Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome caused by minodronic acid hydrate

Background Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS)/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is an important adverse reaction caused by a few drugs. Reactivation of human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) is known to be associated with its pathogenesis. DIHS occasionally manifests as pulmonary lesions with a variety of imaging findings. Case presentation An 83-year-old woman started taking minodronic acid hydrate 5 years before admission. She noticed a generalized skin rash 44 days before admission and started oral betamethasone-d-chlorpheniramine maleate combination tablets for allergic dermatitis. She developed a fever and cough in addition to the rash, and was referred to our hospital. Laboratory data showed a high level of eosinophils and liver and biliary enzymes. Computed tomography (CT) studies revealed bilateral diffuse ground-glass opacities with ill-defined centrilobular nodules from the central to peripheral regions of the lungs. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy specimens showed that lymphocyte infiltration was observed in the alveolar walls and fibrinous exudates and floating macrophages in the alveolar lumina. Immunohistochemistry of biopsy specimens showed more CD4+ lymphocytes than CD8+ lymphocytes, while few Foxp3+ lymphocytes were recognized. The serum anti-HHV-6 immunoglobulin G titer increased at 3 weeks after the first test. Based on these findings, we diagnosed her with DIHS. We continued care without using corticosteroids since there was no worsening of breathing or skin condition. Eventually, her clinical symptoms chest CT had improved. Minodronic acid hydrate was identified as the culprit drug based on the positive results of the patch test and drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test. Conclusions We described the first case of DIHS caused by minodronic acid hydrate. Lung lesions in DIHS can present with bilateral diffuse ground-glass opacities and ill-defined centrilobular nodules on a CT scan during the recovery phase. Clinicians should be aware of DIHS, even if patients are not involved with typical DIHS/DRESS-causing drugs.

Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome following meningitis and systemic lymphadenopathy with persistent Toxoplasma immunoglobulin M: a case report

Background Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome is a rare lymphocyte-related oculorenal inflammatory disease presumed to be associated with drug use and infectious agents. Toxoplasma gondii is one of such pathogens that could exhibit encephalitis, meningitis, and uveitis in immunocompromised or in some immunocompetent individuals. If the immunoglobulin M of Toxoplasma is positive on screening, the interpretation of the result is not simple, especially when immunoglobulin M stays positive persistently. Case presentation A 34-year-old Asian male developed fever, headache, and lymphadenopathy with tenderness, which was initially diagnosed as meningitis. Antibiotics were started, and diclofenac sodium was used for the fever. Although his symptoms were alleviated in a week by the treatment, gradual decline in renal function was noted, prompting a renal biopsy that indicated acute granulomatous interstitial nephritis. A week later, tenderness in both eyes with blurred vision appeared and revealed iritis and keratic precipitations in both eyes; hence, the diagnosis of acute tubulointerstitial nephritis and bilateral uveitis syndrome was made. Toxoplasma gondii-specific immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M titers were both positive. Although we could not rule out recent infection of Toxoplasma gondii, which may cause uveitis initially, Toxoplasma immunoglobulin G avidity test indicated a distant infection, which allowed us to rule out meningitis and uveitis as responsible for the complication of recent Toxoplasma gondii infection. Drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test, or lymphocyte transformation test of diclofenac sodium, was solely positive among the tested drugs. Uveitis was alleviated only with ophthalmic steroid, and renal function returned to normal without administration of systemic steroid. Conclusions We experienced a case of diclofenac-induced tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome. In ruling out infections, Toxoplasma immunoglobulin M was persistently positive, and Toxoplasma immunoglobulin G avidity test indicated a “distant” infection. From these two results, we ruled out recent infection. However, it should be noted that “distant” infection indicated by commercial immunoglobulin G avidity is still a multiplex profile consisting of reinfection, reactivation, and latent infection. Narrowing down the infection profile of Toxoplasma is challenging in some cases. Therefore, careful diagnosis and extended follow-up of such patients are needed.

First Report of Erythema Multiforme Minor Caused by Raloxifene Hydrochloride

Raloxifene is a drug used in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Although hot flashes are known side effects of raloxifene, to the best of our knowledge, erythema multiforme (EM) minor has not been previously reported. Herein, we report about a 74-year-old woman who developed EM minor after the drug alfacalcidol was changed to raloxifene to treat osteoporosis. Skin biopsy revealed a suspicious eczematous drug reaction. The drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test showed a positive result. The stimulation index was 2.2, and there were no other suspected drugs. Based on these results, we diagnosed the condition as EM minor caused by raloxifene. The patient’s symptoms disappeared after the use of antihistamine drugs and topical steroids. In conclusion, raloxifene can cause EM minor in rare cases.

Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis associated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody following cimetidine treatment: a case report

Background Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis usually induces rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, including pauci-immune necrotizing crescentic glomerulonephritis. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN), which is often drug-induced, is a frequent cause of kidney injury. However, ATIN associated with ANCA without any glomerular lesions has been rarely reported, and drug-induced ATIN associated with ANCA is not well recognized. Here we present a case of an older woman with ATIN associated with myeloperoxidase-ANCA (MPO-ANCA) following cimetidine treatment. Case presentation A 70-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital due to acute kidney injury and mild proteinuria. She had a one-year history of chronic thyroiditis and dyslipidemia, for which she was taking levothyroxine sodium and atorvastatin, respectively. Two weeks before admission she had started cimetidine, methylmethionine sulfonium chloride, and itopride hydrochloride for gastric discomfort persistent since a month. She had experienced fatigue for two weeks and later appetite loss. The patient demonstrated a positive titer for MPO-ANCA (192 IU/mL) and a positive drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test for cimetidine. She underwent two kidney biopsies that revealed ATIN without any glomerular lesions. Despite discontinuation of cimetidine on admission, renal injury continued with the presence of high MPO-ANCA titer. Oral steroid treatment was closely related with the recovery of her renal function and disappearance of MPO-ANCA. Conclusions In this case, ATIN presented as sustained renal insufficiency and high MPO-ANCA titer despite withdrawal of cimetidine. Therefore, we reason that the development of ANCA-associated ATIN was caused by cimetidine. Serologic follow-up with measurement of MPO-ANCA titers and renal biopsy are recommended when the clinical history is inconsistent with the relatively benign course of drug-induced ATIN.

Maternal mesalazine-induced neonatal gastrointestinal bleeding

Ulcerative colitis often develops in the reproductive age women and can cause exacerbation by pregnancy. Mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid) is recommended as a safe anti-inflammatory drug during pregnancy. However, maternal mesalazine is transferred to the fetus through the placenta and may cause allergic events. A pregnant woman with severe ulcerative colitis was treated with a dose of mesalazine 4,000 mg/day from early gestation to delivery. Immediately after birth, the preterm neonate vomited bloody contents and discharged massive gross haematochezia. Serum concentrations of mesalazine and its main metabolite were high in the mother and the umbilical cord. Faecal eosinophils and drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test suggested possibility that sensitisation with mesalazine in utero caused allergic enterocolitis like food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis. Maternal mesalazine has a potential of fetal sensitisation and cause allergic disease.

Non–IgE- or Mixed IgE/Non–IgE-Mediated Gastrointestinal Food Allergies in the First Years of Life: Old and New Tools for Diagnosis

non-IgE and mixed gastrointestinal food allergies present various specific, well-characterized clinical pictures such as food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis, food protein-induced enterocolitis and food protein-induced enteropathy syndrome as well as eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders such as eosinophilic esophagitis, allergic eosinophilic gastroenteritis and eosinophilic colitis. The aim of this article is to provide an updated review of their different clinical presentations, to suggest a correct approach to their diagnosis and to discuss the usefulness of both old and new diagnostic tools, including fecal biomarkers, atopy patch tests, endoscopy, specific IgG and IgG4 testing, allergen-specific lymphocyte stimulation test (ALST) and clinical score (CoMiss).

Mesalazine allergy and an attempt at desensitization therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Mesalazine is a key drug used for remission induction and maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We sometimes encounter patients who develop allergic reactions to the drug and inevitably discontinue treatment. Of 692 patients who received mesalazine for IBD between 2014 and March 2020, 33 diagnosed with mesalazine allergy (43 episodes) were included, and their clinical manifestations were evaluated. For ten patients undergoing desensitization therapy, therapeutic outcomes were evaluated. The incidence of mesalazine allergy was 4.8%. The time from the start of oral medication to allergy onset was 10 ± 5 days for the first allergic attack and 2 ± 1 days for the second and subsequent allergic attacks. The observed clinical symptoms included fever (93%), diarrhea (26%), abdominal pain (23%), and bloody stool (12%). Drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test was performed in 85% of the patients (28/33), and the sensitivity was 51%. Desensitization therapy with a time-dependent mesalazine granule formulation was successful in nine of the ten patients (90%), allowing them to receive 2000 mg or more of the drug. Fever was a common allergic symptom, and its presence appeared to be useful for distinguishing mesalazine allergy from exacerbation of the primary disease. Desensitization therapy was useful in patients with mesalazine allergy.

Lymphocyte stimulation test in the diagnostics of adverse reactions to antituberculouse line 1 and 2 drugs

Adverse drug reactions to anti-TB drugs (ADR) are found in 6-20% of patients and have various clinical manifestations and are detected in the lymphocyte stimulation test (LST), recorded by the incorporation on H3 thymidine, but nowadays it has significant limitations. We used LST with WST-1 reagent to detect ADR to the main 1-st and 2-nd line antituberculosis drugs in 11 tuberculosis patients who had ADR (6 - hepatotoxic reaction, 3 - blood eosinophilia and 2 - with joint pain syndrome). 6 people with tuberculosis contacts made up the control group. LST evaluation with WST-1 showed that in patients with a hepatotoxic reaction, the SI index was>2 and exceeded the values in the control group (3.28±0.59, 95% CI-1.16 and 0, 74±0.16, 95% CI - 0.31, respectively) upon stimulation of cell cultures with rifampicin alone but not with other drugs. Cell cultures stimulated with the PHA mitogen have SI >2 in ADR patients (mainly with hepatotoxic reactions). Control group SI was <2 (4,93±0.53, 95% CI - 1, 04 and 1.97±0.3, 95% CI - 0.59, respectively). We have not detected PPD-L cell cultures stimulation with WST-1 reagent both in the group of patients with ADR and the control group. In patients with eosinophilia and joint pain syndrome SI was low for all studied drugs and did not differ from the control group. The sensitivity of the LST test with WST-1 reagent is not sufficient to determine ADR to anti-TB drugs.