Arch Height Index Normative Values of College-Aged Women Using the Arch Height Index Measurement System

2013 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendi H. Weimar ◽  
Justin F. Shroyer
Keyword(s):  
Measurement System ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Standing Position ◽  
Normative Values ◽  
Arch Height ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Index Measurement ◽  
Foot Arch ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
The Mean

Background: The arch height index measurement system (AHIMS) device has been found to be a reliable and valid instrument for measuring the arch height index (AHI) of the feet of individuals; however, normative data for the AHI are lacking for various populations. Therefore, the purposes of this study were to establish population normative AHI values for college-aged females and to compare the observed AHI data across right and left feet. Methods: Seventy-nine college-aged females served as study participants, and both feet were measured using the AHIMS in the seated and standing positions. The AHI was calculated as the ratio of the dorsum height of the foot at half the total foot length to the length of the foot from the heel to the base of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Results: The mean ± SD AHI values for the left and right feet in the seated position were 0.355 ± 0.031 and 0.369 ± 0.034, respectively. The mean ± SD AHI values for the left and right feet in the standing position were 0.338 ± 0.031 and 0.343 ± 0.033, respectively. There were significant differences observed between the left and right feet for the seated (P < .001) and standing (P = .003) positions. Conclusions: Normative values were established for college-aged females for the AHI using the AHIMS. Differences were noted between the right and left feet of the participants sampled. Although normative values were obtained, we caution against using these values to classify foot arch types based solely on a sample of the population studied. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 103(3): 213–217, 2013)

scholarly journals Photographic Estimation of Arch Height of Adult Bangladeshi Male

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-62
Author(s):  
M Tanveer Hossain Parash ◽  
Humaira Naushaba ◽  
Md Ashfaqur Rahman ◽  
Sadia Choudhury Shimmi
Keyword(s):  
Standing Position ◽  
Arch Height ◽  
Predisposing Factor ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Third World Country ◽  
Index Measurement ◽  
Foot Arch ◽  
Rearfoot Eversion ◽  
Alternative Idea

Context: The height of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot is commonly thought to be a predisposing factor to injuries. High-arched runners exhibit more bony, ankle and lateral injuries but low-arched runners reveal a higher risk of soft tissue, knee and medial injuries. Moreover high-arched and low-arched people have greater rearfoot eversion excursions than those with normal arch structure. So, it is important to have relatively easy and reliable way to measure the height of foot arch. The most reliable and valid way of measuring the foot arch is by the arch height index measurement system (AHIMS). The AHIMS can be costly to buy or construct for a third world country like Bangladesh. An alternative idea developed recently involved the use of digital photography to assess the arch height. Study design: Cross sectional, analytical type of study. Place and period of the study: Department of Anatomy, Sir Salimullah Medical College, Dhaka from July 2010 to June 2011. Materials and Method: A total number of 110 medical students of 3rd and 4th year were chosen by purposive sampling. Results: The values of arch height were 6.04 cm to 8.78 cm in sitting position and 4.83 cm to 7.03 cm in standing position respectively. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bja.v10i2.17284 Bangladesh Journal of Anatomy, July 2012, Vol. 10 No. 2 pp 59-62

scholarly journals Foot Arch Posture Development in Children and Adolescents aged 6 to 19 Years: A Cross-sectional Descriptive Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousef Mahmoudzadeh ◽  
Roghayyeh Alipour
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Normative Values ◽  
Childhood And Adolescence ◽  
Healthy Children ◽  
Arch Height ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Foot Length ◽  
Foot Posture ◽  
Foot Arch ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: The arch height index (AHI) is a commonly used method for measuring foot arch posture. However, there are little studies have investigated the natural growth and normative values of the foot arch using the AHI. The objective of this study was to establish normative and cut-off values for foot arch posture and to identify factors influencing foot arch posture across childhood and adolescence. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a sample of 3532 healthy children and adolescents (1804 boys, 1728 girls; aged 6 to 19 years) was recruited for the navicular height (NH) and AHI measurements and anthropometry assessment (weight, height, BMI and foot length). Data were explored descriptively and graphically, comparisons between groups used t-tests or ANOVA model as appropriate and a multiple regressions was conducted. The 95% and 68% prediction intervals were used as cut-off values. Results : approximately 69% had a normal AHI range, 12% low arched foot, 3% severely low arched, 14% high arched and 1.8% severely high arched foot. The mean (SD) AHI was 15.16 (2.61). Very little gender bias was found for AHI values, being higher in males 15.32 (2.54) than in females 15.0 (2.68) ( p = .019). Regression showed approximately 3%, 0.3% and 2% of the AHI change was explained by age, BMI and foot length, respectively. The mean NH significantly increased from the age of 6 (2.62 cm) to 19 (4.20 cm). Conclusions: This study confirms that the ‘flexible flatfoot’ or low arched foot decreases with age. Simultaneously, increase of high arched foot type and shift in foot posture towards more normal foot type are also confirmed. BMI does not seem to be an important determinant of children foot arch posture. Keywords: Foot posture, Navicular height, Arch height index, Normative values, Medial longitudinal arch, Foot arch development, Children, Adolescents

Caliper Method Versus Digital Photogrammetry for Assessing Arch Height Index in Pregnant Women

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
pp. 406-410
Author(s):  
Kathryn D. Harrison ◽  
Jean L. McCrory
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Measurement System ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Digital Photogrammetry ◽  
Arch Height ◽  
Index Measurement ◽  
Foot Arch

Background: Foot anthropometry may be altered during pregnancy. Pregnant women often report lower-extremity pain that may be related to these alterations. The Arch Height Index Measurement System is a common method of foot arch assessment; however, the required calipers are costly and are not widely available. Thus, we compared the reliability of a digital photogrammetry method of arch height index (AHI) assessment with that of the Arch Height Index Measurement System. Methods: Ten pregnant women (mean ± SD: age, 29 ± 4 years; height, 166.9 ± 6.8 cm; weight, 63.3 ± 8.8 kg) in their second trimester were recruited to participate, along with a control group of 10 nulliparous weight-matched women (mean ± SD: age, 22 ± 2 years; height, 164.6 ± 4.8 cm; weight, 61.5 ± 8.1 kg). During the second and third trimesters, and once postpartum, AHI was assessed using calipers and using digital photogrammetry. Mixed model absolute agreement type intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine correlation between the two methods for sitting and standing AHI. Results: The ICC results for sitting AHI only (0.819–0.968) were reasonable for clinical measures; ICC values for standing AHI (0.674–0.789) did not reach values deemed reasonable for clinical use. Conclusions: Caliper and digital photogrammetry methods of AHI assessment are correlated in pregnant women; however, for standing AHI, the correlation is not sufficient for clinical use. Photogrammetry may still be appropriate for clinical use, as long as values from this method are not substituted directly for results obtained from calipers.

Arch Height Index Measurement System

2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Butler ◽  
Howard Hillstrom ◽  
Jinsup Song ◽  
Christine J. Richards ◽  
Irene S. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Measurement System ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Measurement Procedure ◽  
Normative Values ◽  
Structural Factors ◽  
Arch Height ◽  
Lower Extremity Injuries ◽  
Index Measurement ◽  
Recreational Runners ◽  
Extremity Injuries

Background: The purposes of this study were 1) to determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of the arch height index measurement system device, 2) to establish population normative values for the arch height index in recreational runners, and 3) to compare arch height index values between the right and left feet and between genders. Methods: Eleven subjects were used to establish intrarater and interrater reliability of the arch height index measurement system. This system was then used to measure the arch height index of 100 recreational runners. Results: Measurements taken with the arch height index measurement system device exhibited high intrarater and interrater reliability. The mean ± SD arch height index of the recreational runners was 0.340 ± 0.030. Men had larger feet than women, but the arch height index between genders was similar. Conclusions: The arch height index measurement system device is reliable to use between testers while simplifying the measurement procedure for recording the arch height index. The arch height index may be helpful in identifying potential structural factors that predispose individuals to lower-extremity injuries. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 98(2): 102–106, 2008)

An Ergonomic Testing System for the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Stiffness

2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Farhadi ◽  
Muhammad Faraz ◽  
Marabelle Heng ◽  
Shane Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Errors ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Joint Stiffness ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Testing System ◽  
Device Design ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Right

Osteoarthritis sufferers commonly have first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) problems in which articular surfaces are changed permanently due to fatigue. Therefore, medical devices for early diagnosis would increase the opportunity for prevention of disease progression. In previous studies on stiffness of the first MTPJ many details, although functionally of great importance, have not been fully considered including: design and size of the device, tribology consideration, and errors from device. Therefore, the motivation of our research was to enhance the device design by reducing the size of the device, and device design was enhanced by minimizing measurement errors through development of a new ergonomic left and right foot instrument located medial to the first MTPJ (instead of beneath the foot). The first MTPJ stiffness (N mm/kg radian) measurement was taken on 28 subjects with two replicates per subject by the same tester. The first MTPJ stiffness ranged from 3.49 to 14.42 N mm/kg radian with the mean (SD) value of 8.28 (3.15) N mm/kg radian for the left feet and 3.91 to 11.90 N mm/kg radian with the mean (SD) value of 7.65 (2.07) N mm/kg radian for the right feet. Reliability evaluation was measured using intraclass correlation coefficient and described an excellent reliability between two tests.

scholarly journals Treatment of hallux rigidus with percutaneous arthrodesis

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-95
Author(s):  
Vitor Baltazar Nogueira ◽  
Miguel Viana Pereira Filho ◽  
Mauro Cesar Mattos e Dinato ◽  
Márcio De Faria Freitas ◽  
Rodrigo Gonçalves Pagnano
Keyword(s):  
Medical Records ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Time Level ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Pain Improvement ◽  
Consolidation Time

Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the percutaneous arthrodesis technique with single medial portal of the first metatarsophalangeal joint and to evaluate the results of a series of nine cases (10 feet) with a diagnosis of hallux rigidus subjected to this technique, comparing the results with literature data regarding the conventional technique. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study performed by analysis of medical records and radiographs of nine patients undergoing percutaneous arthrodesis of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint. Gender, age, consolidation time, level of postoperative pain and degree of patient satisfaction were evaluated. Results: Eight patients were female, and one patient was male. The mean age was 68.7 years, the mean consolidation time was 8 weeks, the consolidation ratio was 70%, there was pain improvement in the postoperative period, and all patients considered themselves satisfied with the surgery. Conclusion: Percutaneous arthrodesis of the metatarsophalangeal hallux joint potentially yields results similar to those of the conventional method demonstrated in the literature but uses smaller incisions.Level of Evidence IV, Therapeutic Studies, Case Series.

scholarly journals TL 18237 - First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using a minimally invasive technique

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (Supl 1) ◽  
pp. 112S
Author(s):  
Luiz Carlos Ribeiro Lara ◽  
Lúcio Carlos Torres ◽  
Gabriel Cervone ◽  
Juan Antonio Grajales ◽  
Fabio Lemos Rodrigues
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Minimally Invasive Technique ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Percutaneous Technique ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Larger Sample

Introduction: Metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis (MTPA) is a surgical technique indicated for the treatment of hallux rigidus with advanced arthrosis and for rheumatic diseases. This classic surgery is widely used and effective; however, the use of a minimally invasive technique remains mostly unknown. Objective: To present the outcome of MTPA performed using a percutaneous technique. Methods: Hallux MTPA was performed in 8 feet from 4 patients with hallux rigidus and 4 with rheumatoid arthritis, with a higher prevalence of women than men (5 vs. 3) and a mean postoperative follow-up time of 1.5 years. The outcomes were evaluated using a modified version of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) questionnaire and the union time. Results: All patients who underwent surgery showed improvements in pain and arthrodesis union at approximately 8 weeks. The mean AOFAS score increased to 85 points (of a total of 90 possible points). There were no complications, such as infection, nonunion or persistent pain. Conclusion: The percutaneous technique of hallux MTPA was effective, with satisfactory outcomes, reduced surgical invasiveness, immediate walking, rapid union with “arthrodesis take” and significant improvement in pain. However, a larger sample is required to confirm the outcomes.

Silastic first metatarsophalangeal joint arthroplasty for the treatment of end-stage hallux rigidus

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (2) ◽  
pp. 220-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy M. Clough ◽  
Joseph Ring
Keyword(s):  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Silastic Implant ◽  
The Mean ◽  
End Stage

Aims Arthroplasty for end-stage hallux rigidus (HR) is controversial. Arthrodesis remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, although is not without its complications, with rates of up to 10% for nonunion, 14% for reoperation and 10% for metatarsalgia. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of a double-stemmed silastic implant (Wright-Medical, Memphis, Tennessee, USA) for patients with end-stage HR. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 108 consecutive implants in 76 patients, between January 2005 and December 2016, with a minimum follow-up of two years. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 61.6 years (42 to 84). There were 104 females and four males. Clinical, radiological, patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) data, a visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, and satisfaction scores were collected. Results The survivorship at a mean follow-up of 5.3 years (2.1 to 14.1) was 97.2%. The mean Manchester Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (MOXFQ) scores improved from 78.1 to 11.0, and VAS scores for pain from 7/10 to 1.3/10. The rate of satisfaction was 90.6%. Three implants (2.8%) required revision; one for infection, one-month postoperatively, and two for stem breakage at 10.4 and 13.3 years postoperatively. There was a 1.9% reoperation rate other than revision, 23.1% of patients developed a minor complication, and 21.1% of patients had non-progressive and asymptomatic cysts on radiological review. Conclusion We report a 97.2% survivorship at a mean follow-up of 5.3 years with this implant. We did not find progressive osteolysis, as has been previously reported. These results suggest that this double-stemmed silastic implant provides a predictable and reliable alternative with comparable outcomes to arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage HR. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):220–226.

Arthrodesis of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalpesh Shah ◽  
Angelica Augustine ◽  
Robert Carter ◽  
Angus McFadyen
Keyword(s):  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Lag Screw ◽  
Fixation Group ◽  
Joint Fusion ◽  
Bone Fragments ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Time

Background: There are cadaveric and biomechanical studies comparing different methods of fixation for achieving arthrodesis in hallux rigidus. However, there are no comparative clinical studies. We compared the clinical and radiologic outcomes of first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion using three different techniques: lag screw, lag screw and circlage wire, and Memory staples. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 46 patients who underwent first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion. All of the operations were performed by experienced surgeons. Each patient had clinical and radiologic assessments postoperatively. Results: The three groups were matching in terms of demographic features and comorbidity. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability for radiographic metatarsophalangeal joint fusion was excellent. The mean time to clinical and radiologic union in the Memory staples group was earlier (7.6 weeks) than that of the other two techniques (8.0 and 8.1 weeks). The Memory staples group also had the lowest incidence of nonunion (1 of 15 compared with 4 of 15 in the single lag screw fixation group and 3 of 16 in the lag screw and circlage wire fixation group) and no hardware-related problems. Conclusions: Our experience corroborates the advantages of Memory staples as described in the literature, including good approximation of bone fragments, technically easy application with fewer steps than an AO-applied screw, and an adequate source of internal fixation to achieve metatarsophalangeal joint fusion. There is also a suggestion that the time to achieve fusion is shorter. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 102(1): 13-17, 2012)

scholarly journals Effectiveness of the Plantar Aponeurosis Release for Limitation of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Extension after Hallux Valgus Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0001
Author(s):  
Hongjoon Choi ◽  
Daewook Kim ◽  
Yeong Hun Kang ◽  
Jong Ho Park
Keyword(s):  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Metatarsal Head ◽  
Knee Extension ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Plantar Aponeurosis ◽  
First Metatarsal ◽  
Metatarsal Angle ◽  
Additional Procedure ◽  
The Mean

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Even though stiffness of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (1MTP) is not a common complication, reduced dorsiflexion range of motion at the 1MTP after surgery for hallux valgus was reported as a complication. However, few clinical studies have investigated this issue and no clinical resolution has been reached thus far. We hypothesized that tightness of the gastrocnemius-plantar aponeurosis complex is one of the factors that limits the extension of 1MTP after hallux valgus surgery. Thus, an additional procedure of the plantar aponeurosis release during hallux valgus surgery may improve the range of extension at 1MTP. The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of plantar aponeurosis release in improving the range of extension when a limitation is detected after hallux valgus surgery. Methods: Thirteen patients (17 feet) with limited 1MTP extension after hallux valgus surgery, underwent an additional procedure of plantar aponeurosis release. The inclusion criterion was limitation of 1MTP extension showed more than 15 degrees difference between knee extension and flexion position, measured after completing all procedures of the hallux valgus surgery. The passive range of 1MTP extension was evaluated by a goniometer while the first metatarsal head was supported with a palm, assuming a weightbearing position with knee extension and flexion, after completing all procedures of the hallux valgus surgery (Barouk test). A silfverskiold test was performed in all cases preoperatively. The weightbearing dorsoplantar and lateral radiographs of the foot were performed to measure the hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, distal metatarsal articular angle, and the talo-first metatarsal angle. Results: The mean range of 1MTP extension significantly improved from 2.53 degrees to 40.88 degrees in the knee extension position (p<0.0000). The mean range of the 1MTP extension also improved from 18.24 degrees to 43.24 degrees in the knee flexion position. The silfverskiold test was positive in 12 cases. In all patients, congruence of 1MTP was corrected. There were no surgery-related complications such as plantar aponeurosis rupture or nerve injury. Conclusion: Our study supports tightness of the gastrocnemius-plantar aponeurosis complex is one of the factors that limit the extension of 1MTP after hallux valgus surgery. Hence, plantar aponeurosis release can be considered as an effective additional procedure to improve the range of 1MTP extension when a limitation is presented after hallux valgus surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document