Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemias

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Gao ◽  
Amy M. Sands ◽  
Jianlan Sun ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  
Reports ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miller ◽  
Park ◽  
Saxe ◽  
Lew ◽  
Raikar

Lineage switch in acute leukemias is a well-reported occurrence; however, most of these cases involve a switch from either lymphoid to myeloid or myeloid to lymphoid lineage. Here, we report a case of a 14-year-old male with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) who initially responded well to standard chemotherapy but then later developed mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) at relapse, likely reflecting a clonal evolution of the original leukemia with a partial phenotypic shift. The patient had a del(9)(p13p21) in his leukemia blasts at diagnosis, and the deletion persisted at relapse along with multiple additional cytogenetic aberrations. Interestingly, the patient presented with an isolated testicular lesion at relapse, which on further analysis revealed both a lymphoid and myeloid component. Unfortunately, the patient did not respond well to treatment at relapse and eventually succumbed to his disease. To our knowledge, an isolated extramedullary MPAL at relapse in a patient with previously diagnosed B-ALL has not been reported in the literature before.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4475-4475
Author(s):  
Alexandra E. Kovach ◽  
Sunil S. Raikar ◽  
Matthew J. Oberley ◽  
Gerald Wertheim ◽  
Karen R Rabin ◽  
...  

Abstract Mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) is a rare group of acute leukemias defined by immunophenotypic expression of more than one hematopoietic cell lineage. The World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic immunophenotypic criteria for MPAL rely on the intensity of lineage-defining antigen expression, predominantly a qualitative assessment, and are often difficult to apply to a phenotypically heterogeneous leukemia. Cases of MPAL defined by isolated myeloperoxidase (isoMPO) expression on otherwise typical acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are variably diagnosed as MPAL or ALL based on the incompletely defined criteria for assigning MPO expression. We hypothesized that quantitative criteria for antigen intensity could be developed and applied in a uniform manner across flow cytometry instruments, reagents, and analysis software to enable a consistent approach to diagnosing MPAL and better defining isoMPO. We previously reported on a multicenter cohort identified by respective institutions as MPAL with subsequent central review according to 2008 WHO criteria (Oberley et al 2020). Of these, 100 had suitable dot plots for reevaluation (89: B/Myeloid, 10: T/Myeloid, 1: B/T). Antigen expression was concurrently reviewed by two hematopathologists to reach consensus (BLW, AEK). The cohort was divided a priori into randomly selected training and testing cases (n=30/n=70). Classification criteria were generated in the training cohort for WHO lineage-defining antigen expression (myeloid: cMPO, CD64, CD14; B: CD19, T: cCD3) from 10 cases and then refined through review of an additional 20 cases. Positive antigen expression was classified as maximal intensity approaching that of the mature normal counterpart population (NCP) (cMPO: neutrophils; CD64, CD14 and CD11c: monocytes; CD19: B cells; cCD3: T cells) either by 1) range of expression recapitulating maturation of the NCP, irrespective of the percentage on the leukemic population (Figure 1A); or 2) uniform expression above background on a discrete (sub)population (Figure 1B). To account for technical variation within and among laboratories, maximal antigen intensity on the leukemic population was measured in 0.5 log increments and normalized to the maximal intensity of the NCP. An intensity of ≥50% of the NCP above background was defined as sufficient for MPAL lineage assignment and <50% consistent with isoMPO. This approach was then used to classify the remaining 70 cases. Using this approach, 41/98 (42%) cases previously classified as MPAL remained classified as MPAL: 31 as B/Myeloid (25 by maturational MPO expression, 6 by maturational CD64 and/or CD14 expression); 9 as T/Myeloid (8 by maturational MPO expression, 1 with maturational CD64, CD14 and CD11c expression); and 1 as B/T. No cases in the cohort showed uniform expression ≥50% of the NCP. The remaining 57 showed isolated low-level MPO expression (maximal intensity <50% of the NPC) on a uniform leukemic population or on a dichotomous subpopulation (isoMPO), 56 B/Myeloid and 1 T/Myeloid. Two cases of otherwise typical B-ALL without myeloid or monocytic antigen expression were reclassified as B-ALL, one of which showed low variable CD10 suggestive of DUX4-rearranged B-ALL. In comparison to our previously reported study of 2008 WHO-defined MPAL, 53/89 (60%) centrally-confirmed cases would be classified here as isoMPO. Conversely, five cases excluded under 2008 WHO central review would be reclassified as having sufficient antigen expression to qualify as MPAL (2 B/Myeloid, 3 T/Myeloid). Novel semiquantitative immunophenotypic criteria applied to a large cohort of acute leukemias originally diagnosed as MPAL was able to objectively identify a large subset as having dim, uniform MPO expression (isoMPO). Our approach emphasizes antigen expression recapitulating maturational expression similar to their non-leukemic cellular counterparts, normalizes absolute intensities to internal positive and negative control populations to minimize technical variability between observers and assays, and as per the 2017 WHO, does not require a specific percent threshold of positivity. While requiring validation, this is a critical first step toward establishing a reproducible delineation of these complex cases to practically implement the WHO classification to support treatment decisions and ongoing investigation into MPAL genomics and outcomes (available for this cohort by ASH). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Oberley: Caris LIfe Science: Current Employment. Orgel: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 178-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etan Orgel ◽  
Matthew Oberley ◽  
Sisi Li ◽  
Jemily Malvar ◽  
Maurice O'Gorman

Abstract BACKGROUND : Mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) as defined according to the World Health Organization 2016 guidelines (WHO2016) comprises approximately 2-3% of acute leukemia. In other acute leukemias, minimal residual disease (MRD) has emerged as the predominant predictor of relapse. MRD at end of Induction (EOI) is therefore a key risk-stratifying feature for lymphoid and myeloid disease regimens. To our knowledge, no studies to date have reported on the predictive value of MRD for treatment of MPAL. Although the absence of randomized trials for MPAL precludes a clear determination of optimal regimen, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) directed-therapy is increasingly considered frontline treatment internationally. The primary objective for this study was to evaluate the association of EOI MRD with event free survival (EFS) from ALL regimens used for treatment of MPAL. METHODS : Flow cytometry data for all acute leukemias diagnosed 2008-2015 and treated with Children's Oncology Group regimens for ALL were examined by two flow cytometrists blinded to clinical outcomes (MO, SL). Data was analyzed using CellQuestPro and FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). A comprehensive panel of 21 B-, T-, and myeloid markers were evaluated in all cases. A diagnosis of MPAL was strictly established according to the WHO2016 definition. EOI MRD was performed routinely by flow cytometry using a "difference from normal" approach. Cases with insufficient flow cytometry to either (1) establish the diagnosis of MPAL or (2) evaluate the presence and quantity of MRD were excluded. Due to the rarity of the T/myeloid phenotype in the dataset (n=1), the analysis was restricted to B/Myeloid. The primary endpoint was EFS; secondary outcomes explored predictors of EOI MRD positivity and the prevalence of recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities. MRD was categorized as a binomial (negative <0.01%) or ordinal (<0.01%, <0.1%, ≥0.1%) variable in separate models. EFS was calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Step-wise multivariable Cox proportional hazard models included MRD and demographic/disease candidate predictors (age [years], sex, initial white blood cell count [WBC], central nervous system disease, cytogenetic abnormality, isolated myeloperoxidase expression). As some patients were classified as MPAL retroactively, category of treatment regimen (ALL high-risk [36/53] versus standard-risk [17/53]) was "forced" into the final multivariable model. Due to the non-normal distribution of MRD, predictors of MRD positivity were assessed by rank-sum test. Results: Of 59 cases identified as MPAL, 53 met inclusion criteria for analysis (1 Induction death, 1 insufficient MRD for analysis, 2 received AML therapy, 1 T/myeloid, 1 MPAL lymphoma). At a mean follow-up time of 3.5±1.7 years, EFS for the overall cohort was 88.0±4.6%. However, EFS was significantly greater for those MRD- versus those MRD+ (94.4±3.9% vs 67.5±12.1%, p=0.0005; Figure 1). Multivariable analysis confirmed MRD as a significant predictor of EFS even after accounting for treatment regimen (hazard ratio 5.0, 95%CI 1.7-15.3, p=0.0036). No other candidate predictors remained significant in the final multivariable models. Although different levels of MRD positivity were significantly associated with poorer EFS, visual examination of the dataset showed the 0.01% threshold to be most representative. Recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities were found in 15/53 children (Trisomy 4+10 n=11/53, TELAML n=1/53, iAMP21 n=2/53, BCRABL n=1/53). No MLL rearrangements were identified. The single patient with BCRABL received continuous imatinib during therapy (no event). No differences at diagnosis were present in those EOI MRD+ versus MRD-, although a WBC count ≥50K/uL was borderline significant (p=0.051). Conclusion : Using a "difference from normal" approach, EOI MRD at a threshold of 0.01% significantly predicts risk for strikingly poorer EFS in children with B/Myeloid MPAL. Children who achieve an EOI MRD-negative remission demonstrate excellent survival with ALL chemotherapy alone. Future investigation is necessary to prospectively validate these findings, examine MRD in T/myeloid and cytogenetic subgroups, and to explore the success of myeloid salvage therapy ±SCT to "rescue" those with a poor response to ALL therapy. Figure 1 Event free survival by end of Induction MRD status (negative <0.01%) Figure 1. Event free survival by end of Induction MRD status (negative <0.01%) Disclosures O'Gorman: Becton, Dickinson and Company: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3440-3440
Author(s):  
Vera Grossmann ◽  
Ulrike Bacher ◽  
Valentina Artusi ◽  
Hans-Ulrich Klein ◽  
Wolfgang Kern ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3440 The t(10;11)(p13;q14)/PICALM-MLLT10 (CALM-AF10) rearrangement is most frequently associated with T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL), and is rarely observed in AML. The EZH2 gene, located on 7q36.1, is a highly conserved histone H3 lysine 27 methyltransferase that influences stem cell renewal. EZH2 mutations were observed in 10% of patients with myelofibrosis, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. In a previous study, we had investigated AML patients for EZH2 deletions using FISH. 6/20 (30%) of cases had been detected to carry a deletion. Additionally, we had screened these 6 cases for molecular mutations in EZH2 (transcript-ID: ENST00000320356) using an amplicon-based deep-sequencing assay, and one of the 6 patients was harboring both an EZH2 deletion and an EZH2 mutation. More interestingly, this double-mutated case was carrying a PICALM-MLLT10 rearrangement. Therefore, in this study, we were interested to investigate an expanded cohort of 13 cases (T-lineage ALL and AML) harboring a PICALM-MLLT10 rearrangement. Our cohort comprised 12 adults and one pediatric patient (7 males, 6 females) and was characterized by a predominant T-cell origin: 11 patients had T-ALL, 1 patient had mixed phenotype T/myeloid acute leukemia, and 1 patient had AML. EZH2 alterations were detected in 3/13 (including the index case). In more detail, the EZH2 mutation carriers were characterized as follows: Patient #1 (male, 26 years, AML) had a splice site mutation in exon 14 with a mutation load of 13% in a cysteine-rich region. Patient #2 (male, 19 years, T-ALL) harbored a missense mutation (Phe136Leu) with a mutation load of 93%. Patient #3 (female, 53 years, T-ALL) showed three concomitant EZH2 missense mutations in exon 5: His120Gln, Tyr124His, and Gly150Arg. The mutation load detected was 17% for each alteration. A fourth patient had a 1459G>A base substitution (corresponding to Ala487Thr) which to our knowledge had not been described before. However, this alteration had to be interpreted as germline as it was still detectable in the remission state. In contrast, in an independent cohort of 12 patients with PICALM-MLLT10 negative T-ALL (7 females, 5 males) analyzed for comparison no EZH2 mutation was detected. Interestingly, in patients #2 and #3, the mutations were located in exon 5 in the region which interacts with the DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B DNA methyltransferase genes (D1). Moreover, DNMT3A mutations were recently identified in patients with AML and MDS in association with poor outcomes. Therefore, we additionally performed investigation for DNMT3A mutations in all 13 patients with PICALM-MLLT10 positive leukemias but detected no mutation. To investigate further molecular associations, we analyzed these cases also for RUNX1 mutations and FLT3-ITD, but we did not detect any mutation in these molecular genes. Further, we compared the gene expression profiles of 8 patients with PICALM-MLLT10 positive T-ALL to the profiles of 21 PICALM-MLLT10 negative T-ALL patients. Hierarchical clustering revealed a distinct gene expression signature of the PICALM-MLLT10 positive cases. Significant upregulation was found for HOXA5 and HOXA9 genes. Other differentially overexpressed HOX were HOXA3, A4, A6, A7, A10. Genes with a function for cell differentiation and regulation of apoptosis (ZAK) as well as for signal transduction (AKT3) were significantly underexpressed. Subsequently, we compared the gene expression profiles of 2 EZH2 mutated patients to 6 EZH2 wild-type patients in the PICALM-MLLT10 positive cohort. By hierarchical clustering, both EZH2 mutated cases showed a distinct gene expression signature. Increased expression was observed for genes with a role for the regulation of transcription (ZNF207, KDM5B, or CASZ1) or for intracellular transport (SARB1). In summary, we detected EZH2 mutations in 3/13 cases in this series of PICALM-MLLT10 positive malignancies, comprising mostly T-ALL, but also AML or mixed phenotype acute leukemia. This further emphasizes a cooperative effect of EZH2 mutations with the PICALM-MLLT10 fusion in acute leukemias of different lineages. Disclosures: Grossmann: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Artusi:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Kern:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kohlmann:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership.


2017 ◽  
Vol 141 (11) ◽  
pp. 1462-1468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan J. Charles ◽  
Daniel F. Boyer

Mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) is a heterogeneous category in the World Health Organization classification that comprises acute leukemias with discrete admixed populations of myeloid and lymphoid blasts (“bilineal”) or with extensive coexpression of lymphoid and myeloid markers in a single blast population (“biphenotypic”). Flow cytometric findings suggestive of MPAL are often met with consternation by pathologists and oncologists alike, owing to unfamiliarity with the disease and uncertainty about how MPAL fits into established paradigms for treatment of acute leukemia. The purpose of this review is to explain the diagnostic criteria for MPAL, summarize its biological and clinical features, and address common diagnostic pitfalls of these unusual leukemias.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 4658
Author(s):  
Sandeep Batra ◽  
Anthony John Ross

Mixed-phenotype acute leukemias (MPAL) are rare in children and often lack consensus on optimal management. This review examines the current controversies and emerging paradigms in the management of pediatric MPAL. We examine risk stratification, outcomes of recent retrospective and prospective collaborative trials, and the role of transplantation and precision genomics, and outline emerging targets and concepts in this rare entity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason H. Kurzer ◽  
Olga K. Weinberg

Next generation sequencing has uncovered several genes with associated mutations in hematologic malignancies that can serve as potential biomarkers of disease. Keeping abreast of these genes is therefore of paramount importance in the field of hematology. This review focuses on PHF6, a highly conserved epigenetic transcriptional regulator that is important for neurodevelopment and hematopoiesis. PHF6 serves as a tumor suppressor protein, with PHF6 mutations and deletions often implicated in the development of T-lymphoblastic leukemia and less frequently in acute myeloid leukemia and other myeloid neoplasms. PHF6 inactivation appears to be an early event in T-lymphoblastic leukemogenesis, requiring cooperating events, including NOTCH1 mutations or overexpression of TLX1 and TLX3 for full disease development. In contrast, PHF6 mutations tend to occur later in myeloid malignancies, are frequently accompanied by RUNX1 mutations, and are often associated with disease progression. Moreover, PHF6 appears to play a role in lineage plasticity within hematopoietic malignancies, with PHF6 mutations commonly present in mixed phenotype acute leukemias with a predilection for T-lineage marker expression. Due to conflicting data, the prognostic significance of PHF6 mutations remains unclear, with a subset of studies showing no significant difference in outcomes compared to malignancies with wild-type PHF6, and other studies showing inferior outcomes in certain patients with mutated PHF6. Future studies are necessary to elucidate the role PHF6 plays in development of T-lymphoblastic leukemia, progression of myeloid malignancies, and its overall prognostic significance in hematopoietic neoplasms.


2019 ◽  
Vol 493 ◽  
pp. S253-S254
Author(s):  
C. Pizarro Sánchez ◽  
L.A. Bautista Balbás ◽  
M. Rodríguez Gutiérrez ◽  
M. Morado Arias ◽  
A.L. Qasem Moreno ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document