Effect of Different Insole Materials on Kinetic and Kinematic Variables of the Walking Gait in Healthy People

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 390-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramadan Özmanevra ◽  
Salih Angin ◽  
İzge H. Günal ◽  
Ata Elvan
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Ankle Dorsiflexion ◽  
Healthy People ◽  
Walking Gait ◽  
System A ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Analysis System

Background: There is a lack of data that could address the effects of off-the-shelf insoles on gait variables in healthy people. Methods: Thirty-three healthy volunteers ranging in age from 18 to 35 years were included to this study. Kinematic and kinetic data were obtained in barefoot, shoe-only, steel insole, silicone insole, and polyurethane insole conditions using an optoelectronic three-dimensional motion analysis system. A repeated measures analysis of variance test was used to identify statistically significant differences between insole conditions. The alpha level was set at P < .05 Results: Maximum knee flexion was higher in the steel insole condition (P < .0001) compared with the silicone insole (P = .001) and shoe-only conditions (P = .032). Reduced maximum knee flexion was recorded in the polyurethane insole condition compared with the shoe-only condition (P = .031). Maximum knee flexion measured in the steel insole condition was higher compared to the barefoot condition (P = .020). Higher maximum ankle dorsiflexion was observed in the barefoot condition, and there were significant differences between the polyurethane insole (P < .0001), silicone insole (P = .001), steel insole (P = .002), and shoe conditions (P = .004). Least and highest maximum ankle plantarflexion were detected in the steel insole and silicone insole conditions, respectively. Maximum ankle plantarflexion in the barefoot and steel insole conditions (P = .014) and the barefoot and polyurethane insole conditions (P = .035) were significant. There was no significant difference between conditions for ground reaction force or joint moments. Conclusions: Insoles made by different materials affect maximum knee flexion, maximum ankle dorsiflexion, and maximum ankle plantarflexion. This may be helpful during the decision-making process when selecting the insole material for any pathological conditions that require insole prescription.

scholarly journals Effects of Different Assistive Seats on Ability of Elderly in Sit-To-Stand and Back-To-Sit Movements

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 485
Author(s):  
Shu-Zon Lou ◽  
Jia-Yuan You ◽  
Yi-Chuan Tsai ◽  
Yu-Chi Chen
Keyword(s):  
Ankle Joint ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Joint Moments ◽  
Healthy Older Adults ◽  
3D Motion Analysis ◽  
Sit To Stand ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Analysis System

The ability to perform sit-to-stand (STS) and back-to-sit (BTS) movements is important for the elderly to live independently and maintain a reasonable quality of life. Accordingly, this study investigated the STS and BTS motions of 28 healthy older adults (16 male and 12 female) under three different seat conditions, namely nonassisted, self-designed lifting seat, and UpLift seat. The biomechanical data were acquired using a three-dimensional (3D) motion analysis system and force plates, and were examined by one-way repeated-measures ANOVA to investigate the effects of the different seat conditions on the joint angle, joint moments, and movement duration time (α = 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the STS duration among the three test conditions. However, the BTS duration was significantly increased in the UpLift seat condition. Moreover, the peak flexion angle of the hip during STS motion was also significantly higher in the UpLift condition. For both motions (STS and BTS), the lifting seats significantly decreased the knee and hip joint moments, but significantly increased the ankle joint moment. Moreover, compared to the nonassistive seat, both assistive lifting seats required a greater ankle joint strength to complete the STS and BTS motions.

scholarly journals Gait Disorders In Patients After Polytrauma

2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
Ruta Jakušonoka ◽  
Zane Pavāre ◽  
Andris Jumtiņš ◽  
Aleksejs Smolovs ◽  
Tatjana Anaņjeva
Keyword(s):  
Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Step Length ◽  
Vertical Load ◽  
Lower Limb Injuries ◽  
Limb Injuries ◽  
Stance Time ◽  
Polytrauma Patients

Abstract Evaluation of the gait of patients after polytrauma is important, as it indicates the ability of patients to the previous activities and work. The aim of our study was to evaluate the gait of patients with lower limb injuries in the medium-term after polytrauma. Three-dimensional instrumental gait analysis was performed in 26 polytrauma patients (16 women and 10 men; mean age 38.6 years), 14 to 41 months after the trauma. Spatio-temporal parameters, motions in pelvis and lower extremities joints in sagittal plane and vertical load ground reaction force were analysed. Gait parameters in polytrauma patients were compared with a healthy control group. Polytrauma patients in the injured side had decreased step length, cadence, hip extension, maximum knee flexion, vertical load ground reaction force, and increased stance time and pelvic anterior tilt; in the uninjured side they had decreased step length, cadence, maximum knee flexion, vertical load ground reaction force and increased stance time (p < 0.05). The use of the three-dimensional instrumental gait analysis in the evaluation of polytrauma patients with lower limb injuries consequences makes it possible to identify the gait disorders not only in the injured, but also in the uninjured side.

Spinal Curvature and Lower Extremities Kinematics of Simulated Pregnancy during Stair Ascending and Descending

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 11-22
Author(s):  
Ihssan S. Masad ◽  
Sami Almashaqbeh ◽  
Othman Smadi ◽  
Mariam Abu Olaim ◽  
Abeer Obeid
Keyword(s):  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Lower Extremities ◽  
Ankle Dorsiflexion ◽  
Spinal Curvature ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Group Data ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Position Data ◽  
Infrared Cameras ◽  
Hip Flexion

The purpose of this work is to investigate the effect of anteriorly-added mass to simulate pregnancy on lower extremities kinematic and lumbar and thoracic angles during stair ascending and descending. 18 healthy females ascended and descended, with and without a pseudo-pregnancy sac of 12 kg (experimental and control groups, respectively), a costume-made wooden staircase while instrumented with 20 reflective markers placed on the lower extremities and the spine. The movements were captured by 12 infrared cameras surrounding the staircase. Tracked position data were exported to MATLAB to calculate the required joints angles. SPSS was used to compare the ascent and descent phases of control group, and to find if there are any significant differences between control and experimental groups in the ascent phase as well as in the descent phase. When comparing the ascent and descent phases of control group, data revealed a higher hip flexion during ascending and greater ankle planter-flexion and dorsiflexion, lumbar, and thoracic angles during descending; however, no significant difference was shown in the knee flexion angle between ascending and descending. Non-pregnant data showed greater maximum hip flexion and ankle dorsiflexion during stair ascending compared to simulated-pregnant group; while ankle planter-flexion, knee flexion, and lumbar angle were greater for simulated-pregnant status. During stair descending, non-pregnant group had greater minimum hip flexion and ankle dorsiflexion compared to simulated pregnant group; while ankle planter-flexion, knee flexion, and maximum hip flexion were greater for simulated-pregnant group. However, the lumbar and thoracic angles were found to be similar for simulated-pregnant and non-pregnant groups during stair descending. In conclusion, the current study revealed important kinematic modifications pregnant women adopt while ascending and descending stairs at their final stage of pregnancy to increase their stability.

scholarly journals Syndesmotic Implant Removal: Does It Really Improve Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion?

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0026
Author(s):  
John Y. Kwon ◽  
Timilien Wusu ◽  
Jorge Briceno ◽  
Philip Kaiser ◽  
Patrick Cronin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Ankle Dorsiflexion ◽  
Implant Removal ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Measurement Tool ◽  
Digital Measurement ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Radiographic Measurements ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: There is limited evidence that removal of syndesmotic implants is beneficial. Despite this, many surgeons advocate removal based on previous studies suggesting improved ankle dorsiflexion. Methodologic difficulties make the validity and applicability of previous works questionable. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ankle dorsiflexion after syndesmotic implant removal using radiographic measurements of ankle dorsiflexion before and after screw removal utilizing a standardized, applied load. Methods: All patients undergoing isolated syndesmotic implant removal were consented for participation. Ankle dorsiflexion was measured radiographically at three different time points: (I) immediately before implant removal intraoperatively, (II) immediately after implant removal intraoperatively and (III) approximately three months after implant removal. A standardized dorsiflexion torque force of 33.4 newton-meter (Nm) was applied to the ankle by a research assistant using a tensiometer at these time points and a perfect lateral radiograph of the ankle was obtained. Four reviewers independently measured ankle dorsiflexion on randomized, deidentified and blinded images using a digital measurement tool. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables. Paired T-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was used for continuous variables. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated using a 2-way random effects model and the absolute agreement definition. Results: 29 patients met inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. There were 11 men (38%) and 18 women (62%). The mean, and standard deviation, age was 50.3 ± 16.9 years (range 19-80). The mean ankle dorsiflexion pre-operatively, post-op and at 3 month follow up was 13.7°± 6.6°, 13.3°±7.3° and 11.8°±11.3°, respectively (p=0.466). For subsequent analysis, 5 patients were excluded due to potential cofounding effect of retained suture button devices. Analysis of the remaining 24 patients demonstrated similar results with no statistically significant difference in ankle dorsiflexion at all three time points. Conclusion: Removal of syndesmotic screws does not improve ankle dorsiflexion motion and should not be used as an indication for screw removal.

scholarly journals The Kinematics and Kinetics Analysis of the Lower Extremity in the Landing Phase of a Stop-jump Task

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Yin ◽  
D Sun ◽  
Q.C Mei ◽  
Y.D Gu ◽  
J.S Baker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Flexion Angle ◽  
Contact Phase ◽  
Peak Knee ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Kinematics And Kinetics

Large number of studies showed that landing with great impact forces may be a risk factor for knee injuries. The purpose of this study was to illustrate the different landing loads to lower extremity of both genders and examine the relationships among selected lower extremity kinematics and kinetics during the landing of a stop-jump task. A total of 35 male and 35 female healthy subjects were recruited in this study. Each subject executed five experiment actions. Lower extremity kinematics and kinetics were synchronously acquired. The comparison of lower extremity kinematics for different genders showed significant difference. The knee and hip maximum flexion angle, peak ground reaction force and peak knee extension moment have significantly decreased during the landing of the stop-jump task among the female subjects. The hip flexion angle at the initial foot contact phase showed significant correlation with peak ground reaction force during landing of the stop-jump task (r=-0.927, p<0.001). The knee flexion angle at the initial foot contact phase had significant correlation with peak ground reaction force and vertical ground reaction forces during landing of the stop-jump task (r=-0.908, p<0.001; r=0.812, P=0.002). A large hip and knee flexion angles at the initial foot contact with the ground did not necessarily reduce the impact force during landing, but active hip and knee flexion motions did. The hip and knee flexion motion of landing was an important technical factor that affects anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) loading during the landing of the stop-jump task.

Relationship Between Weightbearing Ankle Dorsiflexion Passive Range of Motion and Ankle Kinematics During Gait

2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Hyeok Kang ◽  
Jae-Seop Oh
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Knee Extension ◽  
Ankle Dorsiflexion ◽  
Physically Active ◽  
Ankle Kinematics ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Analysis System ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Paired T Test

Background: Measurement of weightbearing ankle dorsiflexion (DF) passive range of motion (PROM) has been suggested as a way to estimate ankle kinematics during gait; however, no previous study has demonstrated the relationship between ankle DF during gait and ankle DF PROM with knee extension. We examine the relationship between maximum ankle DF during gait and nonweightbearing and weightbearing ankle DF PROM with knee extension. Methods: Forty physically active individuals (mean ± SD age, 21.63 ± 1.73 years) participated in this study. Ankle DF PROM with knee extension was measured in the nonweightbearing and weightbearing conditions; maximum ankle DF during gait was assessed using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. The relationship between each variable was calculated using the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient, and the difference in ankle DF PROM between the nonweightbearing and weightbearing conditions was analyzed using a paired t test. Results: The weightbearing measurement (r = 0.521; P &lt; .001) for ankle DF PROM showed a greater correlation with maximum ankle DF during gait than did the nonweightbearing measurement (r = 0.245; P = .029). Ankle DF PROM was significantly greater in the weightbearing than in the nonweightbearing condition (P &lt; .001) despite a significant correlation between the two measurements (r = 0.402; P &lt; .001). Conclusions: These findings indicate that nonweightbearing and weightbearing measurements of ankle DF PROM with knee extension should not be used interchangeably and that weightbearing ankle DF PROM with the knee extended is more appropriate for estimating ankle DF during gait.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF LOAD CARRIAGE AMONG PRIMARY SCHOOL BOYS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY

2007 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 265-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. N. SHASMIN ◽  
N. A. ABU OSMAN ◽  
R. RAZALI ◽  
J. USMAN ◽  
W. A. B. WAN ABAS
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Gait Pattern ◽  
Load Carriage ◽  
3D Motion Analysis ◽  
Trunk Inclination ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Analysis System ◽  
Similar Body ◽  
The Impact

Backpack carrying is a considerable daily "occupational" load among schoolchildren. Most of the research on children's backpacks have focused on gait pattern and trunk forward lean; only a few researches have investigated the impact of backpack carrying on children using the measurements of static posture and gait kinetics. This study investigated the changes in ground reaction force (GRF) and trunk inclination among primary students when carrying heavy backpacks. A randomized controlled experimental study was conducted on seven boys aged between 9 and 11 years old with a similar body mass index. Observations were done when the boys were carrying school bags of 0% (as control), 10%, 15%, and 20% of their own body weight while walking normally. Data acquisition was carried out using force platforms and a 3D motion analysis system. A significant difference in GRF at a load of 20% of body weight was found: the vertical GRF increased almost three times when loads increased up to 20% of body weight compared to 10% of body weight. The anterior–posterior GRFs were asymmetrical when loads were increased. When carrying a load of 15% of body weight, all of the seven subjects adopted a compensatory trunk inclination. The emphasis on GRF and trunk inclination suggests that the safest load applied does not exceed 15% of body weight.

scholarly journals Shock absorption during transtibial amputee gait: Does longitudinal prosthetic stiffness play a role?

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Boutwell ◽  
Rebecca Stine ◽  
Steven Gard
Keyword(s):  
Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Shock Absorption ◽  
Appreciable Change ◽  
Normal Medium ◽  
Gait Biomechanics ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Transtibial Prosthesis

Background:Reduced-stiffness components are often prescribed in lower-limb prostheses, but their efficacy in augmenting shock absorption has been inconclusive.Objectives:To perform a systematic variation of longitudinal prosthetic stiffness over a wide range of values and to evaluate its effect on shock absorption during gait.Study design:Repeated-measures crossover experiment.Methods:Twelve subjects with a unilateral transtibial amputation walked at normal and fast self-selected speeds. Longitudinal prosthetic stiffness was modified by springs within a shock-absorbing pylon: normal (manufacturer recommended), 75% of normal (medium), 50% of normal (soft), and rigid (displacement blocked). The variables of interest were kinematic (stance-phase knee flexion and pelvic obliquity) and kinetic (prosthetic-side ground reaction force loading peak magnitude and timing).Results:No changes were observed in kinematic measures during gait. A significant difference in peak ground reaction force magnitudes between medium and normal ( p = 0.001) during freely selected walking was attributed to modified walking speed ( p = 0.008). Ground reaction force peaks were found to be statistically different during fast walking, but only between isolated stiffness conditions. Thus, altering longitudinal prosthesis stiffness produced no appreciable change in gait biomechanics.Conclusion:Prosthesis stiffness does not appear to substantially influence shock absorption in transtibial prosthesis users.Clinical relevanceVarying the level of longitudinal prosthesis stiffness did not meaningfully influence gait biomechanics at self-selected walking speeds. Thus, as currently prescribed within a transtibial prosthesis, adding longitudinal stiffness in isolation may not provide the anticipated shock absorption benefits. Further research into residual limb properties and compensatory mechanisms is needed.

scholarly journals External kinetics of the kettlebell snatch in trained athletes

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A Ross ◽  
Justin W L Keogh ◽  
Cameron J Wilson ◽  
Christian Lorenzen
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Force ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Lateral Force ◽  
Applied Force ◽  
Maximum Acceleration ◽  
Training Tool ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Infrared Cameras

Background. Kettlebell lifting has gained increased popularity as both a form of resistance training and as a sport, despite the paucity of literature validating its use as a training tool. Kettlebell sport requires participants to complete the kettlebell snatch continuously over prolonged periods of time. Kettlebell sport and weightlifting involve similar exercises, however their traditional uses suggest they are better suited to training different fitness qualities. This study examined the three dimensional ground reaction force (GRF) and force applied to the kettlebell over a six minute kettlebell snatch set in 12 kettlebell trained males. Methods. During this set, VICON was used to record the kettlebell trajectory with nine infrared cameras while the GRF of each leg was recorded with a separate AMTI force plate. Over the course of the set, an average of 13.9 ± 3.3 repetitions per minute were performed with a 24 kg kettlebell. Significance was evaluated with a two-way ANOVA and paired t-tests, whilst Cohen’s F (ESF) and Cohen’s D (ESD) were used to determine the magnitude. Results. The applied force at the point of maximum acceleration was 814 ± 75 N and 885 ± 86 N for the downwards and upwards phases, respectively. The absolute peak resultant bilateral GRF was 1746 ± 217 N and 1768 ± 242 N for the downwards and upwards phases, respectively. Bilateral GRF of the first and last 14 repetitions was found to be similar, however there was a significant difference in the peak applied force (F (1.11) = 7.42, p = 0.02, ESF = 0.45). Unilateral GRF was found have a significant difference for the absolute anterior-posterior (F (1.11) = 885.15 p < 0.0001, ESF = 7.00) and medio-lateral force vectors (F (1.11) = 5.31, p = 0.042, ESF = 0.67). Discussion. Over the course of a single repetition there were significant differences in the GRF and applied force at multiple points of the kettlebells trajectory. The kettlebell snatch loads each leg differently throughout a repetition and performing the kettlebell snatch for six minutes will result in a reduction in peak applied force.

Effects of gastrocnemius stretching with talus-stabilizing taping on ankle dorsiflexion and balance in individuals with limited ankle dorsiflexion: A randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jong-Chul Jung ◽  
Yong-Il Shin ◽  
Da-In An ◽  
Won-Young Park ◽  
Soo-Yong Kim
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Ankle Dorsiflexion ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Balance Test ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Repeated Measures Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND: Various interventions have been recommended to increase ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (DFROM); however, few studies have investigated the long-term effects of applying gastrocnemius stretching with talus-stabilizing taping (GSTST). OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of gastrocnemius stretching (GS) and GSTST on DFROM and balance in subjects with limited DFROM. METHODS: Twenty-six subjects with limited DFROM were randomly allocated to either the GS group (n= 13) or GSTST group (n= 13) for 6 weeks. Maximum DFROM before heel-off during gait, passive DFROM, posterior talar glide, flexibility of the gastrocnemius, and the lower-quarter Y-balance test (YBT-LQ) were assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the changes in variables. RESULTS: The GSTST group had greater maximum DFROM before heel-off, passive DFROM, and posterior talar glide than the GS group. Gastrocnemius flexibility and YBT-LQ scores increased significantly post-intervention in both groups; however, there was no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: GSTST is recommend for improving ankle DFROM and balance in subjects with limited DFROM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document