scholarly journals Factors associated with hospital mortality in renal transplant patients admitted to the intensive care unit with acute respiratory failure

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Mendes da Silva ◽  
Flavio Geraldo Rezende de Freitas ◽  
Antonio Tonete Bafi ◽  
Hélio Tedesco Silva Junior ◽  
Bartira de Aguiar Roza
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Renal Transplant Patients

Outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 and anti-aminoacyl-RNA synthetase antibodies positive idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in intensive care unit

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiyao Wang ◽  
Xinran Zhang ◽  
Yanhong Ren ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Ye Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Serum Ferritin ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Overall Mortality

Abstract Background: This study aims to identify prognostic factors for mortality of patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (anti-MDA5) or anti-aminoacyl-RNA synthetase (anti-ARS) antibodies positive and acute respiratory failure in the intensive care unit.Methods: Clinical characteristics, laboratory test findings, imaging performance, and management were retrospectively collected in all cases with anti-MDA5 and anti-ARS antibodies positive, as well as follow-up survival data. Risk factors related to prognosis were identified by Cox regression analysis.Results: The 28-day mortality of all patients was 68.8% (n=44/64). The patients who died were more likely to have anti-MDA5 antibody(p<0.001), presented more Gottron papules(p=0.021) or heliotrope rash(p=0.008), had a relatively lower level of WBC(p=0.038), CRP(p=0.004), and had a higher level of LDH(p=0.029), serum ferritin(p=0.002). The main risk factors associated with 28-day mortality were anti-MDA5 antibody positive [HR 10.827 (95% CI: 4.261-27.514), p<0.001], presence of Gottron papules [2.299 (1.203-4.394), p=0.012], heliotrope rash [3.423 (1.773-6.606), p<0.001], and arthritis/arthralgia [2.365 (1.130-4.948), p=0.022). At a median of 14 (IQR 6.33-35.0) months of follow-up, the overall mortality of all patients was 75.0% (n=48/64). The non-survivors were more likely to own anti-MDA5 antibody(p<0.001), had a higher rate of Gottron papules(p=0.020) or heliotrope rash(p=0.014), had lower PFR(p=0.032) while ICU admission, and existed a higher level of serum ferritin(p=0.005). Main risk factors associated with overall mortality were consistent with risk factors for 28-day mortality. Conclusions: Anti-MDA5 antibody positive, presence of Gottron papules, heliotrope rash, or arthritis/arthralgia were the main independent risk factors of poor prognosis for IIM patients admitted to the ICU due to acute respiratory failure.

scholarly journals Procalcitonin in patients with influenza A (H1N1) infection and acute respiratory failure

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-55
Author(s):  
Péricles Almeida Delfino Duarte ◽  
Carla Sakuma de Oliveira Bredt ◽  
Gerson Luís Bredt Jr ◽  
Amaury César Jorge ◽  
Alisson Venazzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Sepsis Group ◽  
Influenza A H1n1 ◽  
Low Serum

ABSTRACT Objective: To verify serum procalcitonin levels of patients with acute respiratory failure secondary to influenza A (H1N1) upon their admission to the Intensive Care Unit and to compare these results to values found in patients with sepsis and trauma admitted to the same unit. Methods: Analysis of records of patients infected with influenza A (H1N1) and respiratory failure admitted to the General Intensive Care Unit during in a period of 60 days. The values of serum procalcitonin and clinical and laboratory data were compared to those of all patients admitted with sepsis or trauma in the previous year. Results: Among patients with influenza A (H1N1) (n = 16), the median serum procalcitonin level upon admission was 0.11 ng/mL, lower than in the sepsis group (p < 0.001) and slightly lower than in trauma patients. Although the mean values were low, serum procalcitonin was a strong predictor of hospital mortality in patients with influenza A (H1N1). Conclusion: Patients with influenza A (H1N1) with severe acute respiratory failure presented with low serum procalcitonin values upon admission, although their serum levels are predictors of hospital mortality. The kinetics study of this biomarker may be a useful tool in the management of this group of patients.

scholarly journals Outcome and prognostic factors of interstitial lung disease patients with acute respiratory failure in the intensive care unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175346662092695
Author(s):  
Wei-Ling Lain ◽  
Shi-Chuan Chang ◽  
Wei-Chih Chen
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Pulse Therapy ◽  
Outcome Data

Background: There are few studies reporting the clinical characteristics and outcomes of interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). The goal of this study is to investigate the clinical features, management, mortality, and associated factors in ILD patients with ARF requiring mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study conducted in a 24-bed intensive care unit (ICU) of a medical center in Taiwan during a 3-year period. Patients admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of ILD with ARF needing MV were included for analysis. Patient characteristics, including demographics, critical-illness factors, and outcome data, were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 82 patients with ILD who developed ARF were admitted to the ICU during the study period. At the onset of ARF, 38 patients received invasive MV, while 44 patients were treated with noninvasive MV. Overall in-hospital mortality was 65.9%, and 90-day and 1-year mortality were 69.5% and 76.8%, respectively. The independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality were worse oxygenation on days 5 and 7 after the onset of ARF. Invasive MV patients had significantly lower albumin levels, had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores at the onset of ARF, and received more vasopressors, sedatives, and corticosteroid pulse therapy during hospitalization compared with noninvasive MV patients. Conclusion: High in-hospital and long-term mortality rates were observed in ILD patients with ARF requiring MV. Poor oxygenation during hospitalization could serve as a predictive factor of poor prognosis. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

scholarly journals Noninvasive respiratory support outside the intensive care unit for acute respiratory failure related to coronavirus-19 disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Critical Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianmaria Cammarota ◽  
Teresa Esposito ◽  
Danila Azzolina ◽  
Roberto Cosentini ◽  
Francesco Menzella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Ventilatory Support ◽  
Respiratory Support

Abstract Background Noninvasive respiratory support (NIRS) has been diffusely employed outside the intensive care unit (ICU) to face the high request of ventilatory support due to the massive influx of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) caused by coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19). We sought to summarize the evidence on clinically relevant outcomes in COVID-19 patients supported by NIV outside the ICU. Methods We searched PUBMED®, EMBASE®, and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical trials register, along with medRxiv and bioRxiv repositories for pre-prints, for observational studies and randomized controlled trials, from inception to the end of February 2021. Two authors independently selected the investigations according to the following criteria: (1) observational study or randomized clinical trials enrolling ≥ 50 hospitalized patients undergoing NIRS outside the ICU, (2) laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, and (3) at least the intra-hospital mortality reported. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines were followed. Data extraction was independently performed by two authors to assess: investigation features, demographics and clinical characteristics, treatments employed, NIRS regulations, and clinical outcomes. Methodological index for nonrandomized studies tool was applied to determine the quality of the enrolled studies. The primary outcome was to assess the overall intra-hospital mortality of patients under NIRS outside the ICU. The secondary outcomes included the proportions intra-hospital mortalities of patients who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation following NIRS failure and of those with ‘do-not-intubate’ (DNI) orders. Results Seventeen investigations (14 peer-reviewed and 3 pre-prints) were included with a low risk of bias and a high heterogeneity, for a total of 3377 patients. The overall intra-hospital mortality of patients receiving NIRS outside the ICU was 36% [30–41%]. 26% [21–30%] of the patients failed NIRS and required intubation, with an intra-hospital mortality rising to 45% [36–54%]. 23% [15–32%] of the patients received DNI orders with an intra-hospital mortality of 72% [65–78%]. Oxygenation on admission was the main source of between-study heterogeneity. Conclusions During COVID-19 outbreak, delivering NIRS outside the ICU revealed as a feasible strategy to cope with the massive demand of ventilatory assistance. Registration PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42020224788, December 11, 2020.

scholarly journals Early resuscitation orders in hospitalized oldest-old with COVID-19: A multicenter cohort study

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110183
Author(s):  
Ruth Piers ◽  
Eva Van Braeckel ◽  
Dominique Benoit ◽  
Nele Van Den Noortgate
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Oldest Old ◽  
Case Report Form ◽  
Resuscitation Orders ◽  
Intensive Care Admission ◽  
Treatment Limitation ◽  
Early Decision

Background: In particular older people are at risk of mortality due to corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Advance care planning is essential to assist patient autonomy and prevent non-beneficial medical interventions. Aim: To describe early (taken within 72 h after hospital admission) resuscitation orders in oldest-old hospitalized with COVID-19. Setting/participants: A cohort of patients aged 80 years and older admitted to the acute hospital in March and April 2020 with COVID-19 were retrospectively recruited from 10 acute hospitals in Belgium. Recruitment was done through a network of geriatricians. Results: Overall, 766 octogenarians were admitted of whom 49 were excluded because no therapeutic relationship with the geriatrician and six because of incomplete case report form. Early decisions not to consider intensive care admission were taken in 474/711 (66.7%) patients. This subgroup was characterized by significantly higher age, higher number of comorbidities and higher frailty level. There was a significant association between the degree of the treatment limitation and the degree of premorbid frailty ( p < 0.001). Overall in-hospital mortality was 41.6% in patients with an early decision not to consider intensive care admission (67.1% in persons who developed respiratory failure vs 16.7% in patients without respiratory failure ( p < 0.001)). Of 104 patients without early decision not to consider intensive care admission but who developed respiratory failure, 59 were eventually not transferred to intensive care unit with in-hospital mortality of 25.4%; 45 were transferred to the intensive care unit with mortality of 64.4%. Conclusions: Geriatricians applied all levels of treatment in oldest-old hospitalized with COVID-19. Early decisions not to consider intensive care admission were taken in two thirds of the cohort of whom more than 50% survived to hospital discharge by means of conservative treatment.

Comparative study between noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with respiratory failure

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed N Al Shafi'i ◽  
Doaa M. Kamal El-din ◽  
Mohammed A. Abdulnaiem Ismaiel ◽  
Hesham M Abotiba
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has been increasingly used in the management of respiratory failure in intensive care unit (ICU). Aim of the Work is to compare the efficacy and resource consumption of NIPPMV delivered through face mask against invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) delivered by endotracheal tube in the management of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Patients and Methods This prospective randomized controlled study included 78 adults with acute respiratory failure who were admitted to the intensive care unit. The enrolled patients were randomly allocated to receive either noninvasive ventilation or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Results Severity of illness, measured by the simplified acute physiologic score 3 (SAPS 3), were comparable between the two patient groups with no significant difference between them. Both study groups showed a comparable steady improvement in PaO2:FiO2 values, indicating that NIPPV is as effective as CMV in improving the oxygenation of patients with ARF. The PaCO2 and pH values gradually improved in both groups during the 48 hours of ventilation. 12 hours after ventilation, NIPPMV group showed significantly more improvement in PaCO2 and pH than the CMV group. The respiratory acidosis was corrected in the NIPPV group after 24 hours of ventilation compared with 36 hours in the CMV group. NIPPV in this study was associated with a lower frequency of complications than CMV, including ventilator acquired pneumonia (VAP), sepsis, renal failure, pulmonary embolism, and pancreatitis. However, only VAP showed a statistically significant difference. Patients who underwent NIPPV in this study had lower mortality, and lower ventilation time and length of ICU stay, compared with patients on CMV. Intubation was required for less than a third of patients who initially underwent NIV. Conclusion Based on our study findings, NIPPV appears to be a potentially effective and safe therapeutic modality for managing patients with ARF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document