scholarly journals Simulation of motor vehicle fires in forensic engineering

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 107-121
Author(s):  
Darko Zigar ◽  
Milan Blagojevic ◽  
Radovan Radovanovic
Author(s):  
Kenneth J. Saczalski ◽  
Eugene B. Loverich

Abstract Forensic engineering problems are reviewed to demonstrate how vibration analysis methods can be utilized in certain instances to determine cause of system failures and injury mechanics associated with certain vehicular accidents. A brief overview of injury criteria and biomechanical analysis methods for evaluation of motor vehicle occupant kinematics induced by shock impact loadings is also included.


Author(s):  
Michael D. Leshner

Cars And Trucks Experience Fires Due To A Variety Of Causes, And The Loss Is Generally Limited To The Value Of The Burned Vehicle. When A Vehicle Defect Or Recent Repair Is Suspected To Be The Cause, The Modest Economic Value Of The Loss Does Not Usually Warrant A Forensic Engineering Investigation And The Expense Of Litigation. However, When Vehicles Burn Inside A Garage Or Other Structure, The Value Of The Loss Can Be Much Greater, And A Thorough Investigation By Fire Investigators And Forensic Engineers Is Often Warranted To Support Potential Litigation. This Paper Will Review Some Cases In Which A Vehicle Burned Within A Garage, Causing Damage To The Structure. In Some Of Those Cases, The Cause Was Clearly Identified And Successfully Litigated. Challenges And Strategies Related To Those Cases Will Be Discussed.


Author(s):  
Laura L. Liptai

Asymmetric Design Of Seatbelts Does Not Limit Potentially Injurious Contact With Vehicle Interior In Opposite Side Motor Vehicle Collisions. In Opposite Side Impacts, Of Approximately 65 To 70 Degrees, The Lap And Shoulder Restraint Functions Less Effectively. At These Angles, With A Change In Velocity Of Greater Than Or Equal To 20 Mph, The Head Injury Criterion (Hic) May Exceed Tolerance When The Occupants Head Impacts Unyielding Structural Surfaces Within The Vehicle. Biomedical Engineering Analysis Should Be Conducted To Determine The Likelihood Of Sustaining Brain Trauma Even When Using A Seatbelt In These Scenarios.


Author(s):  
Jerry S. Ogden

Analyzing Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions Based Upon The Damages To The Involved Vehicles Has Become A Commonly Accepted, Accurate And Reliable Form Of Engineering Analysis. Until Recently, This Analysis Has Been Limited To Relatively High Speed Vehicle Collisions, Where The Effects Of Restitution And Tire Forces Can Easily Be Neglected Without Effecting The Accuracy Of The Analysis. This Paper Focuses On The Analysis Of Motor Vehicle Damages Resulting From Minor Damage, Low Speed Impacts, Where Restitution And Tire Forces May Often Make A Considerable Contribution To The Total Severity Levels Of Such An Accident Event. Like Many Other Fields Of Science And Engineering, There Still Remain A Small Number Of Analysts Whom Have Either Failed To Keep Up With Modern Advances In Damage Analysis, Do Not Know How To Perform A Proper Damage Based Analysis Or Simply Do Not Recognize Its Usefulness And Accuracy. The Focus Of This Paper Is To Develop Damage Based Analysis Methods Applicable To Low Velocity Impacts And Demonstrate Their Usefulness To The Forensic Engineer.


Author(s):  
Martin E. Gordon ◽  
Justin J. Pearson

According to the World Health Organization, there are more than 360 million people worldwide with hearing loss. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has reported that close to 30% of the United States population 65 years or older has significant hearing loss. The objective of this paper was to determine if deaf and hard-of-hearing drivers are more likely to be involved in motor vehicle accidents than hearing drivers. Data was extracted from the National Automotive Sampling System (NASS) and motor vehicle accident recordsfrom the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) and National Technical Institute for the Deaf (NTID) campuses. The results of the NASS data analysis indicate that deaf and hard-of-hearing drivers are one and a half to nine times as likely to be seriously injured or killed in a motor vehicle accident. Motor vehicle accident records from RIT and NTID suggest that deaf and hard-of-hearing drivers are approximately three times as likely to be involved in a motor vehicle accident as hearing individuals. Forensic engineers may be able to use this data to assist in forensic engineering analysis in cases where deaf or hard-of-hearing drivers are involved.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 157-163
Author(s):  
Andrzej Marciniak

The article contains an analysis of the solutions of automatic fire extinguishing systems used in motor vehicles. Automobile vehicle fires do not occur as often as fires in buildings, but in the event of such a situation pose a threat to people and the environment. The motor vehicle is a conglomerate of combustible materials such as fuel, other combustible liquids and solid equipment materials such as polymers and other plastics. The article is an attempt to systematize and analyze currently used extinguishing devices. The analysis includes used extinguishing media and a review of selected technical solutions of individual systems


2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. H. Digges ◽  
R. G. Gann ◽  
S. J. Grayson ◽  
M. M. Hirschler ◽  
R. E. Lyon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 4-7
Author(s):  
Charles N. Brooks ◽  
Christopher R. Brigham

Abstract Multiple factors determine the likelihood, type, and severity of bodily injury following a motor vehicle collision and, in turn, influence the need for treatment, extent of disability, and likelihood of permanent impairment. Among the most important factors is the change in velocity due to an impact (Δv). Other factors include the individual's strength and elasticity, body position at the time of impact, awareness of the impending impact (ie, opportunity to brace, guard, or contract muscles before an impact), and effects of braking. Because Δv is the area under the acceleration vs time curve, it combines force and duration and is a useful way to quantify impact severity. The article includes a table showing the results of a literature review that concluded, “the consensus of human subject research conducted to date is that a single exposure to a rear-end impact with a Δv of 5 mph or less is unlikely to result in injury” in most healthy, restrained occupants. Because velocity incorporates direction as well as speed, a vehicular occupant is less likely to be injured in a rear impact than when struck from the side. Evaluators must consider multiple factors, including the occupant's pre-existing physical and psychosocial status, the mechanism and magnitude of the collision, and a variety of biomechanical variables. Recommendations based solely on patient history and physical findings (and, perhaps, imaging studies) may be ill-informed.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
James K. Kuan ◽  
Robert Kaufman ◽  
Jonathan L. Wright ◽  
Charles Mock ◽  
Avery B. Nathens ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document