A multilaboratory validation study of LC/MS biomarker assays for three lysophosphatidylcholines

Aim: Although the fit-for-purpose approach has been proposed for validation procedures and acceptance criteria for biomarker assays, practical biomarker assays to facilitate clinical application and regulatory documents on biomarker assays remain limited. Materials & methods: We assigned six independent laboratories and selected three lysophosphatidylcholines (LPCs): LPC(16:0), LPC(18:0) and LPC(18:1) as model biomarkers. Using LC–MS, the following key validation parameters were evaluated: calibration curve, carryover, parallelism, precision and relative accuracy and these values were similar among all laboratories. Further, we determined LPC levels in six lots of rat plasma at unknown concentrations and compared them among the laboratories. Conclusion: Our multilaboratory validation and reproducibility data are useful for the development of future biomarker assay validation procedures, as well as regulatory documents.

Validation of a commercial human ELISA to measure hyaluronic acid concentration in feline plasma

Our goal was to validate a human hyaluronic acid (HA) ELISA (Hyaluronic acid plus ELISA; TECOmedical Group) for use in feline plasma. Plasma from 5 healthy cats and 5 critically ill cats was used for validation of the assay. Validation methods performed included intra- and inter-assay variability, spike-and-recovery, and dilutional linearity. All measurements were performed in duplicate. The precision study revealed good intra-assay CV of 7.4–8.9%; inter-assay CV was 3.4–4.2%. Extraction efficiency via spiking tests yielded mean recovery of 89.6%. The assay met criteria for acceptable linearity using 3 serial dilutions. Our results demonstrate that this commercial HA ELISA had acceptable analytical performance using feline plasma and could be a useful tool in the veterinary clinical research setting.

A rapid point-of-care assay accurately measures vitamin D

Purpose Vitamin D (VitD) is a pleiotropic hormone with effects on a multitude of systems and metabolic pathways. Consequently, the relevance of a sufficiently high VitD serum level becomes self-evident. Methods A rapid immunofluorescence assay designed for the point-of-care measurement of serum VitD3 solely was tested. Inter- and intra-assay validation, double testing and result comparison with a standardized laboratory method were performed. Results An overall linear correlation of r = 0.89 (Pearson, 95% CI 0.88–0.92, p < 0.01) between the point of care and the conventional reference assay was registered. Accuracy and precision were of special interest at cut-points (10 ng/ml [mean deviation 1.7 ng/ml, SD 1.98 ng/ml, SE 0.16 ng/ml], 12 ng/ml [MD 0.41, SD 1.89, SE 0.19] and 30 ng/ml [MD − 1.11, SD 3.89, SE 0.35]). Only a slight deviation was detected between the two assays when using fresh (r = 0.91, 95% CI 0.86–0.94, p < 0.01) and frozen serum samples (r = 0.86, 0.82–0.89, p < 0.01). Results remained steady when samples were frozen several times. Inter- and intra-assay validation according to the CLSI protocol as well as multiuser testing showed stable results. Conclusion This novel, innovative, and controlled study indicates that the evaluated rapid point of care VitD assay is reliable, accurate, and suited for clinical practice.

A strategic approach to nonclinical immunogenicity assessment: a recommendation from the European Bioanalysis Forum

Immunogenicity assays are required to evaluate anti-drug antibody (ADA) responses that can be generated against biotherapeutic modalities. Regulatory guidelines focus on clinical requirements, yet it has become apparent that industry has applied these clinical recommendations for immunogenicity assessment to nonclinical studies in varying degrees. ADAs are an anticipated outcome of dosing a humanized or fully human biotherapeutic into an animal. However, a nonclinical ADA response is rarely predictive of the immunogenic potential in humans. The addendum to ICH S6 recommends that immunogenicity should be explicitly examined where there is: evidence of altered pharmacodynamic activity; unexpected changes in exposure in the absence of a pharmacodynamic marker or evidence of immuno-mediated reactions. The European Bioanalytical Forum has extensively discussed and reached a consensus on a minimal strategic approach of when and what to include for nonclinical immunogenicity assessments. Additionally, this paper recommends a strategy for ADA assay validation and sample analysis for those cases when it is considered necessary to include an immunogenicity assessment in nonclinical toxicology studies.

Circulating miR-145 as a marker of therapeutic response to anti-TNF therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Circulating miRNAs appear promising therapeutic and prognostic biomarkers. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of circulating miRNAs on the disease outcome following anti-TNF therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Our study included 19 AS patients assessed at baseline (M0), after three (M3) and twelve months (M12) of therapy. Total RNA was isolated from plasma. A comprehensive analysis of 380 miRNAs using TaqMan Low Density Array (TLDA) was followed by a single assay validation of selected miRNAs. All AS patients had high baseline disease activity and an excellent response to anti-TNF therapy at M3 and M12. TLDA analysis revealed the dysregulation of 17 circulating miRNAs, including miR-145. Single assay validation confirmed that miR-145 is significantly downregulated at M3 compared to baseline. The decrease in the levels of miR-145 from M0 to M3 negatively correlated with the change in BASDAI from M0 to M3; and positively correlated with disease activity improvement from M3 to M12 as per BASDAI and ASDAS. The predictive value of the early change in miR-145 and levels of miR-145 at M3 were further validated by Receiver operating curves analysis. We show that the early change in circulating miR-145 may be a predictor for the future outcome of AS patients treated with TNF inhibitors. Patients with a more significant decrease in miR-145 levels may show further significant improvement of disease activity after 12 months. Monitoring the expression of miR-145 in plasma in AS patients may, therefore, influence our therapeutic decision-making.

An assay validation framework to compare and evaluate targeted environmental DNA assays for routine species monitoring

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis utilises trace DNA released by organisms into their environment for species detection and is revolutionising non ‐ invasive species and biodiversity monitoring. However, this technology requires rigorous validation along the whole workflow – from field sampling to statistical analysis – to ensure appropriate and meaningful interpretation of results. Targeted eDNA assays are often validated within a specific system and with particular aims, but without fulfilling predefined criteria. Consequently, their applicability beyond initial development often remains undetermined. Additionally, there tends to be poor understanding of the uncertainties and limitations associated with already published assays and thus potentially inappropriate interpretation of the results they produce. The lack of a “gold standard” limits the incorporation of targeted eDNA assays into species monitoring and policy making by end-users and is therefore key for the future implementation of eDNA-based surveys. Here, we present a framework (https://edna-validation.com/) and user-friendly criteria for the classification of assays, which is based on previous validation efforts. A 5 ‐ level assay validation scale (“incomplete” to “operational”) was defined by reviewing the current eDNA literature and conducting a meta-analysis on sampling, laboratory practices, detection limits, and detection probabilities. The so far published single species eDNA assays were reviewed for their performance in this new framework and we identified steps within the validation process that often remain untouched. Finally, we provide guidance for end ‐ users as to which criteria are most important for validation and suggest how results obtained from assays at different levels of the validation scale should be interpreted.

2020 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: Vaccine Assay Validation, qPCR Assay Validation, QC for CAR-T Flow Cytometry, NAb Assay Harmonization and ELISpot Validation (Part 3 – Recommendations on Immunogenicity Assay Strategies, NAb Assays, Biosimilars and FDA/EMA Immunogenicity Guidance/Guideline, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine Assays)

The 14th edition of the Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (14th WRIB) was held virtually on June 15-29, 2020 with an attendance of over 1000 representatives from pharmaceutical/biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations, and regulatory agencies worldwide. The 14th WRIB included three Main Workshops, seven Specialized Workshops that together spanned 11 days in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy and vaccine. Moreover, a comprehensive vaccine assays track; an enhanced cytometry track and updated Industry/Regulators consensus on BMV of biotherapeutics by LCMS were special features in 2020. As in previous years, this year's WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2020 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the Global Bioanalytical Community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2020 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 3) covers the recommendations on Vaccine, Gene/Cell Therapy, NAb Harmonization and Immunogenicity). Part 1 (Innovation in Small Molecules, Hybrid LBA/LCMS & Regulated Bioanalysis), Part 2A (BAV, PK LBA, Flow Cytometry Validation and Cytometry Innovation) and Part 2B (Regulatory Input) are published in volume 13 of Bioanalysis, issues 4 and 5 (2020), respectively.