A Novel Lair-1 Antibody Selectively Targets Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Stem Cells

Extensive research has led to recent approval of novel therapies such as mylotarg, venetoclax, glasdegib and CC486, and small molecule inhibitors against actionable mutations such as ivosidenib (IDH1), enasidenib (IDH2), gliteritinib and midostaurin (FLT3) in AML. However, the mainstay of treatment in AML remains unchanged since the 1970s. There is a significant unmet need for AML patients that fail to respond to or relapse after standard-of-care (SOC) treatments including allogeneic stem cell transplantation and targeting actionable mutations. In addition, a large fraction of SOC patients invariably relapse due to persistence of chemotherapy-resistant leukemia stem cells (LSCs) or immune evasion. Therefore, identification of unique therapies that preferentially target elusive LSCs and promote immune responses to AML to prevent relapse are highly sought after. Unlike, targeting acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with CD19 or CD22 with various modalities, when developing AML therapies, it is of paramount importance to differentiate LSCs from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to lessen or abolish unavoidable cytopenias. Leukocyte-associated immunoglobulin-like receptor 1 (LAIR-1) is an immune checkpoint receptor on T cells and myeloid cells that delimits immune cell activation through binding to endogenous collagen ligands. In addition, LAIR-1 is universally expressed on AML blasts and may sustain AML survival signals. We demonstrated using multi-color flow cytometry that LAIR-1 is highly expressed in AML blasts (n=9 of 9) and that LAIR-1 expression in LSCs (markers: CD34 +CD38 -CD90 -CD45RA +/- or CD34 -CD117 +CD244 +/-) is high compared with negligible expression of LAIR-1 in HSCs (markers: CD34 +CD38 -CD90 +CD99 -) (n=3) (Figure 1). Based on these findings, we hypothesized that a LAIR-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) would disrupt LAIR-1 mediated survival signaling and preferentially target LAIR-1 expressing AML LSCs and blast cells but not HSCs. To test this, we developed a novel LAIR-1 targeting mAb with a functional human IgG 1 isotype that blocks LAIR-1 binding to its ligands (including collagens, complement component C1q, MBL and SP-D) To characterize the anti-leukemic effect of the LAIR-1 mAb we performed an in vitro antibody dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) assay with LAIR-1 expressing AML cells (MOLT4 and MV-4-11). Compared with isotype control, the LAIR-1 mAb significantly increased leukemia cell death (MV411 = 17% above isotype, and MOLT4 = 29.24% above isotype at 15 µg/ml), suggesting that the LAIR-1 mAb confers ADCC activity against LAIR1 + AML cells (Figure 2). To elucidate if the LAIR-1 mAb has a direct signaling effect on LAIR-1 + AML cells, a colony forming unit assay using primary AML cells was carried out. Interestingly, the LAIR-1 mAb inhibited colony formation by AML CD34 + cells (40-60% decreased compared with isotype control, N=4), but not normal CD34 + cells. These data suggests that our LAIR-1 mAb stimulated LAIR-1 signaling that inhibits LSC self-renewal. We then tested the in vivo anti-leukemia effect of the mAb in cell line derived xenograft (CDX) models (immune deficient mice transplanted with MV-4-11 expressing luciferase). In vivo bioluminescence imaging indicated that the LAIR-1 mAb significantly inhibited in vivo AML growth (91% reduction of total flux)(Figure 3). A significant increase in cell death was observed in the presence of the mAb in the blood (47%), spleen (89.4%) and bone marrow (27.6%). Similar to the anti-leukemic effect in CDX AML models, the LAIR-1 mAb significantly suppressed in vivo growth of AML patient derived xenografts (5 different primary AML donors) (10-90% human CD33 + AML cells in isotype control treatment vs 0.5-5% CD33 + AML cells in anti-LAIR-1 treatment, N=3) (Figure 4), while minimally impacting normal immune cells. Taken together, our studies suggest that the LAIR-1 mAb we generated is a novel AML immunomedicine that preferentially eradicates AML LSCs and blasts while preserving healthy HSCs through disruption of AML survival signals and clearance of AML through ADCP and ADCC. Additional studies are currently evaluating if this novel LAIR-1 mAb has other mechanisms of action that contribute to overall in vivo activity, including reduction of AML niche implantation, regulation of bone marrow homing and regulation of anti-tumor immunity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Tian: NextCure: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Paucarmayta: NextCure: Current Employment. Lovewell: NextCure: Current Employment. Maloveste: NextCure: Current Employment. Copeland: NextCure: Current Employment. O'Neill: NextCure: Current Employment. Patel: NextCure: Current Employment. Liu: NextCure: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Myint: NextCure: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Langermann: NextCure: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Flies: NextCure: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Kim: Nextcure: Research Funding.

Mathematical modeling reveals a complex network of signaling and apoptosis pathways in the survival of memory plasma cells

The long-term survival of memory plasma cells is conditional on the signals provided by dedicated survival niches in the bone marrow organized by mesenchymal stromal cells. Recently, we could show that plasma cell survival requires secreted factors such as APRIL and direct contact to stromal cells, which act in concert to activate NF-kB- and PI3K-dependent signaling pathways to prevent cell death. However, the precise dynamics of the underlying regulatory network are confounded by the complexity of potential interaction and cross-regulation pathways. Here, based on flow-cytometric quantification of key signaling proteins in the presence or absence of the required survival signals, we generated a quantitative model of plasma cell survival. Our model emphasizes the non-redundant and essential nature of the two plasma cell survival signals APRIL and stromal cell contact, providing resilience to endoplasmic reticulum stress and mitochondrial stress, respectively. Importantly, the modeling approach allowed us to unify distinct data sets and derive a consistent picture of the intertwined signaling and apoptosis pathways regulating plasma cell survival.

Regulation of Bcl-XL by non-canonical NF-κB in the context of CD40-induced drug resistance in CLL

In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the lymph node (LN) microenvironment delivers critical survival signals by inducing the expression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 members Bcl-XL, Bfl-1, and Mcl-1, resulting in apoptosis blockade. We determined previously that resistance against various drugs, among which is the clinically applied BH3 mimetic venetoclax, is dominated by upregulation of the anti-apoptotic regulator Bcl-XL. Direct clinical targeting of Bcl-XL by, e.g., Navitoclax is however not desirable due to induction of thrombocytopenia. Since the actual regulation of Bcl-XL in CLL in the context of the LN microenvironment is not well elucidated, we investigated various candidate LN signals to drive Bcl-XL expression. We found a dominance for NF-κB signaling upon CD40 stimulation, which results in activation of both the canonical and non-canonical NF-κB signaling pathways. We demonstrate that expression of Bcl-XL is first induced by the canonical NF-κB pathway, and subsequently boosted and continued via non-canonical NF-κB signaling through stabilization of NIK. NF-κB subunits p65 and p52 can both bind to the Bcl-XL promoter and activate transcription upon CD40 stimulation. Moreover, canonical NF-κB signaling was correlated with Bfl-1 expression, whereas Mcl-1 in contrast, was not transcriptionally regulated by NF-κB. Finally, we applied a novel compound targeting NIK to selectively inhibit the non-canonical NF-κB pathway and showed that venetoclax-resistant CLL cells were sensitized to venetoclax. In conclusion, protective signals from the CLL microenvironment can be tipped towards apoptosis sensitivity by interfering with non-canonical NF-κB signaling.

Rituximab and Obinutuzumab Induce Direct B-Cell Death Via B-Cell Receptor (BCR) Signaling, but Rituximab Elicits Stronger BCR-Derived Pro-Survival Signals Diminishing Apoptosis

The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) rituximab in combination with chemotherapy has improved outcomes for patients with CD20+ B-cell lymphoma. Obinutuzumab was developed as an anti-CD20 mAb with enhanced induction of direct B-cell death and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. In direct comparison to rituximab, improved outcomes with obinutuzumab have been observed for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and follicular lymphoma (FL), but not for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The molecular basis behind these discrepancies remained unknown. Our aim was to define intracellular signaling events in the induction of direct B-cell death upon rituximab and obinutuzumab treatment. We performed LC-MS/MS phosphoproteomics on SU-DHL4 lymphoma cells treated with rituximab or obinutuzumab (0, 1 and 24 h time-points). Kinase activities were inferred by kinase-substrate enrichment analysis linking kinases to their phosphosite substrates. Immunoblotting was done where necessary to understand the nature of specific signaling events. The activity of 41 and 40 protein kinases was altered upon rituximab or obinutuzumab treatment, respectively, 32 of which were affected by both mAbs. Pathway enrichment analyses revealed up-regulated B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling and down-regulated cell cycle progression with both treatments. To delineate differences between the two mAbs we investigated signaling events in the BCR cascade in more detail. The proximal BCR kinase SYK was strongly phosphorylated on Tyr352 by both mAbs, whereas SYK Tyr525/526 phosphorylation, essential for normal kinase function, was detectable at a low level only with rituximab. Phospho-SYK Tyr352 in the absence of phospho-SYK Tyr525/526 has been associated with autoimmune checkpoint activation and B-cell apoptosis. Both mAbs phosphorylated the key BCR kinase BTK on Tyr551 but not on Tyr223. The latter site was essential for full kinase activity and, in line with incomplete BTK activation, downstream PCLγ2 phosphorylation was delayed. No evidence was found for PLCγ2 dependent de-phosphorylation of NFAT2/NFAT3 and PKCβ activation. Instead, we observed NFAT1 de-phosphorylation and PKCδ activation, both of which have been associated with an anergic B-cell reaction. The MAPK pathway and MYK were strongly activated by both mAbs serving as potent inducers of cell death in the absence of pro-survival signals. To determine if pro-survival signals were generated, we assessed PI3K and NF-κB activation. While we found no evidence for NF-κB activation, differences in the phosphorylation status of PI3K binding sites on CD19 and BCAP suggest stronger PI3K activation by rituximab than obinutuzumab. In keeping with this, the PI3K effector AKT was much more strongly activated by rituximab. AKT activity was likely also increased by Ca2+-flux following rituximab but not obinutuzumab treatment and modified by differential SHIP1 phosphorylation, a phosphatase that hydrolyzes PI3K-generated PIP3. A central AKT target in apoptosis regulation is BAD. We found increased BAD Ser99 and Ser118 phosphorylation only after rituximab treatment. Rituximab thereby sequestered BAD in the cytosol and impaired its inhibitory effects on anti-apoptotic BCL-2 and BCL-xL. Moreover, signaling events protecting against caspase 2 activation were exclusively found for rituximab. In summary, here we show that rituximab and obinutuzumab both induce BCR signaling capable of promoting B-cell apoptosis. However, rituximab generates signals that increase anti-apoptotic BCL-2 effects and diminish B-cell death, whereas obinutuzumab more readily overcomes resistance through BCL-2 overexpression characteristic for FL and CLL. The differences found between rituximab and obinutuzumab are likely less pronounced in cases with strong tonic BCR signaling, which is more prevalent in DLBCL. Thus, our findings provide a mechanistic rationale for the observations made in clinical trials comparing rituximab and obinutuzumab head-to-head. We believe that our results will help to identify new patient subgroups benefitting from obinutuzumab and to better assess the role of anti-CD20 treatment in combination therapies. Disclosures Vilventhraraja: Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies: Employment. Döhner:AbbVie, Agios, Amgen, Astellas, Astex, Celator, Janssen, Jazz, Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; AROG, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene, Novartis, Sunesis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Gribben:Acerta/Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.