scholarly journals SMC5/6 is required for replication fork stability and faithful chromosome segregation during neurogenesis

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alisa Atkins ◽  
Michelle J Xu ◽  
Maggie Li ◽  
Nathaniel P Rogers ◽  
Marina V Pryzhkova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Neural Progenitor Cell ◽  
Cortical Layer ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Dna Replication Stress ◽  
Developing Neocortex

Mutations of SMC5/6 components cause developmental defects, including primary microcephaly. To model neurodevelopmental defects, we engineered a mouse wherein Smc5 is conditionally knocked out (cKO) in the developing neocortex. Smc5 cKO mice exhibited neurodevelopmental defects due to neural progenitor cell (NPC) apoptosis, which led to reduction in cortical layer neurons. Smc5 cKO NPCs formed DNA bridges during mitosis and underwent chromosome missegregation. SMC5/6 depletion triggers a CHEK2-p53 DNA damage response, as concomitant deletion of the Trp53 tumor suppressor or Chek2 DNA damage checkpoint kinase rescued Smc5 cKO neurodevelopmental defects. Further assessment using Smc5 cKO and auxin-inducible degron systems demonstrated that absence of SMC5/6 leads to DNA replication stress at late-replicating regions such as pericentromeric heterochromatin. In summary, SMC5/6 is important for completion of DNA replication prior to entering mitosis, which ensures accurate chromosome segregation. Thus, SMC5/6 functions are critical in highly proliferative stem cells during organism development.

scholarly journals Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response

2012 ◽  
Vol 443 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Jones ◽  
Eva Petermann
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Damage Response

Prevention and repair of DNA damage is essential for maintenance of genomic stability and cell survival. DNA replication during S-phase can be a source of DNA damage if endogenous or exogenous stresses impair the progression of replication forks. It has become increasingly clear that DNA-damage-response pathways do not only respond to the presence of damaged DNA, but also modulate DNA replication dynamics to prevent DNA damage formation during S-phase. Such observations may help explain the developmental defects or cancer predisposition caused by mutations in DNA-damage-response genes. The present review focuses on molecular mechanisms by which DNA-damage-response pathways control and promote replication dynamics in vertebrate cells. In particular, DNA damage pathways contribute to proper replication by regulating replication initiation, stabilizing transiently stalled forks, promoting replication restart and facilitating fork movement on difficult-to-replicate templates. If replication fork progression fails to be rescued, this may lead to DNA damage and genomic instability via nuclease processing of aberrant fork structures or incomplete sister chromatid separation during mitosis.

scholarly journals Dissecting DNA damage response pathways by analysing protein localization and abundance changes during DNA replication stress

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 966-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johnny M. Tkach ◽  
Askar Yimit ◽  
Anna Y. Lee ◽  
Michael Riffle ◽  
Michael Costanzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Protein Localization ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Dna Replication Stress

scholarly journals Banp regulates DNA damage response and chromosome segregation during the cell cycle in zebrafish retina

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swathy Babu ◽  
Yuki Takeuchi ◽  
Ichiro Masai
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Dna Damage Responses

Btg3-associated nuclear protein (Banp) was originally identified as a nuclear matrix-associated protein and it functions as a tumor suppressor. At molecular level, Banp regulates transcription of metabolic genes via a CGCG-containing motif called the Banp motif. However, its physiological roles in embryonic development are unknown. Here we report that Banp is indispensable for DNA damage response and chromosome segregation during mitosis. Zebrafish banp mutants show mitotic arrest and apoptosis in developing retina. We found that DNA replication stress and tp53-dependent DNA damage responses were activated to induce apoptosis in banp mutants, suggesting that Banp is required for integrity of DNA replication and DNA damage repair. Furthermore, in banp mutants, chromosome segregation was not smoothly processed from prometaphase to anaphase, leading to a prolonged M-phase. Our RNA- and ATAC-sequencing identified 31 candidates for direct Banp target genes that carry the Banp motif. Interestingly, two chromosome segregation regulators, cenpt and ncapg, are included in this list. Thus, Banp directly regulates transcription of cenpt and ncapg to promote chromosome segregation during mitosis. Our findings provide the first in vivo evidence that Banp is required for cell-cycle progression and cell survival by regulating DNA damage responses and chromosome segregation during mitosis.

Succinylation at a key residue of FEN1 is involved in the DNA damage response to maintain genome stability

2020 ◽  
Vol 319 (4) ◽  
pp. C657-C666
Author(s):  
Rongyi Shi ◽  
Yiyi Wang ◽  
Ya Gao ◽  
Xiaoli Xu ◽  
Shuyu Mao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Dna Replication And Repair ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks ◽  
Maintain Genome Stability

Human flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) is a structure-specific, multifunctional endonuclease essential for DNA replication and repair. Our previous study showed that in response to DNA damage, FEN1 interacts with the PCNA-like Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 complex instead of PCNA to engage in DNA repair activities, such as stalled DNA replication fork repair, and undergoes SUMOylation by SUMO-1. Here, we report that succinylation of FEN1 was stimulated in response to DNA replication fork-stalling agents, such as ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, hydroxyurea, camptothecin, and mitomycin C. K200 is a key succinylation site of FEN1 that is essential for gap endonuclease activity and could be suppressed by methylation and stimulated by phosphorylation to promote SUMO-1 modification. Succinylation at K200 of FEN1 promoted the interaction of FEN1 with the Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 complex to rescue stalled replication forks. Impairment of FEN1 succinylation led to the accumulation of DNA damage and heightened sensitivity to fork-stalling agents. Altogether, our findings suggest an important role of FEN1 succinylation in regulating its roles in DNA replication and repair, thus maintaining genome stability.

scholarly journals A Degenerate PCNA-Interacting Peptide (DPIP) box targets RNF168 to replicating DNA to limit 53BP1 signaling

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Yang ◽  
Deepika Jayaprakash ◽  
Robert Hollingworth ◽  
Steven Chen ◽  
Amy Jablonski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
S Phase ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Phase Functions

The E3 ligase RNF168 has been suggested to have roles at DNA replication forks in addition to its canonical functions in DNA double-strand break (DSB) signaling. However, the precise role of RNF168 in DNA replication remains unclear. Here we demonstrate that RNF168 is recruited to DNA replication factories independent of the canonical DSB response pathway regulators and identify a degenerate PCNA-Interacting Peptide (DPIP) motif in the C-terminus of RNF168 which mediates its binding to PCNA. An RNF168 mutant harboring substitutions in the DPIP box fails to interact with PCNA and is not recruited to sites of DNA synthesis, yet fully retains its ability to promote DSB-induced 53BP1 foci. Surprisingly, the RNF168 DPIP mutant also retains the ability to support ongoing DNA replication fork movement, demonstrating that PCNA-binding is dispensable for normal S-phase functions. However, replisome-associated RNF168 functions to suppress the DSB-induced 53BP1 DNA damage response during S-phase. Moreover, we show that WT RNF168 can perform PCNA ubiquitylation independently of RAD18 and also synergizes with RAD18 to amplify PCNA ubiquitylation. Taken together, our results identify non-canonical functions of RNF168 at the replication fork and demonstrate new mechanisms of cross talk between the DNA damage and replication stress response pathways.

scholarly journals SAMHD1 promotes oncogene-induced replication stress

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Si Min Zhang ◽  
Jose M Calderón-Montaño ◽  
Sean G Rudd
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Potential Role ◽  
Human Fibroblasts ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Oncogenic Ras ◽  
Dna Replication Stress

AbstractOncogenes induce DNA replication stress in cancer cells. Although this was established more than a decade ago, we are still unravelling the molecular underpinnings of this phenomenon, which will be critical if we are to exploit this knowledge to improve cancer treatment. A key mediator of oncogene-induced replication stress is the availability of DNA precursors, which will limit ongoing DNA synthesis by cellular replicases. In this study, we identify a potential role for nucleotide catabolism in promoting replication stress induced by oncogenes. Specifically, we establish that the dNTPase SAMHD1 slows DNA replication fork speeds in human fibroblasts harbouring an oncogenic RAS allele, elevating levels of endogenous DNA damage, and ultimately limiting cell proliferation. We then show that oncogenic RAS-driven tumours express reduced SAMHD1 levels, suggesting they have overcome this tumour suppressor barrier, and that this correlates with worse overall survival for these patients.Abstract Figure

scholarly journals Adenovirus E1B 55-Kilodalton Protein Targets SMARCAL1 for Degradation during Infection and Modulates Cellular DNA Replication

2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reshma Nazeer ◽  
Fadi S. I. Qashqari ◽  
Abeer S. Albalawi ◽  
Ann Liza Piberger ◽  
Maria Teresa Tilotta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Viral Replication ◽  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Adenovirus E1b ◽  
Cellular Dna

ABSTRACT Here, we show that the cellular DNA replication protein and ATR substrate SMARCAL1 is recruited to viral replication centers early during adenovirus infection and is then targeted in an E1B-55K/E4orf6- and cullin RING ligase-dependent manner for proteasomal degradation. In this regard, we have determined that SMARCAL1 is phosphorylated at S123, S129, and S173 early during infection in an ATR- and CDK-dependent manner, and that pharmacological inhibition of ATR and CDK activities attenuates SMARCAL1 degradation. SMARCAL1 recruitment to viral replication centers was shown to be largely dependent upon SMARCAL1 association with the RPA complex, while Ad-induced SMARCAL1 phosphorylation also contributed to SMARCAL1 recruitment to viral replication centers, albeit to a limited extent. SMARCAL1 was found associated with E1B-55K in adenovirus E1-transformed cells. Consistent with its ability to target SMARCAL1, we determined that E1B-55K modulates cellular DNA replication. As such, E1B-55K expression initially enhances cellular DNA replication fork speed but ultimately leads to increased replication fork stalling and the attenuation of cellular DNA replication. Therefore, we propose that adenovirus targets SMARCAL1 for degradation during infection to inhibit cellular DNA replication and promote viral replication. IMPORTANCE Viruses have evolved to inhibit cellular DNA damage response pathways that possess antiviral activities and utilize DNA damage response pathways that possess proviral activities. Adenovirus has evolved, primarily, to inhibit DNA damage response pathways by engaging with the ubiquitin-proteasome system and promoting the degradation of key cellular proteins. Adenovirus differentially regulates ATR DNA damage response signaling pathways during infection. The cellular adenovirus E1B-55K binding protein E1B-AP5 participates in ATR signaling pathways activated during infection, while adenovirus 12 E4orf6 negates Chk1 activation by promoting the proteasome-dependent degradation of the ATR activator TOPBP1. The studies detailed here indicate that adenovirus utilizes ATR kinase and CDKs during infection to promote the degradation of SMARCAL1 to attenuate normal cellular DNA replication. These studies further our understanding of the relationship between adenovirus and DNA damage and cell cycle signaling pathways during infection and establish new roles for E1B-55K in the modulation of cellular DNA replication.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document