Challenge Tooth Regeneration in Adult Dogs with Dental Pulp Stem Cells on 3D-Printed Hydroxyapatite/Polylactic Acid Scaffolds

Tooth regeneration is an important issue. The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of using adult dental pulp stem cells on polylactic acid scaffolds for tooth regeneration. Three teeth were extracted from each side of the lower jaws of two adult dogs. In the experimental group, dental pulp stem cells were isolated and seeded in the 3D-printed hydroxyapatite/polylactic acid (HA/PLA) scaffolds for transplantation into left lower jaw of each dog. The right-side jaw of each dog was transplanted with cell-free scaffolds as the control group. Polychrome sequentially labeling was performed for observation of mineralization. Dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) irradiation was used for assessment. Nine months after surgery, dogs were euthanized, and the lower jaws of dogs were sectioned and fixed for histological observation with hematoxylin and eosin staining. The results showed that the degree of mineralization in the experimental group with cells seeded in the scaffolds was significantly higher than that of the control group transplanted with cell-free scaffolds. However, the HA/PLA scaffolds were not completely absorbed in both groups. It is concluded that dental pulp stem cells are important for the mineralization of tooth regeneration. A more rapid absorbable material was required for scaffold design for tooth regeneration.

Spatiotemporal Changes in Transcriptome of Odontogenic and Non-odontogenic Regions in the Dental Arch of Mus musculus

Over the past 40 years, studies on tooth regeneration have been conducted. These studies comprised two main flows: some focused on epithelial–mesenchymal interaction in the odontogenic region, whereas others focused on creating a supernumerary tooth in the non-odontogenic region. Recently, the scope of the research has moved from conventional gene modification and molecular therapy to genome and transcriptome sequencing analyses. However, these sequencing data have been produced only in the odontogenic region. We provide RNA-Seq data of not only the odontogenic region but also the non-odontogenic region, which loses tooth-forming capacity during development and remains a rudiment. Sequencing data were collected from mouse embryos at three different stages of tooth development. These data will expand our understanding of tooth development and will help in designing developmental and regenerative studies from a new perspective.

Distinct tooth regeneration systems deploy a conserved battery of genes

BackgroundVertebrate teeth exhibit a wide range of regenerative systems. Many species, including most mammals, reptiles, and amphibians, form replacement teeth at a histologically distinct location called the successional dental lamina, while other species do not employ such a system. Notably, a ‘lamina-less’ tooth replacement condition is found in a paraphyletic array of ray-finned fishes, such as stickleback, trout, cod, medaka, and bichir. Furthermore, the position, renewal potential, and latency times appear to vary drastically across different vertebrate tooth regeneration systems. The progenitor cells underlying tooth regeneration thus present highly divergent arrangements and potentials. Given the spectrum of regeneration systems present in vertebrates, it is unclear if morphologically divergent tooth regeneration systems deploy an overlapping battery of genes in their naïve dental tissues.ResultsIn the present work, we aimed to determine whether or not tooth progenitor epithelia could be composed of a conserved cell type between vertebrate dentitions with divergent regeneration systems. To address this question, we compared the pharyngeal tooth regeneration processes in two ray-finned fishes: zebrafish (Danio rerio) and threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). These two teleost species diverged approximately 250 million years ago and demonstrate some stark differences in dental morphology and regeneration. Here, we find that the naïve successional dental lamina in zebrafish expresses a battery of nine genes (bmpr1aa, bmp6, cd34, gli1, igfbp5a, lgr4, lgr6, nfatc1,andpitx2), while active Wnt signaling andLef1expression occur during early morphogenesis stages of tooth development. We also find that, despite the absence of a histologically distinct successional dental lamina in stickleback tooth fields, the same battery of nine genes (Bmpr1a,Bmp6,CD34,Gli1,Igfbp5a,Lgr4,Lgr6,Nfatc1, andPitx2) are expressed in the basalmost endodermal cell layer, which is the region most closely associated with replacement tooth germs. Like zebrafish, stickleback replacement tooth germs additionally expressLef1and exhibit active Wnt signaling. Thus, two fish systems that either have an organized successional dental lamina (zebrafish) or lack a morphologically distinct successional dental lamina (sticklebacks) deploy similar genetic programs during tooth regeneration.ConclusionsWe propose that the expression domains described here delineate a highly conserved “successional dental epithelium” (SDE). Furthermore, a set of orthologous genes is known to mark hair follicle epithelial stem cells in mice, suggesting that regenerative systems in other epithelial appendages may utilize a related epithelial progenitor cell type, despite the highly derived nature of the resulting functional organs.

REGENERACINIŲ ENDODONTINIŲ PROCEDŪRŲ VEIKSMINGUMO PALYGINIMAS, GYDANT NESUSIFORMAVUSIŲ NUOLATINIŲ DANTŲ ŠAKNŲ PULPOS NEKROZĘ

Šiuolaikinės regeneracinės endodontinės procedūros skatina naujo vaskuliarizuoto audinio susidarymą kanalo ertmėje, todėl galima tikėtis tolimesnio dantų šaknų formavimosi ir viršūninio periodontito sugijimo. Stebint tokius klinikinius bei rentgenologinius pokyčius, regeneracinės endodontinės procedūros gali būti svarstytinos kaip pirmo pasirinkimo gydymo priemonė, nuolatinių dantų nesusiformavusiose šaknyse išsivysčius pulpos nekrozei. Darbo tikslas – atlikti mokslinės literatūros analizę ir palyginti regeneracines endodontines procedūras taikant PRF, PRP, PP arba kraujo krešulį, kai gydomi nuolatiniai dantys, esant nevisiškai susiformavusioms šaknims ir pulpos nekrozei. Metodika. Atlikta elektroninė literatūros paieška anglų kalba PubMed duomenų bazėje, naudojant šias raktažodžių kombinacijas: tooth regeneration, platelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin, platelet pellet, scaffold, immature teeth. Rezultatai. Statistiškai reikšmingas danties šaknies pailgėjimas, atlikus kontrolę po vienerių metų su kraujo krešuliu, nustatytas dviejuose tyrimuose, o naudojant PRP – viename. Išvados. Atliekant regeneracines endodontines procedūras, svarbu sukurti natūralų biologinį audinio regeneravimo matriksą, kuris gali būti PRF, PRP, PP ar kraujo krešulio pavidalu. Nėra patvirtintų mokslinių įrodymų, kad danties kanale vietiškai naudojami antibiotikai teigiamai veiktų regeneracines dantų procedūras. EDTA naudojimas nerekomenduojamas.

Anti–USAG-1 therapy for tooth regeneration through enhanced BMP signaling

Uterine sensitization–associated gene-1 (USAG-1) deficiency leads to enhanced bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling, leading to supernumerary teeth formation. Furthermore, antibodies interfering with binding of USAG-1 to BMP, but not lipoprotein receptor–related protein 5/6 (LRP5/6), accelerate tooth development. Since USAG-1 inhibits Wnt and BMP signals, the essential factors for tooth development, via direct binding to BMP and Wnt coreceptor LRP5/6, we hypothesized that USAG-1 plays key regulatory roles in suppressing tooth development. However, the involvement of USAG-1 in various types of congenital tooth agenesis remains unknown. Here, we show that blocking USAG-1 function through USAG-1 knockout or anti–USAG-1 antibody administration relieves congenital tooth agenesis caused by various genetic abnormalities in mice. Our results demonstrate that USAG-1 controls the number of teeth by inhibiting development of potential tooth germs in wild-type or mutant mice missing teeth. Anti–USAG-1 antibody administration is, therefore, a promising approach for tooth regeneration therapy.

Distinct tooth regeneration systems deploy a conserved battery of genes

BackgroundVertebrate teeth exhibit a wide range of regenerative systems. Many species, including most mammals, reptiles, and amphibians, form replacement teeth at a histologically distinct location called the successional dental lamina, while other species do not employ such a system. Notably, a ‘lamina-less’ tooth replacement condition is found in a paraphyletic array of ray-finned fishes, such as stickleback, trout, cod, medaka, and bichir. Furthermore, the position, renewal potential, and latency times appear to vary drastically across different vertebrate tooth regeneration systems. The progenitor cells underlying tooth regeneration thus present highly divergent arrangements and potentials. Given the spectrum of regeneration systems present in vertebrates, it is unclear if morphologically divergent tooth regeneration systems deploy an overlapping battery of genes in their naïve dental tissues.ResultsIn the present work, we aimed to determine whether or not tooth progenitor epithelia could be composed of a conserved cell type between vertebrate dentitions with divergent regeneration systems. To address this question, we compared the tooth regeneration processes in two ray-finned fishes: zebrafish (Danio rerio) and threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). These two teleost species diverged approximately 250 million years ago, and demonstrate some stark differences in dental morphology and regeneration. Here we find that the successional dental lamina in zebrafish sharply upregulates Wnt signaling and Lef1 expression during early morphogenesis stages of tooth development. Additionally, the naïve zebrafish successional dental lamina expresses a battery of nine genes (Bmpr1a, Bmp6, CD34, Gli1, Igfbp5a, Lgr4, Lgr6, Nfatc1, and Pitx2). We also find that, despite the absence of a histologically distinct successional dental lamina in stickleback tooth fields, new tooth germs also sharply upregulate Wnt signaling and Lef1 expression, and additionally express the same battery of nine genes in the basalmost endodermal cell layer from which replacement tooth epithelia arise. Thus, two fish systems that either have an organized successional dental lamina (zebrafish) or lack a morphologically distinct successional dental lamina (sticklebacks) deploy similar genetic programs during tooth regeneration.ConclusionsWe propose that the expression domains described here delineate a highly conserved “successional dental epithelium” (SDE). Furthermore, a set of orthologous genes is known to mark hair follicle epithelial stem cells in mice, suggesting that regenerative systems in other epithelial appendages may utilize a related epithelial progenitor cell type, despite the highly derived nature of the resulting functional organs.