landslide area
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

320
(FIVE YEARS 69)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunyan Bao ◽  
Lingtao Zhan ◽  
Yingjie Xia ◽  
Yongliang Huang ◽  
Zhenxing Zhao

The creep slope is a dynamic development process, from stable deformation to instability failure. For the slope with sliding zone, it generally creeps along the sliding zone. If the sliding zone controlling the slope sliding does not have obvious displacement, and the slope has unexpected instability without warning, the harm and potential safety hazard are often much greater than the visible creep. Studying the development trend of this kind of landslide is of great significance to slope treatment and landslide early warning. Taking Xiashan village landslide in Huishan Town, Xinchang County, Zhejiang Province as an example, the landslide point was determined by numerical simulation in 2006. Generally, the landslide is a typical long-term slow deformation towards the free direction. Based on a new round of investigation and monitoring, this paper shows that there are signs of creeping on the surface of the landslide since 2003, and there is no creep on the deep sliding surface. The joint fissures in the landslide area are relatively developed, and rainfall infiltration will soften the soft rock and soil layer and greatly reduce its stability. This paper collects and arranges the rainfall data of the landslide area in recent 30 years, constructs the slope finite element model considering rainfall conditions through ANSYS finite element software, and carries out numerical simulation stability analysis. The results show that if cracks appear below or above the slope’s sliding surface, or are artificially damaged, the sliding surface may develop into weak cracks. Then, the plastic zone of penetration is offset; In the case of heavy rain, the slope can unload itself under the action of rainfall. At this time, the slope was unstable and the landslide happened suddenly.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-470
Author(s):  
Cory S. Wallace ◽  
Paul M. Santi

ABSTRACT Landslide runout has traditionally been quantified by the height-to-length ratio, H/L, which, in many cases, is strongly influenced by the slope of the runout path. In this study, we propose an alternative mobility measure, the unitless Runout Number, measured as the landslide length divided by the square root of the landslide area, which characterizes landslide shape in terms of elongation. We used a database of 158 landslides of varying runout distances from locations in northern California, Oregon, and Washington state to compare the two runout measurement methods and explore their predictability using parameters that can be measured or estimated using geographic information systems. The Runout Number better describes the overall runout for several landslide and slope geometries. The two mobility measures show very little correlation to each other, indicating that the two parameters describe different landslide mobility mechanisms. When compared to predictive parameters shown by prior research to relate to landslide runout, the two runout measurement methods show different correlations. H/L correlates more strongly to initial slope angle, upslope contributing area, landslide area, and grain size distribution (percent clay, silt, total fines, and sand). The Runout Number correlates more strongly to planimetric curvature, upslope contributing area normalized by landslide area, and percent sand. Although these correlations are not necessarily strong enough for prediction, they indicate the validity of both runout measurement methods and the benefit of including both numbers when characterizing landslide mobility.


Drones ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Flavio Furukawa ◽  
Lauretta Andrew Laneng ◽  
Hiroaki Ando ◽  
Nobuhiko Yoshimura ◽  
Masami Kaneko ◽  
...  

The development of UAV technologies offers practical methods to create landcover maps for monitoring and management of areas affected by natural disasters such as landslides. The present study aims at comparing the capability of two different types of UAV to deliver precise information, in order to characterize vegetation at landslide areas over a period of months. For the comparison, an RGB UAV and a Multispectral UAV were used to identify three different classes: vegetation, bare soil, and dead matter, from April to July 2021. The results showed high overall accuracy values (>95%) for the Multispectral UAV, as compared to the RGB UAV, which had lower overall accuracies. Although having lower overall accuracies, the vegetation class of the RGB UAV presented high producer’s and user’s accuracy over time, comparable to the Multispectral UAV results. Image quality played an important role in this study, where higher accuracy values were found on cloudy days. Both RGB and Multispectral UAVs presented similar patterns of vegetation, bare soil, and dead matter classes, where the increase in vegetation class was consistent with the decrease in bare soil and dead matter class. The present study suggests that the Multispectral UAV is more suitable in characterizing vegetation, bare soil, and dead matter classes on landslide areas while the RGB UAV can deliver reliable information for vegetation monitoring.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seda Cellek

Aspect is one of the parameters used in the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps. The procedure of this easily accessible and conclusive parameter is still a matter of debate in the literature. Each landslide area has its own morphological structure, so it is not possible to make a generalization for the aspect. In other words, there is no aspect in which landslides develop in particular. Generally, landslides occur in areas facing more than one direction. The biggest reason for this is that those areas are under the influence of other parameters. Therefore, it is wrong to evaluate the aspect, alone. Since it is a part of the system, it should be evaluated together with other conditioning factors. In this research, many landslides susceptibility studies have been investigated. The directions and causes of landslides have been determined from the studies. In addition, the criteria of the used aspect classes have been investigated. In the literature, the number of class intervals chosen, and their reasons were investigated, and the effects of this parameter were tried to be revealed in new sensitivity studies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 289
Author(s):  
Agus S Muntohar ◽  
Gayuh Aji Prasetyaningtiyas ◽  
Rokhmat Hidayat

Severe landslides followed by debris flow were recorded to have occurred on 12 December 2014 and discovered to have ruined infrastructures and buried hundreds of peoples in Karangkobar subdistrict of Banjarnegara district, Central Java. There was, however, a high rainfall of up to 200 mm per day for two days before the disaster. Therefore, this research was conducted to predict and assess the landslide area using Transient Rainfall Infiltration and Grid-Based Regional Slope-Stability (TRIGRS) version 2.0 model to calculate the pore water pressure and safety factor (FS) during rainfall infiltration. The TRIGRS model focused on spatial analysis. The data used as input for this analysis include the DEM, geological and geotechnical properties, infiltration variables, and rainfall intensity. Meanwhile, the FS value was observed to be lowest at the initial condition before rainfall infiltration by ranging between 1 and 1.2 and distributed at the steep slope area near Jemblung. The results were validated through the back analysis of a reference landslide event and the instability in the area was confirmed to be initiated in the 3 three hours of rainfall while the hazards area occurs majorly at the steep slopes with slope angles greater than 30o after 24 hours. The simulation results showed the steep slope area with an inclination angle greater than 30o is susceptible to failure during the rainfall infiltration due to FS < 1.2 while some locations with steep slopes were likely not to fail as indicated by FS >1.2. This study generally concluded that the TRIGRS was able to predict the location of the failure when compared with the results from the field observation of the landslide occurrences.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuf Alhaji Lahai ◽  
Kelvin F. E. Anderson ◽  
Yaguba Jalloh ◽  
Ibrahim Rogers ◽  
Mohamed Kamara

AbstractThis work focused on three landslide events that have attracted significant public concern due to the associated calamities they recorded in 1945, 2017 and 2019, i.e. the Charlotte, Regent and Madina landslides, respectively. Their geology, tectonics (structural discontinuities) and geomorphology, i.e. their GTG characteristics were studied to establish links between them and the landslide events.Field surveys were conducted, particularly on the Charlotte landslide, where the identification of geological structures was impeded to an extent by its obliteration by vegetation and sediment accumulations on relatively planar sections of the landslide area. Remote sensing and GIS techniques (earth imagery and drone images) enhanced the mapping and determination of landslides’ geometric and geomorphic parameters. Laboratory analyses of rock and soil samples provided the landslides’ petrological characterisation and were used to determine the particle-size distribution in the slide-prone soil.The study indicated a change in the gabbroic rock composition, variable geomorphological characteristics, and nature/pattern and density of the discontinuities. These factors, to a large extent, determined the nature and magnitude of the rainfall-triggered landslides. Charlotte lithology slightly differed from the other two landslides and recorded higher Silica (Si) and Aluminum (Al) and lower iron (Fe) from X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) than rocks of Regent and Madina landslides. The study also revealed only a tenuous correlation between rock composition and weathering depth. The slope angles at the landslides’ prominent scarps (depletion zone) are steep (> 45 degrees) with altitudes of approximately 270 m, 200 m and 470 m above sea level for Charlotte, Regent and Madina, respectively. Unlike the Charlotte landslide, both Regent and Madina landslides are active, but geometrically, their area, length and run-out distances have relatively high variance with a coefficient of variance equals to 1. Information derived from this work can help understand the spatial variation in landslide characteristics and develop a susceptibility map.


2021 ◽  
pp. 877-882
Author(s):  
K. Nishiyama ◽  
S. Tochimoto ◽  
H. Fujita ◽  
S. Kinoshita ◽  
S. Sakajo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-128
Author(s):  
Luqman Hakim ◽  
Paksitya Purnama Putra ◽  
Dwi Nurtanto

The land collapsed on Jl. Sultan Agung, Jompo, Jember Regency was reported. A team from the Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD) found cracks in the ground under a shop since February 2019. This incident resulted in a landslide of a road with approximately 45 meters long and 10 meters wide that it blocked the river flow, and nine shophouses, which are the assets of the Jember Regency government, collapsed as deep as approximately 4 meters. The cantilever type retaining wall is designed in the landslide area as an effort to revitalize the banks of Jompo river on Jalan Sultan Agung. Cantilever wall design stability refers to SNI 8460: 2017 and was assisted by using the GEO 5 program. The stability of cantilever walls against overturning shows a safety factor value of 3.72 that greater than 2 (safe condition), whereas the stability of cantilever walls against sliding was 1.61 that greater than 1.5 (safe condition), and the stability of the bearing capacity was 8.18 that greater than 3 (safe condition). Cantilever wall structure using concrete quality (Fc ') 40 MPa, and reinforcement quality (Fy) 420 Mpa, with a diameter and a distance of 25 mm and 125 mm respectively. Additional reinforcement was given to the Cantilever Wall, i.e. a bore-pile with a diameter of 60 cm which was fixed to a depth of 6 meters.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeo Tsuchihara ◽  
Takehiko Okuyama ◽  
Katsushi Shirahata ◽  
Shuhei Yoshimoto ◽  
Hiroomi Nakazato ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document