scholarly journals Current Status of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Gastrointestinal Cancers

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1460-1465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bum Jun Kim ◽  
Hyun Joo Jang ◽  
Hyeong Su Kim ◽  
Jung Han Kim
Author(s):  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Marc S. Ernstoff ◽  
Michael A. Morse

With the recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals of pembrolizumab and nivolumab for refractory deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors have now entered into clinical care for gastrointestinal cancers. Extensive ongoing efforts are exploring additional combinations of therapy in both deficient and proficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer. This review will outline the current status of such efforts and discuss the critical aspects of recognition and management of immune-related toxicities from checkpoint inhibitors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 565-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Kono ◽  
Shotaro Nakajima ◽  
Kosaku Mimura

2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 342-348
Author(s):  
Jin Won Kim

Immuno-oncological treatment approaches, particularly with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors such as antiprogrammed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 antibody or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 antibody, have become the standard treatment for gastrointestinal cancers. However, gastrointestinal cancers show an overall modest tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Nevertheless, subgroups such as tumors that are DNA mismatch repair-deficient or have high microsatellite instability particularly benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. Even in the first-line setting for colorectal cancer, the clinical efficacy of pembrolizumab, an anti–PD-1 antibody, was superior to that of chemotherapy. Recently, a combination of atezolizumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 antibody, and bevacizumab was approved as the first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma, and was reported as superior to sorafenib. Nivolumab, an anti–PD-1 antibody that is added to chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for gastric cancer, resulted in longer survival compared with chemotherapy alone. Further studies are ongoing to investigate additional immune checkpoint inhibitors for other gastrointestinal cancers. This review aims to provide an overview of the results of clinical trials for immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastrointestinal cancers, including colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and biliary tract cancer.


Oncotarget ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (18) ◽  
pp. 14738-14740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aman Chauhan ◽  
Susanne M. Arnold ◽  
Jill Kolesar ◽  
Hala Elnakat Thomas ◽  
Mark Evers ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 3025
Author(s):  
Piera Federico ◽  
Angelica Petrillo ◽  
Pasqualina Giordano ◽  
Davide Bosso ◽  
Antonietta Fabbrocini ◽  
...  

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a promising treatment for many kinds of cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The rationale for using ICIs in HCC is based on the immunogenic background of hepatitis and cirrhosis and on the observation of high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in this cancer. Promising data from phase I/II studies in advanced HCC, showing durable objective response rates (~20% in first- and second-line settings) and good safety profile, have led to phase III studies with ICIs as single agents or in combination therapy, both in first and second line setting. While the activity of immunotherapy agents as single agents seems to be limited to an “ill-defined” small subset of patients, the combination of the anti PD-L1 atezolizumab and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor bevacizumab revealed a benefit in the outcomes when compared to sorafenib in the first line. In addition, the activity and efficacy of the combinations between anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibody and other ICIs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or surgical and locoregional therapies, has also been investigated in clinical trials. In this review, we provide an overview of the role of ICIs in the management of HCC with a critical evaluation of the current status and future directions.


In our living body, foreign objects are eliminated by the function of immunity. On the other hand, cancer cells are known to have a mechanism to break the immune cell system that is trying to attack cancer in order to escape from the attack of immune cells. “Immune checkpoint inhibitors” prevent cancer cells from breaking the immune system. Therefore, the “immune checkpoint inhibitor” is a drug that induces the immune function to attack the original cancer. Currently, PD-1 antibody, PD-L1 antibody and CTLA-4 antibody are used in clinical medicine as anti-cancer drugs. In this paper, the authors discuss the clinical use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecological tumors.


Author(s):  
Hiroshi Nishio ◽  
Takashi Iwata ◽  
Daisuke Aoki

Abstract Recent cancer immunotherapy development with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown durable clinical responses in a wide variety of tumor types. These drugs targeting programmed cell death 1, its ligand programmed death ligand 1 and cytotoxic T cell lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 have revolutionized the field of cancer treatment. It is of significant interest in optimizing the immunotherapy for cancer patients beyond the conventional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. Many clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of various combined regimens with immune checkpoint inhibitors have been reported and are in progress. Among gynecologic malignancy, endometrial cancers have distinct subtypes with microsatellite instability-high status and polymerase ɛ mutation. These types have been shown to immunogenic tumors and appropriated candidate for immune checkpoint inhibitors. Also, recurrent cervical cancer showed a promising objective response with single anti-PD1 Ab treatment. Despite their definite outcome and considerable potential of immunotherapy, not all patients received a survival benefit and further understanding of human tumor immunology is essential to improve this type of therapy. In this review, we have summarized the updated results of clinical trials of cancer immunotherapy for gynecologic malignancies and discussed the future perspectives.


2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2021-002954
Author(s):  
Ana Filipa Palma dos Reis ◽  
Ivo Hennig ◽  
Andrew Wilcock

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is growing rapidly in oncology and palliative care clinicians and other generalists will increasingly see patients who are receiving, or who have received ICI. For optimal care, it is important that clinicians have a basic understanding of the unique nature of ICI as anticancer treatments, including patterns of response, potential issues with concurrent corticosteroid use and the wide range of possible immune-related adverse effects (IrAEs). This paper, informed by a recent literature search, provides a succinct yet comprehensive overview of ICI, with a particular focus on IrAE, highlighting that some are potentially life-threatening and/or can develop a long time, sometimes years, after even a short course of an ICI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document