A phase 2 study of defactinib (VS-6063) in patients with NF2 altered tumors: Results from NCI-match (EAY131) subprotocol U.

3087 Background: The NCI-MATCH trial assigns patients (pts) with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma to targeted therapies based on genetic alterations identified in tumor biopsies. Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2)-inactivated tumors demonstrate increased sensitivity to FAK inhibition in preclinical models. Arm U evaluated the FAK inhibitor defactinib in pts with NF2 altered tumors. Methods: Patients found to harbor an inactivating NF2 mutation on NGS were assigned to the ARM U substudy MATCH. Defactinib 400 mg was given by mouth twice daily until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and 6-month PFS. Results: Of 5,548 cases with sufficient tissue for genomic analysis, 51 pts were found to have NF2 alterations (< 1% of the total analyzed). While NF2 alterations are known to occur more commonly in meningiomas and mesotheliomas, alterations were also detected in an array of other tumor types, including renal cell carcinomas and ovarian cancers. Thirty-five pts were ultimately enrolled; 33 patients were started on therapy, with 2 of those determined to be ineligible for outcome analysis. All pts had received at least one prior therapy, with 52% (16/31) having received 3 or more prior lines of therapy. Median follow-up was 35.9 months. ORR [90% CI] was 3% (1/31, [0.16, 14.86]), with the one partial response in a pt with choroid meningioma. Of the twelve pts whose best response was stable disease (39%, 12/31), 8 demonstrated some degree of tumor shrinkage (Table) with a disease control rate of 42% (13/31). Median PFS was 1.9 months for the 31 eligible pts who received study treatment, with median PFS of 9.3 months for the 9 patients who had a best response of stable disease or better. Six pts achieved a PFS of greater than 5.5 months. Among all treated pts (n=33), the most common treatment-related toxicities were fatigue (36%), nausea (33%), and hyperbilirubinemia (27%). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities; 27% of pts had grade 3 toxicities. No correlation could be made between clinical outcomes and tumor histology or specific NF2 genotype. Conclusions: Defactinib monotherapy had limited clinical activity in this cohort of previously treated patients with solid tumors exhibiting NF2 loss. Clinical trial information: NCT04439331. [Table: see text]

Selumetinib in patients with tumors with MAPK pathway alterations: Results from Arm E of the NCI-COG pediatric MATCH trial.

10008 Background: The NCI-Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (MATCH) trial assigns patients age 1 to 21 years with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, lymphomas, and histiocytic disorders to phase 2 treatment arms of molecularly-targeted therapies based on genetic alterations detected in their tumor. Arm E evaluated the MEK inhibitor selumetinib (ARRY-142886) in patients whose tumors harbored activating alterations in the MAPK pathway ( ARAF, BRAF, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, MAP2K1, GNA11, GNAQ hotspot mutations; NF1 inactivating mutations; BRAF fusions). Methods: Patients received selumetinib 25 mg/m2/dose (max 75 mg/dose) PO BID for 28-day cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity with response assessments obtained every 2-3 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with low grade glioma were excluded. Results: A total of 21 patients (median age 14 years; range 5-21) were enrolled between 10/2017 and 8/2019, with 20 patients evaluable for response. Diagnoses were high grade glioma (HGG; n = 8), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 7), adenocarcinoma (n = 2), and one each of MPNST, endodermal sinus/yolk sac tumor, plexiform neurofibroma (PN), and neuroblastoma. MAPK pathway alterations detected consisted of inactivating NF1 mutations (n = 8), hotspot mutations in KRAS (n = 8), NRAS (n = 3), and HRAS (n = 1), and BRAF V600E (n = 2). No objective responses were observed. Three patients had a best response of stable disease (HGG with NF1 mutation, 6 cycles; HGG with KRAS mutation, 12 cycles; PN with NF1 mutation, 13 cycles prior to removal for dose-limiting toxicity). Six-month PFS was 15% (95% CI: 4%, 34%). Adverse events that were deemed possibly, probably, or definitely attributable to study drug included one case each of grade 3 uveitis, lymphopenia, and thromboembolic event; one grade 4 CPK elevation; and one grade 5 thromboembolic event. Conclusions: Selumetinib did not result in tumor regression in this cohort of children and young adults with treatment-refractory tumors with activating MAPK pathway alterations. Of note, two patients with HGG initially had stable disease, but ultimately progressed after 6 and 12 cycles, respectively. Selumetinib has previously demonstrated activity in low grade glioma and PN and is now FDA-approved for PN. The results of our study indicate that MAPK pathway mutation status alone is insufficient to predict response to selumetinib monotherapy. It is likely that selumetinib and other MEK inhibitors will require combination with targeted or cytotoxic agents for optimal efficacy in children with persistent or progressive cancers after front-line chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03213691. Clinical trial information: NCT03155620.

Factors impacting enrollment on NCI-COG Pediatric MATCH trial treatment protocols.

10007 Background: The NCI-Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (MATCH) trial assigns patients age 1 to 21 years with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, lymphomas, and histiocytic disorders to phase 2 treatment arms of molecularly-targeted therapies based on the genetic alterations detected in their tumor. Treatment arm assignments and enrollment decisions have now been made for 1000 study participants: we report here match and enrollment data and factors affecting treatment protocol enrollment. Methods: Patients enrolled in the Pediatric MATCH screening protocol were assigned to an open treatment protocol if an actionable mutation (aMOI) was detected by tumor DNA and RNA-based cancer gene panel sequencing. After a match, treatment protocol enrollment must occur within 8-12 weeks. Patient demographic data, reasons for not enrolling on treatment protocol (if applicable), and prior history of molecular testing were reported by study sites. The Fisher exact test was used to compare protocol enrollment rates between groups. Results: Results were analyzed for the first 1000 patients with testing completed (enrolled between July 2017 and October 2020). At least one tumor aMOI was detected in 310 (31%) patients and treatment protocol slots were available for 284 patients (28%). A total of 131 patients (46% of those matched) enrolled on a treatment arm. No difference in treatment protocol match or enrollment rate was observed for gender, race, or ethnicity. Both treatment protocol match rate (105/275, 38% vs 86/394, 22%) and enrollment rate (56/275, 20% vs 33/394, 8%) were significantly more frequent in patients with a reported history of prior molecular testing (p<0.0001). The most common reasons provided for not enrolling on a treatment protocol were: patient receiving other treatment (32% of responses), poor clinical status (16%), lack of measurable disease (11%), or ineligible diagnosis for that treatment arm (10%). Ineligibility due to history of excluded prior targeted therapy (6%) or inability to swallow capsules (4%) was less frequent. Conclusions: The rate of Pediatric MATCH treatment protocol enrollment has exceeded pre-study projections, due to more frequent actionable mutation detection and treatment assignment than anticipated (28% observed, 10% projected). This may in part reflect an increased number of targetable events in recurrent or refractory pediatric cancers. Correlative studies analyzing pre-treatment tumors from MATCH study patients are underway and will address this hypothesis. Prior history of molecular testing was associated with higher match and enrollment rate and poor clinical status was a common reason for not enrolling on a treatment protocol, suggesting that early molecular screening of children with solid malignancies may facilitate enrollment to biomarker-selected trials of targeted therapies. Clinical trial information: NCT03155620.

The imprecise promise of the Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI): Where we got it wrong and how can we fix it?

e15102 Background: Over the last several years, science has taken strides in how we understand and treat cancer. We have learned that each person’s cancer is unique, in part because it is influenced by a patient’s biological characteristics, environmental exposures, lifestyle and epigenetic influence. There is excitement about the potential of PMI to transform healthcare delivery and improve population health. Targeted therapies developed based on specific mutations can result in improved outcomes and reduced toxicities. Limited knowledge of cancer biology and the genomic underpinnings of cancer in racial and ethnic minorities diminishes the potential of PMI. Previous efforts of obtaining biospecimens from institutional or local biobanks presents a challenge of inadequate representation of racial and ethnic diversity. This can result in exacerbation in the therapies efficaciousness. Methods: Numerous research studies have surfaced indicating that PMI has resulted in widening racial and ethnic health care disparities since state-of-the art diagnostic and treatment options are unequally distributed across the entire cancer population. A literature review highlighted the racial inequalities and disparities. Results: A report examining the racial diversity of samples in TCGA found that whites were overrepresented in the U.S. population while Asian and Hispanic patients were underrepresented at a 5 percent frequency. In the BATTLE study, 82 percent of participants were white, and only 6% were African American (AA). The NCI-MATCH trial preliminary numbers show that AAs accounted for about 10 percent of patients. Therefore, it should not be assumed that the response rates or clinical effectiveness of the therapeutics tested in these trials will generalize to all racial and ethnic groups. The underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities in cancer clinical trials and prevention research, along with the documented challenges to enrolling these individuals into studies pose a barrier for the implementation of precision medicine in these populations. Collectively, these challenges can slow the pace of medical innovation, decrease the generalizability of research findings, lead to incorrect interpretations, and limit our full understanding of precision medicine. Conclusions: It is imperative we develop solutions to solve for issues identified related to precision medicine testing and treatment development. We have developed a framework to address disparities in PMI through community-based initiatives. A two-step solution could be considered to address this unmet need. Through the development of a registry and biospecimen banking as well as just in time trials that include pharmacogenomics, we can follow the patient journey to identify unique characteristics by race and/or socioeconomic status to begin solving for the disparities across the population.

Precision Medicine in Osteosarcoma: MATCH Trial and Beyond

Osteosarcoma (OS) is a rare bone malignant tumour with a poor prognosis in the case of recurrence. So far, there is no agreement on the best systemic therapy for relapsed OS. The availability of next generation sequencing techniques has recently revolutionized clinical research. The sequencing of the tumour and its matched normal counterpart has the potential to reveal a wide landscape of genetic alterations with significant implications for clinical practice. The knowledge that the genomic profile of a patient’s tumour can be precisely mapped and matched to a targeted therapy in real time has improved the development of precision medicine trials (PMTs). PMTs aiming at determining the effectiveness of targeted therapies could be advantageous for patients with a tumour refractory to standard therapies. Development of PMTs for relapsed OS is largely encouraging and is in its initial phase. Assessing OS features, such as its rarity, its age distribution, the technical issues related to the bone tissue origin, and its complex genomic landscape, represents a real challenge for PMTs development. In this light, a multidisciplinary approach is required to fully exploit the potential of precision medicine for OS patients.

Pharmacodynamic profile in East Asian patients with ACS treated with prasugrel standard-dose v de-escalation strategy: a randomized A-MATCH trial

Compared with Caucasian patients, East Asian patients have the unique risk-benefit trade-off and different responsiveness to antithrombotic regimens. The aim of this study was to compare pharmacodynamic profile in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with prasugrel standard-dose vs. de-escalation strategy. Before discharge, ACS patients with age <75 year or weight ≥60 kg (n=250) were randomly assigned to the standard-dose (10-mg group) or de-escalation strategy (5-mg group or platelet function test [PFT]-guided group). After 1 month, VerifyNow P2Y12 assay-based platelet reactivity (P2Y12 Reaction Units [PRU]) and bleeding episodes were evaluated. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with the therapeutic window (85≤PRU≤208). The percentage of patients within the therapeutic window was significantly lower in the 10-mg group compared to the 5-mg and PFT-guided groups (35.3% vs. 67.5% vs. 65.9%) (Odds ratio [OR], 3.80 and 3.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01-7.21 and 1.87-6.69, respectively). Compared with the 10-mg group, the bleeding rate was tended to be lower with de-escalation strategies (35.3% vs. 24.1% vs. 23.2%) (Hazard ratio [HR], 0.58 and 0.55; 95% CI, 0.30-1.14 and 0.28-1.09, respectively). ‘PRU<127’ was the optimal cut-off for predicting one-month bleeding events (area under curve, 0.616; 95% CI, 0.543-0.689; p= 0.005), which criteria was significantly associated with early discontinuation of prasugrel treatment (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.28-3.03; p= 0.001). In conclusion, compared with the standard-dose prasugrel, prasugrel de-escalation strategy in East Asian patients presented with ACS showed a higher chance within the therapeutic window and a lower tendency toward bleeding episodes.