scholarly journals How CSR Moderates the Impact of Basic Industry and Chemicals Companies' Values in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
pp. 66-79
Author(s):  
Widya Sari ◽  
Leondy Wijaya ◽  
Sherly . ◽  
Sally Sofian
Keyword(s):  
Firm Value ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
P Value ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Basic Industry ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Positive Effect

The purpose of this study was to see how the influence of profitability and corporate governance on firm value with or without CSR as a moderating variable. The researchers collected data on companies in the Basic Industry and Chemicals sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange by accessing the website www.idx.co.id.  The population in this study consisted of 80 companies and a sample of 27 companies with a five-year research period. The research method used was quantitative, utilizing data analysis techniques based on the Partial Least Squares (PLS) model and Smart PLS software. The results showed that institutional ownership (p-value 0.064) has no effect on firm value, managerial ownership (p-value 0.462) has no effect on firm value, independent commissioners (p-value 0.836) has no effect on firm value, ROE (p-value 0.119) has no effect on firm value and the audit committee (p-value 0.012) has a positive effect on firm value, institutional ownership with CSR as a moderating variable (p-value 0.756) has no effect on firm value, managerial ownership with CSR as a moderating variable (p -value 0.141) has no effect on firm value, the audit committee with CSR as a moderating variable (p-value 0.084) has no effect on firm value, independent commissioners with CSR as a moderating variable (p-value 0.745) has no effect on firm value, ROE with CSR as a moderating variable (p-value 1.906) has no effect on firm value an, institutional ownership (P-value = 894) has no effect on CSR, managerial ownership (P-value = .361) has no effect on the audit committee CSR (P-value = .984) has no effect on CSR,  Independent Commissioner (P- value = .000) has a negative effect on CSR, ROE (P-value = .001) has a negative effect on CSR, CSR (P-value = .018) has a positive effect on firm value.

Analisis Pengaruh Kepemilikan Blockholder, Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kepemilikan Institusional, dan Komite Audit terhadap Nilai Perusahaan

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-121
Author(s):  
Iwan Wirawardhana ◽  
Meco Sitardja
Keyword(s):  
Firm Value ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Estimation Model ◽  
Effect Model ◽  
Positive Effect

The aim of this study is to analyse the effect of Blockholder Ownership, Managerial Ownership,Institutional Ownership, and Audit Committee towards Firm Value. The background of this research isthe agency theory and ownership theory. The population in this study are 46 property companies listedon the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period 2012-2016. By using purposive samplingtechnique, 35 companies are qualified as data samples. This research uses the random effect model asthe estimation model and multiple regression as the method of analysis. The results of this study showsthat Institutional Ownership has a positive effect on Firm Value. Meanwhile, Blockholder Ownership,Managerial Ownership, and Audit Committee have no effect on Firm Value. Moreover, the F-testimplies that the variables, blockholder ownership, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, andaudit committee, simultaneously influence firm value.

scholarly journals PENGARUH PROFITABILITAS DAN GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-173
Author(s):  
Rama Andi Wiguna ◽  
Muhammad Yusuf
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Significant Positive Effect ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Positive Effect

This research aimed to get empirical evidence about the effect of profitability and good corporate governance as proxied by the proportion of independent board commissioners, number of board commissioners meetings, proportion of audit committee, number of audit committee meetings, managerial ownersip and institutional ownership. The population of this research was companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016-2017. The sample of this research was fixed by purposive sampling method so that was found 88 samples. Technique of data analysis was multiple linear regression. The result of research showed that profibility, the proportion of independent board commissioners, proporsion of audit committee, managerial ownership and institutional ownership had significant positive effect on firm value, while commissioners meetings and audit committee meetings had no effect on firm value

scholarly journals Pengaruh Pengungkapan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Perioda 2013-2017

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 228
Author(s):  
Stevi Jimry Poluan ◽  
Arya Aditya Wicaksono
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Hypothesis Testing ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Impact

This study aims to prove the impact of Good Corporate Governance on Firm Value in Badan Usaha Milik Negara that listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange. This study used 4 varibles that represented Good Corporate Governance which is Managerial Ownership, Institusional Ownership, Board of Independent Commissioner, and Audit Committee. Meanwhile Tobin’s Q ratio used to counted Firm Value. Population of this research are all Badan Usaha Milik Negara that listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange on 2013 until 2017. There are 20 firm are listed. The total samples are 16 firms selected by using purposive sampling method. Data anlysis and hypothesis testing using multiple regression. From 4 variable that used in this research only 2 that had an effect on firm value. There were Institusional Ownership and Audit Committee. This research prove that Institusional Ownership has a positive and significant effect on firm value. Audit Committee had a negative and insignificant effect on firm value. Other 2 variable like Managerial Ownership, Board of Independent Commissioner  has not effect on firm value, while Audit Committee has negative effect on firm value.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Financial Distress, Ukuran Perusahaan, dan Corporate Governance pada Audit Delay

2019 ◽  
pp. 2154
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Shinta Oktaviani ◽  
Dodik Ariyanto
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Positive Effect

This study aims to determine the effect of financial distress, company size, and corporate governance on audit delay. This research was conducted at mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2017. The number of samples taken was 32 companies so that there were 96 observations, with a purposive sampling method. The analysis technique used in this study is multiple linear regression. Based on the results of the analysis found that financial distress and independent board of commissioners have positive effect on audit delay. Firm size, audit committee and institutional ownership have negative effect on audit delay. Keywords: Financial distress, firm size, corporate governance, audit delay

scholarly journals Analysis of Corporate Governance, Leverage and Company Size on the Integrity of Financial Statements

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Aina Zahra Parinduri ◽  
Risma Koeshartanti Pratiwi ◽  
Oktavina Ika Purwaningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Company Size ◽  
Positive Effect

<p>The purpose of this study is to find empirical evidence of the effect of good corporate governance (Independent Board of Commissioners, Audit Committee, managerial ownership, institutional ownership), Leverage and Company Size on the integrity of financial statements. The sample used in the study was 33 companies listed in the LQ45 category on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2015-2017 period. This study uses the method of multiple linear regression analysis. The analytical tool used for hypothesis testing is SPSS 25. The results of this study indicate that the independent board of commissioners has a positive effect on the integrity of financial statements, institutional ownership has a positive effect on the integrity of financial statements. However, the audit committee, managerial ownership, leverage and company size have no influence on the integrity of financial statements.</p>

scholarly journals PENGARUH KOMPETENSI KOMITE AUDIT, KEPEMILIKAN MANAJEMEN DAN UKURAN DEWAN KOMISARIS TERHADAP KUALITAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-132
Author(s):  
WAHDAN ARUM INAWATI ◽  
MUHAMAD MUSLIH ◽  
KURNIA KURNIA
Keyword(s):  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Management Ownership ◽  
Food And Beverage ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Positive Effect

This research aims to determine the influence of audit committee competency, managerial ownership, and size board of financial statements quality. Financial statement quality in this research measured by relevance. The research method applied quantitative causality method. The object of research is the food and beverage subsector companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in period 2015 – 2018. The sample of this research which complied 8 samples with period of 4 years, so the data processed 32 data. The result of this research 62.1% independent variables can explain the quality of financial statements, while 37.9% is explained by other variables not included in this research. The audit committee competency variables, management ownership and the size of the board of commissioners have a simultaneous influence on the quality of financial statements. The audit committee competency variable has a negative effect while the size of the board of commissioners has a positive effect on the quality of financial statements partially. While management ownership has no influence on the quality of financial statements.

Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eko Hariyanto
Keyword(s):  
Firm Size ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Accounting Conservatism ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Ratio Data ◽  
Property Companies ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Positive Effect

This study aims to analyze whether the factors that affect accounting conservatism. Data is taken from secondary data on real estate and property companies that have sold their shares on the Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2016 to 2019, the number of selected samples is 23 companies. The variables used are profitability, firm size, institutional ownership and managerial ownership. All variables are measured by ratio data. Data analysis using multiple regression which is processed by the SPSS program.The results showed that profitability and managerial ownership had a positive effect on accounting conservatism. Firm size has a negative effect on accounting conservatism, while institutional ownership has no effect on accounting conservatism.

PENGARUH PROFITABILITAS, STRUKTUR MODAL DAN KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL TERHADAP RETURN SAHAM DENGAN NILAI PERUSAHAAN SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERATING (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Sektor Pertanian di BEI)

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Rossy Novia Ellidianti ◽  
Murhaban Murhaban ◽  
Andria Zulfa
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Panel Data Regression ◽  
Data Regression ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Positive Effect

This study aims to examine the effect of profitability, capital structure and managerial ownership on stock return with firm value as a moderator veriable in Agricultural Companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2009-2018. The number of samples in this study are 10 agricultural companies in the Indonesia Stock Exchange obtained by using purposive sampling technique. Data analysis method used is Panel Data Regression. The results of this study prove that capital structure has negative effect on stock returns, firm value has positive effect on stock returns, profitability and managerial ownership have no significant effect on stock returns. Meanwhile, the moderating effect test prove that firm value is able to moderate the effect of profitability on stock returns, but is unable to moderate the effect of capital structure and managerial ownership on stock returns

scholarly journals Influence of Corporate Governance on Firm Value Through Intellectual Capital and Corporate Social Responsibility

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 148
Author(s):  
Zainab Masitha ◽  
Djuminah
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Positive Effect

This study aims to find out empirical evidence about the influence of corporate governance on firm value through intellectual capital and corporate social responsibility. The sample used in this study amounted to 123 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange continuously during the period 2015-2017 using purposive sampling technique. This study uses quantitative methods with secondary data obtained from annual reports that have been published by the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2015-2017, which can be accessed through www.idx.co.id. Data analysis in this study uses Structural Equation Modeling based on Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) with SmartPLS 3.0 software.The results showed that the board of commissioners had a significant negative effect on intellectual capital and had a significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility. Board of Commissioners has a significant positive effect on intellectual capital and has a significant negative effect on corporate social responsibility. The board of commissioners, audit committees, intellectual capital and corporate social responsibility have a positive and significant effect on firm value. Intellectual capital is not able to mediate the relationship between the board of commissioners and firm value, as well as the relationship of the audit committee to firm value. CSR is not able to mediate the relationship between the board of commissioners and firm value and the relationship between the audit committee and firm value.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance pada Nilai Perusahaan dengan Kinerja Keuangan sebagai Variabel Mediasi

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 388
Author(s):  
Gede Marco Pradana Dika Putra ◽  
Ni Gusti Putu Wirawati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Positive Effect

A firm not only aims to get profits but also maximize its value  which can be reflected in stock price. Research aims to examine the effect of good corporate governance on firm value with financial performance as a mediating variable. The study conducted on LQ45 companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2018. Sample determined by purposive sampling with 32 samples. Path analysis was used. analysis showed managerial ownership and institutional ownership had no effect on financial performance, managerial ownership and institutional ownership had no effect on firm value, financial performance had a positive effect on firm value, and financial performance was unable to mediate the relationship between GCG and firm value. Keywords: Good Corporate Governance; Firm Value.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document