WHAT IS THE FUTURE OF INDIA CHINA RELATION – WITH GROWING BORDER DISPUTE AND IT’S INFLUENCE ON THE TRADE RELATIONS

Where the globe is coping with an outbreak, China is attempting to urge management the border regions.In this pandemic scenario, China has attacked Arunachal Pradesh border space, increase it’s readying. With the support of Asian nation, China is getting in Associate in Nursing open war with China, With China management over the South China ocean most countries have stood against China and are supporting Asian nation in its fight against China, US is providing huge support to the Asian nation .Starting from Sit sang, to the North East states of Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim to Himachal Pradesh, China is attempting to enter the Asian nation region. Dokhlam crisis Pangong Lake and Galwan natural depression has been the foremost space of tension at the moment .On the opposite each China and Asian nation are a part of several International forums like G20 ,SCO and BRICS .Over the years China has blocked India’s position at major places like at UN , obstruction India’s bid for permanent member in UNSC .India has even reduced it trade relation with China , Asian nation was the country that has most imports from China and is trying forward to affix hands with different countries to count China Keywords: Asian nation, China, border, control, Galwan natural depression, Pangong Lake, Dokhlam crisis,Pakistan, UN

Kenya’s ICJ exit will entrench Somali border dispute

Headline KENYA/SOMALIA: ICJ exit will entrench border dispute

Dozens of Deeper Reasons for Denial in Internationalizing IndoNepal Border Dispute

Nepal has been having quite endless and unsolved ruffle with neighbouring nation India in light of border dispute. Since long, despite cordial and amicable nexus as well as having almost an airproof proximity in terms of culture, social values and other traits, often Nepal has to present a gesture of unceremonious unwelcome and decent denial over India’s highhanded stance on border issues, more precisely an act of an unethical encroachment. Given the situation, many scholars and analysts often urge and strongly counsel Nepal to internationalize the issue and bring it in notice of International Court of Justice, hereafter said only ICJ. This paper makes an engagement to analyse dozens of prominent bases on why not this will be a beneficial issue for Nepal; thus, Nepal has to more rationally explore other diplomatic routes to resolve it, or should forbid on internationalizing it.

Compliance Bargaining Mechanism as The Way to Ended Iran-Iraq War 1988

<p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Isu-isu terkait budaya, ekonomi, dan nilai seringkali menghasilkan konflik. Tak terkecuali dengan isu perebutan wilayah. Salahsatu perang terbesar yang terkait dengan isu sengketa wilayah adalah perang Iran-Irak 1988. Perang Iran-Irak 1988 membawa sejarah besar dari kedua negara yang saling berhubungan dengan isu perebutan wilayah, perebutan pengaruh ideologi, dan isu ekonomi. Perang yang berlangsung cukup lama ini membuat Iran dan Irak menyadari akan kerugian jangka panjang yang dialami. Pada akhirnya, kedua negara sepakat untuk berdamai dalam sebuah proses yang melibatkan pihak ketiga. Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa mengambil peran sebagai pihak ketiga yang membantu penyelesaian perang antara Iran dan Irak. Resolusi no.598 yang disusun oleh Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa mengarisbawahi akan pentingnya gencatan senjata dengan banyaknya kerugian dan korban jiwa yang muncul. Penelitian ini berargumen bahwa upaya Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa menyusun resolusi no.598 dalam menyelesaikan perang Iran-Irak adalah penerapan dari mekanisme compliance bargaining pada proses resolusi konflik.</p><p><strong>Kata kunci:</strong> compliance bargaining, resolusi konflik, rezim, gencatan senjata</p><p> </p><p align="center"><strong>Abstract</strong></p><p>Conflictual issues can be about economy, culture and values, or even a border dispute. The class cannot be avoided because of several issues triggering the conflict and also several interests. One of the bigger wars that can be was the Iran-Iraq War at 1980-1988. This war brought the long history between both of those countries, which were related with border disputes, ideological influences, and economic war. Those of both countries is thinking that if the war is still being run, it is not giving any good advantage. The damage was so big. So, it required a process to bring the two states involved war into one meeting to talk about peace or end the war. The process is called a peace process. In this case, the peace process arranged by the involvement of third party. The United Nations take a role as the third party in Iran-Iraq War by formed a Resolution no 598. In the resolution the council expressed its concern that, despite its calls for ceasefire, the conflict between Iran and Iraq continued with heavy loss of life and material destruction. The Iran-Iraq war was ended through the resolution no 598 that was produced by the United Nations. Furthermore, this paper argue that the way of the United Nations ended the Iran-Iraq war through Resolution no 598 is implementing the theory of compliance bargaining in conflict resolution.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: compliance bargaining, conflict resolution, regime, ceasefire</p>

THE INTERNATIONAL CASES CONCERNING JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS (The Case of Saadia Arabia- Bahrain, Japan-South Korea, Thailand-Malaysia)

This article is dedicated to analysing the joint development agreements resolving or temporarily suspending maritime boundary disputes cases between Japan-South Korea, Saadia Arabia-Bahrain, and Thailand-Malaysia. Regardless of whether any delimitation line exists or not, international law allows the parties to agree on delimitation by consulting on the most appropriate conditions or jointly operate on the disputed zone, field or maritime border. If the cross-border dispute on hydrocarbon resources exists, the conclusion of a unitization agreement is not ruled out by the international practice as much. This article identifies the features of the joint development agreements, divides them into the three models recognized internationally, analyzes the main characteristics of each model of the joint development agreements through historical important precedents. Furthermore, the research lets daylight into the essential statements that regulate the fiscal regime, share proportion issues, the sovereign right, and the right to use subsoil and the seabed, within the agreements. Key words: Maritime boundary disputes, joint development agreements, unitization agreements, delimitation, joint development zone, international cases, demarcation of the continental shelf, seabed, disputes on petroleum reservoir, oil fields, production share agreements

Changing Geopolitics and Negotiating Postures in the India-China Border Dispute

The article is based on the author’s most recent book Powershift: India-China Relations in a Multipolar World (2020). It retraces the most salient moments and episodes in the India China border issue ever since the crisis broke out in 1959. What we learn from history is Chinese leaders have often shaped their policy on India as part of a wider geopolitical calculus, typically linked to the degree of pressure Chinese perceive on other geopolitical fronts. For India too, the nature of great powers relations impacts how it formulates China policy. This basic framework has remained relevant until the present day.Over the past decade, as the world order began shifting to a multipolar balance of power, India and China have confronted challenges in their relationship. The relationship is at a crossroad, and both Delhi and Beijing are struggling to find an equilibrium that allows both sides to pursue their interests and visions. Nevertheless, as Asia is returning to what it was for 1,800 years of the last two millennia, and, it is that big picture trend that Indian and Chinese leaders must pay attention to. Ultimately, this means stabilising India China relations