borosilicate glass
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1812
(FIVE YEARS 295)

H-INDEX

49
(FIVE YEARS 7)

2022 ◽  
Vol 578 ◽  
pp. 121352
Author(s):  
Ryuhei Motokawa ◽  
Koji Kaneko ◽  
Yojiro Oba ◽  
Takayuki Nagai ◽  
Yoshihiro Okamoto ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 107494
Author(s):  
Shunta Fukushima ◽  
Hirofumi Hidai ◽  
Souta Matsusaka ◽  
Akira Chiba ◽  
Noboru Morita

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J Fisher ◽  
Hao Ding ◽  
Prashant Rajbhandari ◽  
Brant Walkley ◽  
Lewis R Blackburn ◽  
...  

Within the context of the UK’s radioactive waste vitrification programme, which utilises a lithium-sodium borosilicate glass modified with CaO and ZnO to immobilise high level nuclear waste, an investigation was...


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdel-Hameed Dabbour ◽  
Sheryl Tan ◽  
Sang Ho Kim ◽  
Sarah-Jane Guild ◽  
Peter Heppner ◽  
...  

Technological advancements in electronics and micromachining now allow the development of discrete wireless brain implantable micro-devices. Applications of such devices include stimulation or sensing and could enable direct placement near regions of interest within the brain without the need for electrode leads or separate battery compartments that are at increased risk of breakage and infection. Clinical use of leadless brain implants is accompanied by novel risks, such as migration of the implant. Additionally, the encapsulation material of the implants plays an important role in mitigating unwanted tissue reactions. These risks have the potential to cause harm or reduce the service of life of the implant. In the present study, we have assessed post-implantation tissue reaction and migration of borosilicate glass-encapsulated micro-implants within the cortex of the brain. Twenty borosilicate glass-encapsulated devices (2 × 3.5 × 20 mm) were implanted into the parenchyma of 10 sheep for 6 months. Radiographs were taken directly post-surgery and at 3 and 6 months. Subsequently, sheep were euthanized, and GFAP and IBA-1 histological analysis was performed. The migration of the implants was tracked by reference to two stainless steel screws placed in the skull. We found no significant difference in fluoroscopy intensity of GFAP and a small difference in IBA-1 between implanted tissue and control. There was no glial scar formation found at the site of the implant’s track wall. Furthermore, we observed movement of up to 4.6 mm in a subset of implants in the first 3 months of implantation and no movement in any implant during the 3–6-month period of implantation. Subsequent histological analysis revealed no evidence of a migration track or tissue damage. We conclude that the implantation of this discrete micro-implant within the brain does not present additional risk due to migration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document