Implementation of Pangkalpinang City Regional Regulation Number 7 Year 2015 About Handling of Homeless People, Beggars, and Street Children

Implementation is an implementation or an application where there is already a regional regulation in the City of Pangkalpinang Number 7 of 2015 concerning Handling Homeless, Beggars, and Street Children, The problem that occurs in Pangkalpinang City is that there are still homeless people, beggars, and street children who are in public places, highways, and red lights. themselves on the streets. The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not the Pangkalpinang City Regional Regulation Number 7 of 2015 concerning Handling Homeless, Beggars, and Street Children has been implemented and the next goal is to find out what are the supporting and inhibiting factors of the Pangkalpinang City Regional Regulation Number 7 Hold 2015 . The theory used in this study is the theory of Edward III's Policy Implementation which in Edward III's theory has four variables indicating that a policy has been implemented or has not been implemented, the variables are communication, resources, disposition, and bureaucratic structure. The method used in this study is a descriptive qualitative method whose primary source is interviews with 9 informants. The informants were from 1 Pangkalpinang City Social Service agency, 1 Pangkalpinang City Satpol PP agency, 1 agency from the Women's Empowerment Service for Child Protection and Family Planning, 2 community red light intersections seven, 2 red light communities at the Ramayana intersection, 2 red light communities at the intersection of semabung. The results of this study indicate that the Pangkalpinang City Regional Regulation Number 7 of 2015 concerning Handling Homeless, Beggars, and Street Children has been implemented, The supporting factor of this research is the completeness of facilities such as buildings, vehicles and human resources in handling the Pangkalpinang City Regulation Number 7 of 2015, the inhibiting factor is financially, namely funds because the distribution of these funds is for handling Covid-19.

LEADERSHIP SUCCESSION IN INTERSECTIONAL MOBILIZATION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CHICAGO ABORTION FUND, 1985–2015*

While intersectionality is increasingly an object of inquiry in social movement research, few scholars examine leadership’s role in enabling intersectional mobilization. This article draws on data from archives and in-depth interviews (n = 18) to explore the importance of leadership succession in transforming the Chicago Abortion Fund between 1985–2015. Specifically, it explores two types of succession: (1) from grassroots or community-embedded leadership to bridge leadership (which connects the community to the organization), and (2) from bridge to formal leadership. Our study shows how these two types of succession were instrumental in operationalizing margins-to-center organizing. We present our findings in a series of conjunctures or episodes to elucidate how Black women and women of color moved gradually through different forms of leadership. In so doing, they changed the framing and praxis of the organization from a social service agency to a radical reproductive-justice social movement organization.

Ikeda, Tsuguo “Ike”

Tsuguo “Ike” Ikeda (1924–2015) served for more than 30 years as the first Asian American executive director of a non-profit in the United States. He was hired as the first professional director of the Atlantic Street Center, a non-profit social service agency that has been operating since 1910 in Seattle, Washington. Ikeda was a pioneer who built multiracial relations; he was a visionary and a pacesetter, always ahead of his time.

Intersecting Identities, Intersecting Issues: Exploring the Needs of LGBTQ+ Communities in Wisconsin

To identify the most critical needs facing lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus (LGBTQ+) communities in Wisconsin postmarriage equality, this case study utilizes intersectionality as a theoretical framework for conducting a needs assessment through collaborative engagement with social service agency leaders, a community foundation, and a university research center. Adopting intersectionality as a framework allows for a more nuanced understanding of the various communities (racial, class, sexual orientation, gender, etc.) comprising the LGBTQ+ population and, just as critically, generates important qualitative data about the ways in which key social determinants, such as poverty, discrimination, and violence, impact certain communities in more substantive ways.