding

Novel CO2/N2 Foam Concept and Optimization Scheme for Improving CO2-foam EOR Process

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul Gajbhiye
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Supercritical Conditions ◽  
Co2 Gas ◽  
Reservoir Condition ◽  
Injection Process ◽  
Co2 Foam ◽  
Gas Flooding ◽  
Foam Flooding

Abstract Nitrogen and Carbon dioxide are the most common gases utilized in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques. Most of the gas injection process suffers from the gravity override and viscous fingering resulting in lower oil recovery. Foam is introduced in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) to mitigate these problems encountered during gas flooding. When it comes to the CO2-gas injection the CO2-becomes supercritical at a typical reservoir condition giving it difficulty to form CO2-foam at reservoir condition. The CO2-foam has a common problem to become weaker above its supercritical conditions of 1100 psi and 31°C. As a result, the advantages of using CO2 foam are diminished due to the weakness of CO2-foam at supercritical conditions and results in a lower recovery. However, CO2-foam can be generated by replacing a portion of CO2 with N2 gas. It lacks the understating of mixture properties and its effect on EOR. This study evaluates the performance of CO2/N2 foam at supercritical conditions for EOR. It aims to improve recovery under supercritical conditions by using N2/CO2 mixture foam and optimize the foam quality and CO2/N2 ratio. The results from the experiments showed that the CO2/N2 foam flooding recovered an additional oil of Original Initial Oil in Place (OIIP) indicating that foam flooding succeeded in producing more oil than pure CO2-foam injection processes. Also, the results of foam flooding at different foam quality and CO2/N2 ratio significantly affected the performance and recovery of the process. Hence it is necessary to optimize the CO2/N2 foam parameters flooding process which is affected by the parameters such as foam quality and CO2/N2 ratio. The study also shows an experimental approach for optimizing CO2/N2 foam parameters. The concept of adding N2 to CO2 is a novel way of generating CO2 foam at supercritical conditions. Although investigators are trying different ways to generate the strong and stable CO2- foam, adding N2 to CO2 can be considered to be the easiest way for foam generation as CO2 is always having some impurities in the form of other gases and N2 can be considered as one of such gas helps in generating the foam.

scholarly journals Enhanced oil recovery application in low permeability formations by the injections of CO2, N2 and CO2/N2 mixture gases

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1963-1971
Author(s):  
E. S. Bougre ◽  
T. D. Gamadi
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Injection Pressure ◽  
Limiting Factors ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Breakthrough Time ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Gas ◽  
Cost Constraints ◽  
Gas Flooding

AbstractLow oil recovery which is very predominant in shale oil reservoirs has stimulated petroleum engineers to investigate the applications of enhanced oil recovery methods in these formations. One such application is the injection of gases into the formation to stimulate increased oil recovery. In many gas flooding projects performed in the field, the miscibility of the gas injected is usually the most desired displacement mechanism, and carbon dioxide (CO2) gas has been recognized to be the best performing gas for injection due to its ability to be miscible with oil in the reservoir at low pressures compared to other gases such as nitrogen. This minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) is of very crucial importance because it is the primary limiting factor in the feasibility of a miscible gas flooding project. However, there are other limiting factors such as cost and availability and, in these instances, nitrogen (N2) and lean gas are the more preferred candidate as opposed to carbon dioxide gas. Mixing carbon dioxide gas with lean gas or with nitrogen in a required ratio can allow us to design an injection gas that will be suitable enough to satisfy both the availability and cost constraints and at the same time allow us to achieve a reachable and reasonable miscibility pressure. The objective of this paper is to investigate the effect of mixing nitrogen gas and carbon dioxide gas in a 50:50 ratio on oil recovery in tight oil formations. The experiment was performed with controlled constraints such as the same core sample, same crude oil and same core cleaning and saturation process which was repeated for each trial. The oil used was live oil from Eagle ford formation, and the gases used were nitrogen (99.9% purity), carbon dioxide and a mixture of nitrogen and carbon dioxide in a 50:50 ratio. The injection pressure ranged from 1000 to 5000 psi with pressure increments of 1000 psi, and the same flooding time was 6 h. The potential of the N2, CO2 and N2–CO2 mixture for improving oil recovery was assessed along with the breakthrough time. The results showed that CO2 gas had the highest recovery followed by the N2–CO2 mixture and N2 gas had the lowest recovery. The gas breakthrough time results showed that the N2–CO2 mixture had the longest breakthrough time, N2 had the shortest breakthrough time, and CO2 had a significantly longer breakthrough time than pure N2 gas. The RF increased with increasing pressure, but the gas breakthrough time decreased with increasing pressure. However, the incremental RF decreased in all three cases when the injection pressure was above 3000 psi.

scholarly journals Enhanced oil recovery after polymer flooding by wettability alteration to gas wetness using numerical simulation

2018 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kewen Li ◽  
Changhui Cheng ◽  
Changwei Liu ◽  
Lin Jia
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Polymer Flooding ◽  
Water Flooding ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Reservoir Permeability ◽  
Gas Flooding ◽  
Water Cut ◽  
Enhance Oil Recovery

Polymer flooding, as one of the Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) methods, has been adopted in many oilfields in China and some other countries. Over 50% oil remains undeveloped in many oil reservoirs after polymer flooding. It has been a great challenge to find approaches to further enhancing oil recovery when polymer flooding is over. In this study, a new method was proposed to increase oil production using gas flooding with wettability alteration to gas wetness when polymer flooding has been completed. The rock wettability was altered from liquid- to gas-wetness during gas flooding. An artificial oil reservoir was constructed and many numerical simulations have been conducted to test the effect of wettability alteration on the oil recovery in reservoirs developed by water flooding and followed by polymer flooding. Production data from different scenarios, water flooding, polymer flooding after water flooding, gas flooding with and without wettability alteration after polymer flooding, were calculated using numerical simulation. The results demonstrate that the wettability alteration to gas wetness after polymer flooding can significantly enhance oil recovery and reduce water cut effectively. Also studied were the combined effects of wettability alteration and reservoir permeability on oil recovery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document