scholarly journals MERLEAU-PONTY Y LA PSICOLOGÍA DE LA FORMA

2021 ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Renaud Barbaras ◽  
Manfredi Moreno (traductor)
Keyword(s):  
Phenomenological Description ◽  
Gestalt Psychology ◽  
Genetic Phenomenology ◽  
Ontological Difference ◽  
The Relationship

A partir del análisis de la relación de Merleau-Ponty con la psicología de la forma, se intenta dar una lectura de su fenomenología como una lectura ontológica de la forma. De este modo, Merleau-Ponty no solo puede pensar una alternativa a la fenomenología de Husserl, sino que le permite elaborar su propia idea de Ser y dar una nueva interpretación de la diferencia ontológica de Heidegger. Desde una descripción fenomenológica de la experiencia perceptiva, a partir de las nociones de comportamiento, forma y estructura, se mostrará enseguida el sentido de ser que moviliza una filosofía de la forma que implicará proyectar un pensamiento de una pertenencia radical de la fenomenalidad a la existencia, y además renovar el sentido de una fenomenología genética que considera toda conciencia trascendental en el marco de una facticidad originaria.On the basis of the relationship Merleau- Ponty establishes with Gestalt psychology, I seek to provide an interpretation his phenomenology as an ontological reading of the notion of form. Therefore, I claim that Merleau-Ponty is able, not only to develop an alternative to Husserl’s phenomenology, but also to elaborate his own idea of Being; in addition, he can offer a new understanding of the Heidegger's ontological difference. From a phenomenological description of perceptive experience, and starting with the notions of behavior, form and structure, I will then show the sense of being mobilized by a philosophy of form. This sense of being implies a projection of a thinking of phenomenality's radical belonging to the existence and, also, renewal of a genetic phenomenology that considers the whole of transcendental consciousness within the framework of an originary facticity

Der Begriff ,Austrag‘ als Bestimmung des Seins bei Martin Heidegger

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 205-216
Author(s):  
Ales Novák
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Ontological Difference ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

In the late 1950sHeidegger revived the notion of the ,ontological difference‘, which he considered to be the constitution for the meaning of both ,being‘ (Sein) and the ,entity‘ (Seiendes). The unifying process of this constitution bore the name ,discharge‘ (Austrag) and expressed the dynamic, static, and generic features of ,being‘. But even this new description means only the designation for the primordial unconcealedness (Unverborgenheit), which according to Heidegger is the ,matter of thinking‘ (Sache des Denkens). And again, Heidegger brings just another notion to express that the ,nearness‘ as the comprising meaning of presence (Anwesen) is the true name for ,world‘. Thus, Heideggers notions for ,being‘ as presence, ,staying dwelling‘, ,enowing‘ (Ereignis), and ,discharge‘ speak about his turning away from thinking of ,being‘(ontology) and his turning towards ,topology‘, where the relationship of ,world and thing‘ is preferred to the ,ontological difference‘ between ,being‘ and the ,entity‘.

scholarly journals Questions toward a Peircean phenomenological description of association

Semiotica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (207) ◽  
pp. 529-538
Author(s):  
Bent Sørensen ◽  
Torkild Thellefsen
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Inquiry ◽  
Phenomenological Description ◽  
Charles Peirce ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractAccording to the philosopher and scientist Charles Peirce (1839–1914) phenomenology is fundamental to all scientific inquiry and association is the only force that exists within the intellect. However, Peirce only gave his reader a hint about the relationship between phenomenology and association. In this article we will try to follow that hint and point towards a couple of main questions that can guide a Peircean phenomenological description of association. Hence, the conclusion of the article will not be a phenomenological description of association but rather a couple of main questions trying to determine how such a phenomenological description can begin in the first place. Our hypothesis is that the questions depend for their construction on the inter-relatedness and interdependence of certain central Peircean phenomenological concepts – especially, Thirdness, Secondness, and Firstness.

scholarly journals Body As Architecture: Designing the Stout Body in the Age of Standardization

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Downing Peters
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Design Thinking ◽  
The Body ◽  
Gestalt Psychology ◽  
Fashion Design ◽  
Architectural Discourse ◽  
Biological Determinism ◽  
American Fashion ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Style Guides

This article explores the curious intersections of stoutwear design, Gestalt Psychology, and architectural discourse in early twentieth-century American fashion media. In doing so, it focuses principally on trade media, style guides and advertisements that grappled with the perceived flaws of the stout woman’s physique and how sophisticated design principles, if properly handled, could create the appearance of bodily slenderness. By moving beyond the biological determinism of contemporary obesity discourse, this article argues that ideas about stoutness and, more specifically, what constituted a stout body, were produced through attempts to contain, control, and correct the fat, female body in fashion design discourse. By further embedding this research within a broader consideration of the relationship between bodies, dress, architecture, and modernist design thinking, this article argues that the mediums and discourses of fashion can open up pathways for thinking about the body itself as “designed.”

scholarly journals THE RELATIONSHIP CREATIVITY – CREATIVENESS AS A COMPLEX OBJECT OF RESEARCH STUDIES

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 945-949
Author(s):  
Antoniya Krasteva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Literature ◽  
Gestalt Psychology ◽  
Complex Object ◽  
Specific Knowledge ◽  
Content Difference ◽  
Western European ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Research Studies

The article analyses the relationship creativity – creativeness. These two concepts in specialized scientific studies either complement one another or are accepted as synonyms in accordance to the author’s stand. That is why our efforts are aiming to distinguish the ideas and stands of separate specialists, which discuss these concepts. The research conception is based on the understanding that it is essential for a complete personality to possess specific knowledge, skills, beliefs, attitudes, values as well as motivation do develop their creativity. The emphasis is placed on clarifying the separate elements of the two concepts in Bulgaria as well as in the Western European and the Russian literature. In this discourse three basic kinds of opinions concerning the relationship between the concepts creativity and creativeness can be outlined, namely: creativity is perceived as a synonym of the concept creativeness; the differentiation between the concepts creativity and creativeness is provisory and lastly, there exists a content difference between the concepts creativity and creativeness. These opinions are substantiated with certain ideas of prominent specialists in the field of philosophy, pedagogy, psychology, etc. Separate In order to achieve a clearer explanation of the relationship between the concepts creativity – creativeness various trends and schools have also been studied, which supplements the analysis, such as the intuitive trend, the rational trend, including the abstractionism, associationism, behaviorism, gestalt psychology as well as the nativism and sociological trends.

scholarly journals THE CONCEPT OF TOUCHINESS: ORIGINS, PECULIARITIES OF MANIFESTATION

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-267
Author(s):  
A.V. Beltyukova
Keyword(s):  
Personality Trait ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Gestalt Psychology ◽  
Transactional Analysis ◽  
Communication Partner ◽  
Significant Negative Impact ◽  
Real Behavior ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Business Ties

The article discusses the problem of resentment and touchiness from the point of view of various psychological concepts (psychoanalysis, gestalt psychology, transactional analysis, factor theory of personality, sanogenic thinking theory). Resentment is a reaction to the inconsistency of one’s own expectations in relation to another person and his real behavior, and touchiness is a personality trait that is characterized by a tendency to experience resentment in different personally significant situations with minimal mismatch of the expected and real behavior of the communication partner. The article presents the mechanisms of occurrence of touchiness from the point of view of various approaches. Most researchers agree that touchiness is formed in childhood due to disharmonious relations with parents. According to psychologists, touchiness has a significant negative impact on the relationship between people, making it difficult to build personal and business ties.

Attaining Divine Perfection through Different Forms of Imitation

Numen ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Klostergaard Petersen
Keyword(s):  
World View ◽  
Cognitive Structure ◽  
Basic Structure ◽  
Ontological Difference ◽  
Divine Perfection ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Spatial Axis

Abstract This article examines the relationship between notions of imitation of the gods and divinisation. I argue that a close historical connection exists between the two sets of ideas. Although some notion of imitation may be found in most forms of religion, it is intrinsic to utopian types of religion to lay stress on a narrow relationship between ideas about imitation of the gods and the concept of divinisation. Contrary to archaic forms of religion that place emphasis on the ontological difference conceived to separate man from the gods, utopian types of religion emphasise the need for man to overcome the ontological difference in order to attain a higher level of existence. Based on a number of examples from the early Christ-movement, I argue that with respect to the basic structure of its world-view it may — in line with an observation by Nietzsche — be conceived of as a bombastic form of Platonism, that is to say, that the central cognitive structure of Platonism has in the early Christ-movement been projected onto a spatial axis dividing heaven from earth. Man’s true home is no longer on earth but is the heavenly abode to which man, that is, the righteous man shall return subsequent to his death. In all forms of utopian types of religion, there exists an inherent relationship between concepts of imitation of the gods and notions of divinisation.

scholarly journals Ontological Difference and Indeterminacy of Interpretation

2014 ◽  
pp. 175
Author(s):  
Dimitri Ginev
Keyword(s):  
Hermeneutic Phenomenology ◽  
Empirical Adequacy ◽  
Philosophical Hermeneutics ◽  
Ontological Difference ◽  
The Relationship

At issue in this paper is the unfinished dialogue between hermeneutic phenomenology and hermeneutic logic. The paper touches upon two historical contexts of this dialogue. In scrutinizing them I discuss the relationship between philosophical hermeneutics and non-representationalist epistemology. The view gets spelled out that the norms of truthfulness, objectivity, empirical adequacy, and other epistemological characteristics of interpretation become generated within characteristic hermeneutic situations. By elaborating on Heidegger’s nexus between projected understanding and interpretative articulation, the notion of hermeneutic forestructuring of interpretative practices is introduced. Scrutinizing this notion allows one to circumscribe characteristic hermeneutic situations.El tema de este artículo es el diálogo inacabado entre la fenomenología hermenéutica y la lógica hermenéutica. El artículo toma dos contextos históricos de este diálogo. Al investigarlos, discuto la relación entre la hermenéutica filosófica y la epistemología no-representacionalista. Esta visión explica que las normas de veracidad, la objetividad, la adecuación empírica y otras características epistemológicas de la interpretación llegan a generarse dentro de situaciones hermenéuticas características. Al elaborar el nexo de Heidegger entre la comprensión proyectada y la articulación interpretativa, se introduce la noción de preestructuración hermenéutica de las prácticas interpretativas. Investigar esta noción permite circunscribir situaciones hermenéuticas características.

scholarly journals The Environing Air: A Meditation on Communications Structures in Natural Environments

PhaenEx ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
JUDY SPARK
Keyword(s):  
Phenomenological Approach ◽  
Phenomenological Description ◽  
Natural Environments ◽  
Natural Landscapes ◽  
The Everyday ◽  
Basic Concepts ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
The Relationship

Any attention paid to the positioning of telecommunications installations in natural landscapes usually relates to the aesthetic impact. However, such paraphernalia, particularly when contrasted with “natural” surroundings, invites us to think beyond the visible. Through Heidegger’s accounts of Zuhandenheit and Vorhandenheit, as well as his later articulations on Nature as it is subjected to the ordering principles of Gestell, this paper aims to highlight the overlaps of the natural and the technological worlds inhabited by communications structures, considering the relationship between the human and the natural realms, through the uncertain electromagnetic phenomena that envelops the two. The essay is underpinned by the extended phenomenological description of an encounter with such technology that includes, following Anthony J. Steinbock’s outline of a phenomenological approach that might begin with the facts of the everyday sciences, some reference to the basic concepts of physics involved in transmissions technology.

scholarly journals Main (Grundfrage) and leading (Leitfrage) questions about being: Claim for ancient understanding

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-246
Author(s):  
Mikhail A. Bogatov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Being And Time ◽  
Main Question ◽  
Ontological Difference ◽  
Fundamental Ontology ◽  
Convergence And Divergence ◽  
Leading Question ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

The article is devoted to the question of being in Heidegger’s fundamental ontology, namely, his claim to understand the ancient idea of being. In his work “Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning)”, Heidegger distinguishes between the understanding of being as the being of everything that exists and his own understanding of being as such, out of connection with things. He calls the first point the “leading question” and attributes its authorship to Aristotle, the second one – “the main question”. The article discusses the relationship of these issues, the possibility of their formal coincidence and discrepancy between them. The first part of the article introduces the context of Heidegger’s thought. It deals with the “ontological difference” that Heidegger introduces in the framework of “Being and Time”, as well as with what transformation this difference undergoes in his later works, after the “turn” (“Kehre”). In the second part of the article, attention is drawn to the convergence and divergence of the “leading question” from the “main one” by clarifying the ontology of Aristotle. Particular attention is paid to various ways of understanding existence, in particular – an incidental and accidental existence. At the end of the article, the attempt will be made to reconstruct the direction of Heidegger's thought, based on the results of consideration achieved earlier.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document