scholarly journals Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taxonomy

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Bénichou ◽  
Isabelle Gérard ◽  
Éric Laureys ◽  
Michelle Price
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Electronic Publishing ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Free Access ◽  
Scientific Publishing ◽  
Publicly Funded ◽  
End User ◽  
Online Publishing

In order to consider the effects of online publishing on the career of researchers, as well as to encourage both its recognition and its improved positioning within the field and beyond, the CETAF Membership organized two workshops during which specific questions about scientific publishing in taxonomy were addressed: authorship citation and Open Access. The present opinion paper is the result of those workshops held on 19 October 2016 in Madrid and on 4 October 2017 in Heraklion. The discussions were aimed at reconciling the requirements of the relevant nomenclatural codes with recommendations for best practices that are adapted to the evolving landscape of e-publishing. By evaluating the different policies of a range of journals regarding authorship citation, we were able to recognise the conflicting and incoherent practices related to the citation of taxon authorships; an issue that is important to clarify for scientific (explicit source), practical (findability of source) and reputational (citation index) reasons. A collective policy on authorship citation also fits into the wider challenge faced by researchers and institutions, whereby interoperability and traceability become key priorities, both for facilitating access to scientific resources and for generating metrics that accurately represent the activities and output of the community. Publications resulting from publicly-funded research should be considered as an essential part of the research process and there has been a strong move towards Open Access, which increases visibility, citability, innovation and impact. Diverse models of Open Access have appeared in scientific publishing but while they each promote free access to the end user, they are not always equitable for the authors and funders of the original research. Herein we formulate recommendations for the relevant research communities and outline the advantages behind adopting a collective strategy towards the issues of authorship citation and Open Access.

scholarly journals Open-access policy and data-sharing practice in UK academia

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yimei Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Academic Disciplines ◽  
Free Access ◽  
Online Publishing ◽  
Institutional Repositories ◽  
Access To Data

Data sharing can be defined as the release of research data that can be used by others. With the recent open-science movement, there has been a call for free access to data, tools and methods in academia. In recent years, subject-based and institutional repositories and data centres have emerged along with online publishing. Many scientific records, including published articles and data, have been made available via new platforms. In the United Kingdom, most major research funders had a data policy and require researchers to include a ‘data-sharing plan’ when applying for funding. However, there are a number of barriers to the full-scale adoption of data sharing. Those barriers are not only technical, but also psychological and social. A survey was conducted with over 1800 UK-based academics to explore the extent of support of data sharing and the characteristics and factors associated with data-sharing practice. It found that while most academics recognised the importance of sharing research data, most of them had never shared or reused research data. There were differences in the extent of data sharing between different gender, academic disciplines, age and seniority. It also found that the awareness of Research Council UK’s (RCUK) Open-Access (OA) policy, experience of Gold and Green OA publishing, attitudes towards the importance of data sharing and experience of using secondary data were associated with the practice of data sharing. A small group of researchers used social media such as Twitter, blogs and Facebook to promote the research data they had shared online. Our findings contribute to the knowledge and understanding of open science and offer recommendations to academic institutions, journals and funding agencies.

scholarly journals EuroRxiv: a European open science repository

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khaled Moustafa
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Free Access ◽  
Publicly Funded ◽  
European Languages ◽  
Open Access Journals ◽  
Technical Issues ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Science Movement

Open and free access to scientific knowledge keeps scientists up to date with the latest achievements in their respective fields and to help set up appropriate solutions to health, environmental and technical issues. One of the efficient settings toward this purpose is the use of preprint servers- open repositories that allow authors to post their manuscripts ahead of formal peer review/publishing in traditional journals. The recognition of preprints as an essential part of science landscape are on the rise worldwide.In 2018, a European funder coalition, called Coalition S, has been formed and issued an open access plan, called Plan S, that requires authors of studies funded by the Coalition to publish their manuscripts- starting from January 2021- in open access journals or repositories that meet the guidelines of the Plan S. Many publishers and researchers welcomed the Plan S as a step forward to promote openness and free access to publicly funded research. To further enhance the open and free science movement, I'd propose a European preprint server called "European arXiv" (https://eurorxiv.eu) as a multidisciplinary and multilingual repository that will accept manuscripts (preprints and postprints) in the various European languages and beyond. The project is an individual initiative, but interested people are welcome to join.

scholarly journals Navigating the Road to Success: Guidelines for Preparing Competitive Grant Proposals

2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn L. Langille ◽  
Theresa Mackenzie
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Grant Writing ◽  
Original Research ◽  
The Road ◽  
Grant Applications ◽  
Funding Agencies ◽  
Grant Proposals ◽  
Research Grant

Purpose - Difficulty in securing research funding has been cited as one barrier to the involvement of more librarians and information professionals in conducting original research. This article seeks to support the work of librarians who wish to secure research funding by describing some key approaches to the creation of successful grant applications. Approach - The authors draw on more than 15 years experience in supporting the development of successful research grant proposals. Twelve grant-writing best practices or ‘key approaches’ are described, and a planning timeline is suggested. Conclusions - Use of these best practices can assist researchers in creating successful research grant proposals that will also help streamline the research process once it is underway. It is important to recognize the competitive nature of research grant competitions, to obtain feedback from an internal review panel, and to use feedback from funding agencies to strengthen future grant applications.

scholarly journals Open science: a revolution in sight?

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Rentier
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Data Science ◽  
Electronic Publishing ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Free Access ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Access Policy ◽  
Access To Knowledge ◽  
The University

Purpose This paper aims to describe the evolution of scientific communication, largely represented by the publication process. It notes the disappearance of the traditional publication on paper and its progressive replacement by electronic publishing, a new paradigm implying radical changes in the whole mechanism. It aims also at warning the scientific community about the dangers of some new avenues and why, rather than subcontracting an essential part of its work, it must take back full control of its production. Design/methodology/approach The paper reviews the emerging concepts in scholarly publication and aims to answer frequently asked questions concerning free access to scientific literature as well as to data, science and knowledge in general. Findings The paper provides new observations concerning the level of compliance to institutional open access mandates and the poor relevance of journal prestige for quality evaluation of research and researchers. The results of introducing an open access policy at the University of Liège are noted. Social implications Open access is, for the first time in human history, an opportunity to provide free access to knowledge universally, regardless of either the wealth or the social status of the potentially interested readers. It is an essential breakthrough for developing countries. Originality/value Open access and Open Science in general must be considered as common values that should be shared freely. Free access to publicly generated knowledge should be explicitly included in universal human rights. There are still a number of obstacles hampering this goal, mostly the greed of intermediaries who persuade researchers to give their work for free, in exchange for prestige. The worldwide cause of Open Knowledge is thus a major universal issue for the twenty-first century.

scholarly journals Open Access dynamics and prospects

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Grynkiewicz ◽  
Katarzyna Filip
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Electronic Publishing ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Publicly Funded ◽  
New Era ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Open Access Journals ◽  
Green Route

The www has started a new era in dissemination of scientific information, which is already to such extent propagated by electronic media that it has become practically independent from the system of subscription driven printed journals. These developments of marked increase in availability of scientific information, commonly described as Open Access, have profound consequences for functioning of all segments of scientific community and also strategically influence education systems. Generally, there are growing expectations for freely available results of publicly funded research. Open Access (OA), which is developing for ca 25 years, has generated a number of large publishers (i.e. BioMedCentral) and over 5 000 of scholarly peer reviewed journals, which can be checked in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ; https://doaj.org/). Leaving aside new types of business models which evolved in connection with widespread of electronic publishing, we will analyze the OA phenomenon from the point of view of an active life science researcher, as a reader and an author. Thus, the OA “for profit” publishing modalities, distinguished as “green route” and “gold route” will be presented as well as some extracts from ongoing debate on the economics of particular variants. Finally, the question of choice between publishing options for prospective results in getting cited, will be touched upon.

scholarly journals Open Access dynamics and prospects

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Grynkiewicz ◽  
Katarzyna Filip
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Electronic Publishing ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Publicly Funded ◽  
New Era ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Open Access Journals ◽  
Green Route

The www has started a new era in dissemination of scientific information, which is already to such extent propagated by electronic media that it has become practically independent from the system of subscription driven printed journals. These developments of marked increase in availability of scientific information, commonly described as Open Access, have profound consequences for functioning of all segments of scientific community and also strategically influence education systems. Generally, there are growing expectations for freely available results of publicly funded research. Open Access (OA), which is developing for ca 25 years, has generated a number of large publishers (i.e. BioMedCentral) and over 5 000 of scholarly peer reviewed journals, which can be checked in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ; https://doaj.org/). Leaving aside new types of business models which evolved in connection with widespread of electronic publishing, we will analyze the OA phenomenon from the point of view of an active life science researcher, as a reader and an author. Thus, the OA “for profit” publishing modalities, distinguished as “green route” and “gold route” will be presented as well as some extracts from ongoing debate on the economics of particular variants. Finally, the question of choice between publishing options for prospective results in getting cited, will be touched upon.

scholarly journals Editorial: Starting Volume Twelve, Celebrating the Twelfth Year of Platinum Open-Access

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Review Paper ◽  
Board Members ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Free Access ◽  
Applied Chemistry ◽  
Access Policy ◽  
Continuous Support ◽  
Published Paper

Dear Readers, Authors, Reviewers, and Editorial Board Members, Gratitude for the continuous support of the Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry. Volume eleven (associated to 2021) contains 600 papers, which cumulates 7784 pages, which means five times more pages than volume ten (associated to 2020). This was possible thanks to the trust that all of you have in this journal. All papers accepted in this journal are published under the platinum open-access policy, which means that no fees have to be paid by the authors and 100% permanent free access for authors and readers. I would like to share a recently published paper highlighting the first bibliometric analysis of Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry from 2016 to 2020: https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC116.1507515140. I am thrilled to conclude that 838 research institutes from 77 countries have participated in fulfilling the journal's focus. You are very welcome to submit your next manuscript, either original research or review paper, to be considered for publication Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry.

A Review of Scientific Publishing Platforms

2013 ◽  
Vol 411-414 ◽  
pp. 152-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Xu ◽  
Mi Zou ◽  
Wei Liu
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Short Review ◽  
Electronic Format ◽  
Scientific Publishing ◽  
Paradigm Shifts ◽  
Online Publishing ◽  
Knowledge Space ◽  
Static Information

Scientific publishing is currently undergoing significant paradigm shifts, as it makes the transition from print to electronic format, from subscribers only to open access and from static information to a dynamic knowledge space. In this paper, we investigate four tremendously promising online publishing systems and projects as a short review of state-off-the-art scientific publishing platforms.

scholarly journals Free open access to liberate and unleash neglected science

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
King Hwa Ling ◽  
Noraishah Mydin Abdul-Aziz ◽  
Norshariza Nordin
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Scientific Publication ◽  
Research Paper ◽  
Free Access ◽  
Publicly Funded ◽  
Funded Research ◽  
Open Access Publication

Open access has become a choice for scientific publication. In many countries, open access publication has been made compulsory for publicly funded studies. Since 2013, government-funded research paper in United States must be made freely available within 12 months of publication. Such policy will ensure maximum accessibility and circulation of published articles. While the scientific community is benefited at large due to free access and distribution of published materials, open access publication is never free due to the various costs involved in the production, permanent archival and digitalisation of scholarly articles.

scholarly journals Preserving the Open Access Benefits Pioneered by the Journal of Medical Internet Research and Discouraging Fraudulent Journals (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy C Wyatt
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Internet Research ◽  
Open Access Publishing ◽  
Scientific Publishing ◽  
Online Publishing ◽  
Potential Impact ◽  
The Many

UNSTRUCTURED The <italic>Journal of Medical Internet Research</italic> (JMIR) was an early pioneer of open access online publishing, and two decades later, some readers and authors may have forgotten the challenges of previous scientific publishing models. This commentary summarizes the many advantages of open access publishing for each of the main stakeholders in scientific publishing and reminds us that, like every innovation, there are disadvantages that we need to guard against, such as the problem of fraudulent journals. This paper then reviews the potential impact of some current initiatives, such as Plan S and JMIRx, concluding with some suggestions to help new open-access publishers ensure that the advantages of open access publishing outweigh the challenges.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document